did cristiano ronaldo
|

When did Cristiano Ronaldo tell his family about his wedding?

Cristiano Ronaldo and Georgina Rodriguez appear to have kept their long-awaited wedding remarkably private, with reports suggesting that the football superstar informed his mother and siblings about the ceremony only moments before it took place.

According to reports, Ronaldo and Rodriguez married on August 11, 2026, in an intimate ceremony in Portugal after nearly a decade together. The couple reportedly chose Ronaldo’s residence for the occasion, keeping the guest list extremely small.

Only four witnesses and the couple’s children were said to have attended the ceremony. Ronaldo’s mother, Dolores Aveiro, and his three siblings were reportedly not present.

Portuguese television presenter Cristina Ferreira claimed that Ronaldo’s family may have learned about the wedding only around 30 seconds before the ceremony. The surprising detail has attracted considerable attention, particularly because of the close relationship Ronaldo has maintained with his family throughout his career.

Despite not attending the ceremony, Dolores appeared to publicly welcome the marriage. After Ronaldo shared photographs of the couple’s wedding rings, his mother responded with a heart emoji.

The family’s relationship had previously been the subject of speculation after Georgina reportedly unfollowed Dolores on Instagram. Rumours of a disagreement quickly circulated online, but Dolores dismissed the reports, saying the social media action had simply been a mistake and that there was no family dispute.

Ronaldo and Georgina have been together for almost 10 years and have built a family life largely away from the footballer’s professional commitments. Their relationship has attracted enormous international attention, making their decision to keep the wedding private particularly intriguing to fans.

The couple made their first public appearance as husband and wife only days after the reported ceremony. They attended an Al Nassr vs Al Fateh match at Riyadh’s Al-Awwal Park with their children.

Georgina appeared at the stadium wearing a striking golden silky jacket, while Ronaldo opted for an all-black outfit.

The appearance gave fans their first glimpse of the newly married couple following their private celebration and added another memorable chapter to Ronaldo and Georgina’s high-profile relationship.

While the reported 30-second family notification remains the most surprising detail surrounding the ceremony, the couple’s decision to celebrate quietly suggests they wanted the milestone to remain firmly within their immediate circle.

Similar Posts

  • | |

    China stands firm on economic strategy ahead of ke…

    BEIJING: China has intensified its defence of its state-led economic model as it prepares for crucial trade discussions with the European Union and the United States, signalling that it is unlikely to make major policy concessions despite mounting international criticism. Beijing has repeatedly argued that its development strategy, which prioritises investment in advanced manufacturing and technology, remains essential for long-term economic growth. Chinese leaders maintain that the country’s industrial policies have helped strengthen innovation and global competitiveness, rejecting accusations that they distort international trade. The latest policy statements from China’s leadership indicate a commitment to maintaining its current economic direction. While officials acknowledge challenges such as weak domestic demand and excess production capacity, they continue to favour targeted policy support instead of broad consumer-focused stimulus measures. Chinese authorities have also dismissed Western claims of industrial overcapacity, describing such criticism as politically motivated. They argue that China’s manufacturing success reflects its stage of economic development and benefits global consumers through affordable, high-quality products. Ahead of expected meetings between President Xi Jinping and US President Donald Trump later this year, as well as upcoming negotiations with the European Union, Beijing has adopted a more confident tone in defending its economic policies. Analysts believe the messaging is intended to establish clear limits on what China is willing to negotiate while encouraging greater understanding of its development model. China has also sought to counter warnings of a new “China shock” by portraying its industrial expansion as an opportunity for global economic growth. However, many Western economists argue that China’s reliance on exports, combined with subdued domestic consumption, continues to create imbalances that affect international markets. Although Beijing has slowed public investment by tightening oversight of local government spending, officials acknowledge that supply and demand remain uneven. Authorities have pledged to reduce destructive price competition among manufacturers and have reiterated their intention to strengthen consumer demand, though without announcing sweeping structural reforms. Chinese policymakers have also recognised that the country’s traditionally low household consumption cannot remain a permanent feature of its economy. While official publications describe the existing model as historically appropriate, they also suggest gradual adjustments will be necessary to ensure sustainable long-term growth. Despite these acknowledgements, Beijing remains cautious about implementing rapid reforms, fearing that abrupt policy changes could undermine economic stability. International studies continue to raise concerns over China’s economic practices. Recent research suggests that government subsidies have played a significant role in boosting the global market share of many Chinese companies, while other reports attribute much of China’s export growth to weak domestic consumption and industrial overcapacity. Analysts also note that China continues to invest in productive assets at a much faster pace than Europe and the United States, even though returns on those investments have declined. Many experts believe Beijing’s increasingly assertive defence of its economic model reflects growing confidence that it can manage trade tensions with Western partners without fundamentally changing its industrial strategy.

  • | |

    IHC seeks govt response over Arshad Chaiwala’s p…

    The Islamabad High Court (IHC) has sought responses from the federal government and the Directorate General of Immigration and Passports over the reported non-renewal of the passport of Arshad Khan, popularly known as “Arshad Chaiwala.” Justice Umair Majid Malik heard the petition filed by Arshad Khan, with Barrister Umar Ejaz Gilani representing him in court. The petitioner’s counsel told the court that Arshad Khan is an entrepreneur who has promoted Pakistani culture internationally. According to the counsel, the National Database and Registration Authority (NADRA) verification board has already cleared Arshad Khan’s identity. His Computerised National Identity Card (CNIC) is also active. The court was informed that Arshad had applied for renewal of his passport on August 20, 2025. However, despite the passage of nearly a year, the renewed document had allegedly not been issued. The lawyer said Arshad had repeatedly contacted the office of the interior secretary to resolve the matter but had not received a satisfactory response. He also informed the court that a legal notice had been served on the interior secretary. Despite the notice, no response was reportedly received. Arshad has asked the high court to direct the authorities to issue his renewed passport without further delay. His petition also seeks a declaration that the continued failure to issue the passport is unlawful and violates his fundamental rights. During the hearing, Justice Umair Majid Malik observed that the court would first obtain the position of the relevant government authorities before examining the matter further. The IHC subsequently issued notices to the Director General Immigration and Passports and the federal government through the interior secretary.

  • | |

    Why did BTS reject Grammy race this year?

    South Korean global music sensation BTS has decided not to submit its music for consideration at the 69th Grammy Awards in 2027, raising fresh debate over the Recording Academy’s newly introduced Best Asian Pop Music Performance category. The seven-member group announced the decision through individual posts on Instagram, saying it wanted music to be appreciated for its artistic value rather than being separated by region or language. “We hope music can be heard and loved for what it is, rather than being divided by region or language,” the group said while confirming it would not participate in the upcoming Grammy submission process. This marks the first time BTS has stepped away from the Grammy competition, despite being one of the most influential global acts and a major force behind the worldwide rise of K-pop. The controversy began after the Recording Academy introduced the Best Asian Pop Music Performance category, which will debut at the 69th Grammy Awards scheduled for February 2027. The category aims to recognise outstanding pop performances from Asian markets, including K-pop, J-pop and C-pop, featuring Asian languages. However, BTS’ decision highlighted concerns among some artists and fans that creating region-based categories could create divisions within global music rather than promoting equal recognition. Responding to the group’s announcement, Recording Academy CEO Harvey Mason Jr. said he was disappointed but respected BTS’ choice. Mason explained that the new category was created to celebrate the diversity, growth and creativity of Asian artists, not to separate them from other musicians. He said the purpose of the award was to provide more opportunities for artists to receive recognition from Grammy voters and emphasized that artists nominated in genre categories could still compete for major awards, including Record of the Year, Album of the Year and Song of the Year. “The category was created to shine a spotlight on important artists and expand recognition,” Mason said, adding that genre categories and major Grammy fields remain open to all eligible musicians. BTS’ decision comes after a major comeback year for the group. The band released its album “ARIRANG” in March 2026 after completing mandatory military service commitments. The album achieved major international success, spending two weeks at the top of the Billboard 200 chart and setting a new milestone for a K-pop act. Over the past decade, BTS has become one of the biggest names in global entertainment, breaking language barriers and helping Korean music gain mainstream acceptance worldwide. The group, consisting of RM, Jin, Suga, J-Hope, Jimin, V and Jungkook, has previously received multiple Grammy nominations and has repeatedly pushed for greater recognition of K-pop within the academy’s major award categories.

  • |

    Morocco commits to repatriating unaccompanied minors following mass migration into Ceuta

    The Moroccan government has announced its willingness to collaborate with Spain and European authorities to identify and repatriate unaccompanied minors who crossed into the Spanish North African enclave of Ceuta during a recent surge in border crossings. According to state news agency MAP, King Mohammed VI directed the interior and foreign affairs ministries to coordinate the identification and safe return of the young migrants to their families in Morocco. The official statement follows diplomatic discussions aimed at addressing the logistical and legal challenges surrounding under-age migrants, who cannot be immediately turned back under standard border control agreements. The initiative comes in the wake of a massive border influx that saw tens of thousands of individuals attempt to enter European territory on foot and by sea. Spanish officials estimated that 72,000 migrants crossed the border during the height of the crisis, while Moroccan estimates placed the figure closer to 40,000. Although the vast majority of adult migrants have since returned or been repatriated to Morocco, local authorities in Ceuta report that at least 1,100 unaccompanied minors remain in government reception facilities. The diplomatic agreement marks a pivotal step toward relieving pressure on regional welfare services in Ceuta while establishing formal bilateral protocols between Rabat and Madrid to ensure child protection standards are met during repatriation procedures.

  • |

    Nearly 100 children wrongly detained as adults under UK-France migration deal

    At least 94 children were mistakenly identified as adults and held in immigration detention under Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood’s “one in, one out” agreement with France, according to details disclosed in a letter from the Independent Monitoring Boards (IMB). Between August 2025 and May 2026, Home Office officials recorded 304 age-disputed cases arising from the scheme, officially named Operation Hillmore, with 31% ultimately confirmed to be minors. Standard UK policy strictly prohibits the detention of unaccompanied minors beyond 24 hours. The critical findings, sent to Home Office Minister Anna Turley by interim IMB chair Jane Leech, highlighted severe safeguarding and procedural failures. Age assessments at immigration removal centers took up to 40 days to resolve in certain instances, while some individuals faced deportation delays of up to 27 weeks, far exceeding the scheme’s 28-day target. Additionally, detainees were slated for removal despite requiring urgent hospital care or suffering from active tuberculosis. The Refugee Council condemned the findings, urging the government to rely on social-worker-led assessments rather than administrative border checks. In response, a Home Office spokesperson stated that age assessment procedures are being modernized, including plans to roll out AI tools next year to support determinations.

  • | |

    Ten additional LHC judges sworn in after appointme…

    LAHORE: Ten additional judges of the Lahore High Court took oath on Tuesday after President Asif Ali Zardari approved their appointments, bringing an end to a weeks-long delay over their induction. Chief Justice Aalia Neelum administered the oath to the newly appointed judges during a ceremony at the Lahore High Court. The judges who took oath were Ghulam Sarwar Nihung, Muhammad Ajmal Khan Zahid, Aamir Ajam Malik, Shireen Imran, Asad Ali Bajwa, Muhammad Amjad Pervez, Khalid Ibn-i-Aziz, Munawar Iqbal Duggal, Syed Farhad Ali Shah and Muhammad Usman Ghani Rashid Cheema. Justice Tariq Mahmood Bajwa also took oath as a permanent judge of the Lahore High Court after completing his probationary period. The newly appointed additional judges will serve for one year from the date they took oath. Despite the latest appointments, the Lahore High Court still has 10 vacant positions against its approved strength of 60 judges. The number of vacancies is expected to rise to 11 following the retirement of Justice Shahid Karim next week. Earlier on Tuesday, President Zardari approved the appointment of 19 additional judges to five high courts. He also confirmed five judges as permanent members of the superior judiciary. The appointments had remained pending since July after the Judicial Commission of Pakistan recommended the candidates for the positions. The delay had led to a dispute over the presidential approval process. The oath-taking ceremony had initially been scheduled for July 27 but was postponed indefinitely. The issue gained further attention after the president neither approved the appointment summary nor returned it for reconsideration within the expected period. The government had maintained that there was no legal basis for keeping the recommendations pending. At one stage, officials even considered constitutional options to address the delay. Meanwhile, legal teams representing the presidency and the federal government held discussions to resolve the matter. Sources said the talks between the two sides made progress and helped pave the way for the appointments to be approved. The president’s legal team had previously raised concerns about the proceedings of the Judicial Commission. Questions were also raised over the rejection of several nominees and the eligibility of some recommended candidates. The dispute had also raised concerns about delays in filling vacant judicial positions in the high courts.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *