Introduction
Tracks
are an integral part of heavy construction machinery and vehicles used across
various industries for their functionality and ability to traverse diverse
terrains effectively. Traditionally, steel tracks have been the preferred
choice for their durability. However, with technological advancement, rubber
tracks have emerged as a viable alternative. Let’s analyze some key properties
and performance characteristics of steel and rubber tracks.
Steel
tracks and Rubber Tracks Material
Properties
Steel tracks are made of hardened alloy steel and have a rigid interlocked
construction for strength and carrying heavy loads over varied surfaces. They
can withstand high pressure and impacts. However, steel is susceptible to
corrosion if not properly maintained. On the other hand, rubber tracks are
composed of reinforced rubber compounds and flexible belting systems. They
offer greater shock absorption and are corrosion resistant. But rubber has
lower load bearing capacity compared to steel.
Steel Tracks and Rubber Tracks: Traction
and Flotation
The edge lug design of steel tracks provides excellent traction and
flotation for moving heavy loads in muddy, soft soil conditions. Their solid
surface maintains constant ground contact for optimal power transfer.
Conversely, the wider and low ground pressure footprints of rubber tracks
increase floatation and reduce ground compaction. Their enhanced contact
patches result in better traction even in loose rock or debris.
Comfort and Noise Levels
Steel tracks transmit mechanical vibrations directly, making them noisy and
inducing whole body fatigue over long operations. Vibration dampening
properties of rubber reduce noise levels significantly, imparting better ride
comfort. The elastic nature of rubber tracks also eases stress on machine
structures and components compared to steel counterparts.
Maintenance and Lifecycle Costs
Though steel tracks have higher upfront costs, they require less frequent
replacement compared to rubber and can last longer with proper maintenance like
regular cleaning, lubrication and track tension adjustments. On the flip side,
rubber tracks involve lower maintenance and have reduced lifecycle expenses due
to less wear and infrequent replacement needs.
Steel Tracks and Rubber Tracks: Operational
Versatility
Steel tracks are suited for moving heavy payloads on jobsites with rough
ground conditions as they maintain consistent performances. Rubber tracks, with
their self-cleaning and shock resistant qualities, operate smoothly across
varied surfaces from dirt to concrete. Their applications range from
earthmoving to material handling and agricultural sector.
Repairability
It is easier to remove and repair individual lug components in rubber
tracks onsite compared to full steel track replacement. However, repairs in
rubber involve vulcanization processes compared to welding in steel tracks.
Both require special tools and trained personnel for repairs.
To summarize, Steel
tracks and Rubber Tracks each have their advantages suitable for specific
equipment and working environments. Overall track material selection depends on
application, work terrain and productivity requirements and lifecycle
cost-benefit analyses. With ongoing R&D, future track systems may combine
benefits of both steel and rubber compounds.
About Author:
Ravina
Pandya, Content Writer, has a strong foothold in the market research industry.
She specializes in writing well-researched articles from different industries,
including food and beverages, information and technology, healthcare, chemical
and materials, etc
*Note:
1. Source: Coherent Market Insights, Public sources,
Desk research
2. We have leveraged AI tools to mine information it
