irans revolutionary guard
|

Iran’s revolutionary guard claims destruction of US military aircraft and casualties during “Operation Nasr II

Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) has claimed that it destroyed 11 fighter aircraft at US military bases and killed 200 American personnel within 15 days during what it described as “Operation Nasr II.” The claims were made by IRGC spokesperson Brigadier General Hossein Mohebi during an interview, in which he discussed Iran’s reported military operations against American targets.

According to the IRGC spokesperson, the US defense system had become significantly weakened, allowing Iranian drones and missiles to reach their intended targets without facing major obstacles. He claimed that Iran’s military capabilities had successfully challenged American defense mechanisms and demonstrated the effectiveness of its missile and drone technology.

Brigadier General Mohebi stated that Iran targeted eight military deployment centers during attacks on US positions. He further claimed that, at one location, 20 shelters were destroyed as part of the operations. However, the details and figures presented by the IRGC have not been independently verified.

The IRGC spokesperson also issued warnings to Israel, stating that if it became involved in the conflict again, it should be prepared to face serious consequences. He said that any renewed Israeli participation in military operations would result in a strong response from Iran.

In his remarks, Mohebi also addressed the United Kingdom, warning that a bomber aircraft had recently taken off from a British air base. He stated that if Britain cooperated with the United States in military actions against Iran, British interests could become legitimate targets from Iran’s perspective.

The IRGC official called on the US government to allow journalists to visit the damaged military facilities in order to assess the actual scale of destruction and casualties. He argued that allowing independent media access would reveal the real impact of Iran’s reported attacks.

The statements come amid heightened tensions between Iran, the United States, and their regional allies. Military confrontations and threats between these countries have repeatedly increased concerns about the possibility of wider conflict in the Middle East.

Iran has frequently emphasized its missile and drone capabilities as a key part of its defense strategy. Iranian officials have often stated that their military strength enables them to respond to threats and protect national interests. Meanwhile, the United States and its allies have continued to monitor Iran’s military activities and have expressed concerns about regional security.

The claims made by the IRGC spokesperson represent Iran’s official account of the reported military operation. At the same time, independent confirmation of the number of aircraft destroyed, casualties reported, and damage caused has not been provided.

International observers have warned that continued military exchanges and aggressive statements from involved parties could increase instability in the region. Diplomatic efforts have repeatedly been encouraged as a way to reduce tensions and prevent further escalation.

The situation remains closely watched by governments and security analysts around the world, as any direct confrontation involving major military powers could have significant regional and international consequences. Further developments are expected to determine the accuracy of the claims and the future direction of relations between Iran, the United States, and their allies.

Similar Posts

  • |

    NYC homeowners sue Mamdani over new pied-à-terre tax rollout

    A group of New York City homeowners has taken legal action against Mayor Zohran Mamdani and the city’s finance authorities over the rollout of a new pied-à-terre tax, arguing that the administration wrongly identified some primary residences as potential second homes. The lawsuit was filed on Friday by homeowners Simon Hedley, Rachel O’Brien and Carmine Morano. The plaintiffs are not challenging the legality of the tax itself. Instead, their case focuses on how city officials identified properties and made information about potentially affected homeowners publicly available. The dispute follows the publication of a city property tax roll containing the names and addresses of more than 900,000 property owners. Although most of those properties are not subject to the new surcharge, nearly 17,000 homeowners received notices warning that their properties could potentially fall under the tax. The homeowners allege that the city’s process has incorrectly flagged primary residences and unnecessarily exposed private information. O’Brien said her family’s permanent home was identified as a possible second residence despite records indicating that the property was their primary residence. She described the situation as unreasonable and questioned why homeowners were publicly listed when their properties might not ultimately be subject to the tax. The plaintiffs have asked the court to declare the notices and the publicly released property information unlawful. They are also seeking restrictions on public access to the list. In addition, the homeowners want the city to suspend response requirements and halt enforcement measures while the legal proceedings are underway. A spokesperson for Mayor Mamdani said the administration was committed to ensuring that the tax process remained clear and accessible. The spokesperson added that the city’s Law Department was prepared to defend the administration against the lawsuit. The pied-à-terre tax targets qualifying non-primary residences valued at more than $5 million, along with certain cooperative apartments valued at $1 million or above. The surcharge was included in Mamdani’s fiscal 2027 budget as part of efforts to address New York City’s budget shortfall. The rollout has triggered significant criticism from affected homeowners. In response, Mamdani extended the deadline for property owners to demonstrate that their homes are their primary residences by four weeks. The new deadline is now September 18, giving homeowners additional time to challenge their classification and provide documentation to city authorities.

  • |

    Modi ramps up Gen Z outreach on Instagram

    Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi has launched a fresh social media campaign aimed at winning over young voters, shifting to a more informal and relatable style on Instagram after recent student-led protests exposed growing frustration over jobs and education. The campaign features selfie-style videos, casual greetings and short clips with popular music, reflecting a departure from the highly polished political messaging traditionally associated with Modi and his Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP). The strategy is designed to connect with India’s Generation Z audience, which is expected to play a decisive role in the 2029 general election. The renewed digital push follows nationwide protests by students and job seekers last month after an examination paper leak triggered widespread anger over the country’s education and employment system. The demonstrations eventually led to the resignation of India’s education minister. In response, BJP leaders and government ministries have increased their presence on youth-focused platforms by sharing short videos with minimal editing and a more spontaneous style. Officials believe authentic content is more likely to resonate with younger audiences than carefully scripted political messaging. Political observers say Instagram and similar platforms reward creativity, humour and genuine interaction, making them more challenging environments for traditional political campaigns. They note that recent protests gained significant momentum through viral reels and short videos that amplified public dissatisfaction. Beyond social media, the BJP and its ideological affiliate, the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), have also expanded outreach efforts by organising events and discussions targeting students and first-time voters. With more than half of India’s 1.4 billion population under the age of 35, analysts say younger voters are expected to become one of the most influential electoral groups in the next general election.

  • Sarah Ferguson, the former Duchess of York, is said to be pushing back against feelings of isolation from the royal family. Insiders  claim that she is now seeking a direct audience with King Charles and Queen Camilla. The details were shared with Heat World by a source close to the situation. According to the confidant, Ferguson has no intention of quietly fading from public life. She is reportedly determined to make her case directly to the King and Queen, hoping to secure some form of leniency regarding her standing within the family. The source quoted Ferguson as saying she refuses to be discarded simply because it would make things easier for Charles and Camilla. She reportedly believes she deserves far better treatment than that, and is prepared to keep pressing until she gets it. Despite her resolve, the insider noted that Ferguson is not approaching this without apprehension. Returning to England reportedly fills her with nerves, but that anxiety is not enough to make her back down from pursuing the meeting. What seems to be driving her most, according to the source, is the pain of feeling disconnected from her daughters and grandchildren. That separation is reportedly the hardest part of her current situation, more so than any concerns about her public image. The renewed push comes after months of Ferguson keeping an unusually low profile, a shift that followed fresh revelations in January regarding her past association with Jeffrey Epstein. It is worth noting that being named in related documents does not, on its own, suggest any wrongdoing on her part. Ferguson has largely stayed out of the public eye since then. Reports from The Sun suggest she’s been staying with her former partner, Formula 1 businessman Paddy McNally, at his Swiss chalet in Verbier, a property reportedly worth around £15 million known as “Les Gais Lutins.” Her stay there followed her reported eviction from Royal Lodge, the residence she once shared with Prince Andrew. The situation marks a notable shift for Ferguson, who has spent recent months largely removed from royal circles and public appearances. Whether her reported appeal to Charles and Camilla will result in an actual meeting remains unclear, but insiders suggest she has no plans to retreat quietly, even as she navigates both personal anxiety and the complicated dynamics of her relationship with the royal family.

  • | |

    Trump faces awkward moment as Epstein letter repor…

    WASHINGTON: An uncomfortable chapter in the long-running controversy surrounding President Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein returned to the spotlight after journalists whose reporting brought an alleged birthday letter linked to the two men into public view were honored at the White House Correspondents’ Dinner. The moment came during the rescheduled annual dinner on July 24, where Trump was present as The Wall Street Journal received the inaugural Katharine Graham Award for Courage and Accountability for its investigative reporting on his past relationship with Epstein. The award recognized the Journal’s reporting on a controversial letter allegedly written by Trump for Epstein’s 50th birthday in 2003. Trump has denied writing the letter and has strongly disputed the newspaper’s account. The report nevertheless triggered renewed public attention on Trump’s past association with Epstein and contributed to wider scrutiny of documents connected to the late financier. What made the award particularly striking was Trump’s presence in the room. According to reports from the event, Trump briefly congratulated the journalists as they received the honor. His reaction attracted attention because he had previously threatened legal action against the Journal over its Epstein reporting. The dinner itself had already been surrounded by unusual circumstances. The original White House Correspondents’ Association gathering in April was disrupted by a shooting incident, forcing the event to be postponed. The rescheduled dinner took place in July under heightened security measures. Trump also used his speech to take several pointed shots at journalists and political opponents, continuing his frequently combative relationship with the American press. The event nevertheless maintained its traditional role of honoring journalists for investigative and public-interest reporting. The Epstein controversy remains politically sensitive in the United States. Epstein, who died in federal custody in 2019 while facing sex-trafficking charges, had social and professional connections with numerous prominent people. The release and examination of documents related to his activities have repeatedly generated political controversy. For Trump, the latest episode creates an unusual image: a president sitting in the audience as journalists he has publicly challenged receive an award for reporting on one of the most politically explosive stories surrounding his past. The development is likely to keep the Epstein controversy in the headlines, particularly as questions surrounding previously unreleased documents and Trump’s historical relationship with Epstein continue to attract intense public and political scrutiny.

  • |

    Independent experts confirm pellet-gun injuries among protesters in Delhi

    Independent ballistic and forensic experts have confirmed to the BBC that injuries sustained by protesters during the 20 July demonstrations in Delhi were caused by birdshot from 12-gauge pellet guns. The protests, led by the Cockroach Janta Party over repeated exam paper leaks, faced a heavy police and paramilitary crackdown near parliament. While government ministers and Delhi Police have denied deploying pellet guns, insisting only batons and tear gas were used, hospital records, X-rays, and multiple victims verify dozens of small metal pellets embedded in bodies. Among the injured is 19-year-old student Sahil Lochab, who risks losing an eye, and a journalist who documented 30 pellet wounds. If officially verified, this represents the first instance of Indian security forces using pellet guns for crowd control within the capital.

  • |

    Human rights organizations file federal lawsuit challenging Trump administration sanctions on ICC

    Four prominent non-governmental organizations filed a joint federal lawsuit contesting executive sanctions imposed by the Trump administration on the International Criminal Court, arguing the penalties unlawfully disrupt global war crimes prosecutions. The legal challenge, brought by Human Rights Watch, the Center for Constitutional Rights, the Open Society Institute, and the American Friends Service Committee, targets an executive order enacted in February 2025. The presidential directive established financial sanctions and travel bans against ICC officials, judges, and affiliated advocacy groups involved in investigating alleged war crimes in Palestinian territory, including cases involving senior Israeli officials. Attorneys representing the civil rights organizations contend that the broad scope of the sanctions violates First Amendment protections regarding free speech and association. The suit asserts that the threat of severe civil and criminal penalties has effectively forced US-based legal advocates to suspend representation of victims before the tribunal, while halting formal collaborations with sanctioned international rights groups. The filing marks the latest in a series of legal challenges against the administration’s broader push to limit the jurisdiction of the Hague-based court. Representatives for the US Department of State and Department of Justice did not immediately issue formal statements regarding the lawsuit.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *