ayat noor case
| |

Ayat Noor case sparks outrage after tragic Haripur discovery

Haripur has been shaken by the tragic death of a young girl, Ayat Noor, whose disappearance ended in a heartbreaking discovery. The case has once again raised serious concerns about child safety and the growing fear among parents who worry about the dangers their children may face.

According to the details shared about the case, Ayat Noor had been missing for 14 days. During that time, her father reportedly searched tirelessly for his daughter, hoping that she would be found alive and brought home safely. His search, however, ended in devastating circumstances when Ayat’s body was discovered in a well on the 15th day.

Police reportedly confirmed that the child had been sexually assaulted and murdered. The horrifying nature of the case has left the local community deeply disturbed, while the death of such a young child has sparked renewed calls for stronger measures to protect children from abuse and violence.

For Ayat’s family, the tragedy has brought unimaginable grief. Her father is reportedly struggling to come to terms with the loss of his daughter and is now seeking justice for the child. His pain has also become a symbol of the anguish experienced by families who lose loved ones to violent crimes.

Police have arrested three suspects in connection with the case. According to the information circulating about the incident, the suspects have allegedly confessed to their involvement. Their reported demeanor after the arrests has further angered and disturbed people, many of whom believe that anyone responsible for such a brutal crime must face strict legal consequences.

Ayat’s final journey has also drawn emotional attention from people in Haripur and beyond. Images and accounts surrounding her funeral have reportedly left the public heartbroken, particularly the sight of her grieving father seeking justice for his daughter.

The case has once again brought the issue of child abuse into public discussion. Many parents are expressing fear and frustration, saying that repeated reports of violence against children have made them increasingly concerned about their children’s safety. For ordinary families, the thought that a child could become a victim of such a crime is deeply frightening.

Social media users have also expressed anger and helplessness following the incident. One person compared Ayat’s case with another child abuse case, writing, “Aizal did not get justice in Karachi and now we have Ayat in Haripur.” Another user prayed for divine intervention, saying, “May Allah send a miracle to deal with these criminals.”

Others turned their attention to society as a whole, questioning how such tragedies continue to happen and whether enough is being done to prevent crimes against children. One reaction read, “We are all wrong who can’t stop this.”

The outrage surrounding Ayat Noor’s death reflects a wider demand for accountability and effective protection for children. People are now waiting for the investigation and legal proceedings to establish the full circumstances of the crime and determine responsibility.

For Ayat’s grieving family, however, no punishment can undo the loss of their beloved child. What they seek now is justice, accountability and assurance that her death will not simply become another forgotten case. Her tragic story has left Haripur mourning and has once again forced society to confront the devastating consequences of child abuse and violence.

Similar Posts

  • |

    Oil prices tumble to three-week low as Trump delays Iran strike

    LONDON: Global oil prices recorded their sharpest single-day decline in weeks on Monday, falling to a three-week low after US President Donald Trump stepped back from plans for a military strike against Iran, raising hopes that diplomatic efforts could ease tensions and prevent disruptions to energy supplies from the Gulf. International benchmark Brent crude dropped 7 percent, or $6.35, to settle at $83.77 per barrel, while US West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude fell 5.1 percent, losing $4.33 to close at $80.34 per barrel. The decline marked Brent’s weakest closing level since mid-July. Market analysts said the drop was also influenced by the expiry of the higher-priced September Brent contract, with the less expensive October contract becoming the new front-month benchmark. Investor sentiment shifted sharply after Trump announced that he had postponed military action against Iran, saying he wanted to allow time for diplomacy aimed at reaching an agreement that could reduce regional tensions and potentially increase Iranian oil exports. The possibility of additional crude entering global markets eased concerns over supply shortages, prompting traders to sell oil futures and pushing prices lower. However, Tehran quickly dismissed suggestions that negotiations with Washington were underway. Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmail Baghaei said there were no talks taking place with the United States and no meetings had been scheduled. He added that Iran had no plans to host foreign delegations or send negotiators abroad in the coming days. Trump, meanwhile, maintained that discussions with Iran were in progress and warned Tehran of serious consequences if it failed to reach an agreement aimed at ending the ongoing confrontation. Analysts call market reaction excessive Energy analysts said oil markets appeared to react strongly to political rhetoric rather than confirmed developments. According to analysts at energy consultancy Ritterbusch and Associates, the steep decline in crude prices reflected what they described as an overreaction by investors to Trump’s comments suggesting that an agreement with Iran could be imminent. They noted that the US president has repeatedly made strong statements regarding Iran before later softening his position, creating significant volatility in energy markets. Analysts also observed that Trump’s public calls for lower fuel prices in the United States have frequently weighed on oil markets by reducing expectations of sustained price increases. During Monday’s trading session, US gasoline and diesel futures also declined by nearly 5 percent, reflecting broader weakness across the energy sector. Shipping routes remain under pressure Despite hopes for diplomacy, concerns over maritime security in the Middle East continued to influence market sentiment. Shipping data showed that six Saudi-flagged supertankers altered their routes in recent days, avoiding the Gulf of Aden and instead sailing around southern Africa after Yemen’s Iran-backed Houthi movement threatened to target Saudi vessels. At the same time, some oil tankers continued to transit the region. Two Saudi oil tankers successfully crossed the Bab el-Mandeb Strait over the weekend, while vessel movements through the Strait of Hormuz slowed following reports of attacks on commercial shipping. The Strait of Hormuz remains one of the world’s most strategically important energy chokepoints, carrying roughly one-fifth of global oil trade before hostilities between the United States, Israel and Iran escalated earlier this year. A Panama-flagged tanker transporting Russian naphtha also reportedly abandoned plans to pass through the Bab el-Mandeb, choosing the longer route around Africa due to security concerns. Russia boosts maritime security Russia announced on Monday that it was strengthening security measures for commercial shipping in the Azov-Black Sea region while working to expand alternative export routes, following increased attacks on vessels linked to the conflict in Ukraine. As one of the world’s largest crude producers and a leading member of the OPEC+ alliance, Russia remains a key player in global energy markets. Disruptions to exports from the Gulf, Russia and Kazakhstan have continued to limit global oil supplies throughout the year, preventing previously announced OPEC+ production increases from fully reaching international markets. In a separate development, OPEC+ approved a production quota increase of approximately 188,000 barrels per day beginning in September. Although the move is intended to gradually raise output, analysts believe geopolitical risks and transportation disruptions could continue to limit the actual flow of additional crude to global buyers.

  • | |

    Mir Raza’s father raises new questions over son?…

    The father of businessman Mir Raza Ali has raised fresh concerns about the investigation into his son’s death. Speaking to the media on Monday, Mir Hassan claimed that his son’s business partner went missing after being questioned by police. He said police had questioned the business partner once. The man was allegedly not seen again after the questioning. Hassan said the family had not been informed about the investigation involving employees of the guest house in Gulistan-e-Johar. Mir Raza’s body was found near the guest house. “We have not been told what investigations were conducted with the employees,” he said. The victim’s father also questioned why CCTV footage from the guest house had not been made public. The latest concerns have emerged as investigators continue to review the circumstances surrounding Mir Raza’s death. The case took a new turn after the businessman’s body was exhumed for a second post-mortem examination. The second medical examination found a firearm injury and several wounds that had occurred before death. It also reported signs of internal bleeding. According to the findings, a bullet entered the upper right side of Mir Raza’s back and exited through the left side of his chest. The bullet fractured his sixth rib and caused internal bleeding. The report also documented injuries to different parts of his head, face, neck and chest. Following the medical findings, police added Section 302 of the Pakistan Penal Code to the case. The section relates to murder. The original FIR had been registered under Section 365, which concerns kidnapping. Mir Raza, 25, was allegedly abducted from the PECHS area. His body was later found in bushes near a wedding hall in Gulistan-e-Johar. Police had earlier suspected that he may have been tortured before being shot. The case initially faced uncertainty over whether Mir Raza had been murdered or had died by suicide. His family, however, consistently rejected the suicide theory. The second post-mortem has strengthened the family’s claim that Mir Raza was killed. Questions had also been raised about the first post-mortem report. Karachi Police Surgeon Dr Summaiya Syed had pointed out several issues in the initial examination. She had questioned why the body was not X-rayed and why hand swabs were not collected for gunshot residue testing. She had also raised concerns over the scientific measurement and photography of firearm injuries. Questions were further raised about the documentation of the bullet’s path and the examination of the entry and exit wounds. Following these developments, police dissolved the previous investigation team. A new team was formed under the leadership of DIG Crime and Investigation Amir Farooqi. The new team was tasked with conducting a fresh investigation based on the latest medical findings. Investigators were also expected to revisit the crime scene. They were directed to re-question the victim’s family and other relevant individuals. The team was also expected to examine forensic, technical, physical and circumstantial evidence. Mir Raza’s family has repeatedly criticised the handling of the case. They have maintained that he was murdered and demanded that those responsible be identified and brought to justice. The family’s lawyer, Jibran Nasir, had also alleged that investigators pressured the family to accept a suicide theory. He called for an independent and impartial investigation. The Sindh government has meanwhile decided to establish a judicial commission headed by a Sindh High Court judge. The commission is intended to oversee a transparent and impartial investigation into Mir Raza’s death.

  • | | | |

    Two Chinese oil tankers safely cross Bab el-Mandeb…

    RIYADH: Two Chinese supertankers carrying Saudi crude oil have safely passed through the Bab el-Mandeb Strait, despite growing security concerns following the Houthi movement’s recently announced naval blockade targeting Saudi-linked shipping. According to international media reports and shipping data, the vessels successfully navigated one of the world’s busiest maritime chokepoints, even as commercial shipping across the region faces mounting disruption due to escalating tensions in the Middle East. The two tankers departed earlier this week from Saudi Arabia’s Yanbu Port, transporting crude oil to China. Maritime tracking data indicated that both ships identified themselves as carrying Chinese crews, a detail analysts believe may have helped reduce the risk of interception while transiting the strategically important waterway. The successful voyage comes at a time when regional shipping routes are under increasing pressure. While the Bab el-Mandeb passage remained open for these vessels, traffic through the Strait of Hormuz has slowed significantly amid heightened geopolitical tensions and security threats. Industry monitoring organizations reported that only one oil tanker crossed the Strait of Hormuz on Thursday, marking the lowest daily traffic recorded since May 7. The sharp decline reflects growing concerns among shipping companies over the safety of vessels operating in the Gulf region. The latest developments follow the Houthis’ announcement of a naval blockade against Saudi shipping, raising fears of further disruptions to global energy supplies. The Red Sea and nearby waterways serve as vital corridors for international trade, with millions of barrels of crude oil passing through them every day. Maritime security experts say shipping companies are increasingly reassessing routes, insurance coverage, and operational risks as tensions continue to rise. Some firms have warned that insurance policies for vessels operating in high-risk conflict zones could become more expensive or even be withdrawn if security conditions deteriorate further. Although the two Chinese tankers completed their journey through Bab el-Mandeb without incident, analysts caution that the broader security situation remains highly volatile. Any escalation involving key maritime routes could have significant consequences for global oil markets, freight costs, and international supply chains. The safe passage of the vessels offers temporary reassurance for energy markets, but observers note that commercial shipping in the region remains vulnerable as geopolitical tensions persist. Governments, shipping operators, and energy traders are closely monitoring developments, with particular attention focused on the strategic waterways that connect the Gulf to global markets.

  • | |

    Pentagon dismisses three stars and stripes officia…

      ISLAMABAD: The US Department of Defense has dismissed three senior officials associated with the military newspaper citing allegations of insubordination in a move that has intensified concerns over editorial independence and Pentagon oversight of the publication. The officials have been given five days to appeal the decisions, according to US media reports. The dismissals of Slavík and Kurt are reportedly connected to their appearance where they discussed the newspaper’s editorial independence and the Pentagon’s proposed changes to its operations. During the interview, both journalists defended the principle that Stars and Stripes should be able to maintain independent editorial judgment while continuing to serve members of the US military and their families. Slavík said in his dismissal notice that he was being removed after publicly stating that censorship of news intended for service members would cross a “red line.” He maintained that Stars and Stripes should retain its editorial independence and said he stood by the position he expressed during the interview. Kurt also confirmed that she had received a dismissal notice. During the interview, she reportedly emphasised that her professional responsibility was to Stars and Stripes rather than to the Pentagon, a particular administration or individual policymakers. She also argued that members of the US military swear an oath to defend the Constitution and therefore should have access to a free and independent press. Lederer’s dismissal appears to have stemmed from a separate dispute with Defense Department officials. According to reports, Lederer declined to follow certain Pentagon instructions concerning action against journalists. His removal also came earlier than expected, as he had reportedly planned to retire on September 30. The developments come amid months of tension between Stars and Stripes and Defense Department officials over the future direction of the publication. Although the newspaper receives funding from the Pentagon, Stars and Stripes has traditionally maintained a degree of editorial independence and has served as a source of news for US military personnel, veterans and their families. Defense officials have been seeking to reshape the publication’s coverage, placing greater emphasis on combat operations, weapons systems, physical fitness, military readiness and troop survival. Some other areas of coverage have reportedly been described by officials as less essential to service members. The dispute became more prominent after Stars and Stripes published reports examining conditions aboard the USS Abraham Lincoln, as well as concerns raised by military families regarding the mental health and welfare of troops. A Pentagon spokesperson did not provide extensive details about the dismissals but referred to an open letter from Deputy Publisher Capt. William Urban. Urban has called for the newspaper to modernise its operations, strengthen its digital presence and generate additional revenue. At the same time, he has stressed the importance of maintaining professional editorial standards. The dismissals have renewed discussion within US military journalism about how an independent press serving military personnel should operate while receiving government funding. Supporters of Stars and Stripes argue that troops need independent reporting that can examine military policies and conditions without interference. Pentagon officials, meanwhile, have sought greater alignment between the publication’s priorities and the department’s broader communication and operational objectives. The controversy is therefore likely to continue raising questions about the appropriate limits of Pentagon oversight and the editorial freedom of a publication that has served US military communities for decades.

  • | |

    Trump targets birthright citizenship again after c…

    WASHINGTON: US President Donald Trump has signed two executive orders seeking to restrict birthright citizenship, renewing his administration’s challenge to a constitutional provision just weeks after the Supreme Court rejected his earlier attempt. The new orders, signed on Thursday, take a narrower approach than Trump’s previous directive and focus on specific categories of children born in the United States. The administration argues that the measures fall outside the scope of the Supreme Court’s June 30 ruling. Birthright citizenship has been a central issue in Trump’s immigration agenda, with the White House particularly targeting what it describes as “birth tourism” — a practice in which pregnant foreign nationals travel to the US to give birth so their children can obtain American citizenship. At the signing ceremony in the Oval Office, White House aide Stephen Miller said the administration was formally moving to end the practice, declaring that “birth tourism” was banned under the new orders. The executive orders also seek to restrict citizenship rights for children born to certain foreign government employees and children of people classified as “alien enemies.” They could potentially have implications for people born in US territories if Congress approves proposed legislation seeking to end automatic citizenship there. Trump’s latest move comes only weeks after the Supreme Court ruled 6-3 against his earlier attempt to restrict birthright citizenship. His first executive order, issued in 2025, instructed federal agencies not to recognise citizenship for children born in the US when neither parent was an American citizen or lawful permanent resident. The 14th Amendment has traditionally been interpreted as guaranteeing citizenship to people born on US soil, with limited exceptions including children of foreign diplomats and members of an enemy occupying force. Trump criticised the Supreme Court ruling, calling it a “very unfortunate decision” and arguing that businesses and individuals were exploiting the citizenship system through birth tourism. However, legal experts and immigrant rights groups have questioned whether the new orders can withstand judicial scrutiny. The American Civil Liberties Union predicted that the administration’s latest effort would fail in court, while advocates accused Trump of attempting to bypass the Supreme Court. Deborah Fleischaker of UnidosUS said the high court had recently reaffirmed that birthright citizenship was a constitutional guarantee and argued that presidents could not alter it through executive action. The 14th Amendment’s Citizenship Clause states that all persons born or naturalised in the United States and subject to its jurisdiction are US citizens. The Supreme Court’s June ruling, Chief Justice John Roberts wrote, reaffirmed the principle that citizenship represents the right to participate fully in the country’s political community. The latest orders are therefore expected to trigger another legal battle, potentially putting Trump’s immigration policies and the constitutional interpretation of birthright citizenship back before the courts.

  • | |

    PTI must apologise to Fazl, says Kundi

    Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Governor Faisal Karim Kundi has urged Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) to apologise for its past statements and criticism directed at Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam-Fazl (JUI-F) chief Maulana Fazlur Rehman. Speaking to journalists in Nowshera, Kundi said PTI’s current political position appeared different from its earlier stance towards Fazlur Rehman. He said the party should acknowledge its previous remarks and offer an apology. The governor also criticised PTI’s approach towards the judiciary, saying the party had celebrated certain court decisions in the past but later faced adverse verdicts from the same judicial system. Kundi said PTI supporters had previously distributed sweets when courts issued decisions they considered favourable. However, he noted that subsequent decisions by courts resulted in PTI founder Imran Khan being sent to jail. He argued that political parties should maintain a consistent position on state institutions and should not support institutions only when their decisions favour them. Turning to the situation in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Kundi strongly criticised the provincial government and accused it of failing to address the province’s major governance and security challenges. He alleged that political activities and what he described as political drama surrounding Adiala Jail and D-Chowk had continued for years, while the province faced serious issues related to law and order. The governor claimed that the security situation had deteriorated and alleged that the province was being left vulnerable to militants. He said restoring peace and ensuring effective governance should be the government’s primary responsibilities. Kundi also pointed to what he described as a significant change in PTI’s political relationships. He said the party now regarded Maulana Fazlur Rehman and Mahmood Khan Achakzai as important political allies or figures, despite its previous criticism of them. He said the change in political positioning made it even more important for PTI to address its past statements against Fazlur Rehman. The governor’s comments come amid continued political disagreements between the federal and provincial governments, with security, governance and political alliances remaining major areas of contention.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *