US reverses course on Britain’s testing of AI models – report

A growing controversy over undocumented migrants in India’s West Bengal has drawn attention after authorities launched a crackdown targeting people accused of illegal entry from Bangladesh. The move has created uncertainty among many migrant families and sparked debate over immigration policies, legal procedures, and human rights. In border areas such as Hakimpur, families who migrated from Bangladesh in search of better economic opportunities say they are now facing an uncertain future. Many claim they came to India years ago to find work and support their families but are now worried about detention and possible deportation. India shares a long border with Bangladesh, and movement of people between the two regions has a complex historical background. Communities on both sides have long-standing cultural, linguistic, and economic connections, particularly in border states such as West Bengal and Assam. Authorities supporting the crackdown say action is being taken against people who do not have valid documents to remain in India. Officials argue that the country has laws for dealing with undocumented foreign nationals and that proper procedures are being followed. However, human rights organizations have raised concerns about whether individuals are being given sufficient legal protection before removal. Rights groups have emphasized that anyone facing deportation should have access to legal representation and a fair process to verify their citizenship status. The issue has also increased diplomatic sensitivity between India and Bangladesh. Dhaka has called for established verification procedures to be followed before any person is sent across the border, while Indian officials maintain that deportation procedures are carried out according to existing laws. For many migrant families, the dispute is not only about documents and borders but also about their livelihoods and future. Some workers who spent years building lives in India say they now fear losing their homes, jobs, and social connections. The controversy has also fueled wider discussions about identity, religion, and politics in India. Critics argue that vulnerable communities should not become victims of political disputes, while supporters of stricter immigration controls say governments have the right to protect their borders. As authorities continue their actions, the situation remains a sensitive issue involving immigration policy, regional relations, and the rights of individuals caught between two countries.

US President Donald Trump has criticized major oil companies over their growing profits, saying that energy firms are earning excessive amounts of money amid rising fuel prices. His remarks come as global oil markets face uncertainty due to geopolitical tensions and disruptions affecting energy supplies. Speaking to reporters at the White House, Trump said he supports free markets but expressed dissatisfaction with what he described as unusually high earnings by oil companies. He stated that while businesses have the right to operate freely, current market conditions have allowed some energy companies to generate profits beyond what he considers reasonable. The increase in crude oil prices has significantly boosted the revenues of several major energy companies worldwide. Market uncertainty linked to tensions between the United States and Iran has contributed to higher oil prices, creating favorable conditions for large oil producers and companies. Saudi Arabia’s state-owned oil giant Saudi Aramco reported a significant increase in quarterly profit, announcing earnings of $33.4 billion, compared with $25.2 billion during the same period last year. This represents a substantial rise in profits. US-based energy companies have also recorded strong financial results. ExxonMobil reported quarterly earnings of $14.5 billion, more than double compared with the previous year. Meanwhile, Chevron posted a profit of $12.1 billion, marking a significant increase from the same period previously. British energy company Shell also reported nearly $10 billion in quarterly profits, making it one of the company’s strongest financial performances in recent years. While energy companies benefit from higher crude oil prices, consumers in the United States have faced increased fuel costs. Average petrol prices have risen significantly since the beginning of the conflict-related market disruptions, adding further pressure on households already dealing with inflation. Fuel prices have become a major political issue ahead of the upcoming midterm elections. Lowering petrol costs has emerged as a key priority for the Trump administration, as high energy prices often influence public opinion and economic sentiment. A major factor behind the rise in oil prices has been disruption in key shipping routes, including the Strait of Hormuz, one of the world’s most important energy corridors. Reduced oil transportation through the region has affected global supply and contributed to market volatility. Although diplomatic efforts have reportedly aimed at reducing tensions and improving shipping access, uncertainty remains in global energy markets. Security concerns in the Red Sea and Bab el-Mandeb Strait have also affected oil transportation routes. Energy analysts believe that major oil companies may continue benefiting from elevated prices in the short term. However, they suggest that increased global supply or improved conditions in strategic waterways could eventually push crude oil prices lower. The ongoing debate highlights the challenge faced by governments worldwide: balancing energy company profits, market stability, and the need to provide affordable fuel for consumers.