bad breath causes

Bad breath causes and prevention

ByJustpaste.in

Almost everyone experiences bad breath at some point in life. In medical terms this condition is called halitosis. While it is often temporary some people may have bad breath for a long time.

In certain cases it can also be a sign of an underlying health problem. Experts estimate that about half of all adults experience bad breath at least once in their lifetime.

•Common causes of bad breath

•Poor oral hygiene

One of the main causes of bad breath is not cleaning your teeth gums and tongue properly.  Tiny food particles can stay in the mouth and break down over time.

This allows bacteria to grow and produce an unpleasant smell.

•Not cleaning the tongue

The tongue naturally collects bacteria. If it is not cleaned regularly these bacteria mix with leftover food and can cause bad breath.

Cleaning your tongue every day is just as important as brushing your teeth.

•Strong smelling foods

Foods such as garlic onions and certain spices can make your breath smell bad.

After digestion some of the natural oils from these foods enter the bloodstream and reach the lungs where they affect the smell of your breath.

•Smoking

Smoking is another common reason for bad breath. It leaves a strong smell in the mouth reduces saliva and increases the growth of harmful bacteria.

•Dry mouth and not drinking enough water

Saliva helps wash away food particles and bacteria. When your mouth is dry bacteria stay longer and produce bad odors.

A dry mouth can happen if you sleep with your mouth open take certain medicines have problems with the salivary glands, or simply do not drink enough water.

•Gum and tooth problems

Plaque can build up around the teeth and gums if you do not brush and floss properly. Over time this can lead to gum disease infections, and bad breath.

•Nose throat or sinus infections

Bad breath may also be caused by sinus infections throat infections tonsil stones or other conditions affecting the nose and throat.

•Certain medical conditions

Sometimes bad breath is linked to health problems such as diabetes kidney disease liver disease or acid reflux.

If bad breath continues even after improving oral hygiene it is a good idea to consult a doctor or dentist.

•Simple tips to keep your breath fresh

•Brush your teeth twice a day.

•Clean your tongue every day.

•Floss regularly to remove trapped food.

•Drink plenty of water to keep your mouth moist.

•Avoid smoking.

•Limit foods with strong odors before social events. Visit your dentist regularly for check ups and cleanings.

In many cases bad breath can be prevented with good oral hygiene and healthy daily habits.

However if the problem does not go away it may be a sign of an underlying medical condition that should be checked by a healthcare professional.

Similar Posts

  • Best choice 500kg cake covered in 33,000 flower petals

    ByJustpaste.in

    Spanish pastry chef Marc Suarez has created an extraordinary wedding cake for a Saudi royal family.  The giant cake stands 3.5 meters tall is 1.8 meters wide and weighs around 500 kilograms. Months of planning and work According to reports Suarez spent about six weeks designing the cake and another four months bringing the idea to life. Although he normally works alone this huge project required help from several pastry chef friends their families and other people close to him. Thousands of handmade flowers One of the biggest challenges was creating and coloring around 33,000 flower petals.  Each petal had to be carefully prepared and placed with branches and flowers to create the final design. Friends family members and others also helped with the detailed work. Suarez said the project required around 1,800 hours of work in total. The finished cake looks less like a traditional wedding cake and more like a large piece of art that could be displayed in a museum. A grand wedding in paris The enormous cake was presented at the Paris Opera Garnier during the wedding of a Saudi couple. The bride and groom chose to keep their identities private but their wedding featured a cake that was certainly difficult to forget. The project shows how pastry can go beyond food and become a form of art creativity and craftsmanship.

  • Healthy weight may protect male fertility study

    ByJustpaste.in

    Male infertility is becoming a growing health concern around the world and new research suggests that excess body fat may be one of the reasons behind the rising number of cases. A study from Aarhus University found that higher levels of body fat can negatively affect male reproductive health and reduce fertility. The researchers followed 1,058 young men, who were about 18 years and 9 months old when the study began. They measured body fat body weight and muscle mass to understand how body composition affects fertility. According to the researchers a healthy body fat percentage for men is generally between 8% and 19%, while 20% or higher is considered elevated. The study found that men with higher body fat had on average a 23% lower sperm count than those with healthier body fat levels. The researchers also found that excess body fat may disrupt hormones that play an important role in sperm production and overall reproductive health. Hormonal changes caused by obesity can reduce both sperm  quality and fertility. Experts say maintaining a healthy weight through regular exercise a balanced diet enough sleep and stress management can support both overall health and reproductive health. Avoiding smoking limiting alcohol and managing long term medical conditions may also help improve fertility. The findings were published in the journal Human Reproduction. The study supports earlier findings from the World Health Organization, which reported in 2023 that about 17.5% of adults worldwide experience infertility at some point in their lives. The WHO also noted that infertility affects people in high middle and low income countries making it a global public health challenge. Researchers say that while infertility can have many causes keeping body fat at a healthy level may be an important step in protecting male fertility and improving reproductive health.

  • Gustav Klimt’s “Lakeshore with Birches” (1901)

    ByJustpaste.in

    Gustav Klimt’s Lakeshore with Birches (Seeufer mit Birken, 1901) presents a contemplative immersion into nature. This piece was painted during a crucial transitional moment in Klimt’s artistic development. It was completed when Klimt spent his summers away from the urban noise of Vienna at Lake Attersee. This work captures the quiet rhythm of the natural world, distilled through a distinctly modern visual sensitivity. What immediately distinguishes Lakeshore with Birches is its unorthodox composition. Rather than offering a traditional panorama with a distant horizon line, Klimt deliberately truncates the viewer’s field of vision. The composition is anchored by a singular birch trunk rising vertically near the center-right of the canvas. Klimt creates a radical sense of spatial compression by eliminating the sky. The landscape is flattened into a decorative field, where depth is suggested through subtle layering. A lush, wild embankment dotted with small yellow and purple wildflowers. The stark pale birch trunk with its rhythmic dark lenticels, acting as a structural mast. In the background, still water reflecting the dark foliage of the far shore. This croppings draws inspiration from both Japanese ukiyo-e woodblock prints and contemporary square-format photography. The canvas forces the viewer to engage with the textures and moods of the immediate environment. The atmosphere of the painting is dictated by a restrained palette. Dominated by muted moss greens, deep olive tones, and dark murky browns, the water acts as a mirror absorbing the weight of the forest shadows. Against this dark, reflective pool, the small specks of yellow buttercups and delicate purples along the grass introduce a subtle optical vibration. Klimt’s brushwork here bridges French Impressionist techniques and the emerging principles of Art Nouveau. The bank is rendered using tiny, stippled dabs of paint, creating a tapestry-like surface pattern. Up close, the reflections on the water resolve into abstract patches of blue, gray, and dark brown. The slender birch tree provides a crisp, pale contrast. Its bark painted with precise horizontal dashes that echo the linear motifs Klimt would later deploy in his famous Golden Phase. Beyond its formal qualities, Lakeshore with Birches radiates profound stillness. Free from human figures or dramatic narrative.  Turns nature into a psychological sanctuary. The solitary birch trunk stands almost like a quiet observer at the edge of the water. It seems like a subtle proxy for the solitary painter himself. During his summer retreats at the Attersee, Klimt used landscape painting as a palette cleanser, freeing himself from the contentious public commissions and psychological weight of his Viennese portraiture. In Lakeshore with Birches, he captures the fleeting light and quiet isolation of late summer. He converted a humble patch of lakeside grass and water into an intricate sanctuary of pattern and color. It remains a testament to Klimt’s unique ability to merge acute observation with abstract harmony.  

  • Ethics of Journalism in Digital Spaces: When the Speed of News Challenges the Truth

    ByJustpaste.in

    By Ali Ijaz In today’s digital world, news is no longer something we wait for in the morning newspaper or watch at a fixed time on television. It reaches us while we are having breakfast, scrolling through social media, checking messages, or simply browsing our phones. One click can take a piece of information from a small post to a global story within minutes. But behind this incredible speed lies an important question: Are we becoming faster at sharing information than we are at checking the truth? This is where the ethics of journalism in digital spaces becomes more important than ever. I attended a workshop under the project titled “Digital Trust and Free Expression in the AI Era” at the Department of Media and Development Communication, University of the Punjab, supported by the U.S. Mission to Pakistan in partnership with the Pakistan-U.S. Alumni Network (PUAN) where we discussed ethical issues in digital journalism in detail. The digital revolution has completely transformed journalism. Traditional journalists once worked mainly for newspapers, magazines, radio, and television. Today, journalists also work through websites, social media platforms, podcasts, YouTube channels, newsletters, and mobile applications. The platforms have changed, but the fundamental responsibility of journalism remains the same: to inform people accurately, fairly, responsibly, and honestly. Digital journalism gives journalists an opportunity to reach millions of people instantly. At the same time, it creates new ethical challenges. A journalist is no longer competing only with another newspaper or television channel. They are competing with thousands of posts, influencers, bloggers, anonymous accounts, and algorithms—all fighting for people’s attention. And in this race for attention, truth can sometimes become the casualty. One of the biggest challenges in digital journalism is the pressure to be first. When breaking news happens, every newsroom wants to publish it immediately. Social media makes this pressure even stronger. A journalist may feel that if they wait five minutes to verify information, another platform will publish the story first. But journalism is not a competition to see who can press “publish” fastest. Being first is valuable. Being correct is essential. An unverified headline can spread thousands of times before the journalist even gets a chance to correct it. By then, the damage may already be done.This is why ethical digital journalism requires journalists to pause, verify sources, check facts, and distinguish between confirmed information and speculation—even when everyone else is rushing to post. Perhaps the most visible ethical problem in digital spaces is misinformation. A dramatic headline, edited video, misleading photograph, or false claim can easily go viral. Sometimes people share such content because they believe it is true. Sometimes they share it simply because it supports what they already believe. For journalists, however, “everyone is sharing it” is never enough evidence. Ethical journalism requires verification.  Digital media has introduced another major ethical challenge: clickbait. Websites and social media platforms often depend on clicks, views, shares, and engagement. This creates pressure to write shocking headlines. There is nothing wrong with making a headline interesting. Journalism should be engaging. The ethical problem begins when a headline exaggerates, hides important context, or deliberately misleads the audience simply to generate clicks. A journalist’s goal should not be to trick people into opening a story. The goal should be to make people want to read the truth. Digital journalism also raises difficult questions about privacy. Because information can be shared instantly, journalists may have access to photographs, private messages, personal social-media posts, and other sensitive information. But the fact that something is available online does not automatically mean that it is ethical to publish it. Imagine a person experiencing a tragedy. Their photograph may already be circulating online. Does that mean a news organization should publish it? Not necessarily. Ethical journalism requires journalists to consider human dignity, consent, public interest, and potential harm. There is an important difference between what the public wants to know and what the public needs to know. Responsible journalism understands that difference. The rise of artificial intelligence has added another layer to digital journalism. AI can help journalists research topics, analyze large amounts of information, translate material, summarize documents, and produce content more efficiently. But it also creates risks. AI-generated images, manipulated videos, synthetic voices, and automatically generated text can make false information appear extremely convincing. This means journalists must become even more careful about verification. At the same time, news organizations should be transparent about how AI is used. If AI plays a significant role in producing or altering journalistic content, audiences deserve appropriate disclosure. Technology can assist journalism, but technology cannot replace journalistic responsibility. Ethical journalism is not only the responsibility of journalists. Audiences also play an important role in the digital information ecosystem. Every time we share a post, forward a message, repost a video, or comment on a breaking story, we participate in the distribution of information. Before sharing something, we should ask ourselves: “Do I know this is true, or do I simply want it to be true?”That small question can make a huge difference. Digital literacy is therefore becoming an essential part of responsible citizenship. We must learn to recognize unreliable sources, misleading headlines, manipulated media, and information taken out of context.Technology will continue to change journalism. Tomorrow’s journalists may use tools that we cannot even imagine today. News may become faster, more personalized, and increasingly influenced by artificial intelligence and algorithms. But one thing should remain unchanged: the value of truth. A journalist’s greatest asset is not many followers, viral posts, or millions of views. It is credibility. People should be able to look at a news organization or journalist and believe that the information has been gathered responsibly, verified carefully, and presented honestly. In a world where everyone can publish something, journalism must prove why it deserves to be trusted. The views, thoughts, and opinions expressed in this blog are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the U.S. Mission to Pakistan or USEFP/PUAN.

  • High sugar intake in early life may raise dementia risk

    ByJustpaste.in

    A new study has found that children who consume high amounts of sugar at an early age may face a higher risk of developing dementia later in life. The study suggests that pregnant women who avoid sweets, chocolates and other sugary foods may help reduce their child’s risk of developing the disease by up to 20 percent. The research published in the medical journal Neurology also found that consuming very small amounts of sugar during early life may provide protection against dementia. The study’s lead author, Professor Jiazheng Zheng said the findings suggest that limiting sugar intake during the early stages of life could have long-term benefits for brain health. He further said the findings highlight the potential importance of early-life nutrition in reducing the risk of dementia decades later. Researchers from the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology compared the health of 64,737 people who were born before and after sugar rationing was introduced in Britain during World War II. The participants were divided into groups based on the timing of sugar rationing: those who experienced limited access to sugar before birth and during their first year of life, those who experienced it before birth and until the age of two and those who were not exposed to sugar rationing. When the participants reached an average age of 55, the research team began analyzing their medical records to determine which individuals were diagnosed with dementia during the following 15 years. Among the 15,256 people who had limited access to sugar before birth and during their first two years of life, only 2 percent were later diagnosed with dementia. Although researchers say the findings do not conclusively prove that eating less sugar directly prevents dementia, experts believe the results are consistent with growing evidence that sugar can affect brain function. Experts also say that the brain is highly sensitive to fluctuations in blood sugar levels. Other research has found that people with high blood sugar levels may face up to a 69 percent higher risk of Alzheimer’s disease.

  • |

    The return of physical books in a digital world

    ByJustpaste.in

    ​When e-readers and digital publishing exploded in the late 2000s, tech prognosticators predicted the rapid demise of the printed book. Paper was deemed inefficient, heavy, and outdated. An analog relic doomed to follow the cassette tape and the encyclopedia into obscurity. Yet, decades into the digital revolution, the physical book has successfully survived. It is thriving, driven by a growing cultural hunger for tactile experiences in an increasingly virtual world.   ​The persistence of print comes down to a fundamental human reality. Sensory experience matters. A digital screen, no matter how crisp its resolution, flattens every piece of content into the same glass surface. A tweet, a work email, a news alert, and a classic novel all look and feel virtually identical. In contrast, a physical book offers a distinct multi-sensory landscape. The weight of the volume in your hands. The subtle texture of the paper stock. The faint scent of ink and binding glue. Above all, the visual progress of physical pages moving from right to left. Reading a physical book creates an immersive environment that screens simply cannot replicate. British writer Roald Dahl who is known for such classic children’s books as Charlie and the Chocolate Factory (1964) and Matilda (1988). His other notable works include James and the Giant Peach (1961), The BFG (1982), and The Witches (1983). He famously said, So please, oh please, we beg, we pray, go throw your TV set away, and in its place you can install a lovely bookshelf on the wall. Roald Dahl (Roald Dahl was a British novelist, short-story writer, poet, screenwriter, and wartime fighter pilot.)   ​Moreover, print offers a rare sanctuary from the relentless ping of notifications. Modern digital life is characterized by fragmented attention and constant micro-interruptions. Reading a book on a tablet or smartphone means constantly resisting the urge to check email, glance at social media, or reply to a text message. A physical book possesses no hyperlinks, no pop-ups and no algorithmic distraction loops by default. It demands a single-tasking mindset and offers a meditative refuge from digital fatigue.   ​There is also a social and aesthetic dimension to the print resurgence. Bookshelves in a home are not just storage units. Rather, they are visual representations of identity, curiosity, and intellectual history. Browsing a physical bookstore or sharing a physical copy with a friend fosters spontaneous community connections that digital files cannot mirror.   e-books certainly offer undeniable convenience for travel and instant access. However, they have become a supplement to print rather than a replacement. Readers are making a conscious choice to slow down. The deliberately disconnect from screens, and hold stories in their hands. The physical book stands high not for some reason of nostalgia. Rather, it fulfills a psychological need that technology has only managed to heighten.  

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *