rules out extending
| |

US rules out extending ceasefire deal as Iran threatens new offensive

ByJustpaste.in

DUBAI, United Arab Emirates – Iran will shift to a “fully offensive” military posture because efforts to negotiate a permanent end to the war with the US have stalled, a senior Iranian official told Reuters on Monday, August 17, as Washington ruled out extending a temporary ceasefire agreement.

Outward progress toward peace talks and a resumption of oil tanker traffic through the strategic Strait of Hormuz has ground to a halt, threatening to extend the conflict that the US and Israel launched on February 28.

“Iranian entities must be prepared to escalate tensions in the Strait of Hormuz and wider region, as Iran will be ready to make decisions and take action on difficult decisions,” the Iranian official said, adding that Tehran would conduct a “timely and precise” military attack to break the US naval blockade if diplomacy failed.

A memorandum of understanding signed in June to end the war had given Iran and the US until Monday to reach a final peace agreement.

Signed on June 17, the memorandum set a 60-day time frame for a broader deal on Iran’s nuclear program and US sanctions.

The agreement, which declared the “immediate and permanent termination of military operations on all fronts,” quickly unraveled over a dispute about control of the Strait of Hormuz, the narrow waterway through which a fifth of global oil and liquefied natural gas flowed before the war.

Asked by reporters on Monday if the US was seeking to extend June’s interim agreement, US President Donald Trump said no.

Back channel to IRGC

In one glimmer of diplomacy, media reports said Trump had opened back-channel discussions with the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, which has become more powerful during the war and controls large parts of Iran’s armed forces and the economy.

Axios, citing two sources with direct knowledge, reported that former director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard spoke with an Iraqi Kurdish leader with close ties to the IRGC, and that through this intermediary the US delivered a message to IRGC commander General Ahmad Vahidi. Fox News later reported that Trump confirmed the report in a telephone interview.

The Trump administration was concerned whether Iranian negotiators across the table actually spoke for the IRGC, Axios said, at a time when Reuters was reporting that Vahidi had become a pivotal figure. Vahidi responded that he was aligned with the Iranian negotiators, Axios said.

“I can’t go into the details of it, but I will say that the conversations between the US government and different areas of the Iranian government at all areas is probably more robust than it’s maybe ever been,” Jared Kushner, Trump’s son-in-law and special envoy, said in a separate interview with Fox News Channel’s Chief Foreign Correspondent Trey Yingst on Monday.

Trump threatens to bomb Oman

Iran said point 5 of the Memorandum of Understanding gave it the right to manage the strait, which it shares with US ally Oman, while the US rejected that interpretation. Hostilities resumed as Iran began firing on vessels it said were trying to sail through Hormuz on an unapproved route, and Trump said on July 7 that the pact was “over.”

The Iranian official told Reuters the US must meet the entirety of the MoU’s provisions within a few weeks as a precondition for further negotiations.

Even as Iran projects resilience in the war, its leaders are worried that a threat of more economic punishment could increase hardships, reignite unrest and further erode the Islamic Republic’s legitimacy, according to three Iranian officials.

Iran entered the war with high inflation, a weakening currency, energy shortages, sanctions and deep structural weaknesses, and must now contend with damaged infrastructure, disrupted trade, lost production and the cost of rebuilding.

Iran has separately been negotiating an agreement on managing the strait with Oman and says they are close to a deal.

Trump responded to those negotiations with a threat against the Gulf state, a longstanding US security partner.

“If Oman gets in the way, we’ll bomb the shit out of them,” Trump told Fox News.

Thousands of people have been killed in the conflict, mainly in Iran and Lebanon. Iran has bombed US military bases and infrastructure in countries including Oman, Jordan, Kuwait, Israel, the United Arab Emirates and Saudi Arabia.

Trump warned Americans in a speech at a rally on Friday, August 14, to prepare for continued high fuel prices as a result of the war.

Benchmark Brent crude oil futures LCOc1 have surged during the conflict, hitting a peak of $126 a barrel, roughly 75% above pre-war levels. Brent crude settled more than $2 higher on Monday to $90.87 a barrel.

For Americans who will vote in November congressional elections, gasoline prices have risen above $4 per gallon, up from less than $3 before the war, according to the automotive group AAA. – Rappler.com

Similar Posts

  • The US-brokered security framework between Lebanon and Israel

    ByJustpaste.in

    In a historic geopolitical turn of events, representatives from Lebanon and Israel signed a milestone, United States-brokered framework agreement in Washington. The landmark accord aims to establish a structured pathway toward ending ongoing armed conflict, restoring territorial integrity, and enforcing a lasting cessation of hostilities across their shared southern border. While diplomats have hailed the deal as an unprecedented step forward for regional stability, it has simultaneously ignited fierce domestic political debates and public outcry over sovereignty, security, and national defense. Negotiated over several rounds of high-level talks overseen by American officials, the framework establishes a phased operational roadmap designed to reshape the security dynamic along the border. The Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) are slated to progressively pull back from designated areas in southern Lebanon. Initial security sectors, known as pilot zones, will be created where control is formally transferred to standard state forces. Units from the Lebanese Armed Forces (LAF) will assume exclusive security responsibilities in these cleared zones, asserting the government’s monopoly on weapons and defense operations. Under international oversight, the Lebanese government commits to consolidating armed power under state institutions and overseeing the eventual dismantling of non-state armed infrastructure, specifically targeting Hezbollah’s military apparatus. Despite the diplomatic milestone celebrated in Washington, the agreement has met intense polarization within Lebanon. Opponents and vocal social commentators accuse the state leadership of capitulating to foreign pressure, arguing that making Israeli withdrawal contingent upon the disarming of local resistance groups compromises national defense while Israeli troops remain stationed on Lebanese territory. Critics assert that such concessions disproportionately favor foreign security interests at the expense of displaced southern residents who have borne the brunt of military strikes and displacement. Conversely, supporters of the Lebanese central authority emphasize that the country cannot endure perpetual conflict and economic paralysis. Proponents argue that reclaiming exclusive state sovereignty over military decisions is essential for securing international financial assistance, starting the rebuilding of devastated infrastructure, and allowing hundreds of thousands of displaced civilians to safely return to their homes in the south. Beyond the immediate security perimeter, the framework signals a broader effort by international mediators to reconfigure security structures in the Levant. By tying economic revitalization and diplomatic normalization to strict military compliance, Western nations hope to dismantle non-state proxy networks and prevent wider regional war spillover. However, significant hurdles remain. The execution of the agreement depends heavily on whether the Lebanese military possesses sufficient operational capability and political backing to execute its mandate without sparking internal civil strife. Furthermore, continuous monitoring mechanisms led by international entities will be critical to verify that both parties adhere to the standstill terms and avoid accidental escalations during the delicate troop transition phases. As diplomatic delegations prepare for follow-up implementation rounds, the coming months will test whether this framework represents a genuine turning point toward lasting peace or merely a brief intermission in a long-standing regional feud.  

  • | |

    Capital one defends closure of Trump organization accounts

    ByJustpaste.in

    Capital One Financial has responded to a lawsuit filed over its decision to close bank accounts linked to the Trump Organization, arguing that the move was based on internal anti-money laundering reviews rather than political or ideological motivations. The bank, in a legal filing submitted on Friday, stated that it closed the accounts following a detailed assessment conducted by its anti-money laundering (AML) specialists. The company argued that the decision was made after months of analysis and was consistent with its internal policies as well as regulatory requirements. The filing represents the first time a major bank has publicly connected concerns related to money laundering risks with its decision to end a banking relationship involving the Trump family business. However, Capital One clarified that it has never accused the Trump Organization of committing illegal money laundering activities. Instead, the bank said that the account closures were the result of routine compliance procedures. Capital One argued that documents presented in the case, along with the plaintiffs’ own claims, demonstrate that the decision was related to AML concerns rather than any attempt to discriminate against the company because of political beliefs. The dispute began after Capital One informed the Trump Organization in March 2021 that it planned to close more than 300 accounts associated with businesses connected to former U.S. President Donald Trump. The Trump Organization and Eric Trump, Trump’s son, later filed a lawsuit in March 2025 in a Florida federal court, claiming that the bank had unfairly “debanked” them because of political pressure and what they described as the company’s “woke” policies. The lawsuit alleged that Capital One’s decision was influenced by the political environment following the January 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol. The plaintiffs argued that the bank wanted to distance itself from Trump and his supporters during a period of intense public and political scrutiny. A federal court in Miami has already dismissed two versions of the complaint but allowed the plaintiffs opportunities to revise and submit updated claims. Capital One argued in its latest filing that the amended complaint continues to contain the same weaknesses as earlier versions and fails to establish evidence of unlawful discrimination. The bank accused the Trump Organization of presenting selective information and relying on statements taken out of context. Capital One maintained that the allegations of political motivation were unsupported and ignored the broader circumstances behind the account closures. According to the bank’s filing, certain transaction patterns identified during its review matched types of activities that federal banking authorities commonly recognize as requiring additional examination. Capital One said its AML team followed established procedures before reaching the decision to terminate the accounts. The legal battle comes during a broader political debate in the United States over the issue of “debanking,” with some conservatives accusing financial institutions of unfairly targeting individuals and organizations because of their political views. During his second presidential term, Trump’s administration has criticized such practices and taken steps aimed at preventing what it describes as discriminatory banking decisions. The controversy has also involved other major financial institutions. Trump previously filed a lawsuit against JPMorgan Chase, making similar allegations regarding political discrimination. During his first term in office, Trump also took legal action against Capital One and Deutsche Bank in an effort to prevent the release of his financial records to Congress. The case continues to highlight the growing tension between banking compliance practices, political concerns, and the debate over whether financial institutions should have broader restrictions on ending relationships with controversial clients.

  • |

    Two more air India pilots fail initial drug tests

    ByJustpaste.in

      Two more Air India pilots have failed preliminary drug screening following the incident involving an Air India flight from Phuket to Delhi. The airline has temporarily removed both pilots from flying duties while authorities await the results of their final tests. According to Indian media reports, Air India decided to conduct drug screening for all its pilots after the incident. More than 300 pilots have undergone testing so far, with final results generally taking between 24 and 48 hours. The captain of the Phuket-to-Delhi flight also failed two drug-related tests conducted after the aircraft landed. Subsequent testing reportedly detected cannabis in the pilot’s system. Indian media have also reported that a flight attendant complained that the captain had allegedly used cannabis before the flight. The development has raised further questions about safety procedures and pilot fitness at Air India. The airline is now reviewing the results of the wider testing campaign as it seeks to determine whether any other crew members may have violated aviation safety regulations. The Phuket-Delhi flight involved an Airbus A320neo that reportedly experienced a sudden loss of altitude during the journey. The aircraft dropped by around 300 feet before recovering, prompting concerns among passengers and crew. Officials initially described the incident as turbulence. However, detailed information from the aircraft’s systems later prompted closer scrutiny of what happened during the flight and raised questions about possible technical issues as well as the captain’s conduct. Air India has yet to receive the final laboratory results for the two newly identified pilots. Until those results arrive, the airline has kept both pilots off flight operations as a precautionary measure.

  • |

    New dinosaur species discovered in Zimbabwe reveals distinct ancient ecosystems across southern Africa

    ByJustpaste.in

    Palaeontologists have identified a new species of Late Triassic dinosaur from fossils discovered on the shores of Lake Kariba in northern Zimbabwe, offering fresh insights into prehistoric ecosystems across southern Africa. Named Musango matusadonaensis, the 4.5-metre-long creature lived approximately 210 million years ago, a pivotal era when dinosaurs were beginning to spread across the supercontinent Gondwana prior to becoming the planet’s dominant land animals. The discovery represents only the fifth dinosaur species formally named from Zimbabwe, stemming from a international research collaboration between institutions in the United Kingdom, South Africa, and Zimbabwe. Lead researcher Professor Paul Barrett from London’s Natural History Museum, alongside co-authors publishing in the Journal of Systematic Palaeontology, detailed the anatomical characteristics of the fossilised skeleton, which included bones from the spine, arms, and feet. Musango was an early sauropodomorph, an evolutionary precursor to massive four-legged herbivores like Diplodocus, though this earlier relative was lightly built and walked primarily on two legs. Microscopic analysis of its fibula revealed eight distinct growth rings, indicating the animal was around eight years old and nearly fully grown when it died, while weighing an estimated 222 kilogrammes. The discovery challenges long-held scientific assumptions that Late Triassic dinosaur populations were uniform across the southern regions of Gondwana. Based on structural features of its skeleton and comparative ecosystem data, researchers believe Musango was an opportunistic omnivore that fed on plants, small reptiles, lungfish, and crocodile-like phytosaurs. The presence of a distinct species in the Lake Kariba region demonstrates that ancient southern Africa was divided into unique, localised environments with varied wildlife compositions, showing that regional climate and geography drove dinosaur diversification much earlier than previously understood.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *