meralco chair pangilinan
| | |

Meralco chair Pangilinan: Power industry ‘may not survive’ if asked to absorb system loss

MANILA, Philippines – Manila Electric Company (Meralco) chairman Manny V. Pangilinan warned that the Philippine power industry “may not survive” if President Ferdinand Marcos Jr.’s order to remove system loss charges from consumers’ electricity bills is carried out in full.

Asked whether he would bow to the President’s order, Pangilinan did not exactly say yes. He said he wanted to talk to Marcos first.


Meralco chair Pangilinan: Power industry ‘may not survive’ if asked to absorb system loss

“I think we should talk. We’re sympathetic. He’s under pressure too,” Pangilinan told reporters on Wednesday, July 29, referring to the spike in energy costs following the Iran war.


Meralco chair Pangilinan: Power industry ‘may not survive’ if asked to absorb system loss

Pangilinan argued that Meralco’s distribution rate had been unchanged since July 2015, and that recent increases in electricity bills came from other parts of the power supply chain.

“The increase in the bill hasn’t come from us. Others have moved up,” he said in a mix of English and Filipino.

But Marcos’ directive could put Meralco and other utilities on the hook for system losses that consumers currently shoulder. And, according to Pangilinan, that could put them out of business. (READ: Meralco: Some system loss unavoidable, urges careful EPIRA reform)

“If we’re not allowed to charge, we have to absorb the losses coming from the system loss,” Pangilinan said.

“It’s a big bill for the industry,” he added, estimating that the cost could reach “tens of billions of pesos. We may not survive.”

Must Watch

How much could you save if system loss charges are removed from your Meralco bill?


How much could you save if system loss charges are removed from your Meralco bill?

The losses ‘will not disappear’

System loss is the difference between the electricity entering a power network and the amount eventually metered and billed to customers.

Some of it is technical and unavoidable: electricity encounters resistance as it travels through wires and transformers, causing part of the energy to be converted into heat.

But system loss also includes nontechnical losses such as electricity theft, illegal connections, and metering problems. The Department of Energy has said most nontechnical losses may be attributed to pilferage, although the breakdown varies across distribution utilities and electric cooperatives.

At present, consumers shoulder system losses within limits set by the Energy Regulatory Commission. Meralco estimates that system loss can account for about 5% of your monthly bill.

But in Marcos’ recent State of the Nation Address, the President said he wants consumers to stop paying the entire charge, including both technical and nontechnical losses and the value-added tax imposed on them.

“The whole system loss is what was the directive of the President na i-remove,” Energy Secretary Sharon Garin said a day later, confirming the order. “Hindi partial, hindi ‘yung nontechnical lang, kun’di ‘yung buo po (Not just partially, not just the nontechnical, but the whole thing), technical and nontechnical.”

Must Read

EXPLAINER: What is system loss, and how does it affect your power bill?


EXPLAINER: What is system loss, and how does it affect your power bill?

Asked what his general take was on Marcos’ push to lower electricity rates, Pangilinan said Meralco was “one with the President.”

“But first, we have to address [what] are the causes of the sudden rise in electricity. But—” he said, before pausing for several seconds, “I’d better stop there.”

Later, the Meralco chairman would clarify that the problem lies partly in the law of physics.

“The system losses are still there. It’s not going to disappear. So, who’s going to pay for that?” Pangilinan said.

This will be the headache that the Congress and regulators will have to address: who among the generators, the transmission operator, the distribution utilities, or even the taxpayers will absorb the cost?

Meralco clashes with NGCP

Pangilinan also bristled at the suggestion that the National Grid Corporation of the Philippines (NGCP) does not have transmission losses. Any electricity delivered through wires will experience some energy loss, he argued. 

“Meron sila, it’s embedded in their generation. Hindi totoo na wala silang (It’s not true that they don’t have) transmission [cost],” he said, punctuating his rebuttal with a curse.

This was in reaction to a statement by the NGCP that the grid operator doesn’t directly bill Meralco for transmission technical system losses.

“NGCP does not charge or bill our customers, for example distribution utilities like Meralco, for system loss,” an NGCP representative told Rappler.

“We only charge for the delivery of power and for ancillary services, which is a pass-through charge and remitted entirely to ancillary service suppliers,” the representative added.

Meralco is not struggling today

Whatever the future impact of the reform, Meralco is hardly on life support right now.

The company’s gross revenue rose 16% to P283.7 billion in the first half of 2026, while reported income climbed 11% to P26.3 billion. Consolidated core net income reached P26.5 billion, up 3.8% from a year earlier.

The revenue figure does need a bit of context: a large portion reflects generation, transmission, and other charges that Meralco collects from customers and passes on to power suppliers and the grid operator, rather than income the company keeps. Meralco’s regulated distribution business accounts for only part of its total revenue, while its profits also come from power generation and other businesses.

The Energy Regulatory Commission is also set to decide soon, by August or September, on a possible rate reset that could raise Meralco’s distribution charge.

Still, coming from a group that earned a record P50.6 billion in core profit in 2025, Pangilinan’s warning is likely less of an immediate forecast of corporate collapse and more like an aggressive opening position in negotiations. – Rappler.com

Must Read

[Vantage Point] System loss: The electricity consumers pay for but never receive


[Vantage Point] System loss: The electricity consumers pay for but never receive

Similar Posts

  • |

    Pakistan targets 90% clean electricity by 2035, says Awais Leghari

    Federal Minister for Power Awais Leghari outlined Pakistan’s long-term strategy to transform its electricity sector, setting an ambitious target of raising the share of clean energy in the national power mix to 90 percent by 2035. The announcement came during the Solar, Storage and Flexibility 2026 Conference, where the minister also highlighted key policy hurdles, including restrictions under Pakistan’s International Monetary Fund (IMF) programme that are delaying the introduction of a market-based electricity pricing mechanism. Speaking at the conference on Tuesday, Leghari said the government was pursuing a major shift in energy policy by moving away from a traditional generation-focused model towards a system centred on grid flexibility, energy security, battery storage and domestic manufacturing. He said the new approach is designed to reduce Pakistan’s dependence on imported fuels, shield consumers from volatile global energy prices and maximise the benefits of the country’s rapidly expanding solar sector. The minister said Pakistan has witnessed remarkable growth in rooftop solar installations, with nearly 38 gigawatts of distributed solar capacity now installed through private consumer investment. He described the rapid adoption of rooftop solar as one of the country’s biggest energy success stories but cautioned that it has also created new challenges for the national power system. According to Leghari, Pakistan generates significant amounts of electricity from solar energy during daylight hours, yet the absence of sufficient battery storage infrastructure prevents that surplus electricity from being utilised during evening peak demand. He stressed that without modern storage systems, the country would continue to struggle with balancing electricity supply and demand despite having abundant renewable energy resources. Referring to disruptions in Re-gasified Liquefied Natural Gas (RLNG) supplies earlier this year, the minister said the episode exposed Pakistan’s continued dependence on imported fuels. He noted that the interruption in fuel supplies led to electricity shortages and load shedding even though ample solar power was available during the daytime, highlighting the urgent need for large-scale energy storage. “Battery storage is no longer an optional technology—it has become a strategic national asset that is essential for ensuring Pakistan’s energy sovereignty,” Leghari said. He noted that clean energy sources, including hydropower, nuclear, wind and solar, currently contribute approximately 55 percent of Pakistan’s total electricity generation. However, he warned that achieving the government’s renewable energy targets would require significant investment in battery storage systems, transmission infrastructure and power market reforms. The minister emphasised that expanding renewable generation alone would not be sufficient unless supported by a modern electricity network capable of storing and transmitting clean energy efficiently. To support the country’s long-term energy transition, Leghari announced a three-point strategy. The plan includes expanding battery energy storage systems across the national grid, encouraging local battery manufacturing and assembly to reduce reliance on imports while creating employment opportunities, and introducing regulatory reforms aimed at providing long-term certainty and confidence for domestic and foreign investors. During a question-and-answer session following his address, the minister also disclosed that Pakistan’s commitments under the IMF programme currently limit the government’s ability to introduce a fully flexible, market-based electricity tariff system. He explained that the government has been in discussions with the IMF for several months regarding the introduction of a time-of-use tariff, under which electricity prices would vary according to the actual cost of power generation at different hours of the day. Such a system, he said, would encourage consumers to shift electricity consumption to off-peak periods, reduce pressure on the national grid and help integrate renewable energy more efficiently.

  • |

    Pakistan’s auto tax policy sparks industry divide over EV incentives

    LAHORE: Pakistan’s automobile industry is witnessing growing divisions over the government’s taxation policy for vehicles, with local manufacturers warning that the current framework unfairly benefits expensive imported and premium new energy vehicles (NEVs) while placing a heavier tax burden on affordable cars purchased by middle-income families. The controversy has intensified following the government’s decision to introduce a range of fiscal incentives for new energy vehicles, including battery electric vehicles (BEVs), plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs) and range-extended electric vehicles (REEVs). While the policy is designed to accelerate Pakistan’s transition towards cleaner transportation and reduce reliance on fossil fuels, established local assemblers argue that the incentives are skewed in favour of luxury vehicle buyers instead of promoting affordable green mobility. Industry representatives say the taxation gap between conventional locally assembled vehicles and premium electric vehicles has widened considerably, raising concerns over fairness, competitiveness and the long-term sustainability of Pakistan’s domestic automobile manufacturing sector. According to industry estimates, a locally assembled Suzuki Alto—one of the country’s most affordable passenger vehicles priced at around Rs3 million—bears nearly Rs550,000 in taxes, including sales tax, federal excise duty (FED) and the recently introduced New Energy Vehicle (NEV) levy. In contrast, a premium REEV costing close to Rs10 million reportedly attracts sales tax of only around Rs100,000 while remaining exempt from both the federal excise duty and the NEV levy. The tax disparity has triggered criticism from domestic manufacturers, who argue that the current structure effectively penalises middle-income consumers while offering generous incentives to buyers of high-end imported vehicles. Local Assemblers Raise Concerns Pak Suzuki Motor Company spokesperson Ikhlaq Virk said the taxation framework has created an uneven competitive environment that disadvantages affordable vehicles widely used by Pakistani families. He said entry-level models such as the Alto and Cultus serve as essential transportation for the country’s middle class but receive no meaningful tax relief despite their affordability. Virk further noted that premium hybrid and electric vehicles, valued at nearly Rs10 million or more, continue to enjoy substantial concessions under the government’s clean mobility policy. He also pointed to reports suggesting that the sales tax on certain plug-in hybrid and hybrid electric vehicles could be reduced from 25 percent to 18 percent after changes introduced through the Finance Bill, arguing that such relief would primarily benefit affluent consumers rather than encouraging mass-market adoption. IMF Programme Adds Complexity The debate comes at a time when Pakistan remains under an International Monetary Fund (IMF) programme, which has required the government to increase tax revenues, rationalise subsidies and implement fiscal reforms to stabilise the economy. Against this backdrop, industry stakeholders argue that taxation policies should strike a balance between environmental objectives and economic realities, ensuring that clean energy initiatives do not disproportionately favour a small segment of wealthy consumers. The discussion has also reopened a broader policy debate over whether Pakistan’s green mobility strategy should focus solely on reducing emissions or also safeguard domestic manufacturing, employment and industrial investment. Analysts Call for Balanced Incentives Automobile industry experts believe Pakistan’s transition towards cleaner transportation is necessary, but they stress that government incentives should encourage widespread adoption instead of being concentrated in the luxury vehicle segment. Yousuf M. Farooq, Director Research at Chase Securities, said environmental goals should be pursued alongside industrial development and economic sustainability. He noted that while encouraging cleaner transportation is an important national objective, incentive programmes should also consider vehicle affordability, localisation, environmental benefits and the contribution of manufacturers to Pakistan’s economy. Farooq emphasised the need for a consistent taxation framework across all vehicle categories, including conventional internal combustion engine vehicles, hybrids, plug-in hybrids and range-extended electric vehicles, while maintaining adequate protection for local assembly operations and the domestic auto parts industry. He added that environmental incentives should not undermine the competitiveness of local manufacturers or threaten employment generated by Pakistan’s automotive sector. Local Industry Fears Investment Slowdown Pakistan’s automobile industry has invested billions of rupees over the past three decades in assembly plants, localisation programmes and vendor development. The sector supports hundreds of component manufacturers and provides employment to thousands of skilled workers across the country. Industry stakeholders warn that if imported premium electric vehicles continue to enjoy significantly lower taxation than locally assembled conventional vehicles, future investment in domestic manufacturing could slow, weakening Pakistan’s automotive supply chain and localisation efforts. Manufacturers believe a prolonged imbalance may discourage further expansion by existing assemblers while affecting the viability of local parts suppliers that have developed alongside the country’s automobile industry. Government’s Green Mobility Vision Supporters of the government’s policy argue that Pakistan cannot afford to lag behind the global transition towards electric mobility. Many countries are offering tax incentives, subsidies and policy support to encourage electric vehicle adoption, reduce dependence on imported petroleum products and lower carbon emissions. Pakistan, which spends billions of dollars annually on fuel imports, could also benefit from increased electrification of its transport sector by reducing its import bill and improving environmental sustainability over the long term. However, industry observers believe the core issue is not whether electric vehicles deserve policy support but how those incentives should be structured.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *