trump threatens annihilate
| |

Trump threatens to annihilate Iran as diplomats push for deal at UN

ByJustpaste.in

UNITED NATIONS – US President Donald Trump warned on Tuesday, September 22, that he could annihilate Iran if there is no deal to end the war, but also suggested an agreement could come soon amid a diplomatic push at the United Nations.

“I have a big decision to make,” Trump said in a speech at the UN General Assembly in New York.

“Will a deal be made with Iran that lets them rebuild and create a far greater country than it ever was before?… Or do I annihilate the Islamic Republic and do it quickly, never giving them a chance to kill and destroy people and countries again?”

Must Read

Tehran hints at Hormuz talks with US as leaders gather at UN


Tehran hints at Hormuz talks with US as leaders gather at UN

In a statement on Tuesday, Iran’s Armed Forces dismissed Trump’s comments at the UN as “propaganda”, saying their response is “full readiness to inflict more severe, crushing, and unpredictable blows on the aggressors.”

But away from the fiery rhetoric, discussions continued to try to end the nearly seven-month conflict that began with joint US-Israeli strikes and has since killed thousands, driven up oil prices and drawn in neighboring countries.

Trump said that envoys Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner “had a very productive meeting today with mediators of Iran.”

“I think there’s a lot of momentum for them to make a deal,” he said.

Trump also met the leaders of Middle Eastern countries who are keen to restore shipping through the Strait of Hormuz, the conduit for a fifth of global oil and gas shipments before the war, but are wary of giving their longstanding rival Iran too much power.

Many also host huge US military bases that have come under repeated Iranian attack throughout the war.

“We think that the situation with Iran could end right after the (November 3) midterm elections, maybe before. I don’t know. You never know,” Trump said as he met the leaders.

The diplomatic maneuvering comes as Trump faces pressure on multiple fronts — rising energy costs at home, a widening regional conflict abroad, and the midterms six weeks away that could reshape his political standing. Whether talks produce a deal or the war escalates further carries consequences for global oil markets, Gulf security and millions of Iranians.

Iranian foreign minister Abbas Araqchi met with Prime Minister Sheikh Mohammed bin Abdulrahman Al Thani of Qatar, which has spent months trying to de-escalate the conflict, the Qatari state news agency reported.

A senior Iranian official said Tehran could reopen the Strait of Hormuz within days if the US eased military pressure and lifted its blockade on Iranian ports.

The senior Iranian official told Reuters that Tehran had conveyed its latest proposal to Washington through mediators last week and could reopen the strait to Gulf shipping within seven days if its demands were met.

In a reminder of Iran’s firm position so far, Parliament Speaker Mohammad Baqer Qalibaf, who headed Iran’s negotiating team at previous talks, said Iran would never surrender: “Trump must understand that he cannot impose his power on the Iranian people and its armed forces.”

Widening regional conflict

On the table at the Gulf states’ meeting with Trump is a Qatari proposal for a common security framework involving Iran and the Arab Gulf states, regional sources said. One source said Iran was reviewing the proposal.

Al Thani has said any such arrangement would need to provide security guarantees for the Gulf states and expand economic interdependence with Iran.

Saudi Arabia, the largest of the Gulf states, has been drawn deeper into the war this month as Iran-aligned Houthi fighters have advanced in Yemen, routing forces of the Saudi-backed government and threatening Saudi oil exports through the Red Sea.

The US, which bombed the Houthis for two months last year, has so far rebuffed repeated pleas from Saudi Arabia’s Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman to rejoin the fight. The New York Times reported that Trump called off US strikes against the Houthis on Sunday at the last minute.

Asked why Washington had held back from striking the Houthis, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said the United States would always support Saudi Arabia, adding:
“That said, that is a very dangerous and complex conflict that pre-exists … We have a history with the Houthis as well, and that’s something we don’t want to see impacted either.”

Oil markets did find some relief on Tuesday after sources told Reuters that Saudi Arabia had restarted operations at its East-West Pipeline and could resume exports from the Red Sea port of Yanbu within hours, albeit at reduced volumes.

The pipeline, Saudi Arabia’s main export route bypassing wartime disruption in the Strait of Hormuz, had been shut after attacks this month that Riyadh blamed on Iranian-backed groups in Iraq. – Rappler.com

Similar Posts

  • |

    Brazil’s Lula announces fourth-term campaign…

    ByJustpaste.in

    Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva has launched his campaign for a fourth term at a Workers’ Party convention in Sao Paulo, confirming it would be his final bid for office. Centring his platform on global affairs and national defence, the 80-year-old leader pledged to increase military spending and protect the country’s vast rare earth mineral reserves. He warned foreign powers that Brazil would not permit nations like China, France, or the United States to access these resources without respecting territorial sovereignty. Lula currently holds a slight lead in opinion polls against his likely main challenger, Senator Flavio Bolsonaro.

  • |

    Israeli banks plan to end services for Palestinian banks raising fears of financial crisis

    ByJustpaste.in

    Israeli banks have informed Palestinian financial institutions that they plan to end key banking services within the coming weeks, a move that has sparked concerns about serious economic disruption in the occupied West Bank. Officials on both sides say the decision could affect trade, salaries, and the daily financial operations that rely on cooperation between the two banking systems. The banking relationship allows Palestinian institutions to process transactions in Israeli shekels, the currency widely used in the Palestinian territories. These services are essential for paying for electricity, water, fuel, food imports, and other goods purchased from Israel. They also help transfer wages earned by thousands of Palestinians employed in Israel. According to Palestinian banking officials, five local banks that depend on Israel’s Bank Hapoalim for correspondent banking services have been told those arrangements will end on August 13. Other Palestinian banks that work through Discount Bank have reportedly been informed that their services will stop on September 1 unless a solution is reached. Israel’s Finance Ministry confirmed that both banks had announced plans to discontinue their correspondent banking services. The ministry said the decision reflects increasing legal and financial risks faced by Israeli banks while handling transactions for Palestinian institutions. In a statement, the ministry said it is holding discussions with the banks to find a way to continue these services while protecting Israel’s economic and security interests. Officials are exploring options that would allow financial cooperation to continue under conditions that reduce legal exposure for the banks involved. The banking arrangements have long depended on a government backed legal guarantee that shields Israeli banks from liability related to transactions carried out on behalf of Palestinian financial institutions. This protection is renewed every six months by the Israeli government. However, banking officials say commercial lenders no longer believe the existing guarantees provide enough protection. They argue that the risks of possible money laundering claims or allegations linked to terrorist financing have increased over time. According to one Israeli banking official, the banks believe the responsibility should now be taken over directly by the government instead of remaining with private financial institutions. Discount Bank confirmed that it had informed Israeli authorities of its concerns regarding the growing risks associated with these services. The bank said it has a responsibility to protect its depositors and shareholders while operating within an increasingly complex legal environment. Bank Hapoalim said the issue remains under review and did not provide further details. Economic experts warn that ending these banking links could have serious consequences for the Palestinian economy. Without access to correspondent banking services, businesses and individuals may be forced to rely more heavily on cash transactions. That shift could weaken the formal banking sector, reduce financial transparency, and encourage the growth of an informal economy. The decision could also place additional pressure on the Palestinian Authority, which already faces severe financial difficulties. The Authority depends heavily on local banks to finance public sector salaries and cover budget shortfalls. Financial analysts warn that if banks lose access to essential payment systems, the government’s ability to meet its financial obligations could be significantly weakened. A Palestinian businessman with close connections to the banking sector said the stability of local banks is closely tied to the stability of the Palestinian Authority. He warned that serious disruption to the banking system could have wider political and economic consequences across the West Bank. The latest development comes as the Palestinian Authority continues to struggle with reduced revenues after Israel suspended the transfer of customs and tax funds collected on its behalf. Those funds account for around two thirds of the Authority’s income, leaving its finances under increasing strain. Unless an agreement is reached soon, officials fear the planned banking cutoff could deepen the economic challenges already facing Palestinians in the occupied territory.

  • |

    Rahul Gandhi slams India’s education system, calls it expensive and corruption-ridden

    ByJustpaste.in

      India’s Leader of the Opposition in the Lok Sabha and senior Congress leader Rahul Gandhi has strongly criticized the country’s education system, describing it as deeply flawed, expensive, and plagued by irregularities. His remarks came while expressing solidarity with students who have been protesting over issues related to entrance examinations and alleged paper leaks. Speaking on the growing concerns surrounding India’s education sector, Rahul Gandhi said he fully supports the feelings, frustrations, and struggles of students. He stated that the anger displayed by young people is understandable, considering the hardships they have been facing in recent years. According to him, the treatment meted out to students has naturally led to widespread dissatisfaction and protests. Rahul Gandhi argued that India’s education system is not only affected by corruption and alleged manipulation but has also become financially unbearable for ordinary families. He said that the cost of appearing in entrance examinations has increased significantly, placing an enormous financial burden on parents and students. He criticized what he described as an education system that forces families to spend huge amounts of money merely to compete for admission to educational institutions. The Congress leader claimed that charging such high fees for entrance examinations amounts to exploiting families who are already making financial sacrifices to secure a better future for their children. He said many parents invest their savings and borrow money in the hope that their children will receive quality education and fair opportunities. However, according to him, the current system fails to reward those sacrifices. Rahul Gandhi further alleged that after collecting large sums of money from students and their families, authorities often announce that examination papers have been leaked or compromised. He said such incidents destroy the trust of students who spend months, and in many cases years, preparing for highly competitive entrance examinations. The cancellation of exams or questions surrounding their credibility not only wastes students’ time but also causes severe emotional stress and uncertainty about their future. He maintained that repeated incidents of paper leaks and examination irregularities have created frustration among young people across the country. In his view, students have every right to raise their voices and demand accountability from the authorities responsible for conducting these examinations. Gandhi said the protests taking place on the streets reflect the genuine concerns of India’s youth rather than being acts of unnecessary agitation. According to Rahul Gandhi, the government should focus on creating a transparent, affordable, and reliable education system that ensures equal opportunities for all students, regardless of their financial background. He emphasized that education should empower young people instead of becoming a source of anxiety, financial hardship, and disappointment. His comments come at a time when debates over examination management, paper leak allegations, and the rising cost of education continue to dominate public discussion in India. Student groups and opposition parties have repeatedly demanded stronger safeguards to prevent examination irregularities and greater accountability from the authorities. Rahul Gandhi concluded by reiterating his support for students, saying their concerns are legitimate and deserve immediate attention. He stressed that the future of the country depends on its youth and that protecting the integrity of the education system should be a national priority.

  • |

    Israeli crackdown intensifies in West Bank as sett…

    ByJustpaste.in

    The Israeli military has launched an aggressive crackdown across the occupied West Bank, storming towns and villages and detaining hundreds of Palestinians, following a deadly shootout on Friday that killed four Palestinians and two Israeli soldiers . The “wide-scale military operation” ordered by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu intensified on Sunday, as Jewish settlers grew bolder and more violent marauding through villages, scrawling graffiti on buildings, and attacking Palestinians . In the town of Qusra, southeast of Nablus, settlers attempted to set the newly built Al-Rahma Mosque ablaze, spray-painting slogans such as “Jewish revenge” on its walls, according to Abdel Azim Wadi, head of the village council. Videos verified by Al Jazeera showed fire consuming the mosque . A second mosque, in the village of Kour south of Tulkarem, was also targeted in an arson attack. Farid Jiyousi, a member of the village council, said three settlers tried to set the mosque ablaze at dawn, but worshippers managed to extinguish the flames before they could reach the main prayer area . Al Jazeera’s Nour Odeh, reporting from Ramallah, said Israeli forces raided Rafidia near Nablus as part of the ongoing military operation . Political analysts have linked the escalating violence to domestic political pressures on Netanyahu . Opinion polls suggest the Prime Minister could lose power, and land grabs along with accelerating the establishment of new illegal settlements sit well with his right-wing support base . Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich has announced plans to build 763 new units in the illegal Eli settlement, south of Nablus, a move likely to further inflame tensions . The violence has not gone unchallenged inside Israel. Hundreds gathered in Tel Aviv on Saturday to protest against the surge in settler violence and the military crackdown in the West Bank. Israeli police arrested nine protesters, stating that the demonstrations had gone ahead without authorization and had begun to “disrupt public order and block the roadway” . The intensification of military operations and settler violence marks a significant escalation in the occupied territory, coming amid broader regional turmoil including developments in Gaza and along the Lebanese border . The international community has repeatedly condemned settlement expansion and settler violence, though such condemnations have done little to curb the trend in recent years .

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *