rain fails dampen
| |

Rain fails to dampen Khalistan referendum turnout …

INDIANAPOLIS: A large number of members of the Sikh community participated in a Khalistan referendum held in Indianapolis, Indiana, despite rainy weather, as organizers called for the creation of an independent Sikh state.

The event was organized by Sikhs for Justice, with participants travelling from different cities and states across the United States. Organizers said voting continued despite the rain, with women and children also among those attending. Polling was scheduled to remain open until 6pm, after which organizers were expected to announce the final turnout.

Pro-Khalistan slogans were raised during the event, while some participants also expressed support for Kashmir’s independence.

Ghazala Habib, chairperson of Friends of Kashmir, addressed the gathering and said she was the only non-Sikh speaker to speak from the stage.

Vikramjit Singh, a representative associated with the Khalistan Referendum Campaign, said the initiative was launched in 2020 but faced disruptions because of the COVID-19 pandemic. He said the first voting event under the campaign was held in London on October 31, 2021, attracting thousands of Sikh participants.

According to Singh, subsequent voting events were organized in countries including the United Kingdom, Australia, Switzerland, Italy and Canada. He said Canada hosted three events in Toronto, two in Vancouver and another in Calgary, while the United States has held voting in San Francisco, Los Angeles, Washington, DC and now Indianapolis.

Singh claimed that nearly two million Sikhs worldwide had participated in the campaign so far. However, the figure could not be independently verified.

He accused the Indian government of committing historical injustices against Sikhs, citing the 1984 attack that damaged the Akal Takht and subsequent violence against the Sikh community, as well as what he described as the exploitation of Punjab’s economic resources.

Singh said supporters of the movement wanted to pursue their demand through peaceful and democratic means. He called for a formal referendum in Punjab whose outcome, according to him, would have legal and political effect for all parties.

Organizers said details of the Indianapolis vote and the next stage of the campaign would be announced after polling concludes. The campaign is expected to hold another referendum in Canada on October 18, although the specific city has not yet been confirmed.

Similar Posts

  • | |

    Petition urges President Zardari to approve judici…

      A petition submitted to the Islamabad High Court (IHC) has challenged President Asif Ali Zardari’s delay in approving the appointment of judges to several high courts across Pakistan. The petitioner argues that the president’s failure to act on the recommendations has created a serious constitutional issue and worsened the shortage of judges, affecting the country’s justice system. The petition was filed by Advocate Luqman Zafar Chaudhry through his legal counsel, Zahid Asif Chaudhry. It requests the court to issue a writ of mandamus directing the president, through his secretary, to immediately approve the summary sent by the prime minister. The summary contains the recommendations of the Judicial Commission of Pakistan (JCP) for appointments to the Islamabad, Lahore, Sindh, and Balochistan High Courts, along with the confirmation of several additional judges. According to the petition, the Judicial Commission, chaired by the Chief Justice of Pakistan, completed the constitutional process by finalizing its recommendations on July 20 and 21. These recommendations were subsequently forwarded to the president under Article 48 of the Constitution through the prime minister. However, the president has neither approved the summary nor returned it for reconsideration, despite the constitutional process requiring timely action. The petitioner maintains that Article 48 allows the president to return the prime minister’s advice only once within 15 days for reconsideration. Beyond that, the Constitution does not permit indefinite delay or silence. Therefore, the petition argues that the president is constitutionally obligated to approve the recommendations once the prescribed period has passed. It further states that the delay disrupted the oath-taking ceremony for the recommended judges, which had been scheduled for July 27. As a result, the ceremony was postponed indefinitely, leaving several judicial positions vacant and increasing the burden on existing judges. The petition also argues that the president’s inaction effectively transforms a ceremonial constitutional responsibility into an unauthorized veto power, something the Constitution does not allow. It claims this undermines judicial independence protected under Articles 2A and 175(3) of the Constitution. Referring to previous Supreme Court judgments, the petitioner emphasizes that judicial appointments must be completed through a transparent, collaborative, and time-bound constitutional process without executive interference. The petition also compares the president’s role under Article 48 with Article 75, which governs presidential assent to legislation and similarly requires action within a specified timeframe. According to the petitioner, the continued delay has created an acute shortage of judges, slowing the disposal of cases and affecting citizens’ constitutional rights to a fair trial and access to justice under Articles 9, 10A, and 25. The petition also raises concerns that the delay may have been influenced by political considerations rather than constitutional requirements. Citing media reports and public statements, it requests the court to determine when the Presidency received the summary, seek an explanation for the delay, declare the continued inaction unlawful, and prevent any action inconsistent with the Judicial Commission’s recommendations until the case is decided. The controversy has emerged amid a wider constitutional debate regarding the president’s authority in judicial appointments. While earlier Supreme Court decisions have held that the president cannot reject recommendations made by the Judicial Commission, Article 175A(8) does not clearly specify how quickly the president must act. Legal experts believe the issue may ultimately require judicial interpretation to clarify the constitutional limits of the president’s role in the appointment process.

  • | | |

    Pakistan seeks early refinancing of $1.3 billion C…

    ISLAMABAD: Pakistan has formally requested China to speed up the refinancing of a $1.3 billion commercial loan as Islamabad seeks to strengthen its foreign exchange reserves and ease pressure on its external financing position. According to sources, Pakistani authorities are currently holding discussions with their Chinese counterparts to complete the refinancing process at the earliest. The two sides are working to finalize the required terms, conditions, and procedural requirements. Officials expect the refinancing arrangements to conclude soon, with the funds likely to reach Pakistan within the current month if the remaining formalities are completed on schedule. Sources within the Ministry of Finance said the government expects the timely arrival of the funds to provide much-needed support to the country’s foreign exchange reserves. The refinancing would also help Pakistan manage its external debt obligations without placing additional pressure on its existing reserve position. Pakistan made external payments of around $2.2 billion in July, including the repayment of approximately $1.3 billion in Chinese commercial financing. The government now seeks to refinance the repaid amount to maintain liquidity and strengthen its financial position. The move comes as Pakistan continues to manage its external financing requirements and maintain adequate foreign exchange reserves to meet upcoming debt repayments and other international payment obligations. The successful completion of the refinancing deal with China would offer temporary relief to the country’s external account and support overall financial stability.

  • | |

    Ben Affleck wins rare $1 million Who Wants to Be a Millionaire prize

    Hollywood star Ben Affleck and Jeopardy! champion Jamie Ding secured the top prize on Who Wants to Be a Millionaire, winning $1 million for charity after correctly answering the game’s final question in one of the show’s rare celebrity jackpot victories. The pair claimed the grand prize during the July 30 episode of the ABC quiz show, hosted by Jimmy Kimmel. Their winnings will benefit Eastern Congo Initiative, the nonprofit organisation Affleck co-founded to support community-based development projects in the Democratic Republic of Congo. The episode resumed with Affleck and Ding already just two questions away from the million-dollar prize after carrying over from the previous week’s episode. Before the game continued, Affleck explained the mission of the Eastern Congo Initiative, saying the organisation works alongside local communities in a region that has endured years of conflict. The $500,000 question asked which historic achievement occurred only two months after The New York Times predicted it would not happen for “1 million to 10 million years.” The possible answers included splitting the atom, cloning a mammal, the first airplane flight and the polio vaccine. Ding immediately believed the correct answer was the Wright brothers’ first airplane flight, while Affleck recalled reading about the newspaper’s famous misjudgment years earlier. To be safe, the pair used their 50:50 lifeline, leaving only two options. They ultimately trusted Ding’s instinct and correctly selected the first airplane flight, advancing to the final question. The million-dollar question proved even more challenging. Contestants were asked which pair of names had not been used for turkeys pardoned by a U.S. president during the annual White House Thanksgiving tradition. After debating the possible answers, Affleck and Ding turned to host Jimmy Kimmel using the Ask-the-Host lifeline. Kimmel admitted he was not completely certain but suggested “Spaghetti & Meatball” seemed unlikely to have been used. The pair also attempted to use their Phone-a-Friend lifeline, but Ding’s friend was unable to provide a definite answer. With no better option available, Affleck decided to trust Kimmel’s judgment, and the duo locked in “Spaghetti & Meatball.” It proved to be the correct answer, earning them the $1 million prize. As confetti filled the studio, Affleck and Ding embraced in celebration while Kimmel announced their victory. The win places them among the small number of celebrity contestants to claim the show’s top prize, joining previous million-dollar winners including Matt Damon and Ken Jennings, Ike and Alan Barinholtz, and Oscar Nuñez and Kate Flannery. Affleck’s appearance on the programme not only showcased his trivia skills but also raised significant funds for a cause he has supported for years, making the rare television triumph both entertaining and meaningful.

  • | |

    Waqar Zaka clinches global trading crown, wins top…

    LAHORE: Pakistani technology entrepreneur and cryptocurrency advocate Waqar Zaka has won the international WEEX TradFi Masters trading championship, outperforming more than 3,000 participants from across the globe in a solo multi-asset trading competition. The tournament challenged traders to compete independently using their own capital, without team support or referral incentives. Participants traded across stocks, commodities, precious metals and cryptocurrencies on a single platform, with performance measured on profitability and risk management. Zaka emerged as the overall winner after posting a 74 per cent return in just 20 days. Starting with an account of $100,000, he generated a profit of $74,000, increasing his portfolio value to $174,000. His performance placed him ahead of competitors from South Korea and China, who finished second and third with returns of 57 per cent and 35 per cent, respectively. As the champion, Zaka was awarded a brand-new 2026 Mercedes-Benz G-Wagon during a ceremony in Dubai. The organisers also acknowledged his achievement on their official social media platforms. The victory marks a significant milestone, making Zaka the first Pakistani trader to secure the top position in an international competition of this scale focused on both traditional financial markets and digital assets. His latest success also represents a remarkable improvement from the previous edition, where he finished among the top ten competitors. Organisers described the championship as a rigorous test of strategy, adaptability and disciplined decision-making in rapidly changing financial markets. The event reflects the growing popularity of competitive trading, where participants are increasingly recognised for their analytical skills and market expertise. Zaka has been a prominent advocate of cryptocurrency and blockchain technology in Pakistan for several years. He has consistently promoted wider adoption of digital assets and has previously urged policymakers to consider establishing a national Bitcoin reserve as part of the country’s long-term financial strategy. His latest international triumph has once again drawn attention to Pakistan’s growing presence in global financial and digital trading markets, highlighting the increasing integration of traditional finance with the cryptocurrency sector.

  • | | |

    Inquiry report finds CCD constable responsible for…

    CHAKWAL: A departmental inquiry into the June 10-11 firing incident in Chakwal, in which nine-year-old Australian-Pakistani national Hania Ahmed was killed and her father and brother were seriously injured, has held a Crime Control Department (CCD) constable responsible for opening indiscriminate fire at the family’s car without authorisation. The 200-page inquiry report, submitted to the court of Magistrate Rehana Kausar, states that the accused constable allegedly opened fire on the vehicle “with the intention to kill” innocent civilians, without the permission of his superior officer and beyond the scope of his assigned duty. Hania was killed while her father, Adil Ahmed, and 10-year-old brother, Affan Ahmed, sustained serious bullet injuries in the incident. The incident occurred during the night between June 10 and 11 near the CCD police station in Chakwal. According to police, two armed men were allegedly attempting to rob the Australian-Pakistani family when the CCD constable mistakenly opened fire on their vehicle, believing the suspects were fleeing in it. The inquiry report, however, rejected the constable’s claim that he had fired in self-defence against the alleged robbers. According to the inquiry report, the accused constable told investigators that he was standing near the main gate of the CCD police station when he heard a commotion and came outside. He claimed that he saw a white car parked in the street and two armed men allegedly involved in a robbery. He said one of the suspects fired at him, prompting him to return fire. He further claimed that he took cover behind a wall and that the vehicle then sped towards Islamia Chowk. He allegedly followed the car after taking a lift on a private motorcycle. The inquiry report said Duty Officer Inspector Jahanzeb Khan rejected this account. According to the inspector, the constable fired the official rifle without seeking permission from him or any other senior officer and subsequently pursued the vehicle on a private motorcycle without authorisation. Three other police officials present at the station at the time also reportedly corroborated the inspector’s statement. The inquiry team concluded that the constable’s claim that he had fired at the alleged robbers in self-defence was contrary to the facts established during the investigation. According to the report, investigators recovered 14 pistol bullet casings and 13 casings from a Kalashnikov-type weapon from the scene. Statements of 34 witnesses have been incorporated into the inquiry report, including that of eyewitness Ahmed Nawaz, a resident of Chakwal’s Circular Road area, where the incident took place. Nawaz told investigators that he was returning after attending a funeral prayer when, upon reaching the CCD police station, he saw an armed constable carrying a Kalashnikov fire repeatedly at a car travelling ahead. He later learned that the family travelling in the vehicle was related to him. The inquiry report also states that the final opinion of the Punjab Forensic Science Agency regarding the bullets fired from the weapons, the bullets recovered from Hania, Adil and Affan, and the blood samples is still awaited. A police officer said the formal trial in the case is expected to commence in September following the August judicial recess. The inquiry report identifies the two alleged robbers as Muhammad Abbas and Muhammad Fayyaz. Police said both were previously involved in criminal cases, with Abbas facing 15 cases and Fayyaz 12. According to the CCD, both men were killed on the night of June 11 in an alleged police encounter in Chakwal. Police claimed they were killed by firing from their own accomplices. Post-mortem reports, however, showed that both men had sustained gunshot wounds to the head. A CCD official said Abbas had also been arrested in connection with two robbery cases in Chakwal in 2021. The inquiry report states that before allegedly targeting the Australian-Pakistani family, the two suspects had robbed two shops. Following their deaths, the shop owners and a woman who had allegedly been robbed of her gold earrings identified them from photographs, according to the report. Adil Ahmed, a resident of Dhudial village in Chakwal, has been living in Perth, Australia, with his family for several years. He is an engineer, while his wife is a dentist. Hania was a Year 4 student at the Australian Islamic College in Perth. The family had arrived in Pakistan in May. Adil and his wife subsequently travelled to Saudi Arabia to perform Hajj, leaving their children with their grandparents. They returned from Saudi Arabia on June 10. On the same day, the family rented a car from a rent-a-car business in Dhudial for 10 days to travel during their stay in Pakistan. That night, Adil’s father-in-law, retired Colonel Muhammad Khan, hosted a dinner at his residence. The family left for home in the rented vehicle after attending the gathering, after which the firing incident occurred. According to Hania’s post-mortem report, the nine-year-old suffered 11 injury marks on different parts of her body, including bullet wounds. Doctors who conducted the post-mortem examination concluded that she died from massive blood loss caused by deep firearm injuries.

  • |

    British driver sets hydrogen vehicle speed record at 654 km/h

    British driver and former Royal Air Force pilot Andy Green has set a new world land-speed record using a hydrogen-powered vehicle. According to foreign media reports, 64-year-old Andy Green drove the hydrogen-powered vehicle at 406 miles per hour (654 km/h) at the Bonneville Salt Flats in Utah, USA making it the fastest speed ever achieved by a vehicle of this type. According to the report, the HydroMax is equipped with two hydrogen engines that generate a combined 1,600 horsepower. 20-year-old record broken The new HydroMax vehicle more than doubled the previous world record of 185.5 miles per hour, set in 2004 by a hydrogen-combustion vehicle. Twenty years ago at the same location, the same company’s diesel-powered vehicle, DieselMax set a world record by reaching 350 miles per hour (563 km/h). Only person to break sound barrier on land Andy Green has already made history in motorsports. In 1997, he drove the jet-powered ThrustSSC to a speed of 763 miles per hour (1,228 km/h) breaking the sound barrier on land. Andy Green remains the only person to have broken the sound barrier in a land vehicle.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *