prosecution raises objections
| |

Prosecution raises objections over Anmol Pinky cas…

Three drug-related cases involving accused Anmol Pinky came under discussion before the Judicial Magistrate South court, where the prosecution raised objections over deficiencies in the police challans.

Police had submitted interim charge sheets in all three cases to the prosecution for review. However, the Deputy District Public Prosecutor found several important details missing from the documents and returned them to the police with instructions to make the required corrections.

The prosecution pointed out that the interim challans did not contain any mention of proceedings to declare Anmol Pinky a proclaimed offender. The prosecutor directed police to provide complete details of the legal proceedings related to her status and incorporate them into the revised challans.

Another objection concerned accused persons who had already been acquitted in the cases. According to the prosecution, the police challans failed to provide details about those acquittals.

The police were therefore instructed to attach copies of the relevant acquittal orders to the case records so that the challans contain complete information about all accused persons and the outcome of proceedings against them.

The prosecutor directed the investigating authorities to address all the objections before resubmitting the documents. The revised interim challans will be presented to the prosecution after the required amendments and additional records have been included.

The development comes as legal proceedings continue in the three drug cases against Anmol Pinky. The prosecution’s objections mean that the interim challans have not yet been accepted in their submitted form and must first be corrected according to the instructions issued by the prosecutor.

Similar Posts

  • Thai Tourism Operators Urge Government To Revise Indian Visa Policy

    PHUKET, Thailand — The private sector across Thailand’s premier Andaman coast provinces has formally petitioned the government to urgently revise the visa policy for Indian nationals, warning that current regulations could cost the country up to 8 billion baht in lost revenue during the upcoming high season. The coalition, comprising 13 major organizations including the […]

  • Tarar links AJK unrest to foreign funded agenda

    Information Minister Attaullah Tarar said on Tuesday that the recent protests by the banned Joint Awami Action Committee in Azad Jammu and Kashmir were not peaceful. He alleged that militant groups pursuing a foreign agenda, backed by funding from India, were involved in the unrest. Earlier the same day, AJK Information Secretary Muhammad Rashid Hanif said many protesters taking part in the JAAC demonstrations were linked to Fitna Al Khawarij. This is the term Pakistani authorities use for militants belonging to the banned Tehreek-i-Taliban Pakistan. Speaking at a press conference, Hanif said illegal and violent acts had taken place in AJK, aimed at disrupting the ongoing phases of the region’s elections. He said maintaining law and order and protecting the democratic process remains the state’s core duty, and the state is capable of doing so. Hanif said the JAAC protests were not made up of ordinary citizens alone. He played a video showing masked gunmen standing on a rooftop as evidence. He said common protesters were fewer in number, while armed militants linked to Fitna Al Khawarij were present in significant numbers. He urged people to distance themselves from these elements and said the government would issue public appeals soon. He also alleged that anti-state groups were using women and children as human shields, and that misleading videos calling this a human rights movement were being spread on social media. AJK police spokesperson DIG Irfan Kashfi said these armed individuals would be treated as militants, not peaceful protesters, given their possession of automatic weapons, M-4 rifles, AK-47s, and reportedly sniper rifles. He said one police official was killed and five others injured in recent clashes. One suspect, described as a foreign national acting as a sniper, was arrested in Rawalakot with a military-grade weapon in his possession. Kashfi said security forces were acting purely in self-defence and to protect the public, and assured citizens that militants would not be allowed to capture Rawalakot or any other area. AJK Prime Minister Faisal Mumtaz Rathore said the unrest had been planned for weeks and described the march toward Muzaffarabad during the elections as a scheme to trigger mass unrest. He appealed to the public to stay away from the protesters, alleging they were using civilians as human shields. The JAAC was declared a banned organisation on June 5 after weeks of protests demanding the abolition of 12 reserved refugee seats in the AJK assembly. Authorities have since arrested many of its leaders and placed 147 activists under anti-terrorism watch.

  • | |

    Zendaya reveals why working with husband Tom Holla…

    Zendaya has shared the secret behind her effortless on-screen chemistry with husband Tom Holland, revealing that their strong friendship and deep understanding of one another make working together a truly enjoyable experience. The actress spoke about their relationship while attending the London premiere of Spider-Man: Brand New Day on Wednesday, where the couple made a glamorous appearance on the red carpet. Speaking during the premiere, Zendaya explained that working with Holland has always felt comfortable because their bond extends far beyond the movie set. According to the actress, years of friendship, trust and shared experiences have helped them develop a natural rhythm whenever they collaborate on a project. “It’s easy because we’re best friends,” Zendaya said, adding that their familiarity allows them to support each other throughout filming. Rather than creating distractions, their personal relationship has strengthened their ability to work as professional co-stars. The pair first met while filming Spider-Man: Homecoming in 2016, where they portrayed Peter Parker and MJ. Their friendship gradually evolved into a romance, and after years of keeping much of their relationship private, the couple eventually confirmed they were together. Since then, they have become one of Hollywood’s most admired couples, often praising one another in interviews while maintaining a relatively low profile away from the spotlight. Their latest appearance marked another milestone as they celebrated the upcoming release of Spider-Man: Brand New Day. Fans gathered outside the London venue hoping to catch a glimpse of the stars, who happily greeted supporters before posing together for photographers. Their coordinated looks and affectionate interactions quickly became one of the evening’s biggest talking points across social media. Zendaya also highlighted the importance of mutual respect when balancing marriage and work. She noted that both she and Holland understand the pressures that come with leading major film franchises, making it easier to support each other through demanding schedules, long filming days and worldwide promotional tours. Their shared experiences, she suggested, have created a partnership built on trust and understanding. Holland has previously echoed similar sentiments, describing Zendaya as someone he deeply admires both personally and professionally. Over the years, the actors have consistently celebrated each other’s achievements, whether attending premieres, award ceremonies or supporting new projects from the sidelines. Fans have often praised their relationship for its authenticity and mutual encouragement. As excitement builds for Spider-Man: Brand New Day, Zendaya’s comments offer a glimpse into the partnership that has captivated audiences around the world. While their romance continues to attract public attention, the actress made it clear that their enduring friendship remains the true foundation of both their marriage and their successful collaboration on screen.

  • |

    Calgary housing complex fire sends 6 to hospital, …

    CALGARY: A devastating apartment fire in southeast Calgary left six people hospitalized on Sunday after flames rapidly spread through a residential housing complex, triggering a major emergency response and forcing firefighters to battle multiple blazes across the city. Emergency crews rushed to the scene in the 400 block of MacLeod Trail S.E. at approximately 12:25 p.m. following reports of a fire inside the apartment building. According to the Calgary Fire Department, the blaze originated in a single residential suite before quickly spreading, causing significant damage throughout the complex. Firefighters worked to contain the flames and prevent the fire from extending to nearby structures while rescue teams assisted residents trapped inside the building. Alberta Health Services Emergency Medical Services confirmed that six people were transported to hospital with varying degrees of injuries. Among the victims, one person remains in critical condition, while two others sustained serious injuries. Three additional patients were reported to be in stable condition after receiving treatment at the scene before being taken to hospital for further medical care. Officials have not disclosed the identities of the injured or provided details about the circumstances that led to their injuries. Investigators are now working to determine what sparked the fire. Authorities said the cause remains unknown, and a formal investigation has been launched to establish how the blaze began and whether any safety concerns contributed to the incident. The apartment fire was one of several emergencies handled by Calgary firefighters on Sunday, stretching emergency resources across different parts of the city. Earlier in the day, crews responded to another fire in the northwest community of Kensington, where two detached garages and a power pole were damaged. Firefighters also tackled a large blaze at the Shepard Landfill and Eco Centre in southeast Calgary, highlighting an unusually busy day for emergency services. Officials have not yet released information on the number of residents displaced by the apartment fire or the full extent of structural damage to the building. Authorities are expected to continue examining the scene over the coming days as investigators gather evidence and assess the cause of the blaze. The incident serves as another reminder of the dangers posed by rapidly spreading residential fires and the critical role of emergency responders, whose swift action helped evacuate residents and prevent what could have been an even greater tragedy.

  • |

    Trump aide impersonator texts UK PM, sparking security scare

    A security mystery has emerged after an individual posing as White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles reportedly exchanged text messages with UK Prime Minister Andy Burnham. The communications have raised concerns in both Britain and the United States. Officials are examining how the impersonator was able to establish contact with the British prime minister. According to reports, Burnham received a limited number of messages from the individual while he was campaigning for office. The communication reportedly continued for a short period after he became prime minister. Sources familiar with the matter said the messages were ultimately considered to be of no significant consequence. However, the incident triggered concerns because the impersonator claimed to represent a senior White House official. The matter was serious enough for the British embassy in Washington to raise the issue directly with the White House. British officials initially considered the possibility that the real Susie Wiles’ phone, contact information or communications may have been compromised. Authorities therefore examined whether the incident involved a wider security breach. The identity of the person behind the impersonation remains unclear. The incident has highlighted the growing risks posed by sophisticated impersonation scams. High-profile political figures are increasingly being targeted by individuals who attempt to gain their trust by pretending to be senior officials or influential public figures. Similar incidents have previously involved prominent American politicians and business leaders. In such cases, scammers have used false identities and digital communications to establish contact with their targets. The latest case has attracted particular attention because of the positions held by the people involved. Wiles is a senior figure within the White House, while Burnham is the UK prime minister. Despite the security concerns, there is currently no indication that sensitive information was exchanged during the messages. Sources described the content of the communications as having no significant impact. Downing Street has declined to discuss the specific details of the incident. British officials have maintained that national security matters are not normally discussed publicly. The White House has also declined to comment on the reported communications or the identity of the impersonator. The incident nevertheless raises questions about how the individual obtained access to Burnham and successfully presented themselves as a senior White House official. Officials are expected to examine the communication trail and other available evidence to determine how the impersonation occurred. The case also highlights the challenges faced by governments in verifying digital identities. Text messages and other online communications can make it easier for individuals to impersonate senior officials, particularly when they use convincing names, photographs or other identifying details. For now, the mystery surrounding the impersonator’s identity remains unresolved. Authorities have not publicly identified the person responsible or confirmed whether the incident was part of a broader campaign.

  • |

    US Senate confirms Trump nominees for labor board, cementing Republican control

    The US Senate confirmed President Donald Trump’s nominees for two positions on the federal labour law enforcement agency on Friday. The move provides Republicans with the necessary votes to overturn several key decisions that previously supported union organising. The Republican-led Senate approved a block of over 70 federal government nominees in a 51–47 vote. Among those confirmed were James Macy and David Prouty to serve on the National Labor Relations Board. James Macy, a Republican, held several roles at the US Department of Labour after spending four decades representing employers in labour disputes. David Prouty, a former union lawyer serving as the board’s sole Democrat, was confirmed for a second term. The five-member board already held a 2–1 Republican majority prior to the confirmation vote. By tradition, the panel maintains two Democrats, two Republicans, and a chair designated by the president. The NLRB investigates complaints from private-sector workers and unions whilst overseeing workplace elections. Formal complaints filed by the general counsel are heard by administrative judges before reaching the full board, whose rulings can be appealed in federal court. This internal process faces ongoing legal challenges from companies such as Amazon and SpaceX, which argue that the framework violates the US Constitution. Under long-standing tradition, the board requires three affirmative votes to overturn established precedent. Existing Republican appointees Scott Mayer and Chairman James Murphy had previously stated they would not break with that practice without a third vote. Trump’s appointees are expected to target policies favoured by trade unions that contributed to a recent surge in organising efforts. Murphy and Mayer have already revived a rule making it harder to hold companies accountable as joint employers of contract workers, whilst relinquishing jurisdiction over a SpaceX case to another federal agency. The board previously lost its quorum and was unable to process cases last year after Trump took the unprecedented step of removing Democratic member Gwynne Wilcox. Her dismissal left hundreds of cases unresolved for nearly a year. Wilcox sued and brief reinstatement was granted before a federal appeals court paused and reversed the decision. In June, the US Supreme Court upheld Trump’s removal of a Democratic Federal Trade Commission member, ruling that statutory protections against removal without cause were invalid. Wilcox’s petition for Supreme Court review regarding an identical protection remains pending.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *