swedish pop star

Swedish Pop Star Zara Larsson Once Called Koh Lanta Home

KRABI, Thailand – Before she was a Grammy-nominated pop sensation with millions of streams and international acclaim, Zara Larsson was just a third-grade student attending school on the Thai island of Koh Lanta, a place she says raised her and shaped part of her childhood. The 28-year-old Swedish singer-songwriter, who has released five albums including last year’s Midnight Sun and is currently on a world tour with a stop in Bangkok this November, shared her connection to Thailand in a TikTok video, stating, “Thailand raised me. It’s like a part of my childhood actually.”

TAT Inspires Travel across Thailand with LISA through ‘Feel All the Feelings’

Larsson, who won Talang, the Swedish version of Got Talent, in 2008, briefly lived on Koh Lanta with her family while her mother worked as a nursing assistant and her father served as an officer. She attended third grade at Sanuk, a Swedish school located on the island, and has returned to Thailand many times since, expressing her deep affection for the country. The school she attended has since put up a banner and poster celebrating their alumnus’ return and her continued success.

@zaralarsson

Let’s have a chat

♬ original sound – Zara Larsson

In her TikTok video, Larsson addressed the ticket prices for her upcoming Bangkok show, which start at 2,800 baht, acknowledging that some fans had commented on the cost. She explained that while she has no control over pricing for this tour, she would be more involved in the next one. Despite the concern, Larsson remains unbothered, saying, “I get to go to Thailand. I get to eat mango sticky rice.”

Idols From Thailand Who Charm With Their K-Pop

The pop star, who has won two American Music Awards and been nominated for four Brit Awards and a Grammy, is currently promoting her song “Midnight Sun” on TikTok, posting dance videos until her Bangkok show sells out. As of now, tickets remain available, but Larsson’s connection to Thailand and her fond memories of Koh Lanta have endeared her even more to her Thai fans, who appreciate her warmth and familiarity with their country. Her story highlights the unique bond between the artist and the island that she once called home.

-Thailand News (TN)

Similar Posts

  • | |

    Spider-Man, Brand New Day faces boycott calls over…

    Pro-Palestinian campaigners in Lebanon, Jordan and other parts of the Arab world are calling for a boycott of Spider-Man: Brand New Day, turning the release of the highly anticipated superhero film into a wider debate over politics, culture and entertainment. The campaign is focused on producer Avi Arad, an Israeli and US citizen and former Marvel Studios chief, whose public statements and past military service have drawn criticism from activists opposed to Israel’s conduct during the war in Gaza. In Lebanon, the Campaign to Boycott Supporters of Israel urged audiences not to buy tickets for the film, arguing that spending money on productions involving individuals who have publicly supported Israel amounts to cultural normalisation. The group called on the public to avoid paid screenings and questioned whether audiences should financially support a production involving people with political ties to Israel. A separate anti-normalisation group in Jordan, Taharrak, also called for the movie to be boycotted and urged cinemas not to include it in their schedules. The group appealed to Jordanian artists, cinema operators and other organisations to take a position against its screening. The boycott calls have subsequently been shared by activists and online content creators in other Arab countries. The film, which stars Tom Holland as Peter Parker, was released internationally on July 31. Directed by Destin Daniel Cretton, it is produced by Arad alongside Kevin Feige, Amy Pascal and Rachel O’Connor. Campaigners have specifically targeted Arad rather than the film’s storyline or its wider cast and production team. Arad served in the Israeli military from 1965 to 1968 and has previously spoken publicly about his connection to Israel. In a 2024 letter published by TheWrap, he criticised former US Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer after Schumer criticised Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and called for new Israeli elections. Arad argued that American politicians should not interfere in Israel’s electoral affairs and described himself as a proud former member of the Israeli military. Campaigners say such statements justify their call for a boycott, arguing that ticket purchases could provide financial support to a production involving Arad. However, the impact of the campaign on the film’s commercial performance remains uncertain. Despite the boycott appeal, Spider-Man: Brand New Day continued screening in Lebanon, while a representative of Grand Cinemas told L’Orient Today that audience demand remained strong shortly after its release. The controversy highlights how major Hollywood releases can become entangled in geopolitical debates, with audiences increasingly examining the political positions and backgrounds of figures behind popular entertainment.

  • | |

    Supreme Court upholds landlord’s right to us…

    The Supreme Court of Pakistan has ruled that a property owner has the exclusive right to decide how to use their property and is not bound by the wishes or preferences of a tenant. The judgment came while deciding a long-running landlord-tenant dispute involving a residential building in Karachi’s Saddar area. In an eight-page verdict authored by Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, the apex court set aside an earlier decision of the Sindh High Court, which had ruled in favour of the tenant. The Supreme Court observed that it is a well-established legal principle that a property owner is the sole judge of their own requirements. The court held that if a landlord submits a sworn statement declaring the need to use their property personally, that statement is sufficient to establish bona fide necessity unless proven otherwise. The judgment further stated that an owner cannot be compelled to use another portion of the property simply because a tenant believes alternative accommodation is available. The court emphasised that the landlord’s choice regarding the use of their property cannot be dictated by the tenant. The case involved a dispute over a flat in a building located in Karachi’s Saddar neighbourhood. During the proceedings, the tenant argued that several other flats in the same building had become vacant and could instead be used by the landlord. The Sindh High Court accepted this argument and ruled in favour of the tenant. However, the Supreme Court disagreed with that reasoning, stating that the availability of other vacant units does not deprive the owner of the right to reclaim a specific property for personal use. Allowing the landlord’s appeal, the Supreme Court ordered the tenant to vacate the flat within six months, bringing the legal dispute to a close while reaffirming the property rights of landlords under the law.

  • | |

    Imran Khan receives eight books in jail

    PTI founder Imran Khan has been provided with eight books in jail following directions from the Islamabad High Court. A deputy superintendent of the jail said the prison authorities received the eight books from the Islamabad High Court. The court had directed the authorities to provide the books to Imran Khan. The jail administration subsequently handed all eight books over to the PTI founder. However, Khan returned four of the books to the jail authorities. He reportedly told officials that he had already read those books. The remaining books were kept with him after being delivered by the prison administration. The development comes after the Islamabad High Court issued directions regarding access to reading material for the former prime minister. The jail authorities confirmed that the court’s instructions regarding the books had been followed. Officials did not provide further details about the titles of the books that were delivered or returned. The provision of books gives Khan access to additional reading material during his time in prison.

  • | |

    Elon Musk takes brutal dig at actress Anne Hathawa…

    Elon Musk has sparked fresh controversy after taking aim at actress Anne Hathaway over a speech she delivered nearly eight years ago in support of LGBTQ+ rights. The Tesla and SpaceX CEO criticized Hathaway on X after clips from her 2018 Human Rights Campaign National Dinner speech resurfaced online and gained renewed attention.  The debate began when marketing professor Gad Saad shared criticism of Hathaway’s remarks from the event. Responding to the post, Musk dismissed the actress in blunt terms, writing, “She’s just a marionette. Whoever wrote her speech is the real douchebag.” In separate posts, he also suggested Hathaway was simply reading a script and accused her of lacking independent thought.  Hathaway’s original speech was delivered in September 2018 after she received the National Ally for Equality Award from the Human Rights Campaign. During her address, the Oscar winner spoke about equality and urged people to reject discrimination based on sexual orientation, gender identity, and race. She also encouraged audiences to embrace empathy and treat others with dignity and respect.  Although the speech was widely praised at the time, a short clip recently resurfaced on social media, introducing it to a new audience. The video quickly went viral, triggering intense debate online and drawing reactions from supporters and critics alike. Musk’s comments added fuel to the discussion, with many users defending Hathaway while others echoed his criticism.  As of now, Hathaway has not publicly responded to Musk’s remarks. Her representatives have also remained silent on the renewed backlash surrounding the years-old speech.  The exchange highlights how old public statements can resurface and generate fresh controversy years later, particularly when amplified through social media. It also reflects the increasingly polarized conversations surrounding cultural and political issues online, where comments from high-profile figures often become major talking points. For now, the disagreement remains confined to social media, with Musk standing by his criticism and Hathaway choosing not to engage publicly. Whether the actress will respond remains to be seen, but the episode has once again demonstrated how celebrity opinions and online platforms can reignite debates long after the original moment has passed. 

  • | |

    UNESCO raises questions over Pakistan’s Taxila h…

    Islamabad: Pakistan’s ancient heritage sites have come under scrutiny after UNESCO raised questions over conservation work carried out at the historic Taxila archaeological sites of Mohra Moradu and Sirkap, prompting a Senate committee to seek detailed explanations from government officials. The Senate Standing Committee on National Heritage and Culture reviewed UNESCO’s concerns during a meeting at Parliament House and questioned whether restoration work at Pakistan’s internationally recognised heritage sites was being carried out according to global preservation standards. Officials informed the committee that UNESCO had asked for additional information regarding the conservation work conducted by the Directorate General of Archaeology, Punjab, at the Taxila sites. The committee was told that the required details had already been provided to UNESCO by the provincial authorities and no further objections had been received after the submission. Officials assured lawmakers that the restoration work followed UNESCO conservation guidelines and international standards. The meeting was chaired by Senator Hidayatullah Khan and attended by Senators Abdul Wasay, Bushra Anjum, Sarmad Ali and Syed Waqar Mehdi along with senior officials from the Ministry of National Heritage and Culture. During the briefing, officials explained that after the 18th Constitutional Amendment, responsibility for heritage conservation was transferred to provincial governments. They said the Government of Punjab started conservation activities at the Taxila archaeological sites and followed recommendations provided by UNESCO, ICOMOS and other expert organisations. Officials said the conservation strategy focused on protecting the original structure of the ancient remains while using scientific methods. They explained that the work included repairing damaged walls, improving drainage systems, protecting old structures from weather damage and using materials compatible with the original construction. Senator Syed Waqar Mehdi asked officials about the exact concerns raised by UNESCO. Officials explained that UNESCO’s observations mainly focused on the materials used during restoration, the method for rebuilding certain walls and the height of reconstructed structures. They said these issues were reviewed and addressed through detailed documentation submitted to UNESCO. The committee was informed that scientific cleaning and repair methods were used to protect the archaeological remains while maintaining international conservation principles. Pakistan currently has six sites listed as UNESCO World Heritage Sites, while documents for 24 more locations have been prepared for possible future inclusion. Officials told the committee that UNESCO usually considers only one nomination from each country annually.   They said Pakistan has requested UNESCO to give priority to its pending nominations so more historical locations can receive international recognition. The committee also discussed plans to develop Taxila as a major heritage and tourism destination.   Officials informed members that around Rs100 million had already been spent during the current year on conservation activities. They said further projects, including an open air museum and improved visitor facilities, were being considered to attract tourists while protecting ancient sites.   Senator Bushra Anjum stressed that stronger federal monitoring was needed despite heritage being mainly managed by provinces. She said Pakistan must improve tourism facilities around heritage sites, including better visitor services, accommodation options and a sustainable system that creates income while preserving history.   She warned that inappropriate materials or poor restoration methods could permanently damage important archaeological sites.   The committee directed the ministry to provide UNESCO’s official response once received and recommended that members visit the Taxila archaeological sites personally to review the conservation work. The meeting also discussed another major heritage issue involving the recovery of smuggled Pakistani archaeological artefacts from the United States. Officials informed the committee that 513 valuable archaeological artefacts had been returned to Pakistan through cooperation with US authorities. They said the recovered objects mainly belonged to the ancient Gandhara civilisation and had been seized after being illegally taken out of Pakistan over several decades. Officials described the artefacts as priceless national treasures representing Pakistan’s thousands of years of history. The committee was informed that plans were underway to establish a new museum where these recovered items could be safely preserved and displayed to the public. Officials said efforts were being made to acquire land for the museum in coordination with the Capital Development Authority and public private partnership options were also being explored. Committee members demanded details about the people involved in the smuggling network, the investigation process and the estimated value of the recovered artefacts. They directed the ministry to submit a complete report explaining how the artefacts were recovered and what action had been taken against those involved in illegal trafficking. The committee also discussed reports about the demolition of a historic Mughal era arch near Rohara Village for a housing development project. The chairman directed officials to collect complete information about the incident and present a detailed report at the next meeting.

  • Father of School Shooter Apologizes as Police Uncover Boy’s Motives

    BANGKOK – The parents of a 14-year-old student who opened fire at Debsirin Nonthaburi School faced police questioning this weekend. The tragic incident, which unfolded on Friday, left nine people dead and sparked national outrage over gun control. Law enforcement officials summoned the mother and father separately to uncover what led to the brutal massacre. […]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *