prince harry others
| | |

Prince Harry, others face multi-million legal bill after Daily Mail lawsuit defeat

LONDON, UK – Prince Harry and other high-profile claimants face paying millions of dollars towards the legal costs of Associated Newspapers after they lost their privacy lawsuits against the Daily Mail publisher, London’s High Court heard on Wednesday, July 29.

Earlier this month, a judge at London’s High Court comprehensively ruled against King Charles’ younger son, singer Elton John and five other British figures, rejecting allegations that the Mail titles had engaged in widespread unlawful activities, such as phone hacking.

Associated said it was an overwhelming victory for its newspaper and journalists, and “for a free press generally,” while the prince, 41, described the ruling as a “complete and obvious whitewash.”

Must Read

Prince Harry’s lawyer tells UK court Daily Mail complicit in unlawful acts


Prince Harry’s lawyer tells UK court Daily Mail complicit in unlawful acts

At a hearing on Wednesday to determine how much of the Mail’s legal costs the claimants should pay, Associated’s lawyer Antony White argued they should do so on an “indemnity basis,” under which the losing party must cover the other side’s charges without the need to show they were proportionate.

The court heard that Associated had incurred a legal bill of £34.5 million ($45.8 million), while Harry and other claimants only have an insurance policy which covers £16 million.

In a scathing attack on the claimants’ case, which he said had been designed to create “a banquet of litigation” against Associated, White argued they had made wide-ranging and serious “egregious” allegations without supporting evidence which had added to their costs.

He also said Harry’s statement following the ruling was an abuse of his position and celebrity status.

“It was entirely inappropriate and unreasonable,” White said.

Associated said it was seeking an interim payment of £10 million.

Nicholas Bacon, the lawyer for the claimants, said in their submissions that Associated’s £34.5 million legal bill was “eye-watering,” far exceeding its agreed budget, and there was clearly a shortfall from the level of security they had in place.

He said it had been reported that Associated wanted “to go for the jugular” and teach the claimants a lesson by obtaining indemnity costs.

They have offered an interim payment of £8 million by August 28.

In his ruling rejecting the case, Judge Matthew Nicklin said the claimants had needed to prove that information published about them had been obtained unlawfully, but had failed to do so, and that suspicion alone was not enough.

In written submissions, the claimants’ lawyers also said any application for permission to appeal that decision had been deferred until after Nicklin gave judgment on the costs.

The hearing continues on Thursday. – Rappler.com

($1 = 0.7527 pounds)

Similar Posts

  • US and Saudi forces launch joint precision strikes on Iranian-backed targets in eastern Iraq

    Joint military operations between United States fighter jets and the Saudi Arabian Armed Forces targeted multiple logistics and weapons facilities belonging to Iranian-aligned armed groups across eastern Iraq, US Central Command confirmed in an official statement. The coordinated air raids were conducted in direct retaliation to more than thirty Iranian-directed aerial drone attacks launched over a seventy-two-hour period. Central Command specified that the targeted militia groups acted under the explicit direction of Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps to strike American troop installations and Saudi energy infrastructure. While American military officials confirmed that recent strikes against US assets were successfully defended without casualties, the Saudi Ministry of Defense cited international self-defence provisions under Article 51 of the United Nations Charter, noting that the aerial campaign directly addressed drone incursions originating from Iraqi territory against petroleum facilities in eastern Saudi Arabia and Riyadh. The joint intervention signals a notable strategic escalation for Saudi Arabia, which had previously sought to limit direct military involvement despite recurring proxy threats along its borders and maritime trade corridors. Central Command noted that Iranian-backed militias in Iraq attempted over six hundred attacks against US personnel and facilities between February and April alone, warning that failure to cease offensive operations would trigger further military action. In response to the bombings, representatives for Iraq’s Popular Mobilization Forces reported casualties and structural damage across several headquarters, condemning the strikes as a severe violation of Iraqi national sovereignty.

  • | |

    Trump hits back at Canada as tariff war escalates

    WASHINGTON: US President Donald Trump has lashed out at Canada after Prime Minister Mark Carney announced retaliatory tariffs on American goods, deepening a trade dispute that threatens to further strain economic ties between the two neighbouring countries. Trump responded sharply on Sunday after Canada confirmed that new tariffs targeting US products would take effect on September 8. “Canada wants the benefits of being a state, without being one!!!” Trump said in a post on Truth Social, while also accusing Canada of imposing heavy tariffs on American farmers for years. The latest escalation follows the introduction of new US tariffs covering around $20 billion worth of Canadian goods. The measures, which took effect on Saturday, impose tariffs of up to 50 per cent and affect products ranging from hockey sticks and cement to other Canadian exports. Carney announced Canada’s response a day earlier, saying Ottawa would impose new tariffs particularly targeting American steel and dairy products. The Canadian prime minister described the situation in unusually forceful terms, saying the country had effectively been “attacked” and was responding accordingly. The confrontation follows the collapse of recent trade negotiations between Washington and Ottawa. Earlier discussions had appeared more constructive, with Trump saying he believed the United States could reach an agreement with Canada and pointing to his positive relationship with Carney. But Carney said the latest US demands had crossed a line. According to the Canadian leader, Washington proposed terms that were “uneconomic” and “unfair” while undermining the benefits Canada expected from a potential agreement. Ottawa ultimately rejected the proposal. US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer offered a different account of the negotiations. He told The New York Times that Washington had offered to reduce tariffs on Canadian steel, aluminium and automobiles while also removing a recently imposed tariff on Canadian lumber. Greer said the proposed measures would have provided Canada with exceptionally favourable treatment compared with other US trading partners. However, the offer failed to produce a breakthrough. Greer also told Fox News that Washington was preparing measures in response to Canada’s retaliation, signalling that the dispute could escalate further rather than return immediately to the negotiating table. A senior US official described the latest talks as candid but not acrimonious, suggesting that despite the increasingly hostile public statements, both sides had maintained communication during negotiations. The economic stakes are significant. The United States and Canada share one of the world’s largest trading relationships, with businesses and consumers on both sides relying heavily on cross-border commerce. The latest tariffs could therefore raise costs for companies, disrupt supply chains and put additional pressure on industries already facing uncertainty. With Canadian counter-tariffs scheduled to take effect in September, attention will now turn to whether Washington and Ottawa can find a compromise before the measures trigger a wider trade confrontation.

  • |

    Afghan resistance launches armed campaign against Taliban

    The United Front of Afghanistan has announced the launch of an armed campaign against the Afghan Taliban, marking what it describes as a new phase in its efforts to challenge the Taliban-led administration. The group’s leader, General Sami Sadat, also appealed to the United States, NATO and other members of the international community for political support. In a video message, General Sadat said the resistance movement had formally begun military operations in Kandahar. He described the campaign as an effort to free Afghanistan from Taliban rule and restore stability to the country. Sadat said the group’s military activities are not limited to targeting the Taliban. He claimed that United Front fighters are also operating against Al-Qaeda, Daesh (ISIS) and the Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), saying these organisations pose a serious threat to Afghanistan and the wider region. He stressed that the resistance movement does not seek conflict with neighbouring countries. According to Sadat, the group’s objective is to establish peaceful relations with Afghanistan’s neighbours and promote regional cooperation. He argued that the Taliban’s policies have created security concerns for neighbouring states, while the United Front aims to contribute to long-term regional stability. General Sadat also pledged that his forces would conduct all military operations in accordance with international law. He said the movement would respect humanitarian principles during its campaign and insisted that it would not seek permission from any foreign country before carrying out its operations. Calling for international engagement, Sadat urged the global community to provide political backing to the resistance movement. He appealed to the United States, NATO and other governments to support what he described as the Afghan people’s struggle for freedom, saying the international community should stand on the “right side of history.” The announcement comes amid continuing political and security tensions in Afghanistan, where anti-Taliban resistance groups have periodically claimed attacks against Taliban positions, particularly in northern and central parts of the country. Despite these claims, the Taliban remain in control of most of Afghanistan and continue to reject the legitimacy of armed opposition groups.

  • |

    Ancient Roman shipwreck found off Sicily carrying hundreds of 2,000-year-old amphorae

    Italian authorities have uncovered an ancient Roman merchant ship off the coast of Sicily, dating back to the 2nd or 1st Century BC. The vessel was discovered lying 46 metres underwater roughly three nautical miles off Mazara del Vallo. Measuring 21 metres long and 6 metres wide, the vessel’s cargo holds remain piled with hundreds of well-preserved amphorae, primarily Dressel 1A ceramic jars used during the late Roman Republic to transport commodities such as wine, olive oil, and grain. Italian Culture Minister Alessandro Giuli described the site as “one of the most important underwater archaeological discoveries of recent years”. Local fisherman and free-diver Giacomo De Mola first flagged the site after detecting an anomaly on his sonar scanner that resembled a massive reef or rock. Upon diving down to investigate, he encountered the intact cargo mound surrounded by marine life. Following De Mola’s report, specialist divers from the Carabinieri Command for the Protection of Cultural Heritage (Carabinieri Art Squad), working alongside the Sicilian Region’s Superintendency of the Sea, were dispatched to survey and document the seabed. Archaeologists also identified two lead anchor stocks alongside the vessel’s structure. Italian maritime authorities have implemented security measures to safeguard the wreckage from illicit looting while further documentation and cargo analysis take place.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *