rana sanaullah compares
| |

Rana Sanaullah compares AJK protesters to former m…

Prime Minister’s Adviser Rana Sanaullah has compared some protesters in Azad Jammu and Kashmir (AJK) to militant groups that Pakistan had trained in the past, claiming that certain elements later turned against the country.

Speaking during an interview Sanaullah alleged that individuals associated with armed organisations had become involved in the ongoing unrest in AJK. He claimed that these groups possessed weapons and were attempting to exploit public gatherings to create instability rather than pursue legitimate political objectives.

According to the prime minister’s adviser, the protesters do not have genuine political demands and are instead using ordinary citizens as a shield while pursuing what he described as a broader agenda. He suggested that the situation involved elements who wanted to take advantage of public sentiment and use the protests to challenge the state.

Sanaullah also defended the actions of law enforcement agencies, arguing that the authorities had few alternatives in dealing with what he characterised as an armed threat. He said security forces had to respond when groups carrying weapons created a law-and-order situation and posed a threat to public safety.

The adviser maintained that the government could not allow armed groups to operate freely under the cover of protests. He said law enforcement agencies would continue to take action whenever necessary to maintain order and protect citizens.

His comments come at a time of heightened political and social tensions in AJK, where protests have sparked a wider debate about public grievances, governance, law enforcement, and the government’s response. The situation has also raised questions about how authorities should balance the right to peaceful protest with the need to prevent violence and maintain public order.

Sanaullah’s remarks are expected to fuel further discussion about the nature of the ongoing demonstrations and the role of political and armed elements in the unrest. While the government has emphasised the need for strict action against violence and armed activity, critics have continued to call for dialogue and political engagement to address the underlying concerns of the people of AJK.

Similar Posts

  • | |

    Philippines says ship hit by Chinese water cannon …

    The Philippines accused China’s coast guard of blasting a government vessel with a water cannon near Scarborough Shoal on Friday, marking the third confrontation between the two sides this week in the South China Sea. The Philippine Coast Guard said the Chinese vessel came within seven metres of the BRP Datu Paduhinog, striking it with a water cannon that caused a temporary loss of satellite connectivity. Two other ships — the BRP Datu Cabaylo and BRP Cape San Agustin — were also targeted but not hit. China’s coast guard confirmed it fired water cannon, saying it had taken “necessary measures” to drive the Philippine ships away. “We sternly warn the Philippine side to immediately stop its infringing and provocative actions,” spokesperson Jiang Lue said. Beijing’s foreign ministry added that Philippine vessels had “deliberately intruded first” and insisted its actions were “professional and standard.” The clash came as Southeast Asian diplomats concluded a regional forum in Manila and as Rome hosted talks between Lebanon and Israel. Earlier this week, tensions flared at Second Thomas Shoal, where Manila accused Chinese sailors of clubbing a Filipino crew member, prompting condemnation from allies. On Thursday, the Philippines reported another water cannon incident at Scarborough. Both countries have said they are working toward completing a Code of Conduct for the South China Sea by year’s end, but the repeated confrontations underscore the volatility of the disputed waters. Beijing claims most of the sea, including Scarborough Shoal, despite a 2016 international tribunal ruling that rejected its claims.

  • Thai Marine Injured by Landmine During Border Clearance in Trat

    BANGKOK – A Thai Marine engineering specialist was wounded on Sunday morning after stepping on a landmine while conducting clearance operations along the border in Trat province. The incident occurred in the Ban Nong Ree area of Muang district, a zone recently retaken by Thai forces following intense clashes with Cambodian troops. Thai Navy Uncovers […]

  • Thai Heritage Chief Vows Restoration of Temples Damaged in Border Conflict

    BANGKOK – A senior Thai heritage official has pledged that ancient temples damaged in the ongoing border clashes with Cambodia can be fully restored to their original state, though he stressed that such work must await a return to peace along the frontier. Thailand Intensifies Strikes on Cambodian Drone Bases and Border Casinos Tossaporn Srisaman, […]

  • | |

    US appeals Court again blocks Trump’s $100,0…

    The Trump administration has suffered another legal setback after a US federal appeals court refused to reinstate a controversial $100,000 fee for H-1B visas, dealing a fresh blow to the administration’s immigration policy. A three-judge panel of the First US Circuit Court of Appeals in Boston ruled that the administration had failed to demonstrate a strong likelihood of success in its appeal or prove that it had acted within its legal authority when imposing the massive fee increase. The decision comes in a lawsuit filed by attorneys general from 20 Democratic-led states, who challenged the legality of the policy soon after it was introduced. The appeals court’s ruling leaves in place an earlier decision issued on June 8, when a lower court declared the $100,000 H-1B visa fee unlawful. That court concluded that Congress had never granted the executive branch the authority to impose a charge of that magnitude, describing it as a tax that exceeded the administration’s legal powers. President Donald Trump introduced the fee increase through an executive order issued last year, arguing that the H-1B visa program had been widely used by companies to replace American workers with lower-paid foreign professionals. The administration maintained that the significantly higher fee would discourage misuse of the program and encourage employers to prioritize hiring US workers. Critics, however, argued that the measure would severely disrupt industries that rely on highly skilled international talent, particularly the technology, healthcare and engineering sectors. Under current immigration rules, the United States issues 65,000 H-1B visas annually, along with an additional 20,000 visas for applicants holding advanced academic degrees from US institutions. The visas are generally granted for periods ranging from three to six years. Before Trump’s proposed increase, employers typically paid between $2,000 and $5,000 in government filing fees for an H-1B visa, depending on the size of the company and other applicable charges. The proposed $100,000 fee would not have applied to foreign nationals already in the United States on student visas who later transitioned to H-1B status. The latest court ruling represents another significant legal obstacle for the Trump administration’s immigration agenda and ensures that the dramatic fee increase will remain suspended while the broader legal battle continues.

  • | | |

    Pakistanis get relief as US visa policy overturned

    A US federal judge has struck down a State Department policy that suspended immigrant visa processing for applicants from Pakistan and 74 other countries. US District Judge Jeannette Vargas issued the ruling in Manhattan, finding that the policy exceeded the legal authority of Secretary of State Marco Rubio. The State Department had introduced the suspension in January, preventing consular officials from issuing immigrant visas to applicants based solely on their nationality. Judge Vargas described the policy as unlawful and said it conflicted with federal immigration law. She ruled that the law does not give the Secretary of State the authority to impose a blanket suspension on immigrant visa issuance based on an applicant’s nationality. The policy affected applicants from a wide range of countries, including Pakistan and Bangladesh in South Asia. Several countries in Latin America, the Balkans, Africa, the Middle East and the Caribbean were also included. US authorities had defended the measure by arguing that applicants from the listed countries were considered more likely to become dependent on government-funded assistance after entering the United States. The ruling came in a case brought by immigrant rights organisations, visa applicants and US citizens sponsoring family members from the affected countries. The plaintiffs challenged the State Department’s decision, arguing that the blanket suspension unlawfully restricted access to the immigrant visa process. The decision represents a legal setback for the Trump administration, which has pursued tougher immigration policies since returning to office. The administration has said its immigration measures are intended to strengthen national security and reduce pressure on public resources. Immigrant rights groups, however, have criticised several aspects of the crackdown. They have raised concerns about due process, discrimination and the treatment of ethnic minorities. The State Department had not immediately issued a response to the judge’s decision.

  • | | | |

    US accused of hitting LPG tanker as Bahrain, Kuwai…

    New, unverified claims from Iranian media and an American newspaper have added another layer of uncertainty to the escalating tensions in the Gulf, with allegations that the United States mistakenly struck an LPG tanker in the Gulf of Oman while Bahrain and Kuwait secretly carried out airstrikes inside Iran. According to Iran’s state-affiliated media, a US missile attack targeted an LPG tanker in the Gulf of Oman after it was allegedly mistaken for a vessel transporting Iranian gas. The reports claimed that two crew members were killed in the strike and that the ship’s engine room was destroyed, leaving the tanker disabled at sea. No official statement has been issued by Washington regarding the reported incident, and the claims have not been independently verified. In a separate development, The Wall Street Journal reported that Bahrain and Kuwait conducted covert air operations against military targets inside Iran earlier this month. The report alleged that the strikes targeted drone facilities and missile stockpiles as part of a broader regional effort to weaken Iran’s military capabilities. The newspaper further claimed that the United Arab Emirates assisted the operations by providing intelligence on Iranian targets and offering air defence support during the missions. Despite the significance of the allegations, neither Bahrain, Kuwait, the UAE nor the United States has publicly confirmed or denied the reported operations. Independent verification of the claims also remains unavailable. The reports emerge at a time of heightened regional instability, with the Gulf witnessing increased military activity and growing concerns over the security of international shipping routes. Analysts say any confirmed expansion of military involvement by Gulf states could further complicate the already volatile security situation in the Middle East. Until official confirmations are issued, the reported US strike on the tanker and the alleged covert air raids inside Iran should be treated as unverified claims originating from media reports rather than established facts.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *