कारोबार

The National Electric Power Regulatory Authority (Nepra) has approved a Rs21.436 billion Distribution Investment Plan (DIP) for Sukkur Electric Power Company Limited (SEPCO), covering its transmission and distribution operations for the five-year Multi-Year Tariff (MYT) period from fiscal year 2025-26 through FY2029-30. Along with the investment plan, the regulator has also set provisional targets for transmission and distribution (T&D) losses, while directing SEPCO to improve project execution, digitalise operational data and strengthen its planning and monitoring mechanisms. SEPCO had originally requested approval for an investment programme worth Rs90.563 billion. However, after Nepra raised several questions regarding the proposed projects, costs, utilisation of existing assets and investment requirements, the power utility submitted revised details. Following the revisions, SEPCO reduced its proposed investment to Rs40.191 billion in information submitted to Nepra on June 19, 2026. The revised proposal included changes in investment priorities and network development requirements based on updated demand projections. The company also revised project costs in light of the latest Purchase Orders (POs). Nepra, however, found substantial weaknesses in SEPCO’s original investment submission. According to the regulator, the initial proposal did not adequately reflect actual field conditions and lacked a comprehensive assessment of the utility’s requirements. It also contained gaps in cost calculations and information concerning the utilisation of existing assets. The regulator stressed that future investment planning should be based on reliable data, realistic demand assessments and proper evaluation of existing infrastructure rather than relying solely on projected requirements. Low utilisation of previous investments raises concerns Nepra also raised concerns over SEPCO’s ability to execute projects and utilise approved investment funds effectively. During the previous control period, SEPCO had been allowed investment of Rs39.509 billion. However, the company utilised only Rs14.231 billion, representing around 36% of the approved amount. The regulator said the low utilisation rate raised questions about SEPCO’s project implementation capacity and the efficiency with which approved investments were being converted into infrastructure and operational improvements. Delays were particularly noted in projects falling under the STG head. Nepra attributed the slow progress to difficulties in acquiring land, procurement-related problems and inadequate coordination between relevant departments. The regulator indicated that these issues point towards weaknesses in project planning, monitoring of milestones and implementation. SEPCO asked to improve network performance Nepra has also expressed concern over SEPCO’s technical and operational performance, particularly its transmission and distribution losses and reliability indicators, including the System Average Interruption Frequency Index (SAIFI) and System Average Interruption Duration Index (SAIDI). The authority directed the company to strengthen preventive maintenance programmes, improve energy accounting and introduce stronger system controls. These measures, Nepra said, are necessary to reduce losses, improve reliability and ensure consumers receive a more stable electricity supply. SEPCO’s approved investment priorities include expansion and strengthening of its 132-kilovolt network, augmentation of the existing system to accommodate future electricity demand and the deployment of modern technologies. The proposed technological improvements include Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI), Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) systems and Geographic Information System (GIS)-based mapping. These technologies are expected to support better monitoring of the electricity network, improve operational efficiency and enhance safety and service quality. Independent consultant made mandatory In a significant condition attached to the investment approval, Nepra has required SEPCO to engage an independent third-party consultant to review and validate its future investment plans before they are submitted to the regulator. SEPCO has also been instructed to prepare detailed Terms of Reference (ToRs) for the consultant and obtain Nepra’s approval before beginning the procurement process. The regulator said independent validation would help ensure that future investment proposals are based on actual requirements and that proposed projects are properly justified. Nepra pushes digitalisation of SEPCO operations Nepra has further directed SEPCO to move away from manual data-management practices and establish a comprehensive digital system for its operational information. The authority noted that dependence on manual systems can result in errors, delays and inefficient decision-making. A fully integrated digital platform, according to Nepra, would allow the company to monitor its network in real time, improve demand forecasting and make investment decisions based on reliable data. The regulator has also adopted a dynamic approach to the approved investment programme, allowing adjustments on an annual basis as well as a mid-term review. SEPCO has been directed to submit its mid-term review by December 2027. The review will include updated electricity demand forecasts, progress on approved projects and the company’s financial performance. Provisional T&D loss target set at 16.31% For FY2025-26 and FY2026-27, Nepra has approved a provisional T&D loss target of 16.31% for SEPCO. The target includes a 1% allowance related to law-and-order conditions. The regulator has also ordered SEPCO to commission an independent third-party assessment of its T&D losses through an international consultant or consortium. The study is required to be completed within nine months, with the timeline taking effect from January 7, 2026, in accordance with the tariff rebasing decision. Nepra warned that failure to submit the required independent study within the prescribed period could result in the regulator applying benchmark loss levels. Under the benchmark framework, the applicable levels would include 5.32% high-tension (HT) losses and 1.85% low-tension (LT) losses, resulting in total distribution losses of 7.17%. Transmission losses would be set at 1%, while the overall technical loss ceiling would remain within the range of 8% to 10%.

WELLINGTON: Pakistan and New Zealand have agreed to intensify bilateral economic and commercial cooperation, with agriculture, livestock, information technology, education and services identified as key areas offering greater potential for collaboration. The understanding was reached during a series of high-level meetings held in Wellington on August 6, where officials from both countries reviewed the state of bilateral relations and discussed measures to expand trade and investment ties. According to a statement issued by Pakistan’s Foreign Office on Saturday, the discussions placed particular emphasis on improving market access and developing practical avenues for cooperation in sustainable agriculture. The two sides also explored the possibility of technical collaboration in areas such as wool production and plant protection. The meetings included the 5th round of Pakistan-New Zealand Political Consultations and the 3rd meeting of the Pakistan-New Zealand Joint Trade Committee (JTC). The talks provided both sides with an opportunity to assess existing cooperation and identify new sectors for mutually beneficial economic engagement. The Pakistani delegation at the Joint Trade Committee meeting was headed by Commerce Secretary Jawad Paul Khawaja, while the New Zealand side was led by Grahame Morton. Officials also examined ways to strengthen institutional arrangements that could facilitate closer economic cooperation between the two countries. Improving trade relations and creating a stronger framework for investment were among the areas discussed during the engagement. The political consultations were co-chaired by Ambassador Dr Syed Ali Asad Gillani, Additional Foreign Secretary for Asia Pacific at Pakistan’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and Grahame Morton, Deputy Secretary of the Americas and Asia Group at New Zealand’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade. During the consultations, the two delegations conducted a broad review of Pakistan-New Zealand relations and discussed opportunities to expand cooperation in several fields. These included economic development, science and technology, education, counterterrorism, efforts against transnational crime, high-level exchanges and people-to-people contacts. The officials also discussed regional and global developments and agreed on the importance of maintaining closer coordination at multilateral forums. Pakistan briefed New Zealand on its position regarding developments in the Middle East, including Islamabad’s efforts to help reduce tensions and promote peace. The Pakistani delegation also shared its assessment of the regional situation in South Asia, including developments concerning Indian Illegally Occupied Jammu and Kashmir (IIOJK) and Pakistan’s concerns over India’s actions relating to the Indus Waters Treaty. According to the Foreign Office, Morton acknowledged Pakistan’s constructive contribution to efforts aimed at promoting peace in the Middle East. Education cooperation gains momentum One of the major outcomes of the engagement was the signing of an Education Cooperation Arrangement between Pakistan and New Zealand. The agreement is expected to provide a foundation for closer cooperation in education and create opportunities for greater institutional engagement between the two countries. Education was also discussed as an important component of broader people-to-people relations, alongside science, technology and skills development. The latest consultations come as both countries seek to build on existing bilateral ties and diversify areas of cooperation. Agriculture and livestock, in particular, offer opportunities for technical exchanges and knowledge sharing, while the growing importance of information technology and services could provide additional avenues for economic collaboration. The two sides also stressed the need to translate discussions into practical initiatives that can improve bilateral trade and investment flows. Officials described the meetings as an opportunity to take stock of progress in Pakistan-New Zealand relations, explore emerging areas of cooperation and strengthen institutional mechanisms for future engagement. The discussions concluded with a reaffirmation of the two countries’ commitment to developing a broader, forward-looking partnership based on mutual economic interests, diplomatic coordination and stronger people-to-people connections.

UMERKOT: Flour mill owners in Umerkot district have rejected the government-fixed price of Rs128 per kilogram, arguing that the sharp increase in wheat prices has pushed their production costs far above the officially notified rate. The millers said the prevailing wheat price in the open market had climbed to around Rs125 per kilogram, while additional expenses related to milling, labour, electricity, transportation and other operations had increased the overall cost of producing flour to nearly Rs140 per kilogram. They maintained that selling flour at Rs128 per kilogram was therefore commercially unsustainable and would force mill owners to operate at a loss. In this regard, representatives of the flour milling industry have submitted written applications to the Mirpurkhas commissioner and the Umerkot deputy commissioner, requesting authorities to reconsider the existing flour price and determine a new rate based on prevailing market conditions and production costs. The mill owners also raised objections to what they described as excessive administrative action against flour mills across the district. They specifically complained about raids and wheat seizures allegedly carried out by assistant commissioners in Umerkot, Kunri, Samaro and Pithoro. According to the millers, government policy allows flour mill owners to maintain wheat stocks of up to 850 bags per stone at their mills or designated warehouses. They alleged that despite the provision, local administrative officials had conducted raids on mills and storage facilities and seized wheat stocks. The mill owners termed the alleged seizures unjustified and said such actions were creating additional difficulties for an already financially pressured industry. They urged the authorities to ensure that enforcement measures were carried out strictly in accordance with the relevant government policy. The millers further called for an investigation into alleged irregularities involving food department inspectors. They demanded that senior provincial officials examine the complaints and take appropriate action if any wrongdoing is established. They appealed to the Sindh chief minister, provincial food secretary, Mirpurkhas commissioner, Umerkot deputy commissioner and other concerned authorities to intervene in the matter and review the officially fixed flour price. The mill owners argued that the price should be determined after taking into account the current cost of wheat as well as electricity, labour, transportation, maintenance and other expenses associated with flour production. They warned that continued enforcement of a price they consider economically unviable could increase financial losses for flour mills and put further pressure on the district’s milling industry. The millers said they were willing to cooperate with the administration in maintaining the availability of flour and preventing unjustified price increases, but stressed that any official pricing mechanism must reflect actual market and production costs. They also urged the provincial government to establish a transparent mechanism for monitoring wheat stocks and flour prices so that disputes between millers and local administrations could be resolved through clear rules rather than repeated raids and seizures.

KARACHI: A nationwide strike by goods transporters has triggered growing concern among industrialists, who fear that a prolonged disruption in cargo movement could disrupt factory operations, delay export shipments and add further pressure to Pakistan’s already fragile economy. Business leaders have warned that the continued suspension of freight services could create serious bottlenecks in the supply chain, particularly for industries that rely on the regular movement of raw materials and intermediate goods. Any prolonged shortage of essential inputs could force factories to slow down production or temporarily shut operations. The industrial sector is also facing the risk of delays in the delivery of finished products to domestic markets and international buyers. Export-oriented industries, in particular, could suffer if consignments fail to reach ports or overseas customers within agreed timelines. President of the SITE Association of Industry (SAI) Abdul Rehman Fudda said the transporters’ strike had created a critical situation for the manufacturing sector, as industries could not maintain uninterrupted production without a reliable logistics network. He said factories depended on the timely arrival of raw materials and the smooth transportation of finished goods. Any disruption in freight movement, he added, could interrupt production schedules and increase costs for manufacturers. Fudda warned that the impact of the strike could extend beyond factories, affecting workers, suppliers, exporters, retailers and other businesses linked to the industrial supply chain. He pointed out that Pakistan’s export sector was already operating under significant pressure because of high production costs and other economic challenges. A disruption in transportation, he said, would further increase the difficulties faced by exporters. The SAI president cautioned that delays in export shipments could have financial as well as reputational consequences. International buyers may impose penalties, demand price reductions or seek compensation when shipments fail to arrive within agreed deadlines. According to him, exporters operate under strict delivery schedules, and even a temporary disruption in logistics can affect production planning, container bookings and shipment arrangements. Fudda stressed that the consequences of the strike should be assessed from a broader economic perspective rather than being viewed solely as a dispute between transporters and other stakeholders. He said an interruption in the movement of goods could affect the entire supply chain, from the procurement of raw materials to the manufacturing process and eventual delivery of products to customers. The industrialist further warned that repeated delays in fulfilling export orders could undermine the confidence of foreign buyers and make it more difficult for Pakistani businesses to retain existing international contracts or secure new orders. Industrialists have therefore urged the relevant authorities and representatives of goods transporters to resolve their differences at the earliest and restore the movement of cargo across the country. They maintained that an uninterrupted logistics system was essential for keeping factories operational, protecting jobs, meeting export commitments and supporting economic activity. Business leaders also called for a sustainable resolution to the issues behind the transporters’ strike so that similar disruptions could be avoided in the future. They said uncertainty in the movement of goods not only affects individual industries but can also have wider implications for investment, exports, government revenue and overall economic growth. With industries already facing a challenging business environment, manufacturers fear that a prolonged transport shutdown could further increase operational costs and compound supply-chain problems. They urged the authorities to prioritise negotiations and ensure the resumption of freight services without further delay.

KARACHI: A proposed move to withdraw the permission allowing factories operating in Pakistan’s Export Processing Zones (EPZs) to sell up to 20% of their output in the domestic market has triggered concerns among exporters, investors and international textile-recycling organisations, who fear the policy could disrupt investment, employment and a wider global circular-economy supply chain. The controversy has emerged after Pakistan committed to the International Monetary Fund (IMF) that it would amend the existing rules governing EPZs and prohibit sales from these zones into the domestic tariff area. According to the IMF’s latest programme review, Pakistan has committed to introduce amendments aimed at ending domestic sales by EPZ-based manufacturers. The report states that the amendments were to be placed before the federal cabinet for approval by September 2026. However, exporters and industry representatives have challenged the move, arguing that the existing 80:20 arrangement was part of the investment and regulatory framework under which many businesses established operations in the zones. Under the existing system, EPZ manufacturers can export 80% of their production while selling up to 20% in Pakistan after payment of applicable duties and taxes. Industry stakeholders say the domestic-sale provision is particularly important for products that have limited commercial demand in overseas markets. The proposed abolition has also attracted attention in the United States because American companies supply raw materials and used textiles to Pakistani businesses operating in the EPZs. The US-based Secondary Materials and Recycled Textiles Association (SMART) has approached IMF Mission Chief to Pakistan Iva Petrova, warning that eliminating the domestic-sales provision could have consequences extending beyond Pakistan’s industrial sector. The association has argued that Pakistan occupies an important position in the global textile circular economy, particularly in the sorting, grading, reuse and recycling of used textiles collected in North America and Europe. According to SMART, used clothing and textile materials collected in the United States, Canada and European countries are sent to Pakistan, where they are sorted and graded before being channelled into reuse, recycling, manufacturing and affordable consumer markets. The association has warned that ending the 80:20 mechanism could reduce demand for recovered textiles and place downward pressure on their prices. Such a development, it said, could weaken textile-collection programmes in North America and reduce the income generated by charitable organisations from donated clothing. Organisations including Goodwill, the Salvation Army and St Vincent de Paul depend partly on revenues generated from donated goods to finance a range of social programmes, including workforce training, employment assistance, food support, recovery services, youth programmes and housing assistance. SMART has therefore cautioned that a major disruption in Pakistan’s used-textile market could have financial consequences for charitable organisations in North America, with potential losses running into tens of millions of dollars. The association also warned that reduced demand for used textiles could ultimately result in a greater volume of reusable material being sent to landfills or incinerators rather than being recycled or reused. US exporters raise objections US exporters have also expressed concern over the proposed withdrawal of the 20% domestic-sale allowance. Their concerns are significant because American suppliers form part of the upstream supply chain that feeds Pakistani recycling and manufacturing units located in EPZs. Abid Iqbal, representing Nashmia Industries, said during Express News programme The Review that US exporters had communicated their concerns to Pakistani counterparts. According to Iqbal, US exporters had also been told informally that the IMF itself had not initiated the proposal to remove the 20% quota. The development has consequently raised questions within the industry about how the condition was incorporated into Pakistan’s commitments under the IMF programme and whether sufficient consultation took place with affected stakeholders. Industry representatives have also warned of possible legal and contractual disputes, maintaining that the 20% domestic-sales provision was part of the regulatory and investment framework under which businesses made their investment decisions. They argue that companies entered the zones with an understanding that they would be able to export the bulk of their production while disposing of a limited portion in the domestic market after meeting applicable tax and customs obligations. EPZ rules and proposed amendment The Export Processing Zones Authority (EPZA) operates under the legal framework established through the EPZ Act of 1980. The law enables the establishment of export processing zones with approval from the federal government. Under Rule 228(5) of the Customs Rules, EPZ-based factories have historically been allowed to sell up to 20% of their production in the domestic tariff area, subject to applicable duties and taxes. A higher limit of 30% had been applicable to the Resalpur area. EPZA has reportedly forwarded a proposal to the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) to eliminate the 20% quota from October 1 in line with the IMF-related commitment. The proposal, however, has exposed differences within the government over the scope and interpretation of the IMF condition. Proceedings of the Senate Standing Committee on Industries held last month indicate that the Ministry of Industries and Production maintained that abolition of the 20% domestic-sales quota was not included in the original IMF agreement. According to the ministry’s position, the initial IMF requirement was restricted to preventing the introduction of new fiscal incentives, including tax concessions and subsidies, rather than immediately eliminating the existing domestic-sales mechanism. The ministry has reportedly argued that the later addition of the quota-related condition requires further clarification. Assessment of EPZs The issue is also linked to an assessment of Special Economic Zones (SEZs) and EPZs that Pakistan was required to undertake under the IMF programme. The government engaged consultancy firm AT Kearney to assess the zones and determine whether their operations were creating distortions in the domestic market. According to records presented before the Senate Standing Committee on Industries, the assessment completed last year concluded that EPZs were not creating significant market distortions. The report, according to the parliamentary proceedings, did not recommend withdrawing existing fiscal incentives. The issue has therefore become a point of discussion between government officials and the IMF as authorities seek to reconcile the lender’s programme requirements with