russian independent paper
| |

Russian independent paper Novaya Gazeta finally forced to close its doors

MOSCOW, Russia – The Russian independent newspaper Novaya Gazeta said on Friday, October 30, that it was winding up its remaining operations after a campaign of state pressure in which a senior editor has been prosecuted and its financial support and premises have been taken away.

“We have been killed,” the publication, set up with money from the Nobel Peace Prize of the last Soviet leader, Mikhail Gorbachev, said in a statement.

The paper halted its print edition inside Russia in 2022, but had continued to produce online content and operate from its office in central Moscow.

“On November 9, we will turn off the lights in the home where we have lived for 30 years, shut down our servers, and leave,” it said. “The newspaper no longer exists. The Russian authorities and the Russian security services have forced our editorial team to cease its operations.”

Novaya Gazeta a thorn in Russian authorities’ side

There was no immediate comment from the authorities, which had designated the publication a “foreign agent.”

But the Kremlin — which accuses foreign intelligence services of trying to stir up discontent inside Russian society — has said in the past that some censorship is necessary at a time when Russia is locked in what it describes as an existential struggle with the West over Ukraine.

The prominent war blogger Rybar offered a taste of how the publication is seen in some official circles, reposting a diatribe that accused Novaya Gazeta of systematically promoting an anti-Russian narrative and of relishing the difficulties faced by the Russian state.

Founded in 1993 in line with Gorbachev’s vision of “glasnost” or openness, Novaya Gazeta (“New Newspaper”) became one of Russia’s most influential newspapers and defenders of democracy with its investigations into corruption and critical coverage of Russian politics.

Dmitry Muratov, its co-founder and long-time editor-in-chief, shared the 2021 Nobel Peace Prize, dedicating it to six colleagues who had been killed because of their work, including the investigative journalist Anna Politkovskaya, who wrote about Moscow’s wars in the restive Chechnya region.

Pressure from fallout of Ukraine war

Like other media outlets not run by the state but critical of it, Novaya Gazeta came under increasing pressure after Russia launched its full-scale war in Ukraine in 2022. Sweeping censorship rules were introduced that mandated long jail terms for “discrediting” the Russian army or disseminating what the authorities deem to be fake news.

“Since the start of the ‘special military operation’ in Ukraine and the introduction of criminal charges for ‘discrediting the Russian army’, we cannot report on the most critical and tragic events of our time,” the newspaper said. “Censorship applies to virtually every sphere of civic life.”

Many of its own journalists and those from other outlets had fled Russia in 2022, it added. Some of its former employees began a separate Latvian-based print and online publication called Novaya Gazeta Europe, which the Moscow authorities designated an “undesirable organisation,” effectively banning it within Russia. It will continue to operate.

Inside Russia, Novaya Gazeta noted that its website had been blocked, its print license revoked and its presses seized, and that one of its editors, Oleg Roldugin, was under house arrest awaiting trial on allegations that he misused personal data, an offence that carries a prison term of up to 10 years.

Its offices in central Moscow — from which it is now being evicted — have also been searched by the authorities, and the home of Sergei Sokolov, its editor-in-chief, was also searched this month.

“We carried on as long as we could,” Novaya Gazeta said in its farewell statement. – Rappler.com

Similar Posts

  • |

    Diplomatic tension flares between Kyiv and Tehran following Caspian Sea maritime strike

    Ukrainian Foreign Minister Andrii Sybiha held a direct phone call with Iranian counterpart Abbas Araghchi following Tehran’s formal condemnation of a Ukrainian drone attack on a vessel in the Caspian Sea. During the exchange, Sybiha cautioned Iran against taking escalatory measures and reiterated Kyiv’s demand that Tehran cease all military support for Russia’s invasion. Ukrainian officials maintained that their military strikes in the Caspian body of water strictly targeted Russian warships and cargo ships transporting military equipment between Iran and Russia, stressing that Ukraine had no intention of causing civilian casualties or damaging commercial shipping. In response, Iranian Foreign Minister Araghchi confirmed that Sybiha characterised the strike on the vessel as unintentional, noting that while Tehran does not seek wider conflict, any assault on Iranian citizens or commercial assets remains unacceptable. The incident, which resulted in the death of one Iranian sailor and injuries to another, previously drew sharp rhetoric from Tehran, with Iranian officials accusing Ukraine of acting at the behest of Israel and warning that the strike would not go unanswered. The dispute highlights the growing convergence between the Eastern European conflict and Middle Eastern tensions, underscored by concurrent discussions between Ukrainian and Israeli foreign ministers regarding shared security threats posed by Iranian military capabilities.

  • | |

    Pentagon faces shortage of missile defense interceptors

    The US Department of Defense is facing a growing shortage of missile defense interceptors after months of sustained military operations in the Middle East, raising concerns among American defense planners about the Pentagon’s ability to maintain its current pace of operations and protect US forces in the event of another major conflict. According to a report by Fox News, data compiled by the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) indicates that US stocks of Patriot air defense interceptors have fallen sharply. Before the recent escalation in regional conflicts, the United States reportedly held around 2,300 Patriot interceptors. That figure has now dropped to fewer than 827. The Pentagon has also seen a significant reduction in its stockpile of interceptors used by the Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) system. CSIS data cited in the report shows that the number of THAAD interceptors has declined from approximately 452 to fewer than 278. The decline in these critical missile defense stocks has prompted questions about the US military’s ability to respond to multiple threats at the same time. Defense planners are particularly concerned about the possibility of a new crisis emerging in another strategic region, such as the Indo-Pacific, while American forces remain engaged in the Middle East. CSIS has warned that rebuilding depleted interceptor inventories could take at least three years. The lengthy replenishment timeline reflects the difficulty of rapidly expanding production of sophisticated missile defense systems, which require specialized components, advanced manufacturing capabilities and extensive testing. The shortage could create additional pressure on US military leaders as they balance the need to defend American troops and military installations overseas with the requirement to maintain sufficient reserves for future conflicts. To address the growing gap, the Pentagon has included $18.2 billion in its broader $67 billion emergency funding request for fiscal year 2026. The proposed funds would support the replenishment of Patriot interceptors, Tomahawk cruise missiles used by the US Navy and additional interceptors for the THAAD missile defense system. The Pentagon’s spending plans also highlight a broader effort to rebuild weapons inventories that have come under pressure from sustained military operations and rising global security demands. US defense officials have increasingly focused on expanding domestic production capacity and ensuring that the military can replace weapons at a faster rate. According to the report, nearly half of the weapons included in the Army’s preliminary fiscal year 2027 budget requests fall into the relatively lower-cost category, with each weapon costing $600,000 or less. The approach reflects efforts to strengthen stockpiles of systems that the military can procure in larger quantities while continuing to invest in more advanced and expensive defense technologies. The interceptor shortage underscores a wider challenge for the United States as it seeks to prepare for potential conflicts on multiple fronts. While missile defense remains a key component of US military strategy, the depletion of interceptor stocks could limit Washington’s flexibility if it faces simultaneous threats in the Middle East, Europe or the Indo-Pacific. Defense analysts say the issue also highlights the importance of maintaining adequate reserves during prolonged conflicts. Replenishing stocks may take years, meaning decisions about the use of missile defense interceptors could become increasingly important as the Pentagon seeks to protect US personnel and strategic assets while preserving its ability to respond to future crises.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *