map filipino families
| | |

MAP: Where Filipino families earn the most and least

MANILA, Philippines – An average Filipino family’s income can look vastly different depending on where in the country they live.

Nationwide, average annual family income stood at P411,350 in 2025, or about P34,300 a month, according to preliminary results of the Philippine Statistics Authority’s (PSA) latest Family Income and Expenditure Survey (FIES).

But families in some of the country’s wealthiest cities and provinces earned far more. Makati had the highest average annual income among highly urbanized cities (HUCs) at P796,990, while Ilocos Norte led the country’s provinces at P619,240.

Makati’s figure works out to around P66,400 a month, nearly twice the national average. The next four highest HUCs were also all in Metro Manila: San Juan at P735,960, Parañaque at P711,310, Mandaluyong at P676,130, and Quezon City at P648,150.

At the other end was Zamboanga City, where families earned an average P309,610 annually, or about P25,800 a month. Average family income in Makati was more than two-and-a-half times that in Zamboanga City.

The PSA comparison covers HUCs, rather than every city in the Philippines.

Luzon-Mindanao economic divide

The FIES rankings point to a clear concentration of higher family incomes in Luzon, particularly around the country’s main economic centers.

At the regional level, National Capital Region (NCR) led with an average family income of P574,370, followed by Calabarzon at P526,070 and Central Luzon at P447,310. They were the only three regions above the national average of P411,350, further showing how much economic activity and higher-paying jobs cluster in and around Metro Manila. At the other end were the Bangsamoro Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao (BARMM) at P246,050, the Zamboanga Peninsula at P286,340, and Soccskargen at P292,820.

The provincial rankings show a similar pattern. Ilocos Norte topped all provinces at P619,240, followed by Batanes, Cavite, Rizal, and Batangas. At the other end, the five lowest-income provinces were all in Mindanao, led by Maguindanao del Sur at just P177,750. Ilocos Norte’s average was nearly three-and-a-half times as high.

Ilocos Norte’s place at the top is striking because it sits outside the Luzon Economic Corridor. One clue may be where families in the province get their income. PSA data show they rely less on salaries and more on overseas remittances and business income than the national average. Wages accounted for just 39.8% of family income in Ilocos Norte in 2025, while cash receipts from abroad made up 20.2% and entrepreneurial activities another 19.1%. Nationally, wages accounted for 54.6% of family income and cash from abroad just 8.5%. 

Ilocos Norte’s rise has also been unusually fast. Average family income there climbed from about P364,800 in 2021 to P447,860 in 2023, and P619,240 in 2025 – nearly 70% in four years versus about 34% nationwide. The increase also sped up after 2023, with income growth jumping from 22.8% in 2021-2023 to 38.3% in 2023-2025.

That timing overlaps with the presidency of Ferdinand Marcos Jr., whose family’s political dynasty has long counted Ilocos Norte as its bulwark. Still, the FIES by itself deoesn’t show what drove the province’s income surge or whether increased national government spending played any role.

Must Watch

The Philippines is now upper-middle income. Really?


The Philippines is now upper-middle income. Really?

Fast growth doesn’t necessarily mean high income

Speaking of growth, today’s richest places were not necessarily the ones where incomes grew fastest.

Average family income increased in every region from 2023 to 2025, with Cagayan Valley recording the fastest growth at 25%, from P310,550 to P388,220. Despite that increase, the region’s average family income remained below the national average.

Soccskargen posted the slowest regional growth at just 3.7%.

At the provincial level, Samar registered the biggest increase at 54.4%, with average family income jumping from P231,430 in 2023 to P357,340 in 2025.

Not everywhere saw gains. Sultan Kudarat posted the largest decline at 8.2%, from P293,830 to P269,610.

How families earn their income also differs across the country. Wages and salaries were the largest source of family income in every region except BARMM, where entrepreneurial activities accounted for 43.8% of total family income. – Rappler.com

Must Read

Beyond income, 12.8% of Filipinos are poor across multiple dimensions in 2024


Beyond income, 12.8% of Filipinos are poor across multiple dimensions in 2024

Must Read

[In This Economy] Less than 10% of Filipinos are now poor? Not so fast


[In This Economy] Less than 10% of Filipinos are now poor? Not so fast

Similar Posts

  • |

    Goods transport strike threatens Pakistan’s industry

    KARACHI: A nationwide strike by goods transporters has triggered growing concern among industrialists, who fear that a prolonged disruption in cargo movement could disrupt factory operations, delay export shipments and add further pressure to Pakistan’s already fragile economy. Business leaders have warned that the continued suspension of freight services could create serious bottlenecks in the supply chain, particularly for industries that rely on the regular movement of raw materials and intermediate goods. Any prolonged shortage of essential inputs could force factories to slow down production or temporarily shut operations. The industrial sector is also facing the risk of delays in the delivery of finished products to domestic markets and international buyers. Export-oriented industries, in particular, could suffer if consignments fail to reach ports or overseas customers within agreed timelines. President of the SITE Association of Industry (SAI) Abdul Rehman Fudda said the transporters’ strike had created a critical situation for the manufacturing sector, as industries could not maintain uninterrupted production without a reliable logistics network. He said factories depended on the timely arrival of raw materials and the smooth transportation of finished goods. Any disruption in freight movement, he added, could interrupt production schedules and increase costs for manufacturers. Fudda warned that the impact of the strike could extend beyond factories, affecting workers, suppliers, exporters, retailers and other businesses linked to the industrial supply chain. He pointed out that Pakistan’s export sector was already operating under significant pressure because of high production costs and other economic challenges. A disruption in transportation, he said, would further increase the difficulties faced by exporters. The SAI president cautioned that delays in export shipments could have financial as well as reputational consequences. International buyers may impose penalties, demand price reductions or seek compensation when shipments fail to arrive within agreed deadlines. According to him, exporters operate under strict delivery schedules, and even a temporary disruption in logistics can affect production planning, container bookings and shipment arrangements. Fudda stressed that the consequences of the strike should be assessed from a broader economic perspective rather than being viewed solely as a dispute between transporters and other stakeholders. He said an interruption in the movement of goods could affect the entire supply chain, from the procurement of raw materials to the manufacturing process and eventual delivery of products to customers. The industrialist further warned that repeated delays in fulfilling export orders could undermine the confidence of foreign buyers and make it more difficult for Pakistani businesses to retain existing international contracts or secure new orders. Industrialists have therefore urged the relevant authorities and representatives of goods transporters to resolve their differences at the earliest and restore the movement of cargo across the country. They maintained that an uninterrupted logistics system was essential for keeping factories operational, protecting jobs, meeting export commitments and supporting economic activity. Business leaders also called for a sustainable resolution to the issues behind the transporters’ strike so that similar disruptions could be avoided in the future. They said uncertainty in the movement of goods not only affects individual industries but can also have wider implications for investment, exports, government revenue and overall economic growth. With industries already facing a challenging business environment, manufacturers fear that a prolonged transport shutdown could further increase operational costs and compound supply-chain problems. They urged the authorities to prioritise negotiations and ensure the resumption of freight services without further delay.

  • |

    Electricity tariff may rise by Rs1.34 per unit under quarterly adjustment

    ISLAMABAD: Electricity consumers may face higher power bills for the next three months as the National Electric Power Regulatory Authority (Nepra) considers a proposal seeking to recover an additional financial burden from consumers through the quarterly tariff adjustment mechanism. Nepra has reserved its decision on a request submitted by electricity distribution companies seeking to pass on around Rs34 billion in additional costs to consumers. According to sources, the proposed adjustment could increase the electricity tariff by approximately Rs1.34 per unit each month for three months. If approved, the additional charge would be reflected in consumers’ electricity bills during the applicable period. The quarterly tariff adjustment is used to account for changes in various costs incurred by power distribution companies, including fluctuations in generation and other sector-related expenses. The adjustment is subsequently passed on to consumers after regulatory scrutiny. Sources said Nepra has not yet issued its final decision on the request. The regulator will examine the financial details and relevant data submitted by the distribution companies before determining whether the proposed increase should be approved in full, partially accepted or rejected. The final decision is expected to clarify the exact amount to be recovered from consumers and the period over which the additional charges will apply. Until Nepra announces its decision, the proposed Rs1.34 per-unit increase remains under consideration and should not be treated as a final tariff hike.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *