Life & Style

Dr. Samina Haq, a Pakistani gynecologist and fertility specialist with more than 30 years of experience, has sparked a heated debate on social media following remarks about young women living in hostels away from their hometowns. Haq, who is known for discussing women’s health as well as social issues on digital platforms, made the controversial comments during a recent podcast with Main Arsalan. Her remarks focused on young women who move from smaller cities to larger urban areas for higher education or employment. (Reviewit.pk⁠) According to the report, Haq claimed that a “majority” of young women living in hostels while studying or working are involved in earning money through unspecified “other means” at night, while attending university or working regular jobs during the day. The sweeping nature of the statement quickly drew attention online. (Reviewit.pk⁠) The comments have divided social media users. Some people supported Haq and argued that parents should remain involved in their daughters’ lives when they move away for education or employment. Others said that families should be aware of their children’s surroundings and that hostel management and wardens also have an important responsibility. However, many users strongly criticized the statement. Some argued that making such a broad claim unfairly associates female hostel residents with immoral behavior and could damage the reputation of thousands of young women who move to major cities simply to pursue their education or careers. One concern repeatedly raised online was the possible effect on families. Critics argued that statements like these could discourage parents from allowing their daughters to study in other cities, potentially limiting their educational and professional opportunities. (Reviewit.pk⁠) The debate also raises a larger question about how society discusses young women living independently. Moving away from home for university or employment can bring genuine challenges, including loneliness, safety concerns, financial pressure and adjusting to an unfamiliar environment. However, those challenges should not automatically be connected to assumptions about a woman’s character. Haq’s professional background has also contributed to the discussion. Medical profiles identify her as an MBBS and FCPS-qualified gynecologist, with certifications in IVF/ICSI as well as laparoscopic and hysteroscopic surgery. She has been practicing for roughly three decades. (www.marham.pk⁠) Her remarks have therefore attracted attention not only because of their controversial subject matter but also because they came from a respected medical professional and public speaker. Ultimately, the online reaction demonstrates how sensitive conversations surrounding women, education, independence and morality remain in Pakistani society. While concerns about young people’s safety and wellbeing deserve serious discussion, broad claims about an entire group can easily create stigma. The controversy surrounding Dr. Samina Haq’s comments is likely to continue, particularly as social media users debate where parental responsibility, personal freedom and social judgment should intersect. Dr. Samina Haq, a Pakistani gynecologist and fertility specialist with more than 30 years of experience, has sparked a heated debate on social media following remarks about young women living in hostels away from their hometowns. Haq, who is known for discussing women’s health as well as social issues on digital platforms, made the controversial comments during a recent podcast with Main Arsalan. Her remarks focused on young women who move from smaller cities to larger urban areas for higher education or employment. (Reviewit.pk⁠) According to the report, Haq claimed that a “majority” of young women living in hostels while studying or working are involved in earning money through unspecified “other means” at night, while attending university or working regular jobs during the day. The sweeping nature of the statement quickly drew attention online. (Reviewit.pk⁠) The comments have divided social media users. Some people supported Haq and argued that parents should remain involved in their daughters’ lives when they move away for education or employment. Others said that families should be aware of their children’s surroundings and that hostel management and wardens also have an important responsibility. However, many users strongly criticized the statement. Some argued that making such a broad claim unfairly associates female hostel residents with immoral behavior and could damage the reputation of thousands of young women who move to major cities simply to pursue their education or careers. One concern repeatedly raised online was the possible effect on families. Critics argued that statements like these could discourage parents from allowing their daughters to study in other cities, potentially limiting their educational and professional opportunities. (Reviewit.pk⁠) The debate also raises a larger question about how society discusses young women living independently. Moving away from home for university or employment can bring genuine challenges, including loneliness, safety concerns, financial pressure and adjusting to an unfamiliar environment. However, those challenges should not automatically be connected to assumptions about a woman’s character. Haq’s professional background has also contributed to the discussion. Medical profiles identify her as an MBBS and FCPS-qualified gynecologist, with certifications in IVF/ICSI as well as laparoscopic and hysteroscopic surgery. She has been practicing for roughly three decades. (www.marham.pk⁠) Her remarks have therefore attracted attention not only because of their controversial subject matter but also because they came from a respected medical professional and public speaker. Ultimately, the online reaction demonstrates how sensitive conversations surrounding women, education, independence and morality remain in Pakistani society. While concerns about young people’s safety and wellbeing deserve serious discussion, broad claims about an entire group can easily create stigma. The controversy surrounding Dr. Samina Haq’s comments is likely to continue, particularly as social media users debate where parental responsibility, personal freedom and social judgment should intersect.

Yash’s much-awaited film Toxic: A Fairy Tale for Grown-Ups has found itself at the centre of a legal controversy shortly after its theatrical release. While the film has been receiving mixed to negative reactions from audiences and critics, several YouTubers and social media influencers who posted critical reviews have reportedly received legal notices from representatives of the film’s production team. The controversy comes just days after the makers obtained an ex-parte interim injunction from a Bengaluru court. The order restricts the publication and circulation of content that is considered false or defamatory against the film. The development has now drawn attention to the difference between a legal notice and an actual court order, particularly as reviewers continue to discuss their experiences online. One of the reviewers who publicly revealed receiving a notice is YouTuber Suraj Kumar. He shared a screenshot of the legal communication on social media. The notice was issued by Bengaluru-based Aiplex Software, which stated that it was acting on behalf of KVN-Monster Mind Creations LLP, the production company behind Toxic. The notice reportedly referred to a review uploaded by Suraj on the day the film was released. It alleged that his review had been published, circulated, shared, posted or otherwise communicated online. Despite receiving the notice, Suraj did not remove his review. Instead, he shared the legal notice with his followers and responded with a sarcastic caption thanking the Toxic team for taking legal action over his review. Another reviewer who has spoken about receiving a similar notice is Tamil YouTuber Prashanth Rangaswamy. He also took to social media to reveal that he had received a legal notice concerning his review of the film. His post expressed disappointment over the development and questioned the decision to take legal action against reviewers who had expressed negative opinions about the movie. Reports also suggest that an influencer on X received a similar notice after uploading a negative review in Tamil. The notices appear to have been sent as part of the production team’s wider effort to address online content surrounding the film. According to the legal communication, Aiplex has been authorised to represent the producers for a specific period, from July 13 through September 26. During this period, the company can reportedly issue takedown requests and approach online platforms, internet service providers and search engines regarding allegedly objectionable material connected to the film. However, receiving a legal notice does not automatically mean that a reviewer has been found guilty of defamation. The court order is a separate matter. The interim injunction was granted on August 22 by Bengaluru’s Additional City Civil and Sessions Court and specifically concerns content alleged to be false or defamatory. The order is temporary and is expected to remain in force until the next hearing, scheduled for September 28. This is not the first time Aiplex has been involved in disputes concerning online film reviews. Telugu YouTuber Sushant had previously accused the company of using copyright-related strikes against critical movie reviews during opening weekends, adding another layer to the ongoing discussion about how film criticism is handled online. Meanwhile, Toxic, directed by Geetu Mohandas, features Yash in the lead role alongside Kiara Advani, Nayanthara and other prominent actors. The film had generated considerable anticipation before its release, but its reception has reportedly been largely negative. The film’s box-office performance has also shown a significant decline after its opening day. Toxic reportedly earned around Rs 101 crore on its first day, while its collection fell sharply to approximately Rs 36 crore on the second day. The legal notices issued to reviewers have therefore become a major talking point alongside the film’s performance. As the court proceedings continue, the controversy has raised broader questions about the boundaries between film criticism, online opinions and allegedly defamatory content.

Indian actress Kriti Sanon’s Raksha Bandhan advertisement became the centre of an online debate over clothing, cultural traditions and expectations surrounding women’s appearance during festivals. The discussion gained further attention after Madhu Chopra, mother of Priyanka Chopra Jonas, shared her views on personal choice, dignity and dressing appropriately for different occasions. Speaking at the Women Building Cinema Together event in Mumbai, Madhu acknowledged that individuals should have the freedom to make their own choices. However, she stressed that personal freedom should also be balanced with awareness of the occasion and respect for other people’s values. “My body, my choice is right, but woh daayra zaruri hai,” Madhu said while discussing the issue. She explained that although people have the right to decide what they want to wear, there is also a need to consider the setting and maintain a certain level of dignity. According to her, clothing choices can be personal while still taking into account the cultural or social environment in which a person appears. Madhu also referred to the way her children dress for professional commitments. She said that her children, including Priyanka, wear different kinds of outfits depending on their work and personal preferences. However, she added that clothing should also be aesthetically suitable for the occasion. “My kids also wear such clothes, for work and because they like wearing but I also feel, they need to look good aesthetically as per the occasion,” she said. Her comments came amid criticism surrounding a Raksha Bandhan campaign by jewellery brand GIVA featuring Kriti Sanon. The advertisement showed Kriti in an Indo-Western outfit while celebrating the festival by tying a rakhi to her onscreen brother as well as her pet dog. The campaign quickly attracted criticism on social media, with some viewers questioning whether the actress’s outfit was appropriate for a festival associated with family traditions and cultural values. The debate soon expanded beyond the advertisement itself, with people discussing whether women should be expected to follow particular dress codes during traditional celebrations. Following the backlash, GIVA removed the advertisement from its social media platforms. The jewellery brand later clarified that it respected Indian culture, traditions and festivals and said that there had been no intention to hurt anyone’s sentiments through the campaign. Kriti subsequently addressed the controversy through her Instagram Stories. Rather than focusing on the clothes featured in the advertisement, the actress highlighted the emotional meaning behind Raksha Bandhan. She argued that the festival should primarily be understood through the relationships, affection and emotions shared between loved ones. “The essence of festivals is not in the clothes you wear; it is in the emotions and meaning you attach to the traditions,” Kriti wrote. The actress also spoke about her own relationship with her sister and the role her pets play in her life. She described Raksha Bandhan as a celebration of care, protection, love and prayers for the wellbeing of family members. Kriti further questioned the tendency to judge women primarily through their clothing during traditional occasions. She suggested that culture and traditions should not be reduced to the clothes a woman chooses to wear, particularly when the deeper meaning of a festival lies in relationships and emotions. The contrasting perspectives from Kriti and Madhu kept the conversation going online. While Kriti focused on personal choice and the emotional significance of festivals, Madhu emphasised the importance of balancing individual freedom with the nature of the occasion and respect for cultural values. The controversy ultimately became part of a wider discussion about how women are viewed during traditional celebrations and whether their clothing should determine how respectfully they are perceived. It also highlighted the continuing debate between personal expression and cultural expectations, particularly when celebrities and brands use traditional festivals in advertising campaigns.

Yash and Kiara Advani’s much-awaited film Toxic has officially arrived in cinemas, but its opening-day response from audiences has been far from the excitement that surrounded the project before its release. The film hit theatres on August 26, marking Yash’s return to the big screen after a four-year gap following the success of the K.G.F franchise. With a star-studded cast featuring Kiara Advani, Nayanthara, Tara Sutaria and Huma Qureshi, Toxic had generated considerable anticipation among fans. The film has been directed by Geetu Mohandas and revolves around a powerful mafia group, promising an intense and visually striking cinematic experience. However, after watching the film on its first day, several moviegoers took to social media to share their disappointment. While expectations were high because of Yash’s popularity and the film’s ambitious scale, a section of viewers felt that the final product failed to live up to the hype. One viewer described Toxic as a “huge disappointment,” criticizing its storytelling, pacing and overall execution. According to the audience member, the film felt boring and failed to make an impact despite the expectations surrounding it. The viewer rated the movie 2 out of 5 and suggested that much more was expected from a project featuring such a major star. Another viewer was even more critical of the film, calling it a major disappointment and describing the experience as extremely frustrating. The reaction also focused on the film’s lengthy runtime and Yash’s portrayal, with the viewer questioning why a major star’s comeback had been presented in such a manner. The negative reactions have particularly focused on the contrast between the film’s massive pre-release buzz and the experience some audiences reported after watching it. Yash’s return had been eagerly awaited since his last appearance in K.G.F: Chapter 2, and fans had expected Toxic to deliver another memorable performance from the actor. Instead, some viewers have described the comeback as loud but lacking substance. For them, the film’s scale, star power and promotional build-up were not enough to compensate for what they considered weak storytelling and execution. The reactions have also sparked discussions about whether Toxic was able to make effective use of its impressive ensemble cast. With actors such as Kiara Advani, Nayanthara, Tara Sutaria and Huma Qureshi sharing the screen with Yash, expectations were naturally high. However, early audience feedback suggests that some viewers felt the characters and performances did not make the desired impact. Despite the criticism, the film’s opening-day response on social media represents only the initial reaction, and its overall reception could change as more audiences watch it in the coming days. Box-office performance, word of mouth and reviews from a wider section of viewers will ultimately determine how Toxic fares during its theatrical run. For now, however, the film appears to have left a section of moviegoers underwhelmed, particularly those who had been waiting years to see Yash make his return to the big screen. With such high expectations attached to the project, Toxic now faces the challenge of convincing audiences that the film has more to offer beyond its star power and grand presentation.

Dolly Parton’s death has left fans, fellow musicians and the entertainment industry mourning the loss of one of country music’s most beloved and influential figures. The legendary singer, songwriter, actress and philanthropist died on Tuesday, August 25, in Nashville at the age of 80. Parton’s family initially announced her death without revealing the cause. Her representatives and an estate spokesperson have now confirmed that the music icon died following a brief battle with cancer. The specific type of cancer was not disclosed. According to the statement, Parton passed away peacefully at Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center in Nashville, surrounded by members of her family and loved ones. Her representatives described her final battle as brave and reflected on the extraordinary impact she made throughout her decades-long career. The statement also highlighted Parton’s lifelong commitment to helping others. Beyond her achievements in music and entertainment, she became widely respected for her generosity and philanthropic work. Her representatives pointed to her Imagination Library, a nonprofit program that has distributed hundreds of millions of books to children. Parton’s charitable legacy also extended to medical research. In April 2020, during the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic, she donated $1 million to Vanderbilt University Medical Center after learning from a doctor friend that researchers needed additional funding for coronavirus studies. The contribution helped establish the Dolly Parton COVID-19 Research Fund, which provided early financial support for research that contributed to the development of the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine. Her representatives described her generosity and compassion as central to the legacy she leaves behind. From encouraging children to read to supporting scientific research, Parton consistently used her success to make a difference in the lives of others. Dolly Parton’s death announcement The initial announcement of Parton’s death came through her official Instagram account. Her nephew and longtime head of security, Bryan Seaver, shared the heartbreaking news on behalf of the Parton and Owens families. Seaver described Parton as his aunt and recalled the difficult responsibility of announcing her passing. He revealed that Parton had asked him years earlier to make such an announcement when the time came. Seaver had worked as Parton’s head of security for more than two decades, following in the footsteps of his father, Larry. While acknowledging the sadness surrounding her death, he emphasized the pride and honor he felt in being part of her life and protecting her for so many years. Dolly Parton’s remarkable career Born on January 19, 1946, Parton grew up in a large family in Tennessee and developed a passion for music at a young age. She began performing on local radio and television programs as a child before building a professional career that would eventually make her one of the most recognizable figures in country music. Parton released her debut studio album, Hello, I’m Dolly, in 1967. Over the following decades, she achieved enormous success as a singer and songwriter, earning 11 Grammy Awards and producing numerous enduring hits. Her career eventually expanded beyond music into acting, television, business and philanthropy. Parton was also known for maintaining a deeply private personal life despite her immense fame. She married Carl Thomas Dean on May 30, 1966, and remained with him for nearly six decades until his death in March 2025. The couple did not have children together. With her death, the entertainment world has lost an extraordinary performer whose influence extended far beyond the stage. Her music, generosity and commitment to helping others have secured a lasting legacy that is expected to continue inspiring generations.

Sydney Sweeney and Scooter Braun appear to be taking their relationship to thrilling new heights, with the couple recently embracing a series of adventurous activities together. The Euphoria star gave fans a glimpse into their latest date night on August 25, sharing a collection of photos and videos featuring Braun during their action-packed outing. Sweeney appeared to be enjoying the experience alongside her boyfriend as they took part in an extreme adventure that showcased their fearless sides. One of the playful photos showed Sweeney sitting on Braun’s lap as the pair posed beside a colorful aircraft. Keeping the caption short and sweet, the actress simply wrote, “Date night.” The post quickly caught the attention of fans, particularly because of the couple’s willingness to participate in daring activities together. In one of the videos, Braun, 45, could be seen taking part in bungee jumping, fully embracing the adrenaline-filled experience. Sweeney herself also appeared ready for an adventure. A day earlier, the actress shared a video showing her standing on top of a biplane while taking part in wing walking. The unusual activity gave followers another glimpse of the actress stepping outside her comfort zone and enjoying an adventurous moment. The couple’s recent social media posts have generated plenty of reactions from fans, many of whom expressed their admiration for their relationship and their adventurous date choices. One fan jokingly praised the romance, writing that it was like “dating the coolest woman on earth.” Another admitted they could not understand why anyone would willingly choose such a dangerous activity, while a third commenter shared a personal experience involving the same aircraft. The reactions highlight the curiosity surrounding Sweeney and Braun’s relationship, which has attracted considerable public attention since romance rumors first emerged. Who is Sydney Sweeney dating? Sydney Sweeney is reportedly dating Scooter Braun, with the pair appearing to be in a serious and committed relationship. Sweeney, best known for her roles in Euphoria, The White Lotus and Anyone but You, and Braun, a prominent figure in the music industry, were first linked after reportedly meeting at the wedding of Jeff Bezos and Lauren Sánchez in Venice, Italy, in June 2025. Their relationship has since become a subject of widespread interest, particularly as they have gradually been seen together in public and have shared glimpses of their time together. Although both Sweeney and Braun have largely kept details of their romance private, their recent social media activity has offered fans a closer look at their dynamic. Their latest adventure-filled date night suggests that the pair are comfortable enjoying exciting experiences together. From bungee jumping to wing walking, Sweeney and Braun appear to have found a shared enthusiasm for adrenaline-fueled activities. As their relationship continues to attract attention, fans are watching closely for more glimpses of the couple and their life together. For now, their latest posts suggest that the pair are enjoying their time together while making some unforgettable memories along the way.