Features

The newly signed defence agreement between Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and Türkiye marks a significant step towards formalising their longstanding security and strategic cooperation, while establishing a framework focused on collective defence and regional stability. The trilateral partnership brings together three countries with strong historical, political, economic and defence ties. Their cooperation has grown over decades and is now being shaped into a more structured security framework amid a rapidly changing regional environment. The agreement comes as conflicts, emerging security threats and evolving forms of warfare continue to reshape the strategic landscape. Supporters of the pact say closer coordination among the three countries can contribute to regional stability and strengthen their ability to respond collectively to security challenges. Focus on defence and deterrence The agreement has been described as defensive rather than offensive. Its central principle is collective security, under which an armed attack against one member is considered a threat to all three. The arrangement is aimed at strengthening deterrence and reducing the possibility of conflict by demonstrating that aggression against one country could trigger a coordinated response from the other two. The framework is not intended to target any particular country, according to the explanation of the agreement. Instead, it seeks to promote peace, stability and security through stronger defence cooperation. Complementary strengths Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and Türkiye bring different strategic capabilities to the partnership. Pakistan contributes extensive military experience and defence expertise, including experience in managing complex security challenges. Saudi Arabia brings its strategic position in the region, economic strength and political influence. Türkiye contributes advanced defence technology, a growing defence industry and substantial industrial capabilities. Together, these capabilities could provide the three countries with a broader platform for strategic coordination and defence preparedness. The partnership could also encourage greater cooperation in areas such as military coordination, intelligence sharing, defence technology and strategic planning. Pakistan’s regional role The agreement also highlights Pakistan’s expanding engagement with different regional and global actors. Islamabad maintains strategic and diplomatic relations with Saudi Arabia and Türkiye while also engaging Iran, China, the United States and other international partners. This network of relationships could allow Pakistan to play a constructive role in regional diplomacy and help facilitate communication among countries with differing interests. The effectiveness of the trilateral framework, however, will depend on how consistently the three countries translate the agreement into practical cooperation. Not a NATO-style alliance The partnership has also been described as not a Muslim NATO and not a mechanism for providing nuclear protection to its members. Instead, it is presented as a defensive arrangement designed to strengthen collective deterrence and security cooperation while supporting regional peace. The agreement effectively formalises much of the strategic cooperation that Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and Türkiye have developed over the years.

Pakistan has witnessed a significant decline in registered blasphemy cases this year following a crackdown on hardline religious groups, signalling what analysts describe as a major shift in the country’s security policy. According to figures cited by the Human Rights Commission of Pakistan (HRCP), only 13 blasphemy cases have been registered so far in 2026, marking a fall of nearly two-thirds compared with the same period in recent years. Data from conflict monitoring organisation ACLED also indicates that only one blasphemy-related riot or attack has occurred over the past year, compared with an annual average of more than seven incidents between 2021 and 2024. The decline comes after security agencies intensified action against several extremist organisations accused of exploiting blasphemy allegations to incite violence. Officials familiar with the matter said the campaign has included arrests of key figures, restrictions on organisational activities, freezing of financial assets and tighter monitoring of religious gatherings. The change was evident during an incident in Karachi last month, where allegations of blasphemy against a Christian family drew a large crowd. Police officers intervened before the situation turned violent and persuaded protesters to disperse peacefully. Authorities later determined that the accusations against the family were baseless, allowing them to be moved to safety without further harm. Analysts believe the reduced presence of organised extremist groups has played a key role in preventing mob violence that has historically followed blasphemy accusations. Pakistan has witnessed around 90 blasphemy-related lynchings since 1990, with many incidents beginning after rumours spread through local communities. Security experts say the military leadership has adopted a tougher stance against groups previously accused of using religious sentiments to mobilise supporters and pressure governments. They argue the policy shift is linked to broader efforts to strengthen Pakistan’s international image, attract foreign investment and improve relations with Western countries while tackling growing security threats at home. Officials also believe that curbing religious extremism is necessary to address worsening militancy in Balochistan and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, where insurgent violence continues to challenge the state’s authority. Some analysts say extremist organisations and militant groups have historically drawn support from similar networks of radicalised youth. The country’s largest hardline religious party, Tehreek-e-Labbaik Pakistan (TLP), was banned last year after authorities concluded that its activities posed a threat to public order and Pakistan’s international reputation. Government measures reportedly included detaining senior leaders, sealing offices and restricting financial operations. The party has rejected the ban, calling it unconstitutional. Despite the decline in violence, observers caution that extremist ideology remains deeply rooted in parts of society. Human rights advocates say minority communities, including Christians, Ahmadis and Shia Muslims, continue to live under the fear of false accusations, as Pakistan’s blasphemy laws remain in force and carry the death penalty. Security analysts also warn that sustained enforcement will be necessary to prevent banned organisations from regrouping or resurfacing under new identities. They argue that long-term success will depend on consistent policies rather than temporary crackdowns.

The Human Rights Commission of Pakistan (HRCP) and the Pakistan Federal Union of Journalists (PFUJ) have strongly criticised the government’s newly introduced Foreign Media Facilitation Guidelines 2026, describing the policy as a serious threat to press freedom and independent journalism. The criticism comes after the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting reminded foreign media organisations that journalists must obtain prior government approval before carrying out reporting assignments outside Islamabad, Lahore and Karachi under the revised External Publicity Guidelines. The ministry issued the reminder following concerns over international coverage related to Azad Jammu and Kashmir. In a statement, the HRCP said the new guidelines could discourage independent reporting on issues of public interest instead of facilitating journalistic work. The commission expressed concern that the policy reflects an increasing trend of restrictions on media freedom, including tighter controls on reporting and growing administrative hurdles for journalists. According to the rights body, requiring official permission before reporting from many parts of the country could create an atmosphere where critical journalism is discouraged. It urged the government to withdraw the new measures and ensure protection of freedom of expression in line with constitutional guarantees and international commitments. The PFUJ also condemned the notification, calling it a direct attack on press freedom. The journalists’ union argued that the policy not only limits the movement of foreign correspondents but also places restrictions on Pakistani journalists working for international media organisations. PFUJ President Afzal Butt and Secretary General Arshad Ansari questioned how journalists would be able to perform their professional responsibilities if access to large parts of the country is restricted. They warned that the policy could affect Pakistan’s international reputation and further weaken its standing in global press freedom rankings. The union also expressed concern that Pakistani journalists employed by foreign media organisations could face job losses if they are prevented from reporting from different regions of the country.