erc scrutiny adds
| | | |

ERC scrutiny adds a new wrinkle to Ramon Ang’s Lopez Inc. investment

MANILA, Philippines – Ramon S. Ang’s acquisition of a 25.68% stake in Lopez Inc. has moved beyond a family ownership story and into the regulatory arena, with the Energy Regulatory Commission (ERC) now examining whether his entry into the Lopez holding company could have implications for competition in the power sector.

ERC Chair Francis Saturnino Juan told reporters last week the regulator is looking into whether Ang’s investment, made personally through Illumina Investment Holdings Inc., could raise issues involving generation market-share limits and cross-ownership restrictions because of the relationship between San Miguel Global Power and Lopez-controlled First Gen.

The distinction is important. Ang did not buy the Lopez Inc. stake through San Miguel Corp., and his 25.68% holding does not by itself establish control. But under the Electric Power Industry Reform Act (EPIRA), regulators are not limited to counting shares. They may also consider whether ownership, contractual arrangements, management rights or other forms of influence effectively place companies within a related group.

Must Read

[Vantage Point] System loss: The electricity consumers pay for but never receive


[Vantage Point] System loss: The electricity consumers pay for but never receive

That makes the still-undisclosed governance terms of Ang’s Lopez Inc. investment increasingly important.

Juan said the ERC still needs to determine whether Ang obtained an officer position or other governance role within the Lopez group. The regulator’s inquiry therefore puts a spotlight on questions that the transaction disclosures have so far left unanswered: Does Illumina have board representation, veto rights, special voting arrangements or contractual influence over major decisions?

The ERC has made no finding of wrongdoing and has not said the transaction violates EPIRA. Nor is there any new formal disclosure confirming earlier reports of a broader 71% sale of Lopez Inc. for about ₱45 billion.

Still, the regulatory interest changes the complexion of the deal.

What began as a surprising minority investment by one of the country’s most powerful businessmen in one of its oldest family conglomerates now carries a second question beyond who owns Lopez Inc.: how much influence did Ang actually buy?

That answer could matter not only to the Lopez family, but also to the competitive structure of the Philippine power industry. – Rappler.com

Must Read

[Vantage Point] The math behind Ramon Ang’s Lopez bet


[Vantage Point] The math behind Ramon Ang’s Lopez bet

Must Read

[Vantage Point] Whose P3.5 billion is I&C investing in ABS-CBN?


[Vantage Point] Whose P3.5 billion is I&C investing in ABS-CBN?

Similar Posts

  • |

    Senate seeks review of IPP deals over rising power costs

    Islamabad: Independent Power Producers (IPPs) faced strong criticism in the Senate after lawmakers raised serious concerns over billions of rupees paid as capacity payments to power plants that are not fully operational, calling the practice an unnecessary burden on electricity consumers. The issue was discussed during a meeting of the Senate Standing Committee on Cabinet Secretariat, where members questioned the impact of IPP agreements on electricity prices and demanded a complete review of power generation contracts. The committee expressed concern that consumers are paying for electricity capacity even when some power plants are not producing electricity according to expectations. Members said such payments increase the cost of electricity and place additional pressure on ordinary citizens already facing high power bills. The committee directed the National Electric Power Regulatory Authority (NEPRA) to provide complete details of all Independent Power Producers, including their electricity tariffs, generation capacity, installation costs and rate analysis. The committee chairman stressed that electricity prices must be reviewed and unnecessary costs should be removed to provide relief to consumers. The committee also discussed whether some IPPs had affected the government’s solar energy policy. Members observed that certain power producers had, apparently, created difficulties for the promotion of solar energy initiatives and questioned whether existing agreements were supporting or limiting cheaper energy options. The committee demanded transparency in tariff decisions and questioned why NEPRA had not provided complete tariff determination details despite repeated directions. Lawmakers said clear information was necessary to understand how electricity prices are decided and why consumers continue to face expensive power bills. The committee also discussed imported coal and RLNG based power plants installed in Punjab instead of coastal areas. Officials explained that these plants were established near major electricity demand areas to improve supply efficiency. However, the committee directed NEPRA to provide a detailed comparison of all power projects so that lawmakers could examine costs, benefits and long term impact. The chairman said the government should consider renegotiating IPP agreements where necessary and review contracts of projects that are no longer useful. He said reducing electricity prices requires serious decisions and better management of power sector agreements. The meeting was chaired by Senator Rana Mahmood Ul Hassan and attended by Senators Mohammed Abdul Qadir and Aimal Wali Khan, while other members participated in person and online. The committee also reviewed issues related to circular debt, which remains one of the biggest challenges facing Pakistan’s power sector. Members said increasing electricity costs and financial problems in the energy sector require immediate attention because they directly affect households, businesses and the national economy. The committee’s discussion highlighted concerns over the relationship between power generation costs, IPP agreements and electricity bills paid by consumers. Members called for accountability, transparency and a detailed examination of agreements to ensure that the electricity system works in the public interest. The committee will continue reviewing IPP agreements and related energy sector issues in upcoming

  • |

    Oil prices climb on fears of prolonged Middle East supply disruptions

    LONDON: Global oil prices moved higher on Friday and remained on course for weekly gains as fresh threats from the United States to maintain an indefinite naval blockade of Iran heightened concerns over the security of crude shipments from the Middle East. Brent crude futures gained $1.43, or 1.64%, to reach $88.50 a barrel by 0810 GMT. US West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude also advanced, rising $1.56, or 1.92%, to $82.81 a barrel. The latest rally reflected growing market anxiety that the conflict in the region could persist for an extended period, potentially placing further pressure on one of the world’s most important oil supply routes. Bjarne Schieldrop, chief analyst at SEB Research, said the prospect of prolonged US pressure on Iran had increased uncertainty in the oil market. He noted that the latest developments offered little indication of a quick return to normal conditions in the region. US pressure raises supply concerns Oil markets reacted strongly after the United States warned on Thursday that its naval blockade of Iran could continue indefinitely while Washington considers additional economic measures against Tehran. US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said the administration was preparing further measures aimed at increasing economic pressure on Iran, signalling that Washington could take steps beyond those already announced. The comments added to concerns that tensions between the United States and Iran could remain elevated, making it more difficult for shipping and energy companies to operate normally in the region. Schieldrop said expectations for a rapid restoration of regular shipping through the Strait of Hormuz had weakened significantly as a result of the latest developments. The waterway is particularly important to global energy markets. Before the current conflict began in late February, roughly one-fifth of the world’s daily oil and liquefied natural gas supplies passed through the Strait of Hormuz. Any prolonged disruption could therefore have consequences far beyond the Middle East, potentially affecting crude availability, transportation costs and fuel prices in major consuming markets. Strait of Hormuz traffic under pressure Shipping activity through the strategic waterway declined below the monthly average toward the end of the week as tensions increased and both sides issued competing claims regarding control of the passage. The situation escalated further on Thursday when two vessels belonging to Abu Dhabi National Oil Company were attacked while travelling through the strait, according to the UAE’s state news agency WAM. The UAE government condemned the incident and attributed the attack to Iran, adding another layer of uncertainty for commercial shipping operators using the vital route. Market participants are closely monitoring developments in the strait because even a partial disruption could force vessels to take longer and more expensive alternative routes. Demand outlook limits oil gains Despite the immediate supply concerns, expectations of weaker global oil demand growth are acting as a counterweight to the price rally. Recent forecasts from the Organisation of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) and the International Energy Agency (IEA) have pointed towards slower growth in oil consumption, suggesting that demand may not be strong enough to absorb a prolonged increase in prices without affecting economic activity. US inventory data also provided a bearish signal. American crude stockpiles recorded their biggest weekly increase in more than three and a half years, indicating that supplies in the world’s largest oil-consuming economy remain relatively comfortable. Norbert Rucker, head of economics and next-generation research at Julius Baer, said recent reports from the IEA and US Energy Information Administration showed that oil storage levels were holding up better than markets had initially feared. According to Rucker, stronger-than-expected inventories could eventually put downward pressure on crude prices if geopolitical risks ease. For now, however, the possibility of further escalation between Washington and Tehran is keeping traders focused on supply risks. The market is expected to remain highly sensitive to developments surrounding the Strait of Hormuz, particularly any signs of prolonged restrictions on tanker movements. Analysts said the direction of oil prices in the coming sessions would depend on whether geopolitical tensions intensify further or whether diplomatic efforts succeed in restoring more predictable shipping and energy flows from the region.

  • | | |

    Tax ombudsman flags flaw in FBR refund system

    Pakistan’s Federal Tax Ombudsman has identified a major flaw in the Federal Board of Revenue’s (FBR) FASTER sales tax refund system and directed the tax authority to take immediate corrective measures. The ombudsman said the issue is affecting exporters and undermining the effectiveness of the automated sales tax refund mechanism, which was introduced to ensure quicker processing of refund claims. The observations were made in a ruling issued by Federal Tax Ombudsman Zafar Hijazi while deciding complaints filed by a company regarding delays and issues in the refund process. According to the decision, the FASTER system is unable to distinguish between commercial export goods declarations and non-commercial sample exports. As a result, exporters may face unnecessary delays or complications in obtaining legitimate sales tax refunds. The ombudsman directed the FBR to address the technical shortcomings in the system without delay to ensure that genuine exporters receive timely refunds and the automated mechanism functions efficiently. The ruling emphasized that improving the FASTER system is essential for protecting exporters’ interests and maintaining confidence in Pakistan’s tax refund process

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *