Salman Khan faces court summons over jewellery business dispute

Independence Day celebrations at Liberty Chowk in Lahore took an unexpected turn after a large crowd became involved in disorderly behaviour following an organised event on Thursday night. The Punjab government had arranged a special programme at Liberty Chowk to mark Pakistan’s Independence Day. The venue was decorated with lights and other patriotic arrangements, while professional artists were invited to entertain the public. The official celebrations were held as planned, with people gathering at the iconic Lahore location to mark August 14. However, scenes changed after the formal programme ended. Videos circulating on social media appeared to show a large crowd behaving aggressively at the venue. The footage showed people climbing and swinging on structures at the site. Some individuals were also seen throwing bottles and getting involved in physical confrontations. The gathering appeared to consist largely of young men, while women and families were not prominent in the crowd shown in the videos. The scenes quickly attracted criticism online. Many social media users expressed disappointment over the behaviour and questioned whether such actions were appropriate during a national celebration. One user criticised the crowd for behaving like a mob rather than a united nation. Another argued that the country needed a stronger sense of civic responsibility. Others said the incident was unfortunate and pointed to the need for citizens to take responsibility instead of blaming authorities and institutions for every problem. The videos sparked a wider discussion about how public celebrations should be conducted. Independence Day events are traditionally associated with patriotism, national unity and respect for public spaces. The incident at Liberty Chowk highlighted the contrast between the carefully organised official celebrations and the disorder that reportedly followed among sections of the crowd.

British singer Ellie Goulding has launched legal proceedings against her former managers, Ben Mawson and Ed Millet of TaP Management, alleging that they failed to disclose a business connection to Live Nation while representing her. The dispute centers on HNOE, the parent company associated with TaP Management. Goulding alleges that the company was owned by Live Nation during the period in which Mawson and Millet managed her. According to the claims, the alleged ownership was not disclosed to her, despite the managers receiving a 20 percent commission on her earnings between 2018 and 2025. The lawsuit argues that the undisclosed relationship created a potential conflict of interest. During those years, Goulding entered into several agreements involving Live Nation-related companies, including deals connected to touring, merchandise and film projects. She claims she was unaware of the alleged ownership connection when those agreements were made. The case also reportedly points to contractual arrangements that prevented her managers from reducing or avoiding their business ties with Live Nation. Goulding’s legal action therefore raises questions about whether decisions made on her behalf were influenced by interests that had not been fully revealed to her. The allegations have drawn attention across the music industry because of TaP Management’s wider history with major recording artists. Online discussion has also connected the dispute with Dua Lipa’s departure from TaP and the management links surrounding Lana Del Rey, although those circumstances are separate from Goulding’s legal claims. Goulding’s lawsuit remains at an early stage, and the allegations have not been established in court. The case is expected to focus on the nature of the relationship between TaP, HNOE and Live Nation, as well as what Goulding was told about those business interests during her management agreement. Neither Mawson nor Millet has publicly responded to the allegations at the time of publication. The outcome of the proceedings could have broader implications for artist-management relationships, particularly when managers have financial or corporate connections to companies with which their clients conduct business. As the legal process continues, the central issue will be whether Goulding was adequately informed about the alleged ownership structure and whether the relationship created a conflict that affected business decisions made during her seven-year management period. https://variety.com/2026/music/news/ellie-goulding-sues-former-managers-live-nation-1236826769/