maya khan shares
| |

Maya Khan shares empowering message for divorced women

ByJustpaste.in

Renowned Pakistani television host and actress Maya Khan has released an empowering video message dedicated to divorced women, urging them to stop punishing themselves, release past regrets, and embrace life after a failed marriage.
​Drawing from her own personal experiences—including navigating an unhappy marriage and a difficult public divorce—Maya opened up about the emotional hurdles of moving forward. The actress, who recently won praise for her performances in hit television dramas like Kabhi Main Kabhi Tum, Milkiyat, and Baray Bhaiyya, shared how societal pressures and self-doubt often trap women in cycles of guilt.
​In her video message, Maya addressed the common struggle of accepting past mistakes, emphasizing that intelligent and capable individuals frequently fall victim to harsh self-blame after a relationship ends:
​”Stop punishing yourself. It’s hard to accept your mistakes because, as human beings, we all believe we are educated, wise, and intelligent. We often think, ‘How could I possibly make a wrong decision?’ According to the world, I was wise, so how could I go wrong? How could one wrong person make me feel weak, trivial, and unimportant? The girl who appeared strong on the outside was actually very weak on the inside during her difficult days—but that’s enough now.”

​Reflecting on her journey, Maya revealed how her former husband previously took away her savings, compounding the personal hardship she faced during her split. However, rather than dwelling on past betrayal, she reframed those difficult chapters as invaluable life lessons.
​She encouraged women to view painful experiences as blessings in disguise that build resilience and inner wisdom. Urging her followers to let go of self-blame, Maya advised them to gather the lessons learned from adversity and channel that strength into building a brighter, independent future.
​The inspiring video drew widespread appreciation across social media platforms, with fans, followers, and fellow industry figures applauding Maya for using her platform to break the stigma surrounding divorce and offering compassionate guidance to women rebuilding their lives.

Similar Posts

  • |

    Why did Zelensky sack his Army Chief?

    ByJustpaste.in

    Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has removed the country’s top military commander, General Oleksandr Syrskyi, in a major change to Ukraine’s military leadership as the war with Russia enters its fifth year. The decision comes during a difficult period for Ukraine, where fighting continues on several front lines and pressure is mounting on the government to improve military performance. General Syrskyi had been serving as Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of Ukraine. He was responsible for leading the country’s military operations against Russian forces. President Zelensky announced that General Mykhailo Drapatyi will replace him as the new army chief. In his statement, Zelensky thanked Syrskyi for his service and praised Ukrainian soldiers for defending the country. However, he said Ukraine now needs a “reset” in military leadership to strengthen operations, improve coordination among commanders and address challenges related to troop mobilisation and battlefield management. The leadership change comes only a few days after Zelensky removed Defence Minister Mykhailo Fedorov from office. That decision sparked public protests in the capital, Kyiv, with many people expressing concern about changes in the country’s defence leadership while the war is still ongoing. Who is Oleksandr Syrskyi? General Oleksandr Syrskyi is one of Ukraine’s most experienced military officers. He was born in Russia in 1965 when both Russia and Ukraine were part of the former Soviet Union. During his early military career, he served in Soviet forces before choosing to remain in Ukraine after it became an independent country in 1991. Over the years, Syrskyi rose through the ranks of the Ukrainian military. In 2014, he led Ukrainian forces during fighting against Russian-backed separatists in eastern Ukraine. When Russia launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, Syrskyi became one of the country’s most important military commanders. He played a leading role in defending the capital, Kyiv, from Russian attacks during the early weeks of the war. His leadership was widely praised, and he later received Ukraine’s highest national honour, the title of “Hero of Ukraine.” He was also credited with planning Ukraine’s successful counteroffensive in the Kharkiv region in 2022. During that operation, Ukrainian forces regained control of several key cities that had been occupied by Russian troops. Why was he removed? President Zelensky has not accused Syrskyi of any wrongdoing. Instead, he said the leadership change is aimed at improving Ukraine’s military strategy as the war continues. Reports suggest there had been disagreements within Ukraine’s defence leadership over military reforms, mobilisation policies and battlefield planning. Former Defence Minister Mykhailo Fedorov had previously criticised Syrskyi, saying some reforms were progressing too slowly. The appointment of General Mykhailo Drapatyi is seen as an attempt to bring fresh leadership and improve cooperation between military commanders and government officials. Ukraine has changed several military leaders This is not the first time Ukraine has replaced senior defence officials since the war began. In September 2023, Defence Minister Oleksii Reznikov left office after corruption allegations involving the defence ministry. In February 2024, General Valerii Zaluzhnyi, who was one of Ukraine’s most popular military commanders, was replaced by Syrskyi as commander-in-chief. Several other senior officers have also been reassigned as Ukraine continues to adjust its military leadership during the conflict. Russia has also changed its commanders Russia has also replaced several top military officials since launching its invasion of Ukraine. The commander of Russia’s Black Sea Fleet was removed after the sinking of the warship Moskva in 2022. Major General Ivan Popov was dismissed after publicly criticising Russia’s military strategy. General Sergey Surovikin, who once commanded Russia’s aerospace forces, was also removed following the failed Wagner Group rebellion in 2023. Why does this matter? Military leadership plays a crucial role in any war. Commanders make important decisions about troop movements, battlefield tactics, defence planning and military operations. Ukraine hopes the appointment of General Drapatyi will strengthen its armed forces at a time when Russia continues to launch attacks across different regions. The change also reflects Kyiv’s effort to improve military efficiency and prepare for future operations

  • | |

    Police chief: Missing weapon may crack Mir Raza my…

    ByJustpaste.in

    Karachi Police Chief Azad Khan has said that investigations into the death of Mir Raza are continuing from every possible angle, adding that recovering the missing weapon could be crucial in determining what happened. Speaking to the media, Azad Khan said the initial medical report was prepared by a doctor working under the police surgeon. The medico-legal officer (MLO) examined the body and submitted the report to the police surgeon, who kept it for two days before it was released. He questioned why any concerns regarding the report were not addressed immediately. According to the police chief, the police surgeon neither personally examined the body nor conducted the medical examination, and any reservations about the findings should have been communicated to investigators without delay. Azad Khan said police based their early investigation on the preliminary medico-legal report provided by the MLO. He added that confirmation of gunpowder residue on the deceased’s hands was also essential to the investigation. The police chief said the Crime Scene Unit collected evidence from the scene and handed all relevant material over to the medical team. He also questioned why the medical team did not visit the crime scene, noting that in many countries medical experts inspect the scene themselves, particularly in high-profile cases. He said that if Mir Raza’s family requests it, another medical examination can be conducted. Meanwhile, investigators are looking into the disappearance of the weapon believed to be linked to the case. Azad Khan also confirmed that police are searching for a waste collector seen in a video recorded near the scene. He said locating the missing weapon could help investigators resolve key questions surrounding Mir Raza’s death. The investigation remains ongoing, with police continuing to gather evidence and examine all possible leads.

  • |

    Arab and Palestinian groups urge global action to protect Jerusalem and Al Aqsa Mosque

    ByJustpaste.in

    Fourteen Arab and Palestinian organisations have issued an urgent appeal calling for immediate international action to protect occupied East Jerusalem and the Al Aqsa Mosque, warning that recent Israeli measures are threatening the city’s religious heritage and historic identity. The groups said the situation has reached a critical stage and argued that stronger global intervention is needed to prevent further escalation. In a joint statement released on Wednesday, the organisations expressed concern over what they described as increasing Israeli actions aimed at changing the existing status of Jerusalem and its holy sites. They said recent developments have targeted not only Al Aqsa Mosque but also the Palestinian residents of Jerusalem and the city’s Arab, Islamic, and Christian character. Al Aqsa Mosque is considered Islam’s third holiest site. The same area is also revered by Jews as the Temple Mount, believed to be the location of two ancient Jewish temples. Israel captured East Jerusalem during the 1967 Arab Israeli war and later declared the entire city its capital in 1980, a move that has not been recognised by most of the international community. According to the appeal, Israeli authorities have allowed an increase in visits to the Al Aqsa compound by Jewish groups under police protection. The organisations claimed these actions, along with restrictions placed on Muslim worshippers, are attempts to alter the long standing arrangements governing access to the holy site. The statement also raised concerns about attacks on worshippers, restrictions placed on religious leaders, and measures targeting guards responsible for protecting the mosque. The groups argued that these actions undermine freedom of worship and threaten the historical and legal status of one of Islam’s most important religious landmarks. Beyond the mosque itself, the organisations accused Israel of expanding settlements, demolishing Palestinian homes, revoking residency rights, carrying out excavations around the Old City, and increasing pressure on both Islamic and Christian religious sites. They warned that these policies are changing the city’s demographic and cultural landscape while placing Jerusalem’s diverse religious heritage at risk. The appeal also highlighted concerns over the city’s Christian community. It said restrictions affecting churches, religious institutions, and Christian leaders threaten the long established Christian presence in Jerusalem and weaken the city’s multicultural identity. The organisations argued that international statements of concern are no longer enough to address the situation. They called for coordinated political, legal, and human rights efforts to stop actions they consider violations of international law. They also urged governments and international institutions to ensure accountability and prevent further changes to the city’s status. The statement specifically called on Jordan, which holds custodial responsibilities for Jerusalem’s Islamic and Christian holy sites, to intensify diplomatic efforts and encourage stronger international engagement. The groups said Jordan’s role remains essential in defending the religious and historical significance of the city’s sacred places. Describing Jerusalem as a shared historical, cultural, and religious responsibility, the organisations stressed that protecting the city requires practical measures rather than symbolic declarations. They said preserving the rights of its residents and safeguarding its holy sites should remain an international priority. The appeal was signed by several organisations, including the Popular Conference for Palestinians Abroad, the Al Quds International Institution, the Arab National Congress, the European Palestinian Conference, and the Islamic National Conference. The statement comes as tensions continue to rise across the occupied West Bank, where Israeli military raids and settler related violence have increased since the start of the Gaza conflict in October 2023. Palestinian officials say thousands of people have been injured or arrested during this period, while violence has intensified further following recent deadly clashes near Nablus involving Palestinians, Israeli settlers, and Israeli forces.

  • | |

    Atif Aslam performs with Fahad Mustafa, Asim Azhar…

    ByJustpaste.in

    Atif Aslam recently gave fans a special musical moment when he was joined on stage by Fahad Mustafa, Asim Azhar and Talha Anjum at the launch of his new album Subha Aye Naa. The star-studded gathering brought together some of Pakistan’s biggest names from music, television and film. (Facebook⁠) The four celebrities were spotted performing together during the event, creating a scene that quickly caught the attention of Pakistani entertainment fans. According to videos shared from the evening, Fahad Mustafa, Asim Azhar and Talha Anjum joined Atif on stage for a special rendition of his popular song “Hum Kis Gali Ja Rahe Hain.” (Instagram⁠) The unexpected combination of artists made the performance particularly exciting. Atif is known for his powerful vocals and emotional songs, while Asim Azhar has established himself as one of Pakistan’s popular contemporary singers. Talha Anjum, meanwhile, represents the country’s growing hip-hop scene through his work with Young Stunners and his solo career. Fahad Mustafa added a different element to the performance. Best known for his work as an actor, television host and producer, Fahad has also remained closely connected with Pakistan’s entertainment and music scene. The gathering came as Atif celebrated the launch of Subha Aye Naa, his fourth album, making the occasion significant for his fans. The album launch also highlighted how Pakistan’s entertainment industry continues to bring together artists from different parts of the creative world. (Facebook⁠) Social media users were quick to notice the chemistry between the four stars. Images and videos from the event showed the performers sharing the stage, giving fans a rare crossover between mainstream pop, acting and Pakistani hip-hop. For many listeners, seeing Atif Aslam perform alongside younger artists such as Asim Azhar and Talha Anjum also reflected the changing landscape of Pakistani music. While Atif remains one of the country’s most recognised voices, newer musicians are bringing different sounds and audiences into the spotlight. The album launch therefore became more than a promotional event. With four major Pakistani stars coming together for a live performance, it offered fans an entertaining celebration of the country’s evolving music culture. The memorable stage appearance is likely to remain one of the standout moments from Atif Aslam’s latest musical chapter, especially for fans who enjoyed seeing different generations of Pakistani entertainment come together.

  • |

    Buleha” faces suspension as Senate demands name change and removal of Bulleh Shah dialogue

    ByJustpaste.in

    Islamabad: A controversy over the Pakistani film “Buleha” after a Senate committee questioned whether the movie damaged the image of legendary Sufi poet Baba Bulleh Shah by showing a character connected with violence, weapons and personal justice. During a heated discussion, Senator Pervaiz Rashid questioned how a film carrying the name of a famous symbol of peace and love was approved despite scenes and dialogues that critics said were opposite to Bulleh Shah’s teachings. The controversy intensified when members of the Censor Board admitted that some important points were overlooked during the approval process. Dr. Sultan Azam Taimuri, a senior member of the board, accepted responsibility and said the concerns raised about the connection between the fictional character and Baba Bulleh Shah should have been discussed more carefully. The committee argued that Baba Bulleh Shah was known for promoting peace, humanity and love, while the film appeared to show a character using force and weapons to fight criminals. Members questioned whether such a portrayal could create confusion among young viewers about the real message and personality of one of Punjab’s most respected Sufi poets. The debate became intense when a Senator Pervaiz Rashid asked if a film about another respected poet, such as Khushal Khan Khattak or Ghalib, showed that personality in a completely opposite way, would the Censor Board approve it. A censor board member admitted that such a film would not be acceptable and said it would be wrong to show a historical personality against their actual beliefs. The committee then questioned why the same standard was not applied to “Buleha.” The Censor Board defended its decision by saying the movie was not a biography of Baba Bulleh Shah. Officials explained that the character in the film was fictional and had no direct connection with the real life of the Sufi poet. They said the board considered the movie a fictional story and believed the name alone was not enough reason to stop its release because Bulleh Shah himself used the word “Bullah” in his poetry. However, the committee pointed out that the board’s explanation created confusion. Members questioned how the film could have no connection with Bulleh Shah but still use a name and dialogue strongly linked with him. The discussion became more serious when Dr. Sultan admitted that the committee’s concerns had a point. He said the board did not discuss this angle properly at the time of approval and accepted responsibility. He also admitted that a dialogue in the film where the character compares himself with Bulleh Shah could be controversial. Another Censor Board member, Syed Farooq Hassan, also accepted that the board overlooked this perspective. He said the board knew Baba Bulleh Shah’s teachings were completely different from the violence shown in the film, but members believed the character was fictional and not based on the actual life of Bulleh Shah. The board members also explained that Pakistan’s film industry was already struggling, and they wanted to support local movies within acceptable limits. They said promoting cinema was also one reason behind their decision. The committee, however, questioned whether supporting the film industry should come before protecting the image of respected cultural and historical figures. During the meeting, criticism was also directed at the writer of the film. Members questioned whether being a successful film writer was enough qualification to handle the story of a major historical and spiritual personality. They argued that the writer’s fame came mainly from action based films and said success in commercial cinema does not automatically mean expertise in history, culture or the lives of national figures. One committee member strongly criticised the idea of approving a film simply because it was written by a famous writer. He said the writer was known for introducing violent action elements in films but was not known as an expert on Sufi personalities or Pakistan’s cultural traditions. The committee also rejected the argument that other provincial censor boards had already approved the film. Officials said Punjab and Sindh censor boards had approved the movie without cuts, and it had also been aired on Local TV. However, committee members said approval by other boards did not remove the responsibility of reviewing the film’s impact. The discussion also raised questions about the knowledge and background of Censor Board members. Members suggested that people approving films about major personalities should have knowledge of history, literature, culture and society. They said the selection criteria for board members should ensure they understand how films can influence children and families. The committee argued that showing respected personalities incorrectly could affect how younger generations understand their history. At the end of the meeting, the committee made a strong recommendation regarding the film. The committee suggested that the film name should be changed and the dialogue in which the character calls himself Bulleh Shah should be removed. It further recommended that the film’s exhibition licence should remain suspended until these changes are made and that online versions should also be removed if available. The Senate Standing Committee on Information and Broadcasting has also included the film “Buleha” issue in its upcoming agenda, calling Censor Board members and producers to explain the certification process and the discussions behind the film’s approval.

  • | |

    Afghan man married to Pakistani woman granted bail…

    ByJustpaste.in

    The Supreme Court of Pakistan has granted bail to an Afghan national, who is married to a Pakistani woman, against surety bonds worth Rs20,000 in a case registered under the Foreign Act. During the hearing, the government lawyer informed the court that the accused had been arrested under the Foreign Act. He argued that the man did not possess a marriage certificate proving his marriage to the Pakistani woman at the time of his arrest. The prosecution further stated that the marriage certificate was obtained in 2024, although the accused claimed to have married in 1993. The lawyer also told the court that the man had no documentary evidence of his entry into Pakistan and was not carrying an Afghan passport. Justice Hashim Kakar questioned the prosecution’s arguments, observing that in many rural areas marriages are conducted without immediately registering a formal marriage certificate. The defence counsel told the court that the couple had married in 1993 and only later obtained official documentation. Justice Kakar also noted that two high courts had already directed authorities to issue the man a domicile, adding that the government itself had allowed Afghan nationals to enter Pakistan in the past. He remarked that they had even been provided ration support. The judge further questioned the prosecution, asking what additional proof of marriage was required when the couple had two children together. He also asked how the authorities had concluded that the accused was an Afghan citizen if he allegedly had no identification or official documents. After hearing the arguments from both sides, the Supreme Court approved the Afghan national’s bail, subject to the submission of surety bonds worth Rs20,000.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *