openai acknowledges wiki

OpenAI acknowledges ‘wiki incident’ and need for more transparency around unintended AI behavior

OpenAI said on Saturday, September 5, that its agents had appropriated wiki sites as impromptu message boards, adding that more transparency was needed around such incidents.

The statement follows a report that a swarm of OpenAI agents had hijacked a communally edited German site earlier this year and used it as a springboard for cheating during tests and other rogue behavior.

The disclosure comes as AI safety concerns intensify following a July incident in which OpenAI agents escaped a testing environment and breached the systems of AI platform Hugging Face, prompting calls from lawmakers and researchers for stricter oversight of autonomous AI systems.

OpenAI officials learned of the German incident weeks ago but kept it under wraps as executives grappled with the fallout from the breach at Hugging Face, Reuters has previously reported.

OpenAI did not immediately return a message seeking further details on what the company knew about what it described as the “wiki incident”, or why it waited until after the Reuters story to discuss it publicly.

In a statement posted to the social media site X, OpenAI said that it, and others, needed to be more transparent about incidents of unintended behavior by AI — typically referred to in the industry as “misalignment.”

“Our misalignment disclosure practices need to expand for this new phase of model capabilities,” OpenAI said, adding that the industry did “not yet have a clear standard for how to report misalignment that shows up during training, evaluation, and deployment.”

OpenAI said that it was “working with dozens of government regulatory agencies worldwide on these issues.”

– Rappler.com

Similar Posts

  • |

    Meta faces major trial over alleged harmful impact

      Meta Platforms is facing a major legal battle in a California federal court, where a group of state attorneys general is accusing the company of deliberately designing Facebook and Instagram in ways that can make children and teenagers addicted to social media. The trial, beginning Wednesday in Oakland, could result in huge financial penalties and force Meta to make major changes to how its platforms operate. The seven-week trial will examine allegations from Colorado, Kentucky, California and New Jersey that Meta designed its platforms to keep young users engaged for extended periods while misleading the public about their safety. The case also involves claims from 29 states that Meta illegally collected and used children’s personal information, allegedly violating federal law. Jury selection is scheduled to begin on Wednesday, with opening statements expected on August 18. Meta founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg is expected to testify during the proceedings, along with Instagram chief Adam Mosseri. The case is considered one of the biggest legal challenges yet faced by Meta over the effects of social media on young people. The company has estimated that potential damages could reach $1.4 trillion, a figure close to its market value of around $1.5 trillion. However, the states involved have not publicly revealed how much compensation they intend to seek. The attorneys general are also asking the court to order Meta to introduce stronger age restrictions and remove features such as infinite scrolling. They want the company to make additional changes aimed at reducing the potential negative effects of social media on children. Meta has strongly rejected the allegations and said it expects evidence presented during the trial to demonstrate its efforts to protect young users. The company said it has listened to parents, worked with experts and law enforcement agencies, and conducted extensive research into issues affecting children and teenagers. The lawsuit, filed in 2023, followed a multistate investigation into the impact of Facebook and Instagram on young users. The investigation gained momentum after former Meta employee and whistleblower Frances Haugen testified before a US Senate committee in 2021. Haugen alleged that Meta was aware of potential harm to young users and had information about ways to make its platforms safer but chose not to make certain changes. New Jersey Attorney General Jennifer Davenport has accused Meta of continuing to prioritise user engagement and profits despite allegedly knowing that its platforms could negatively affect children. Public concern over social media use among young people is also growing. A recent Reuters/Ipsos poll found that 85% of Americans believe social media can be addictive for children, while 61% said social media companies need stronger government oversight. Meta and other technology companies are facing thousands of similar lawsuits from states, school districts, local governments and individuals. Two cases that have already reached juries resulted in verdicts against Meta. Last week, a New Mexico judge ordered the company to pay $567 million and make changes to its platforms after finding Meta responsible for contributing to a children’s mental health crisis in the state. Meta continues to deny wrongdoing and has argued that social media addiction is not officially recognised as a psychiatric condition. Legal experts believe the latest trial could become a crucial test for the company, particularly following recent courtroom losses. The case will be overseen by US District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers, who has taken the unusual step of using an advisory jury to provide findings on specific questions. Rogers will consider the jury’s conclusions but will have the final authority over the case. The states are seeking financial damages as well as nationwide changes to Meta’s platforms. Their demands include stronger age restrictions, deletion of systems created using children’s data, limits on notifications and infinite scrolling, and changes to algorithms so that the well-being of young users is given greater importance than simply maximising engagement.

  • |

    SpaceX revenue nearly doubles in first earnings report

    SpaceX has released its first earnings report since becoming a publicly traded company. Revenue nearly doubled over the past year, even as artificial intelligence spending surged sharply. Despite beating analyst forecasts on both revenue and earnings, the company’s stock slipped in after-hours trading. Investors appeared more focused on rising costs than on the strong topline numbers. The company reported $7.8 billion in revenue for the second quarter. That marked a 92% jump compared to the same period last year. Net losses narrowed significantly to $541 million, down from $1 billion a year earlier. SpaceX began trading on the US stock market back in June. Starlink, the company’s satellite internet division, remained the only profitable business unit. It generated $1.6 billion in revenue during the quarter. Elon Musk told analysts on the earnings call that people were underestimating the company. He pointed directly to Starlink’s rapid growth as proof. Musk suggested Starlink could eventually power a large share of global internet access. Meanwhile, the company’s AI computing division posted a $1.2 billion loss on $2.5 billion in sales. The core space business also posted a loss, at $542 million on $962 million in sales. Musk said SpaceX currently runs 1.4 gigawatts of AI computing capacity. He added that this figure is expected to hit 10 gigawatts within the next year. Chief Financial Officer Bret Johnson said capital spending would stay steady for the rest of the year. Industry voices offered mixed reactions to the results. Carré Partners CEO Wendy Souvannarath noted that heavy AI investment has become the norm across tech firms. Analyst Brady Wang praised Starlink’s strong subscriber growth as a genuine bright spot. However, IG analyst Fabien Yip pushed back on Musk’s framing. He said it was a stretch to call the company underestimated while its AI division kept losing money.

  • | | | | |

    Did hackers hit PH nuclear agency, shipping firm with alleged Navy ties?

    Cybersecurity firm Hunt.io says a Chinese-speaking operator quietly collected sensitive nuclear and personnel data from a nuclear agency, along with WordPress data, media library, and credentials from an unnamed private company

  • | |

    Australia defends social media ban for under-16s

    The Australian government has defended its ban on social media use by children under the age of 16, despite new data showing that most teenagers continue to access restricted platforms months after the law came into effect. The legislation, introduced in December, was designed to protect children from the harmful effects of social media on their mental and physical health. The policy attracted international attention, with Australia becoming the first country to implement such a nationwide restriction on underage social media users. A recent report by Australia’s online safety regulator found that more than eight in ten teenagers under the age of 16 were still using social media platforms three months after the restrictions became operational. The findings have highlighted the challenges governments face in enforcing digital regulations. Despite the report, Australian authorities insisted that the policy remains an important step toward creating a safer online environment for children. Officials said the law has already influenced public discussion about online safety and encouraged greater awareness among parents, educators and technology companies. Assistant Minister for Productivity, Competition, Charities and Treasury Andrew Leigh said the government never expected complete compliance immediately after the law came into force. He explained that many public safety laws require time before they achieve widespread compliance. Leigh said the government considers the legislation successful because it has changed the national conversation about children’s use of social media and encouraged stronger action to protect young users from harmful online content. He noted that millions of social media accounts had already been closed or restricted since the implementation of the law. According to the minister, this demonstrates that the legislation is already having an impact, even if some teenagers continue to access online platforms. The government also stressed that technology companies have a major responsibility to ensure compliance with the new rules. Officials said digital platforms must strengthen age verification systems and take effective measures to prevent underage users from creating or maintaining accounts. Regulatory authorities are continuing to assess how well social media companies are implementing the restrictions. They are also examining additional measures that could improve enforcement and ensure technology firms meet their legal obligations. Experts say the latest findings illustrate the complexity of regulating online platforms, particularly as social media has become deeply integrated into the daily lives of young people. They note that effective enforcement will require cooperation between governments, parents, schools and technology companies.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *