pakistan increases diyat
| |

Pakistan increases Diyat amount by 97% to over Rs….

The federal government has significantly increased the value of diyat (blood money) for the fiscal year 2026-27, setting the amount at more than Rs. 19 million due to a sharp rise in silver prices. The new value represents an increase of nearly 97 percent compared to the previous year.

According to a notification issued by the Ministry of Finance, the official value of diyat has been fixed at Rs. 19,352,390 in accordance with the provisions of the Pakistan Penal Code (PPC), 1860.

Under Pakistani law, diyat refers to the compensation paid by an offender to the heirs of a person killed in a criminal case. The amount is determined based on the value of 30,630 grams of silver, as outlined in Section 323 of the PPC.

The latest increase is mainly linked to the significant rise in silver prices. The diyat amount for the fiscal year 2025-26 was Rs. 9,828,670, meaning the new figure has almost doubled within one year.

The value of diyat has continued to rise in recent years due to fluctuations in precious metal prices. For the fiscal year 2023-24, the amount was fixed at Rs. 6,757,902, which was already a 56 percent increase from Rs. 4,318,524 in 2022-23.

Section 323 of the Pakistan Penal Code states that courts must determine the diyat amount while considering Islamic injunctions from the Quran and Sunnah, as well as the financial circumstances of both the convicted person and the victim’s heirs. However, the amount cannot be lower than the value of 30,630 grams of silver.

The law also requires the federal government to announce the value of silver through an official notification each year. This declared value becomes the basis for calculating the minimum diyat amount for that financial year.

The increase has renewed discussion over the method used to calculate blood money. In July 2025, a proposed amendment was introduced in the Senate suggesting that the minimum diyat calculation should be changed from 30,630 grams of silver to either 2,000 grams of gold or one-fourth of the assets owned by the convicted person.

The latest notification highlights how changes in precious metal markets can directly affect legal compensation amounts in Pakistan. As silver prices continue to fluctuate, the annual revision of diyat remains an important financial and legal matter affecting victims’ families and the criminal justice system.

Similar Posts

  • |

    UK stars join the fight to stop the Paramount-Warner Bros mega-merger

    Benedict Cumberbatch, Alan Cumming, and Benedict Wong are calling on the British government to step in and stop a massive media merger. They believe the deal could seriously damage the country’s entertainment industry. The three actors co-wrote an opinion piece for the Guardian, warning readers about the potential fallout from the merger. They urged immediate action to prevent it from going through. The well-known performers argued that the merger poses a serious threat to the public, describing its consequences as deeply harmful to people across Britain. Their intervention follows similar pushback from actors in Hollywood, adding British voices to the growing opposition against the proposed $111 billion merger between Paramount and Warner Bros. Discovery. The trio emphasized their long-standing ties to the UK’s creative industry, noting decades spent collaborating with British crews on British stages and film sets. They framed their involvement as a natural extension of their responsibility toward audiences who support and enjoy their work. According to the actors, the merger threatens nearly 180,000 jobs within the UK’s entertainment sector. It also puts billions of pounds in annual production spending at risk. They described the situation as one where intervention could still make a difference, calling it a battle that can still be won if action is taken soon. The piece also referenced recent comments from UK Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy, who has hinted she might take formal steps to intervene in the deal. The actors suggested that Nandy’s potential involvement represents one of two major fronts in the broader fight to stop the merger. They called any decision from her department potentially one of the most consequential moves affecting British film and television in years. Towards the end of their piece, the trio acknowledged that actors are typically expected to steer clear of legal and regulatory debates. However, they pushed back against that expectation, explaining that their years spent working alongside British crews, watching talented homegrown productions struggle to secure funding, gave them a personal stake in the outcome. Their public stance adds significant star power to the growing resistance against the merger. Industry figures on both sides of the Atlantic continue voicing concerns about its potential impact on jobs, cultural output, and the broader landscape of film and television production in the UK.

  • | |

    Jonathan Bailey shares his down-to-earth beauty ro…

    Jonathan Bailey may be one of Hollywood’s biggest stars, but his approach to grooming is surprisingly simple. The Bridgerton actor has revealed that he does not rely on an elaborate skincare routine to maintain his appearance. The 38-year-old British actor, who was named PEOPLE’s Sexiest Man Alive in 2025, recently discussed his approach to self-care while promoting Giorgio Armani’s new men’s fragrance, I Will. Rather than listing a long collection of beauty products, Bailey highlighted a few everyday habits that help him feel his best. For the actor, staying hydrated, getting enough sleep and protecting his skin with SPF are key parts of his routine. He has also spoken about spending time outdoors and walking whenever possible, describing it as an important form of wellbeing. (People.com⁠) Keeping skincare simple Bailey’s routine reflects his relaxed attitude toward grooming. Instead of suggesting that looking after your skin requires countless products, he focuses on basic habits that fit naturally into his lifestyle. Sleep and hydration are particularly important to his daily routine. He has also emphasized the importance of SPF, making sun protection one of the straightforward steps he does not overlook. His approach comes as skincare has become an increasingly important part of modern grooming. Experts generally recommend keeping routines practical and consistent rather than overwhelming the skin with unnecessary products. (GQ⁠) His dog Benson is part of the routine Bailey’s idea of self-care extends beyond skincare. He also enjoys spending time outside with his aging cockapoo, Benson. Walking has become one of his favorite ways to create space during a busy day. In a recent interview, Bailey explained that he will sometimes leave earlier simply so he can walk to a meeting. He sees that time outdoors as an opportunity to slow down and reflect. The actor has also mentioned drinking plenty of water and even enjoying cold-water swimming as part of his wellbeing habits. (Esquire⁠) A busy year ahead While Bailey has kept 2026 relatively selective, his career remains busy. Following his success in Wicked: For Good and Jurassic World: Rebirth, he has several major projects lined up. He is set to appear in the upcoming films Monsanto and Pumping Black. He is also preparing to return to the West End stage in a revival of Sunday in the Park with George in 2027. (GQ⁠) For Bailey, however, looking after himself does not seem to require an overly complicated formula. Good sleep, plenty of water, time outdoors and daily sun protection remain at the heart of his refreshingly down-to-earth approach.

  • | | |

    BTS member V reveals hearing problem he has faced …

    BTS member V, whose real name is Kim Taehyung, has revealed that he has been dealing with a hearing problem for the past two and a half years. The South Korean singer shared the personal health update with fans during a live broadcast on Weverse alongside fellow BTS member Jungkook, following the group’s return to activities after completing their mandatory military service. During the conversation, V explained that there is a significant difference in his hearing ability between his two ears. He reportedly said that if the hearing ability in his left ear is considered 100, his right ear is currently around 30. V also indicated that he is receiving treatment for the hearing issue. His revelation came as a surprise to many fans, who had not previously been aware of the extent of the problem. The live session took place after BTS performed two consecutive sold-out shows at M&T Bank Stadium in Baltimore, United States. V and Jungkook spoke to fans directly following the concerts and shared updates about their experiences during the group’s ongoing tour. Jungkook also discussed a health issue during the broadcast. The singer said he has been performing despite experiencing significant pain in his legs during the tour. According to Jungkook, the pain in his shin has reached a level where there is concern about the possibility of a stress fracture. Despite the discomfort, he said he often wanted to run and move freely while performing on stage, but the pain sometimes prevented him from doing so. The health disclosures from both members have attracted attention from BTS fans around the world, particularly as the group has returned to major live performances following their military service. All seven BTS members have now completed their mandatory military service in South Korea and resumed group activities. The group made its comeback with the album “ARIRANG” and subsequently launched a global music tour. V’s revelation about his hearing has added a personal dimension to the group’s comeback, as the singer continues performing while undergoing treatment. Fans have expressed concern and support for the singer as he manages the condition alongside BTS’s demanding international schedule. The latest update also highlights the physical demands placed on performers during major global tours, with both V and Jungkook discussing health challenges while continuing to appear on stage for fans.

  • |

    Government will complete constitutional term, says…

    Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif’s Special Assistant, Huzaifa Rehman, has dismissed speculation about political instability, insisting that the federal government will complete its constitutional term and that comments made by individual ministers do not determine the future of an administration. Speaking during a television interview, Rehman said Interior Minister Mohsin Naqvi had already clarified his recent remarks, adding that the issue should now be considered settled. He also noted that Naqvi shares a close personal relationship with Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, suggesting there was no reason to read more into the controversy. Commenting on recent political statements, Rehman said he had not expected such remarks from Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) Chairman Bilawal Bhutto Zardari. However, he described Bilawal’s comments as emotional and declined to engage in further criticism. Rehman emphasized that the PPP remains a valued coalition partner of the Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N). At the same time, he asserted that the ruling party has enough parliamentary support to continue governing even without the PPP’s backing. He also responded to political rhetoric about the government’s future, saying that any political “countdown” would not be limited to the PML-N. According to him, the same pressure could also apply to the provincial governments in Sindh and Balochistan. Addressing another claim, Rehman said he did not agree with the suggestion that the government had achieved 30 years’ worth of progress in just three years. He maintained that performance should be judged on measurable results rather than exaggerated comparisons. The prime minister’s aide further revealed that Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif directed all federal ministries about a month ago to submit detailed performance reports. He said the initiative reflects the government’s focus on reviewing progress, improving governance, and ensuring accountability across ministries.

  • |

    Spanish minister bids for top UN labour agency post amid US funding crisis

    Spain has officially nominated its Labour Minister and Second Deputy Prime Minister, Yolanda Díaz, to run for Director-General of the International Labour Organization (ILO). If elected, Díaz would become the first woman to lead the Geneva-based UN agency in its 107-year history. Díaz is set to challenge incumbent Director-General Gilbert Houngbo of Togo, who took office in 2022 as the first African leader of the ILO and is seeking re-election. Her candidacy comes as the agency faces a severe liquidity crisis, exacerbated by unpaid contributions from member states, most notably the United States, which owes 257 million Swiss francs ($315 million) in arrears and has outlined plans to halt funding for the upcoming fiscal year. The nomination highlights her domestic record of labor reforms and social dialogue in Spain, though analysts note her candidacy faces a diplomatic balancing act between securing European support and risking friction with the African diplomatic bloc. The election will take place in November 2026, with the winner’s five-year term beginning in October 2027.

  • | |

    Capital one defends closure of Trump organization accounts

    Capital One Financial has responded to a lawsuit filed over its decision to close bank accounts linked to the Trump Organization, arguing that the move was based on internal anti-money laundering reviews rather than political or ideological motivations. The bank, in a legal filing submitted on Friday, stated that it closed the accounts following a detailed assessment conducted by its anti-money laundering (AML) specialists. The company argued that the decision was made after months of analysis and was consistent with its internal policies as well as regulatory requirements. The filing represents the first time a major bank has publicly connected concerns related to money laundering risks with its decision to end a banking relationship involving the Trump family business. However, Capital One clarified that it has never accused the Trump Organization of committing illegal money laundering activities. Instead, the bank said that the account closures were the result of routine compliance procedures. Capital One argued that documents presented in the case, along with the plaintiffs’ own claims, demonstrate that the decision was related to AML concerns rather than any attempt to discriminate against the company because of political beliefs. The dispute began after Capital One informed the Trump Organization in March 2021 that it planned to close more than 300 accounts associated with businesses connected to former U.S. President Donald Trump. The Trump Organization and Eric Trump, Trump’s son, later filed a lawsuit in March 2025 in a Florida federal court, claiming that the bank had unfairly “debanked” them because of political pressure and what they described as the company’s “woke” policies. The lawsuit alleged that Capital One’s decision was influenced by the political environment following the January 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol. The plaintiffs argued that the bank wanted to distance itself from Trump and his supporters during a period of intense public and political scrutiny. A federal court in Miami has already dismissed two versions of the complaint but allowed the plaintiffs opportunities to revise and submit updated claims. Capital One argued in its latest filing that the amended complaint continues to contain the same weaknesses as earlier versions and fails to establish evidence of unlawful discrimination. The bank accused the Trump Organization of presenting selective information and relying on statements taken out of context. Capital One maintained that the allegations of political motivation were unsupported and ignored the broader circumstances behind the account closures. According to the bank’s filing, certain transaction patterns identified during its review matched types of activities that federal banking authorities commonly recognize as requiring additional examination. Capital One said its AML team followed established procedures before reaching the decision to terminate the accounts. The legal battle comes during a broader political debate in the United States over the issue of “debanking,” with some conservatives accusing financial institutions of unfairly targeting individuals and organizations because of their political views. During his second presidential term, Trump’s administration has criticized such practices and taken steps aimed at preventing what it describes as discriminatory banking decisions. The controversy has also involved other major financial institutions. Trump previously filed a lawsuit against JPMorgan Chase, making similar allegations regarding political discrimination. During his first term in office, Trump also took legal action against Capital One and Deutsche Bank in an effort to prevent the release of his financial records to Congress. The case continues to highlight the growing tension between banking compliance practices, political concerns, and the debate over whether financial institutions should have broader restrictions on ending relationships with controversial clients.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *