opinion 54th anniversary
|

[OPINION] The 54th anniversary of Martial Law and Edjop

As we commemorate the 54th anniversary of Martial Law and recall the memory of those who took a stand and paid the ultimate price, it may be worth reflecting on the life of a young man who exemplified the meaning of a “person for others.”

As Ateneo student council president who later led the National Union of Students of the Philippines (NUSP), Edgar “Edjop” Jopson had organized a rally calling for “a non-partisan constitutional convention” on the eve of the “First Quarter Storm” which resulted in a clash with truncheon-wielding troopers.  

A few days later, January 30, 1970, NUSP president Edjop was summoned by the president to Malacanang. While the meeting transpired without any resolution, I still recall the vigil outside its gates and the violence I witnessed ensuing far into the night in what has been described as the “Battle of Mendiola” presaging the so-called, “First Quarter Storm.”

I was then a seminarian at the Loyola House of Studies at the Ateneo campus in Loyola Heights. The first time I met him was at the January 26, 1970, rally at the opening of the 7th Congress when then-president Ferdinand E. Marcos delivered the State of the Nation address after Jesuit priest, Pacifico Ortiz, had invoked the image of a “social volcano” in his opening prayer.  

On February 17, 1970, a meeting of student leaders who refused to take the armed path in the struggle against the impending dictatorship met at the large third-floor classroom at the Loyola House of Studies. When a movement espousing non-violence and civil disobedience began to be considered, it was a “no-brainer” that the logical leader was the NUSP president Edjop.

However, Edjop was hesitant and stated that his “plate was full” and begged off.  Instead, he suggested a seminarian whom he believed had more time should step up; so, he turned to me on his right, and volunteered me which accounts for the reason why I chose “accidental activist” as the sub-title of my Memoir. This moment marked the founding of the militant non-violent movement, Lakasdiwa.

It also represented a conjuncture; giving people a choice between ending the cycle of violence prevailing at that time by means of armed struggle or by means of active non-violence (an option that probably seemed quixotic at that time). However, it may have instilled the seeds of people power that took place at a later time.

Based on Mahatma Gandhi’s “satyagraha” (or, the strength of spirit), non-violence has a long history. This militant form of struggle has been applied in similar situations as far apart as India and South Africa, and the pushback against racial segregation in America’s south. Other efforts in Eastern Europe and countries in the Middle East likewise made their influences felt.

The people power in the Philippines that took place in the mid-‘80s equally influenced other settings in different parts of the globe. It was this context that provided a backdrop to the actions taken by Edjop during this historic conjuncture.

Several incidents portrayed Edjop’s evolving character at this time. Close associates and friends of Edjop described him as a reticent and reluctant leader whose original instincts were moderately “down to earth,” to say the least. However, changing circumstances and his incisive analysis led him to a conclusion that he believed in — remaining true to his heroic calling.

As we commemorate another anniversary of Martial Law, it might be worth reflecting on the life of Edjop: someone who turned his back on a secure future to pursue a cause that he believed in till the ultimate consequences. Edjop belonged to a rare breed of people who learned slowly yet intently, and who acted decisively when the times called for bold action and the aspiration to be brave.  

As the country faces critical choices and disturbing trends, the example of Edjop’s life provides an inspiration to take up unprecedented challenges and the invitation to take the road less traveled. Though not all may feel up to the task, it is not the matter of numbers but the intensity of the response that may in the end spell the difference. As a sage once put it, “sometimes, the majority is one man or woman of courage.” 

For the young, and those whose hearts were young once, the challenge remains difficult and uncertain; likewise, the times seem uncertain, and the odds remain steep. But the question remains: to be brave, when the times demand.

A new generation of young people who will ponder on the life and choices of Edjop will most certainly confront the question of conscience and convenience, problems and principles, the present and a future of possibilities. – Rappler.com

Ed Garcia is the author of Reinventing Resistance! Memoir of an Accidental Activist, 2025, and Chronicle of a Life Untold.Testament to Hope, 2026, both published by San Anselmo Press.

Similar Posts

  • |

    The Education Dilemma

    By Tuba Khan Literacy is the key to a successful political, economic and social structure of a country. Nations that prioritize education give birth to a strong, responsible and intellectual generation that could foster civic culture in the country. A well-educated and politically aware youth is the backbone of a country’s development. Society can only progress if it invests in its youth, allocating resources and opportunities to young people. Pakistan ranks fifth among the countries having the largest young population in the world. This youth bulge could become a driver of economic prosperity and social progress if quality education and skills development are provided to the youth. Unfortunately, Pakistan lacks an education system that can produce civic-minded, skilled and informed people. The education sector has remained stagnant for several decades and the quality of education is declining day by day, producing an intellectually enslaved generation. Pakistan ranked 164th out of a total of 194 countries globally in education quality, lagging far behind from the other countries in the region. Education in Pakistan is treated as a business for generating revenue and in return creating inequality across all levels of education.   In Pakistan, around 54% of students are enrolled in public sector institutions, where the quality of education and the infrastructure are in a state of severe deterioration. The country’s education standard is so poor that no Pakistani university ranks among the world’s top 350 reputable universities as per QS World University Rankings 2026. Moreover, approximately 26 million children are out of school and those who are enrolled in schools are often products of the rote learning system, unable to think critically and lack the ability to build independent opinions. They are deprived of basic facilities, such as safe and secure buildings, furniture, laboratories, libraries, electricity, clean drinking water, proper sanitation facilities and other basic amenities at the public educational institutions. The outdated syllabus and unprofessional staff at public educational institutions add fuel to the fire, aggravating the education crisis in Pakistan. According to the data provided by UNESCO in 2024, there were 25.38 million students in total for all public and private elementary schools in the country, while only 445,877 teachers were available to facilitate the students. This highlights that there are around 57 children for each teacher. This highlights the ailing condition of the education system of Pakistan.   Despite the educational challenges and poor education system, government spending on the education sector has declined significantly. From 0.8% of GDP allocated to the education sector in 2024, the education spending has dropped to only 0.2% of the federal budget in 2026. Additionally, the privatization of public schools in Punjab is also the biggest failure of the government as it raised the costs and fees, putting a financial burden on low-income families and provoking more elimination of students from the schools. The privatization policy is contrary to the constitutional promise, introduced under the 18th amendment in 2010 of providing free and compulsory education up to Matriculation, exacerbating the education breakdown. This underscores the incompetence of the government in addressing the paramount issue, the root cause of several multidimensional problems of Pakistan.   Education is a fundamental right of every human being and it must be delivered to its citizens by the state. The government of Pakistan must realize that without an educated nation, the country could never be placed on the path of progress. The government should focus on eliminating gender inequality in the education sector while raising awareness in rural areas, making the educational institutions safe for women and holding the institutions accountable. It should encourage digital and vocational training programs, research, practical learning, skills development and the ability of youth to think critically and form independent opinions about the important issues. It is the duty of the government to provide quality education, maintain educational institutions, strengthen checks and balances within the education system, fulfil the constitutional promise of providing free education to children between the ages of 5 and 16 and strengthen the economy so that the middle and lower-middle class can easily afford education. Investing in education is not merely the responsibility of the government, but a national necessity. However, education alone is not enough unless it is coupled with employment opportunities. Otherwise, the youth bulge would become a demographic burden, marked by unemployment, poverty and instability. Pakistan urgently needs reforms in the education sector and strategies to transform the young population from a demographic challenge into a valuable demographic dividend for sustainable growth. The government must treat the education crisis as a priority issue to ensure a prosperous future.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *