holly willoughby laughs
| |

Holly Willoughby laughs off daughter’s YouTube tease

Television presenter Holly Willoughby has admitted she is still learning the ropes of YouTube after launching her new digital series Together, revealing that her teenage daughter laughed at her attempts to sound like an experienced content creator.
The former This Morning host recently premiered the first episode of her YouTube show, which features celebrity conversations in a relaxed setting. Actor Stanley Tucci, known for The Devil Wears Prada, appeared as the programme’s first guest. The launch has also drawn comparisons between Willoughby’s new venture and Meghan Markle’s lifestyle-style content.
Speaking on Sara Cox’s Radio 2 Breakfast Show, the 45-year-old presenter described the release of the series as an emotional milestone.
“Today is launch day, this is like I’m giving birth today!” Holly said, adding that moving away from traditional television to a digital platform still feels unfamiliar.
She admitted that stepping into the world of YouTube has been a completely new experience after spending decades working in broadcast television.
During the conversation, Sara Cox jokingly asked whether Holly’s children were annoyed that she had entered a platform usually associated with younger audiences.
Laughing, Holly recalled her daughter Belle’s reaction while filming promotional messages encouraging viewers to subscribe.
“My daughter was laughing at me as I was saying ‘subscribe and ding the bell and you’ll get notifications.’”
She revealed that Belle quickly pointed out how unfamiliar she sounded with YouTube culture.
“She was like, ‘mum, you really don’t know what you’re talking about,’ and I’m like, ‘no I don’t but I’m learning!’” Holly said.
The presenter admitted that adapting to digital content creation has taken her outside her comfort zone, particularly after building her career through conventional television formats.
Unlike her previous programmes, Together is designed specifically for YouTube, allowing Holly to have longer and more informal conversations with well-known personalities.
The show’s debut episode featured actor and food enthusiast Stanley Tucci, whose appearance helped launch the series. Since its release, viewers have discussed the programme online, with some drawing comparisons between Holly’s approach and Meghan Markle’s recent lifestyle projects.
According to the report, Together is produced by Hungry Bear Media, the production company owned by Holly’s husband, Dan Baldwin. The company has produced several successful British entertainment programmes and is now backing Holly’s latest move into digital media.
Although she acknowledged that she is still adjusting to YouTube’s style and audience expectations, Holly appeared enthusiastic about embracing the new challenge. Her comments suggested that she is willing to learn from younger viewers—including her own children—as she builds a presence on the platform.
The presenter has received support from many fans following her honest remarks, with viewers praising her willingness to laugh at herself while trying something new. Rather than pretending to know everything about the digital world, Holly openly admitted she is still figuring it out, a response many found both relatable and refreshing. 

Similar Posts

  • |

    Cambridge paper leak case: students hand over 17 papers evidence to NCCIA, but investigation still not complete

    Islamabad: The investigation into the alleged Cambridge A Level and O Level paper leaks has drawn fresh criticism after affected students claimed that they provided complete evidence, forensic details and technical assistance to the National Cyber Crime Investigation Agency (NCCIA), but the inquiry remains incomplete. Students associated with the Accountability4Cambridge movement said they made every possible effort to help NCCIA investigate the case and submitted evidence related to 17 leaked examination components. They claimed they even conducted their own forensic checks and prepared detailed records before handing them over to authorities. The students said their main demand was a quick investigation because their future depends on the final results. They wanted the matter resolved before results were announced so that affected students could receive relief if unfair practices had affected their grades. However, according to the students, NCCIA has still not completed its investigation. They claimed that the investigation officer assigned to the case has gone on training, causing further delay. The Accountability4Cambridge representatives said they submitted a complete evidence package to NCCIA, including 44 exhibits with verification details. They said the material was prepared carefully to help investigators identify where the papers were leaked and who was involved. The students said they tracked the movement of leaked papers and provided information about possible sources, online groups and communication channels where the leaked material was shared. Their evidence included details about WhatsApp numbers, Telegram groups and payment methods allegedly used to purchase the leaked papers. The students submitted the evidence directly to NCCIA’s forensic department and expected progress within days, but they were later informed that the assigned official was unavailable because he had gone for training. The controversy started after students alleged that Cambridge examination papers reached some candidates before the official exams, creating an unfair advantage for those who accessed them early. According to Accountability4Cambridge, around 17 examination components were leaked during the June 2026 examination series. They said Cambridge International acknowledged four of these components, while the remaining cases were still disputed. Students argued that a leaked paper could damage the grades of honest candidates because grade boundaries may change when some students score unusually high marks after seeing questions in advance. They said a student who worked honestly could lose university opportunities if their grades dropped because of unfair competition. The students also raised concerns about delays in the official response. The Senate Standing Committee on Federal Education had directed NCCIA to provide findings by July 21, 2026, but the deadline passed without a final report being submitted. The group said only an informal indication was given that findings would come later, while students continued waiting for answers. During their efforts, students met with various institutions, including the IBCC, Senate committees and NCCIA officials, and prepared documentation to support their claims. They said the evidence was not based only on screenshots but included detailed verification methods such as timestamps, recordings and technical information to support the authenticity of the leaked material. The students said they wanted authorities to identify the people responsible and ensure accountability instead of allowing the matter to continue without a clear conclusion. They also demanded stronger action from Cambridge, including transparency regarding how the leaks happened, where they originated and what action was taken against those involved. The students further demanded reforms in the examination system, including better protection of papers, separate arrangements for Pakistan and measures to prevent future leaks. They warned that the issue concerned not only marks but also the future of thousands of students who depend on Cambridge results for university admissions in Pakistan and abroad.

  • | | |

    MQM-P pushes for grand national dialogue on new pr…

    KARACHI: The Muttahida Qaumi Movement-Pakistan (MQM-P) has announced plans to approach political parties across the country to launch a “grand national dialogue” on the creation of new provinces and administrative units. Speaking at a press conference on Sunday, MQM-P Chairman Dr Khalid Maqbool Siddiqui said Pakistan needed a serious national discussion on restructuring its administrative system, arguing that the country’s growing population had increased the need for additional provinces. Siddiqui said MQM-P had been advocating the creation of more provinces for decades, maintaining that Pakistan’s existing provincial structure was largely shaped by linguistic considerations rather than purely administrative requirements. He stressed that the party’s demand was not limited to Sindh and that it would support calls for new provinces wherever there was public and political backing. The MQM-P leader urged political parties to sit together and discuss their proposals and reservations instead of treating the issue as a source of political confrontation. He said his party was prepared to take the lead in initiating such a dialogue. Siddiqui also linked the debate over new provinces with the need to strengthen local governments. Referring to Article 140-A of the Constitution, he said provinces were constitutionally required to devolve political, administrative and financial powers to elected local representatives. He criticised the failure to fully implement the provision and recalled that MQM-P had previously approached the Supreme Court over the issue. He argued that creating additional provinces was not unconstitutional and said Parliament could debate the appropriate mechanism for establishing them. He also questioned whether existing provinces should have the sole authority to decide on their own division. MQM-P leader and Health Minister Mustafa Kamal said the party’s proposal was aimed at administrative restructuring rather than dividing communities or territories. He argued that people should have greater control over local leadership and governance, particularly when their cities face serious problems in living standards and public services. The MQM-P campaign follows recent remarks by Interior Minister Syed Mohsin Naqvi, who called for political parties to address major national issues, including the creation of new provinces. His proposal has since generated debate among government figures, lawyers and political circles, giving fresh momentum to the long-running discussion over Pakistan’s provincial structure. The MQM-P leadership said it would also engage legal experts and explore further legal avenues regarding the implementation of constitutional provisions related to local governance.

  • | |

    Hayden Panettiere’s boyfriend Brian Hickerson’…

    Hayden Panettiere’s tragic death has brought renewed attention to the actress’s complicated relationship with Brian Hickerson, including a legal setback he faced only days before her passing. Panettiere, best known for Heroes and Nashville, died at the age of 36 on August 16, 2026. Her death remains under investigation, and authorities have said there were no initial signs of foul play. An autopsy reportedly found no signs of trauma, while the official cause of death has not yet been determined.  Just three days before Panettiere died, a judge rejected Hickerson’s request to reduce his previous felony domestic abuse convictions to misdemeanors and have them dismissed. The ruling came during a hearing on August 13, according to reports citing the Los Angeles County District Attorney’s Office.  Hickerson had pleaded no contest in April 2021 to two felony counts of injuring a spouse or girlfriend. The charges followed a series of incidents involving Panettiere between 2019 and 2020. He was originally facing eight felony counts connected to the alleged abuse.  As part of his 2021 sentence, Hickerson received 45 days in county jail, four years of formal probation, 52 domestic violence classes and a five-year restraining order. He ultimately served 33 days after receiving credit for time previously spent in custody.  The legal history has resurfaced because of its timing. Hickerson had previously tried to have the felony convictions reduced or dismissed in 2025, but that request was also unsuccessful. His latest petition noted that he had completed the conditions of his probation.  Panettiere had spoken publicly about the abuse in her memoir, This Is Me: A Reckoning. She described how difficult it was to completely break away from an abusive relationship. Hickerson later acknowledged responsibility for some of the incidents discussed in the book, while also reflecting on his own struggles with substance abuse.  The pair’s relationship began in 2018 and continued on and off for several years. Despite their turbulent history, they later reconnected, with Hickerson publicly discussing their relationship and acknowledging that they were not necessarily good for each other.  Hickerson was reportedly with Panettiere around the time of her death, adding another layer of public interest to their complicated history. However, there is currently no evidence that Hickerson was responsible for Panettiere’s death, and authorities have not indicated that the two matters are connected.  As fans continue mourning Panettiere, her past struggles are once again receiving attention. Yet her legacy extends far beyond her difficult personal experiences. Through Nashville, Heroes and other performances, she left behind a career that made a lasting impression on audiences around the world.

  • | | | |

    PTI seeks immediate hospital transfer for Imran Kh…

    The Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) has demanded the immediate transfer of party founder Imran Khan to a hospital after a medical report highlighted concerns over his blood pressure and anxiety. The demand came after a report from Adiala Jail authorities was submitted to the Supreme Court. The report contains details of Imran Khan’s latest medical condition and recommendations for his care. PTI leaders held a press conference on Monday and expressed concern over the former prime minister’s health. They called for him to be moved to a hospital where he could receive specialised medical treatment. PTI Chairman Barrister Gohar Ali Khan said Imran Khan’s elevated blood pressure was a serious concern. He demanded that the former prime minister receive the best available medical care. Gohar said Imran Khan should also be given access to his personal doctors. He demanded that his family members and lawyers should be allowed to meet him. The PTI chairman said access to Imran Khan had remained restricted for months. He claimed that party representatives had repeatedly approached the courts seeking permission for meetings. According to Gohar, the PTI had approached the high court around 25 times and the Supreme Court around 15 times over the issue. He described meetings with family members, doctors and lawyers as Imran Khan’s fundamental legal right. He urged the judiciary to address the matter and ensure that the former prime minister received appropriate medical attention. Gohar said the party’s concerns would not end until Imran Khan was provided proper medical treatment and regular access to his family and legal team. He also criticised what he described as a prolonged dispute over access to the PTI founder. Gohar said the situation had continued since October and called for an end to what he termed a “cat and mouse game”. The PTI’s demands came shortly before the Supreme Court was scheduled to hear matters concerning Imran Khan. The jail report had recommended increasing family interaction to help manage his anxiety and blood pressure. It also contained details of his medical examinations and treatment. PTI leaders argued that the reported health concerns should be treated seriously and that hospitalisation would ensure closer medical supervision. The party has also continued to call for access to Imran Khan’s personal physicians, saying they should be allowed to assess his condition independently. The issue of Imran Khan’s health has become a major political and legal point of contention. PTI leaders have repeatedly raised concerns over his medical care and restrictions on meetings.

  • |

    Jon Batiste cancels concerts amid wife’s cancer battle

    Jon Batiste has cancelled three upcoming concerts in the United States amid what he described as personal circumstances. The Grammy-winning singer was scheduled to perform at three venues this week. However, fans were informed on Wednesday, August 12, that the performances had been called off. Batiste was due to perform at the New Haven Westville Music Bowl in Connecticut on Thursday, August 13. He was then scheduled to take the stage at the TD Pavilion at Highmark Mann in Philadelphia on Friday, August 14. His third show was planned for Forest Hills Stadium in New York on Saturday, August 15. The singer addressed the cancellations in a statement shared by the venues. “As I navigate some personal circumstances, I unfortunately need to cancel a portion of my upcoming performance dates,” Batiste said. Despite the cancellations, Batiste assured fans that he remains committed to his music. He also highlighted his upcoming albums, Monk Meditations and Monk Movements. The musician said his team is looking for new ways to share his music with fans. He also expressed hope that he would be able to return to live performances soon. Fans affected by the cancellations will receive refunds through the original point of purchase. Batiste’s decision comes as his wife, Suleika Jaouad, continues her long battle with acute myeloid leukemia. Jaouad is a bestselling author and Emmy Award-winning journalist. She is also known for her memoir Life, Interrupted, which explores her experience with cancer. Jaouad was first diagnosed with acute myeloid leukemia at the age of 22. After undergoing treatment, she eventually entered remission. However, the disease returned in 2021. Her treatment later included another bone marrow transplant. In 2024, Jaouad was diagnosed with acute myeloid leukemia once again. She has continued to receive treatment since then. Acute myeloid leukemia is an aggressive cancer that affects the blood and bone marrow. Treatment can involve several stages and may require long-term medical care. A May 2026 profile reported that Jaouad was expected to remain in treatment for the rest of her life. Her cancer was also described as incurable. Batiste and Jaouad have remained supportive of each other throughout her health struggles. The couple married in 2022 after years of being together. Although Batiste did not specifically mention his wife’s cancer in his concert cancellation statement, the announcement comes during a particularly challenging period for the couple. For now, Batiste appears to be stepping back from some of his live commitments while continuing to work on his music. Fans will now await further updates about his cancelled performances and his eventual return to the stage.

  • |

    Texas governor targets Muslim airport facilities

    Texas Governor Greg Abbott has ordered a review of state grants provided to Dallas Fort Worth International Airport (DFW) and Houston’s George Bush Intercontinental Airport (IAH), alleging that facilities for Muslim passengers to perform ablution and pray could amount to religious discrimination. Abbott’s office said the matter has also been referred to the US Department of Transportation for investigation and possible action. According to a statement from the governor’s office, state grants provided to entities operating airports in Texas will be reviewed to determine whether existing funding should be withdrawn or whether the airports should be denied future state funding. Abbott has argued that providing facilities specifically associated with one religion at government-owned facilities could raise concerns under religious discrimination laws. The governor’s office said DFW International Airport is planning to establish a dedicated ablution facility for Muslim passengers. At George Bush Intercontinental Airport, a similar facility has reportedly already been established, along with a designated space for prayer. Abbott has written to US Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy, asking the Department of Transportation and the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to immediately review the existing or proposed religious facilities at both airports. He has also called for corrective or legal action if federal authorities determine that any violations have occurred. The Texas governor maintains that both airports receive federal funding and are therefore required to comply with federal laws prohibiting discriminatory practices. In his statement, Abbott said the proposed ablution facilities appear to provide a special accommodation to a particular section of the population based on religion, which he considers potentially unlawful. He further argued that because the airports are publicly owned, government authorities cannot give preference to one religious viewpoint over others. Abbott reiterated his position on social media, saying that government facilities funded by taxpayers should not allow what he described as unlawful religious discrimination.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *