marcos pushes tax
|

Marcos pushes tax cuts, lower power bills as inflation strains economy

MANILA, Philippines – With inflation still elevated and economic growth expected to slow sharply, President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. used his fifth State of the Nation Address to push wider tax relief for workers and small businesses, and lower electricity bills for consumers.

He also sought an “immediate amendment” to the Electric Power Industry Reform Act (EPIRA) to prohibit power distributors such as Meralco from passing system loss charges and the corresponding value-added taxes (VAT) on to consumers.

Business and taxes: Wider exemptions and amnesty

Marcos proposed raising the annual personal income tax exemption threshold from the current P250,000 to P350,000. Senate President Win Gatchalian also earlier stated that among the Senate’s priorities is a bill to boost workers’ take-home pay by raising the income tax exemption threshold to P400,000 annually while removing taxes on bonuses, overtime, holiday pay, night differentials, hazard pay, and service charges.

Marcos also called for the abolition of the minimum corporate income tax for small businesses. The tax is imposed on gross income when it exceeds the regular corporate income tax, potentially requiring companies to pay even when their taxable profits are low.

The President additionally pushed for an amnesty covering unpaid income, estate, donor’s, and VAT liabilities. Marcos did not explain how much revenue the government could forgo or how the tax reductions would be reconciled with its deficit and debt targets.

Energy: Consumers should not pay for system losses

Marcos’ call to remove system loss charges was among his clearest interventions on persistently high electricity prices.

System loss refers to electricity lost during transmission and distribution, including technical losses from power lines and equipment and nontechnical losses such as theft and meter problems. Under EPIRA, a portion is currently recoverable from consumers, subject to regulatory caps. (READ: Why your Meralco bill will be higher in July – and might rise again soon)

“Hindi naman kasalanan ng consumer kung bakit nagkaroon ng system loss. Kaya hindi naman tama na kailangan sila pa ang pagbabayarin dito (Systems loss is not the fault of the consumer. So it’s not right for them to have to pay for it),” Marcos said.

He called for EPIRA to be amended immediately to prohibit charging system losses to consumers, including the VAT imposed on those charges.

Removing the charge could reduce monthly bills, but Congress and regulators would have to determine who ultimately absorbs the cost. According to Meralco, system loss accounts for about 5% of a consumer’s electricity bill.

Beyond the proposal, Marcos said the government was monitoring almost 200 power projects with nearly 10,000 megawatts (MW) of capacity through 2028, plus more than 1,700 MW of energy-storage projects.

He also highlighted the discovery of an estimated 222 billion cubic feet of additional natural gas at Malampaya and said the resource could support continued production until 2034.

Must Watch

How do we fix our broken electricity system?


How do we fix our broken electricity system?

Trade and financial system: P6-trillion pipeline, lower fees

Marcos said the Philippines now has 23 free trade agreements either in force or under negotiation, including a planned comprehensive economic partnership agreement with the United Arab Emirates.

He said more than P6 trillion in investments had been facilitated through the government’s Green Lanes over the past three years, with the projects estimated to create more than 400,000 jobs. The amount represents investments endorsed or assisted through expedited processes, however, and does not necessarily mean all projects have been constructed, funded, or started commercial operations.

Marcos credited banks and e-wallets for lowering or removing digital transaction fees, and cited loan-payment extensions offered during the crisis. (READ: Banks are dropping transfer fees. Here’s why it took so long.)

What Marcos skipped: Inflation, slow economic growth

The most striking omission was inflation and the sluggish growth of the Philippine economy.

Marcos repeatedly discussed high fuel, food, electricity, and transport costs and the pressure they placed on household incomes. But he did not directly address inflation or explain the government’s outlook for consumer prices. Headline inflation remained high at 6.4% in June, which is well above the government’s target range of 2% to 4%.

There was also no substantial discussion of economic growth, unemployment, wages, poverty, the fiscal deficit, public debt, or the peso. Marcos didn’t mention the Philippines’ new status as an upper-middle-income country, which took the country nearly four decades to achieve. For context, days after achieving this milestone, the government’s economic managers cut growth outlook to only 3.5% to 4.5% in 2026.

Negros groups’ react

In Negros Occidental, several groups frowned over Marcos’ push to exempt workers earning up to P350,000 annually from income tax lacked consultation with stakeholders.

Carlo Oñate, spokesperson of the Trade Union Congress of the Philippines (TUCP), said, “This is not what we want actually. What we want is a P600,000 threshold or P50,000/month earning to be exempted from income tax.”

Oñate said the revenue gap should be addressed by taxing billionaires and large companies instead of ordinary workers. He added that Congress must consolidate competing proposals, including Senate President Sherwin Gatchalian’s “Ginhawa Bill,” which seeks a P400,000 annual income tax exemption.

“Reality check, therefore, is a must before deciding on the exact figure to be exempted,” he said. “Otherwise, the President’s pronouncement on tax exemption will only be classified as rhetoric.”

Roland de la Cruz, president of the National Congress of Unions in the Sugar Industry of the Philippines, said the announcement was not enough because it did not address wage increases.

“It didn’t even pass through a deep conversation with the labor sector,” he said.

De la Cruz said workers expected Marcos to discuss wage hikes amid rising costs but instead highlighted government assistance programs.

On Marcos’ proposal to provide zero tax for small and medium enterprises, Oñate said the measure was “quite impressive” but questioned whether its benefits would reach workers.

Frank Carbon, vice president of the Metro Bacolod Chamber of Commerce and Industry (MBCCI), opined that Marcos failed to sufficiently address unemployment, which has risen to 4.8%, or around 2.5 million jobless Filipinos.

“The labor market is failing to absorb displaced workers, particularly after climate anomalies caused a net loss of 905,000 agricultural and forestry jobs,” Carbon said. – with reports from Ambo Delilan/Rappler.com

Must Read

[Puso at Diwa] Beyond the World Bank’s reclassification of PH as upper-middle income


[Puso at Diwa] Beyond the World Bank’s reclassification of PH as upper-middle income

Similar Posts

  • | | |

    Ministers seek PM’s approval for prices of 52 vi…

    ISLAMABAD: The federal health ministry has sought an urgent meeting with Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif to obtain approval for the pricing of 52 newly registered life-saving medicines. Health Minister Syed Mustafa Kamal and Finance Minister Senator Muhammad Aurangzeb are expected to attend the meeting along with Federal Health Secretary Muhammad Aslam Ghauri and Drug Regulatory Authority of Pakistan (DRAP) Chief Executive Officer Dr Obaidullah. Officials said the health ministry has contacted the prime minister’s adviser, Tauqeer Shah, requesting an early appointment for the delegation. The Cabinet Committee on Drug Pricing had already approved prices for the 52 medicines during its meeting on July 24. However, the medicines cannot be legally marketed in Pakistan until the federal cabinet gives its final approval. After cabinet approval, DRAP will be able to issue notifications fixing the maximum retail prices of the medicines, allowing pharmaceutical companies to formally launch the products in the regulated market. Health ministry officials said the proposed meeting with the prime minister is aimed at obtaining his support for placing the pricing decision before the federal cabinet at the earliest. The delegation is also expected to raise the issue of hardship cases involving several essential medicines. Manufacturers and importers of these medicines have requested price adjustments, arguing that continued production or imports at the existing prices have become increasingly difficult. A senior health ministry official said the government was concerned because several registered medicines remained unavailable in the regulated market despite their prices having been approved by the drug pricing committee. The official said the delegation would brief the prime minister on the situation and seek immediate action to prevent further shortages. Among the medicines facing supply pressure are essential products such as influenza vaccines and morphine used in cancer treatment, along with other drugs whose manufacturers have reported difficulties in maintaining supplies at existing prices. The Cabinet Committee on Drug Pricing, chaired by Finance Minister Muhammad Aurangzeb, approved the 52 pricing cases after reviewing recommendations submitted by DRAP’s Drug Pricing Committee and Policy Board. All 52 cases forwarded by the Drug Pricing Committee and endorsed by the DRAP Policy Board were approved by the cabinet committee. However, the committee’s decision is not the final step in the process. The federal cabinet must endorse the recommendations before DRAP can officially notify the maximum retail prices. The medicines covered by the proposed pricing decision are used to treat a range of serious and chronic conditions. They include medicines for cancer, diabetes, haemophilia, Parkinson’s disease, autoimmune disorders, blood-clotting conditions and severe infections. Some are also used in intensive-care units and emergency treatment. Officials believe timely approval could help bring the newly registered medicines into the regulated market and improve availability for patients requiring specialised treatment.

  • |

    Oil prices rise as Middle East conflict deepens

    Global oil prices edged higher on Wednesday as escalating tensions in the Middle East renewed fears of supply disruptions and pushed investors to closely monitor developments in the region. Brent crude futures rose to $91.51 per barrel, while US West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude increased to $84.64 per barrel in early trading. The gains came after oil prices reached a five-week high in the previous session. The latest rise followed another round of US military strikes inside Iran. American forces carried out attacks on Iranian military targets for the 11th consecutive night, highlighting the continued escalation of the conflict. At the same time, Kuwaiti authorities reported that air defense systems intercepted Iranian drones, adding to growing concerns that the conflict could spread further across the Gulf region. The continued exchange of attacks between Iran and the United States has heightened fears over the security of global energy supplies. Investors worry that any disruption in oil-producing regions or major shipping routes could tighten supplies and drive prices even higher. Additional pressure on energy markets came after Yemen’s Houthi movement announced a naval blockade targeting Saudi Arabia and warned that ships transporting Saudi oil through the Bab el-Mandeb Strait could face attacks. The Bab el-Mandeb Strait is one of the world’s most important maritime trade routes and serves as a key passage for oil shipments from the Middle East to international markets. The route has become increasingly important as traffic through the Strait of Hormuz has declined amid the worsening regional conflict. Energy analysts say that any disruption in either of these strategic waterways could significantly affect global oil supplies, increase shipping costs and create further volatility in international energy markets. Meanwhile, US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said the military campaign against Iran has so far cost the United States $37.5 billion, reflecting the growing financial burden of the prolonged conflict. Market participants are also monitoring supply data from the United States. Industry figures showed that US crude oil and distillate inventories increased during the previous week, while gasoline stockpiles declined, indicating mixed signals about fuel demand and supply conditions. Investors are now awaiting official inventory data from the US Energy Information Administration, which could provide further insight into supply trends and influence the direction of oil prices.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *