meta settlement opens
| |

Meta settlement opens new front in global fight over social media harm

Meta’s move to restrict teenagers’ use of social media in the US shows companies have tools to better protect young people online, Australian regulators said on Thursday, August 27, as the country grapples with patchy enforcement of restrictions at home.

Meta’s up to $18 billion settlement with nearly 50 US states over social media harm to teenagers has opened a new front in a global government fight to protect children and curb addiction to platforms such as Facebook and Instagram.

Governments around the world are trying to curb children’s access to harmful online content, including a world-first ban in Australia late last year on social media for children under 16.

Australian Communications Minister Anika Wells said social media companies “have the tools at their disposal to protect young people from their addictive features but have chosen not to use them”.

“That’s why Australia took world-leading action to create a minimum age for social media, and we are proud that more than 20 countries are joining us,” she added in an email to Reuters.

Meta agreed to pay the sum over a decade and limit how teenagers use Facebook and Instagram under an agreement with nearly all US states to resolve claims that it designed those platforms to addict children. Meta denied wrongdoing in agreeing to settle.

The deal brings sweeping changes to Meta’s Facebook and Instagram platforms, including imposing a default two-hour limit on its apps for users under the age of 18.

Enforcement of similar restrictions in Australia has, however, been patchy so far.

Early evidence suggests the law has been undermined by weak age-verification systems, with studies showing that most Australian teenagers continue to access social media months after the restrictions took effect.

Multiple studies, including from Australia’s internet regulator, showed 80% of minors were still on social media months after the ban took effect in December. That prompted lawmakers to double the maximum fine and increase regulator powers.

As governments worldwide seek social media curbs, Poland’s minister of digital affairs said he has asked the European Commission to impose a €250 million ($291 million) fine on Meta.

“I also call on Meta to immediately introduce effective tools to eliminate scams, false advertising, and the promotion of illegal applications,” Krzysztof Gawkowski posted on X.

In Asia, countries including China, South Korea, India, Malaysia, Indonesia and the Philippines are also seeking to curb social media activity among children.

In South Korea, the media regulator said Meta’s measures should be applied to young users worldwide, rather than just in specific markets.

The Korea Media and Communications Commission (KMCC) said in a statement to Reuters that social media companies needed to take greater responsibility for protecting children and teenagers and pointed to seven bills pending in the country’s parliament aimed at strengthening youth protections online.

The commission “believes that in order to create an environment in which Korean youth can use social networking services safely, it is necessary to strengthen social media providers’ responsibility to protect minors,” the regulator said.

Philippine Department of Information and Communications Technology Secretary Henry Aguda said he hoped the Meta deal “will boost my talks with Meta this morning here in Singapore at their HQ”.

Aguda is meeting with Meta officials to discuss issues including online sexual abuse and exploitation of children and child sexual abuse material, financial scams targeting Filipinos and online grooming of minors.

In the United States, social media companies still face thousands of lawsuits in federal and state courts by individuals, school districts, municipalities and other government entities claiming they knowingly sought to addict children and caused a mental health crisis including harms such as anxiety, depression and suicide.

Australian class action law firm Shine Lawyers said it was in discussions with Mark Lanier, a lawyer who worked on the California action against Meta, about a potential similar action.

“For years, families have been asking whether enough has been done to protect children from platform features designed to maximise engagement,” said Shine Lawyers head of class actions Craig Allsopp.

“We are now examining whether similar legal issues arise in Australia, including whether Australian children and families may have claims connected to the design, operation and promotion of social media platforms. If Australian families have been affected, they deserve answers.” – Rappler.com

Similar Posts

  • Britain unveils new strategy to boost AI and semiconductor industry

      The United Kingdom’s new government is placing advanced technology at the center of its economic and industrial strategy, with a strong focus on artificial intelligence, semiconductor manufacturing, and drone technology. The initiative reflects the government’s belief that success in the global AI race will depend not only on software development but also on the ability to design and manufacture the hardware that powers artificial intelligence systems. AI Minister Kanishka Narayan said the government aims to strengthen Britain’s domestic chip industry as part of a broader plan to modernize the economy while enhancing national security. He emphasized that AI chips and semiconductor technology are becoming increasingly important in global supply chains and represent a major source of long-term economic value. The strategy is being implemented under the leadership of Prime Minister Andy Burnham’s administration, which is combining artificial intelligence, chip production, and drone technology into a unified industrial policy. The government believes that investing in these sectors will help position Britain as a competitive player in the rapidly evolving global technology landscape. As part of the initiative, the government has committed £1.1 billion to support AI hardware development. The funding package includes £150 million specifically allocated for the direct purchase of AI chips from British companies. By becoming an early customer for domestic manufacturers, the government hopes to help local businesses expand production, strengthen supply chains, and improve their ability to compete internationally. Kanishka Narayan explained that financial investment alone will not be enough to achieve these goals. He said the government is also pursuing broader policy reforms aimed at creating an environment that encourages technological innovation and industrial growth. Among the proposed measures are changes to immigration policies designed to attract highly skilled engineers and technology specialists from around the world. The government also plans to simplify planning procedures for major infrastructure projects, allowing new manufacturing facilities and research centers to be developed more quickly. Continued public investment is expected to support research, innovation, and the commercialization of emerging technologies. Although Britain currently has a relatively small semiconductor manufacturing sector compared with major global producers, Narayan believes the country has a significant advantage in semiconductor design. British companies and researchers have earned an international reputation for designing advanced chip architectures, providing what he describes as a strong foundation for expanding domestic manufacturing capabilities. Alongside efforts to promote technological growth, the government has indicated that it intends to introduce regulations addressing the potential risks associated with artificial intelligence. Narayan stated that responsible AI development requires safeguards to protect jobs, national security, and public interests. He stressed that the government does not support unregulated technological expansion and believes innovation should be accompanied by appropriate oversight. The minister also linked Britain’s technology strategy to growing geopolitical tensions surrounding artificial intelligence and semiconductor technologies. He pointed to recent export restrictions imposed by the United States on advanced AI technologies as evidence that artificial intelligence has become a significant issue in international relations and global competition. Narayan also expressed concern about maintaining British ownership and influence over important technology assets. He highlighted Arm, the Cambridge-based semiconductor design company now owned by Japan’s SoftBank, as an example of British-founded innovation whose long-term economic value should continue to benefit the United Kingdom. As part of broader government restructuring, the administration has also announced plans to dissolve the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology, with its responsibilities expected to be integrated into other government departments. Through increased investment, policy reforms, and strategic regulation, the UK government aims to strengthen its position in the global technology sector. By supporting semiconductor manufacturing, encouraging AI innovation, and expanding advanced industrial capabilities, Britain hopes to secure long-term economic growth while enhancing its role in an increasingly competitive and technology-driven world.

  • |

    Apple offers 15% App Store fee, pushes for Epic settlement talks

    Apple is making two significant moves at once in its long-running legal battle with Epic Games. The tech giant has proposed a new commission structure while also pushing for both sides to return to the negotiating table. In a new court filing, Apple proposed capping commissions at 15% on purchases made through alternative payment systems in the US. The move follows a period during which Apple charged a 27% commission on those same transactions. That earlier rate had already landed Apple in trouble. Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers ruled it violated a prior court order requiring Apple to let developers direct users toward outside payment options. Epic Games wasted no time responding to the new proposal. The company argued the revised fees still fall far outside what the Ninth Circuit has indicated would be acceptable. The timing of Apple’s filing is notable too. It landed the same day the Supreme Court rejected Apple’s request to pause lower-court proceedings while it separately reviews Gonzalez Rogers’ contempt finding against the company. That rejection means the fee-setting process will continue moving forward in the district court. This holds true regardless of how the higher court eventually rules on the separate contempt issue. Alongside the commission proposal, Apple filed a separate motion asking the court to order both companies into a settlement conference. The session would be overseen by Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero. According to the filing, Apple had already proposed this meeting directly to Epic’s legal team on August 11. Epic, however, declined to agree to the arrangement at that time. Despite Epic’s refusal, Apple maintains the court still has the authority to compel the conference. The company points to the fact that the Ninth Circuit itself had previously invited both parties to work toward an agreement on link-out commissions. Apple believes a confidential meeting could help resolve the dispute without further extending the ongoing remand proceedings. Notably, the filing does not include any actual settlement terms, it simply requests a court order mandating the conference take place. With both sides digging in on separate fronts, the long-running dispute between Apple and Epic shows no signs of reaching a resolution anytime soon.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *