explainer system loss
| | | |

EXPLAINER: What is system loss, and how does it affect your power bill?

MANILA, Philippines – President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. wants Congress to stop electricity distributors from making consumers pay for system losses, arguing in his fifth State of the Nation Address that households should not be charged for electricity that never reaches them.

Hindi naman kasalanan ng consumer kung bakit nagkaroon ng system loss (System loss is not the fault of consumers),” Marcos said to roaring applause, calling for an “immediate amendment” to the Electric Power Industry Reform Act (EPIRA) that would prohibit system loss charges and the value-added tax (VAT) imposed on them.

What is system loss?

System loss is the difference between the electricity entering a power network and the amount eventually measured and billed to customers. According to Meralco, this charge accounts for electricity lost due to both technical and non-technical factors.

Most of it is technical and a consequence of physics. Electric current encounters resistance as it passes through wires, converting part of the energy into heat. Transformers and other equipment also consume or dissipate small amounts of power.

There are also non-technical losses, including electricity theft, illegal connections, defective meters, and errors in metering or billing. Unlike losses caused by the physics of transporting electricity, these can be reduced substantially through better meters and improved operations.

“‘Yun naman pong non-technical losses, most of these can be attributed to pilferages kasi marami pong nakikikabit,” Department of Energy (DOE) Undersecretary Mario Marasigan said during a press briefing on Tuesday, July 28

(On non-technical losses, most of these can be attributed to pilferages because many are illegally tapped in.)

DOE Secretary Sharon Garin clarified that Marcos’ directive covers the removal of the entire system loss charge from consumers’ bills – including both technical and nontechnical losses – along with the VAT imposed on that charge, not the VAT on the entire electricity bill.

How much of your Meralco bill is it?

The DOE estimates consumers could save around 5% to 10%, depending on their utility’s system loss rate. 

Meralco says system loss accounted for about 5% of an average customer’s bill, based on its 2025 bill breakdown. Meralco’s system loss rate was at 5.72% by the end of Q1 2026. (READ: Why your Meralco bill will be higher in July – and might rise again soon)

Meralco says it does not earn from this item. The amount covers the cost of electricity purchased from generation companies and the corresponding transmission charges for power that is lost before reaching consumers. Meralco remits this collection to suppliers of electricity and the National Grid Corporation of the Philippines.

So what is the role of a distribution utility company like Meralco? It operates the local wires, poles, transformers, substations, and meters that bring electricity from the transmission grid to customers within its franchise area. It’s also responsible for managing and reducing system losses within that network.

Meanwhile, Meralco said it respected the President’s policy direction but stressed that a certain level of technical loss is “inherent in operating an electric distribution system.” (READ: Meralco: Some system loss unavoidable, urges careful EPIRA reform)

Must Watch

How do we fix our broken electricity system?


How do we fix our broken electricity system?

What’s the role of EPIRA?

EPIRA authorizes the ERC to determine caps on the system losses that utilities may recover from customers. Any losses beyond that cap must be absorbed by the distribution utility.

Section 43 of the law directs the regulator to set those caps based on technical factors such as load density, sales mix, cost of service, and delivery voltage. It also requires rate-setting rules to consider the efficiency or inefficiency of regulated utilities.

The cap provides an incentive for utilities to reduce losses because they must shoulder anything above the allowed level.

How long will it take to change this?

To carry out Marcos’ proposal, Congress would have to amend the 25-year-old EPIRA to limit the system losses that can be charged. EPIRA was most recently amended in April 2025, but only to extend the Power Sector Assets and Liabilities Management Corporation’s corporate life, which is unrelated. The provision allowing utilities to recover system losses from consumers has remained largely intact since the law was enacted more than two decades ago.

The DOE aims to implement the directive within a year, possibly before the next SONA. However, the rollout may be staggered because the DOE, ERC, and National Electrification Administration must assess more than 100 electric cooperatives and private distribution utilities individually, while some networks may require new equipment and infrastructure.

What does the DOE say?

The Department of Energy (DOE) backed Marcos’ proposal for the immediate amendment of EPIRA, saying consumers should no longer bear system losses that could be reduced through advanced metering, grid upgrades, digital technologies, stronger operations, and measures against electricity theft.

“The President’s directive reflects a clear principle: consumers should not continue to bear the burden of avoidable system losses that can be reduced through better infrastructure, modern technologies, stronger operational discipline, and more effective regulation,” read a DOE statement on Monday, July 27.

But the DOE also acknowledged the balancing act. It said any EPIRA amendments must protect consumers while preserving a financially sound and reliable electricity industry and encouraging continued infrastructure investment.

Asked who should shoulder the cost of system losses, Garin said it should fall on electric cooperatives. – Rappler.com

Similar Posts

  • | | |

    Pakistan’s solar capacity reaches 38,000MW: …

    ISLAMABAD: Federal Minister for Power Awais Leghari has said Pakistan’s solar energy capacity has reached 38,000 megawatts (MW), highlighting the country’s growing shift toward renewable energy and its commitment to reducing dependence on imported fuels. Speaking at the Battery Storage Flexibility 2026 Conference, the minister said the government aims to increase the share of clean energy in Pakistan’s electricity mix to 90% by 2035. He said expanding renewable energy and developing battery storage solutions are key to strengthening the country’s energy security and lowering the import bill for conventional fuels. Leghari said the government is promoting the development of a local battery energy storage industry, encouraging domestic engineering, system integration and battery management software. He added that the Ministry of Industries is finalizing a national policy to support local battery manufacturing. The minister announced that the government is also preparing a National Battery Energy Storage Framework, which will include safety standards, grid connection guidelines and investment regulations to support the growth of the sector. According to Leghari, clean energy now accounts for 55% of Pakistan’s total electricity generation, reflecting significant progress in the country’s transition toward sustainable energy sources. He said a National Steering Committee for Battery Energy Storage Systems has already been established, while technical and regulatory working groups have also been formed to guide policy development and implementation. Leghari further revealed that pilot battery energy storage projects have been approved for electricity distribution companies. The data collected from these projects will help shape future regulatory policies and improve the country’s energy planning. The minister said Pakistan has emerged as one of the world’s fastest-growing distributed energy markets and assured investors that the government will provide a clear, transparent and long-term regulatory framework to encourage investment.

  • |

    FBR demonstrates digital tax return features to Karachi tax bar

    ISLAMABAD: The Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) has demonstrated several features of its digital income tax return system to the Karachi Tax Bar Association (KTBA), including mechanisms for reporting investments in immovable property, declaring multiple business capital accounts, recording inheritance assets and calculating tax under relevant provisions of the law. The demonstration was held during an online consultation between the FBR Domain Team and representatives of the KTBA as part of the tax authority’s efforts to obtain feedback from taxpayers and tax practitioners on the design and functionality of the income tax return system. The meeting focused on improving the digital filing experience and identifying areas where the online return could be made simpler, more efficient and easier for taxpayers and professionals to use. KTBA President Mehmood Bikiya welcomed the FBR’s prompt response in arranging the session and appreciated the efforts made by the Domain Team to develop a responsive and user-friendly return system. According to the participants, the existing system is operating satisfactorily, with no major technical problems or significant glitches reported during the discussion. Instead, the meeting primarily focused on clarifications, suggestions for improvement and practical issues faced by tax practitioners while completing returns. The FBR officials addressed a number of queries through live demonstrations, allowing participants to better understand the available options and procedures within the digital system. During the session, the Domain Team demonstrated how taxpayers can report investments in immovable property, enter details of more than one business capital, declare tax under applicable sections and include inherited property in their tax records. Officials also clarified that certain information fields are optional. In particular, the chassis number required in the vehicle-related section does not have to be entered where it is not applicable or available. The consultation also covered several policy-related matters raised by the KTBA. These included the timing of refund applications, deemed assessment orders and procedures for revising income tax returns. The FBR Domain Team explained that such matters are governed by existing policy provisions, including the 15-day rule relating to deemed assessments. The concerns and proposals raised by the tax bar were also forwarded to the FBR’s Policy Wing for examination. Both sides agreed that continued consultations between tax officials and tax practitioners could help address implementation-related concerns and improve taxpayers’ understanding of the digital filing process. The KTBA also submitted several proposals for future versions of the income tax return system. One of the key suggestions was to introduce an option for uploading data through Excel files, which could reduce the time required to manually enter large volumes of information. Other proposals included reconsidering the requirement to enter certain financial information in subsequent years and introducing a system-generated PDF explaining the relevant legal provisions concerning residence status. The FBR Domain Team recorded the suggestions and indicated that they would be considered for possible incorporation into future versions of the return system. Most of the technical and operational questions raised during the meeting were resolved through on-screen demonstrations and explanations by the FBR team. The exercise also provided practitioners with a clearer understanding of the functions already available on the digital platform. KTBA Vice President Saud ul Hasan appreciated the FBR’s willingness to engage directly with representatives of the tax community. He said continued interaction between tax practitioners and the revenue authorities could promote greater understanding of taxpayers’ concerns and strengthen confidence in the digital filing mechanism. The FBR, meanwhile, reiterated its commitment to maintaining regular consultations with the business community, tax practitioners and their representative organisations. The tax authority said feedback received through such engagements would remain important in improving the income tax return system and making the filing process more transparent, straightforward and taxpayer-friendly.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *