elon musk admits

Elon Musk admits his OpenAI bet backfired

Elon Musk now believes one of his earliest moves to stop any single company from dominating artificial intelligence may have backfired badly. In a conversation with Zanny Minton Beddoes, editor-in-chief of The Economist, the xAI founder said he originally helped create OpenAI as a counterweight to Google, which had “more or less a monopoly on AI” at the time. Musk admitted things did not play out the way he had hoped.

He pointed to Anthropic’s split from OpenAI, and its rise into a leading AI company, as proof his original bet triggered consequences he never saw coming. It ultimately sped up the AI race rather than slowing it down. He said he was not really trying to accelerate AI, but that creating OpenAI, followed by Anthropic spinning out of it, ended up producing knock-on effects that did exactly that. His takeaway was blunt, every road in AI now leads to faster development, not less.

The comments arrive amid Musk’s ongoing legal battle with OpenAI CEO Sam Altman over the company’s shift from nonprofit research lab to commercial powerhouse.

Musk has framed his frustration in simple terms, he says that he funded a nonprofit meant to be an open-source AI company owned by the world, only to watch it become an $800 billion closed-source for-profit business. That is the opposite of what he intended his donation for.

Musk had sought $150 billion in damages from OpenAI, Altman, Microsoft, and other parties. A federal jury in Oakland ruled in May that his claims fell outside the statute of limitations, and Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers dismissed the case on those grounds. Musk has said he plans to appeal to the Ninth Circuit.

Despite the feud with Altman, Musk struck a notably warmer tone about Anthropic. He suggested the people who left OpenAI to start it did so because they had lost faith in Altman’s leadership, and he praised Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei as someone genuinely principled and seriously concerned about AI’s future. He went so far as to say the company’s team passed what he called his “evil detector.”

Musk also floated a safety proposal: giving leading AI labs a window of a week or two to review rivals’ models before public release. His reasoning was that competitors checking each other, even amid personal animosity between CEOs, would actually make the process more honest rather than less.

Similar Posts

  • | | |

    Iran unleashes drone barrage on US bases

    The conflict between Iran and the United States intensified on Friday as Iranian military officials claimed to have carried out drone attacks on several military facilities used by US forces in Kuwait, Bahrain and Jordan. The developments came after fresh US airstrikes on Iranian targets, signalling another major escalation in the months-long regional confrontation. According to Iranian military statements, “Arash” attack drones targeted US military warehouses and troop positions at Camp Udairi, Camp Doha and Camp Arifjan in Kuwait. Iranian officials said the attacks focused on weapons storage sites, military equipment and logistical facilities. They warned that further military action would continue if attacks against Iran persisted. Iran also claimed responsibility for drone strikes on Sheikh Isa Air Base in Bahrain and Al-Azraq Air Base in Jordan. Iranian state media reported that fuel storage areas, aircraft hangars, maintenance facilities and accommodation used by US personnel were among the intended targets. However, there was no immediate confirmation from the United States, Bahrain, Jordan or Kuwait regarding the reported attacks. Officials in those countries also did not immediately report casualties or significant damage. Meanwhile, US forces reportedly carried out fresh airstrikes on an Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) naval headquarters in the northern Iranian town of Zibakenar. Iranian authorities said the facility was hit but added that initial assessments showed no casualties. In Iraq, several explosions were reported near Erbil International Airport, where US-led coalition forces are stationed. Witnesses reported hearing air defence systems in operation while drones were seen flying over the area. Smoke was later observed rising near the airport complex. Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi warned that any country assisting the United States in military operations against Iran would be held responsible under international law. He said Tehran reserved the right to respond with measures permitted under self-defence. Araghchi also criticised Washington over comments suggesting frozen Iranian assets could be used to compensate for damage caused to commercial shipping. He warned that confiscating another country’s assets would create a dangerous international precedent and undermine global financial stability. The military escalation has also affected global energy markets. Concerns over security in the Strait of Hormuz and the Red Sea have sharply reduced tanker traffic through key shipping routes. Shipping data indicated that only one oil tanker crossed the Strait of Hormuz on Thursday, the lowest daily figure in more than two months. The situation worsened after attacks on Saudi oil tankers in the Red Sea increased fears of further disruption to global energy supplies. Rising tensions pushed international oil prices above $100 per barrel, raising fresh concerns about inflation and the global economy. US President Donald Trump warned that Iran and the Iran-backed Houthi movement would face severe military consequences if attacks on commercial shipping continued. He said Washington was prepared to respond forcefully to any further threats against regional security and international maritime trade.

  • |

    Dubai launches tourist discount drive for residents

    Dubai has introduced a new initiative offering special discounts and benefits to residents who invite friends and family members to visit the emirate. The move aims to support the tourism sector, which has faced challenges due to regional tensions and declining visitor activity. Under the programme, residents can invite their relatives and friends to Dubai and receive benefits worth more than AED 3,000, including hotel stays, dining offers, entertainment experiences and attraction tickets. The initiative, called “A Dubai Invite,” encourages residents to become ambassadors for the city by promoting Dubai as a travel destination among their personal networks. The programme will continue until the end of October. Residents can register and nominate guests through an official platform, allowing invited visitors to access the available offers and experiences during their stay. The campaign comes during the summer season, which is traditionally a slower period for tourism in the United Arab Emirates due to extremely high temperatures that can reach around 50 degrees Celsius. Dubai remains one of the world’s leading tourism destinations, attracting millions of visitors every year with its luxury hotels, shopping centres, entertainment venues and iconic landmarks. However, the emirate’s tourism industry has faced pressure following regional security concerns. Earlier tensions in the Middle East affected travel patterns, with some tourists cancelling trips and hotels experiencing lower occupancy levels. The tourism sector has gradually shown signs of recovery after a ceasefire reduced tensions in the region. Industry officials said many hotels have increasingly relied on domestic visitors and local tourism activity during the recovery period. The Dubai government has also introduced financial support measures to help businesses affected by regional disruptions. Previous relief packages included fee reductions, exemptions for certain sectors and support measures for hospitality and aviation-related businesses.

  • |

    Oman proposes gulf-backed plan to ease Strait of Hormuz tensions

      Oman has proposed a new framework for managing the strategically important Strait of Hormuz, with support from Gulf countries, according to a Gulf source and a Western diplomat who spoke to Reuters on Tuesday. The proposal includes a system under which ships using the waterway would be encouraged to make voluntary financial contributions rather than pay mandatory transit fees. The initiative is aimed at easing tensions and restoring stability in one of the world’s busiest maritime trade routes following months of disruption caused by the conflict involving the United States, Israel, and Iran. A senior Iranian official told Reuters that Tehran has not yet responded to Oman’s proposal, which is intended to provide a foundation for a broader agreement to ensure the safe movement of commercial vessels through the strait. The Strait of Hormuz is one of the most critical shipping lanes in the world, carrying around one-fifth of global oil and liquefied natural gas supplies before the conflict intensified. The route has become a focal point of regional tensions, with repeated incidents affecting international trade and energy markets. Meanwhile, US President Donald Trump said there had been “good talks” involving Iran but warned that military action could resume if diplomatic efforts fail to produce results. Trump recently halted a planned two-week US bombing campaign, marking another major shift in his administration’s approach toward the conflict. Despite his comments, Iranian officials continue to deny that Tehran is preparing to restart negotiations with Washington. Earlier this month, the United States launched a renewed military campaign aimed at reducing Iran’s influence over the Strait of Hormuz. Iran had effectively restricted access to the waterway following military strikes by the United States and Israel on February 28, allowing only Iranian vessels to move freely through the area. Although a temporary agreement between Washington and Tehran led to the partial reopening of the strait last month, the arrangement quickly fell apart in early July. According to reports, Iran fired on ships using a navigation channel that it does not officially recognize, reigniting concerns about maritime security and the uninterrupted flow of global trade. Iran has repeatedly stated that it wants to jointly oversee the Strait of Hormuz with Oman, which borders the opposite side of the narrow waterway. Tehran has also proposed charging vessels for navigation-related services. However, the United States argues that international ships should continue to enjoy unrestricted passage without being required to pay mandatory fees, maintaining that such charges would violate international law. Under the proposal put forward by Oman, Iran would not have exclusive authority over the strait. Instead, management responsibilities would be shared, and any payments made by vessels would be entirely voluntary rather than compulsory, according to the Gulf source and the Western diplomat familiar with the discussions. The proposed model is similar to the system used in Southeast Asia’s Strait of Malacca, where Indonesia, Malaysia, and Singapore invite shipping companies to make voluntary contributions. Those funds are used to support navigation safety, environmental protection, and search-and-rescue operations instead of functioning as mandatory transit charges. The Omani initiative is being viewed as a possible compromise that could reduce regional tensions, safeguard international shipping, and help restore confidence in one of the world’s most strategically significant maritime corridors.

  • | |

    Canada announces retaliatory tariffs as trade talks with US collapse

    OTTAWA: Canada has announced plans to impose new tariffs on a range of American products in response to steep duties introduced by US President Donald Trump on Canadian goods, marking another sharp deterioration in trade relations between the two North American neighbours. Prime Minister Mark Carney said on Saturday that Canada would adopt a “dollar-for-dollar” approach to Washington’s latest tariffs. The retaliatory measures are scheduled to take effect on September 8 and will cover products including US steel, electronics, appliances, agricultural equipment, pulp and paper and other goods. The announcement came after three days of intensive negotiations between Canadian and US officials ended without a trade agreement. Both sides blamed the other for the failure to reach a breakthrough, raising fresh uncertainty over the future of the United States-Mexico-Canada trade framework. Carney vows to defend Canadian economy Speaking at a press conference in Ottawa, Carney said Canada would respond to the US measures in an effort to shield workers, farmers, businesses and families from the economic impact of the new duties. “Canada will match Washington’s new tariffs dollar for dollar,” Carney said, stressing that Ottawa could not accept the conditions put forward by the US administration. Asked whether the dispute had effectively developed into a trade war, Carney responded in stark terms, saying Canada had been attacked and therefore had to defend its economic interests. The Canadian government said its countermeasures would target a broad selection of US products. Further details, including the specific goods affected and the tariff rates, are expected to be announced in the coming days. Carney also indicated that Ottawa would introduce support programmes for Canadian industries affected by the American duties. The assistance could remain in place for several years depending on the impact of the trade measures. US-Canada negotiations break down The latest dispute follows the collapse of negotiations that had been viewed as an opportunity to prevent a further escalation in tariffs. US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer described the failed talks as a missed opportunity for Canada and said Washington would proceed with measures responding to Canadian retaliation. He also suggested that no fresh negotiations were immediately planned. The White House and offices representing the US commerce secretary and trade representative did not immediately issue a detailed response to Canada’s announcement. The breakdown has created additional uncertainty for businesses operating across the US-Canada border, particularly industries that depend heavily on integrated North American supply chains. New US duties affect key Canadian exports The latest US tariffs apply to a range of Canadian exports, including wine, furniture, dairy products, cement, clothing, fishing equipment and hockey-related products. According to the Canadian government, the new duties affect approximately $20 billion worth of Canadian exports to the United States. Unlike some previous measures, the latest tariffs do not fully exempt products traded under the existing North American trade agreement. The new duties represent a relatively small share of Canada’s overall exports to the US, but officials and industry representatives warn that individual sectors could face significant pressure. Industries such as softwood lumber, wine, manufacturing and other export-oriented businesses could experience weaker demand, higher costs and potential employment losses if the dispute continues. Candace Laing, chief executive of the Canadian Chamber of Commerce, urged companies across the country to prepare for a prolonged period of uncertainty. Dispute over vehicles and trade conditions One of the most difficult issues during the negotiations involved the treatment of larger vehicles. Canadian negotiators reportedly sought to extend preferential tariff arrangements for light-duty vehicles to medium- and heavy-duty trucks. Washington opposed the proposal, according to people familiar with the negotiations. Carney said the US position could have placed Canadian-made models at a competitive disadvantage. He specifically pointed to vehicles produced in Canada, including Ford’s F-350, F-450 and F-550 trucks and General Motors’ Silverado. The Canadian prime minister also said some US proposals touched on issues involving Canadian culture, language and sovereignty, although he did not provide further details. Ontario backs Ottawa’s position Ontario Premier Doug Ford, a prominent critic of US tariffs, welcomed Carney’s decision to reject what he described as an unfavourable agreement. Ford said the proposed terms would have harmed Ontario’s automotive, steel and manufacturing industries, adding that he supported Ottawa’s decision to retaliate rather than accept a deal that he considered damaging to the province. Ontario is particularly exposed to disruptions in US-Canada trade because of its large manufacturing and automotive sectors and its close integration with American supply chains. Canada seeks new international partnerships The escalating dispute also comes as Canada seeks to reduce its economic dependence on the United States. Nearly 70% of Canadian exports are destined for the US market, making the country particularly vulnerable to changes in American trade policy. Carney has nevertheless pledged to strengthen Canada’s relationships with other countries and explore new trade and security partnerships. The prime minister was elected on a platform that included a tougher negotiating stance toward the Trump administration. His government has maintained that Canada should defend its economic interests while looking for opportunities to expand trade beyond its southern neighbour. Public opinion has also strengthened Ottawa’s position, with polling indicating that many Canadians oppose making major concessions to Washington. Conservative Party leader Pierre Poilievre, who leads the federal opposition, also called for national unity in response to the US tariffs.

  • |

    Iranian flight plunges, makes emergency Ankara landing

    ANKARA: An Iranian passenger aircraft travelling from Istanbul to Tehran made an emergency landing at Ankara International Airport after reportedly developing a serious technical problem during the flight. According to sources, Iranian Flight 7282 departed from Istanbul at 11:43am Pakistan Standard Time with Tehran as its destination. The flight initially proceeded normally after takeoff. At around noon, the aircraft was reportedly cruising at an altitude of approximately 35,000 feet when a sudden technical malfunction occurred. The aircraft subsequently began losing altitude, prompting the crew to take emergency measures. The pilot formally declared an emergency at approximately 12:13pm. During the emergency descent, the aircraft rapidly lost altitude and reportedly descended to around 10,975 feet. Sources said the aircraft later disappeared from radar at an altitude of approximately 7,815 feet. It reportedly reappeared on radar around five minutes later at an altitude of about 5,150 feet. As the situation developed, the pilot contacted Ankara Air Traffic Control and requested permission to divert the aircraft to Ankara for an emergency landing. The request was granted, and the aircraft landed safely at Ankara International Airport at approximately 12:29pm. Following the landing, security and emergency personnel immediately moved into position around the aircraft. The plane was surrounded as a precaution and subsequently transferred to a designated area of the airport. Sources said the aircraft remained at Ankara Airport following the emergency landing. Its engines were reportedly still running while the aircraft remained under observation. There were no immediate reports of casualties or injuries following the landing. The exact nature of the technical malfunction has not yet been officially disclosed. It is also unclear whether the problem involved the aircraft’s engines, flight-control systems or another critical component. A technical inspection is expected to determine what caused the aircraft to lose altitude so rapidly during the flight. The incident comes as aviation authorities continue to maintain strict emergency procedures for aircraft experiencing technical problems while operating in international airspace.

  • | | |

    Imran Khan breaks silence on gender stereotypes, feminism and Bollywood’s portrayal of men

      Ahead of his much-anticipated return to the big screen, Indian actor Imran Khan has spoken candidly about gender stereotypes, feminism, masculinity, fatherhood and the influence cinema can have on social attitudes. In a recent conversation, the actor explained that his growing concern over the way gender-based assumptions have become part of everyday discussions played an important role in shaping his decision to speak more openly about these issues. Khan said he had become increasingly interested in examining the expectations society places on both men and women. According to him, certain assumptions about how people should behave based on their gender have become so common that they are often expressed without being questioned. The actor said he felt a personal responsibility to contribute to conversations surrounding these issues. Rather than remaining a passive observer, he wanted to use his public platform to encourage people to reconsider ideas that have gradually become normalised in society. Khan also discussed the relationship between feminism and conversations about men’s rights. He argued that debates surrounding both subjects can sometimes become trapped within the same stereotypes they are attempting to challenge. In his view, some men who criticise feminism for being problematic may fail to recognise that their own arguments can be influenced by patriarchal thinking or ideas associated with toxic masculinity. For Khan, feminism should not be understood as an attempt to marginalise men or exclude anyone from the conversation. He stressed that discussions about feminism and masculinity should ultimately focus on equality and creating a society in which people are not restricted by traditional gender expectations. The actor also turned his attention to the portrayal of men in Indian cinema, particularly characters who struggle to cope with romantic rejection. Khan argued that Bollywood has repeatedly presented emotionally immature male characters in a sympathetic manner, often encouraging audiences to overlook their problematic behaviour because the characters are experiencing heartbreak. He criticised films in which a male protagonist responds to rejection with anger, obsession or inappropriate behaviour, while the narrative continues to portray him as a victim deserving sympathy. According to Khan, these stories can unintentionally normalise unhealthy emotional responses and send the wrong message about relationships and masculinity. Khan suggested that cinema has a significant cultural influence and therefore filmmakers should consider how their characters and storylines may shape public perceptions. Instead of constantly justifying problematic behaviour through a character’s emotional pain, films could present more mature and realistic portrayals of men dealing with rejection, relationships and vulnerability. His comments come as he prepares to make his return to acting after a prolonged break from the industry. Khan’s decision to step away from films had kept him largely out of the public eye, making his comeback a significant moment for fans who have followed his career. Now, as he prepares to return to the screen, Khan appears interested not only in acting but also in engaging with wider social conversations. His recent remarks reflect his desire to use his experiences and public platform to question established ideas about gender, relationships and masculinity. With his comeback approaching, audiences will be watching closely to see whether Khan’s renewed presence in cinema also brings a different perspective to the kinds of stories and characters he chooses to be part of.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *