thai automotive associations

Thai Automotive Associations Call For 32% Import Duty On Chinese EVs

BANGKOK, Thailand — Thailand’s automotive and auto parts industry associations are urging the government to impose a 32% import duty on Chinese battery electric vehicles (BEVs), warning that a potential surge in imports following the expiration of current incentive programs could severely undermine the country’s domestic manufacturing sector and supply chain.

Thai Government Pushes Plan to Get 300,000 EVs on the Road

The call to action comes as industry leaders express concern about the long-term implications of the EV3.5 scheme, a government incentive program running from 2024 to 2027 that offers tax cuts and subsidies to automakers in exchange for investment in BEV assembly plants within Thailand. Under the scheme, participating companies must maintain a production-to-import ratio, requiring them to produce two BEVs locally for every one imported between 2024 and 2025, with the ratio increasing to three locally produced vehicles for every imported unit by 2027.

However, executives from the Electric Vehicle Association of Thailand (EVAT) and nine other industry groups fear that Chinese automakers may scale back or halt local production entirely once they have satisfied the minimum requirements under EV3.5, potentially flooding the Thai market with imported vehicles while bypassing domestic manufacturing commitments.

“Once Chinese manufacturers meet their obligations under the incentive scheme, there is a real risk they could shift strategy and prioritize imports over local production,” warned an EVAT executive who requested anonymity due to the sensitivity of ongoing policy discussions. “Such a move would deal a serious blow not only to Thailand’s BEV manufacturing sector but also to the extensive network of auto parts makers and suppliers that depend on steady production volumes.”

To address these concerns, EVAT and allied associations plan to submit a formal proposal to the government calling for a 32% import duty on Chinese BEVs. While Chinese automakers currently benefit from zero tariffs on BEV imports under the ASEAN-China Free Trade Agreement, imports remain subject to other duties depending on vehicle classification. Companies participating in the EV3.5 scheme receive additional reductions on certain duties, providing them with a competitive advantage in the Thai market.

Industry analysts argue that without stronger protective measures, Thailand’s auto parts sector—which comprises approximately 1,700 companies under the Federation of Thai Industries—faces significant vulnerability. Most of these firms are small or medium-sized original equipment manufacturers categorized as tier 2 and tier 3 suppliers, which typically provide components to larger tier 1 producers that are often subsidiaries of global carmakers.

“In a market dominated by large foreign manufacturers, our smaller suppliers are the first to suffer when production shifts overseas,” said a representative from the Thai Auto Parts Manufacturers Association. “Protecting local content requirements isn’t just about economics; it’s about preserving jobs and industrial capability.”

Beyond import duties, the associations are also urging the government to tighten local content requirements for electric vehicle production. Under current Board of Investment guidelines, global EV producers receiving investment incentives must source 40% of their EV components domestically. The industry groups are proposing to raise this threshold to 80%, arguing that higher local content would strengthen Thailand’s supply chain resilience, foster technological development, and safeguard employment across the manufacturing ecosystem.

“Thailand has built a robust automotive ecosystem over decades,” noted a Bangkok-based industry analyst who requested anonymity. “The transition to electric vehicles presents both opportunity and risk. If we don’t structure our policies carefully, we could find ourselves assembling vehicles with imported parts while losing the deeper industrial capabilities that have defined our sector.”

Concerns over sluggish domestic car sales have already prompted the National EV Policy Committee to ease certain production rules. Under a revised framework, each BEV produced for export now counts as 1.5 units toward the quota, providing automakers with greater flexibility in meeting their obligations. However, industry leaders remain wary that such adjustments, while helpful in the short term, may not adequately address the strategic positioning of Chinese manufacturers in the regional market.

“A flood of Chinese EVs would hurt local BEV manufacturing, auto parts makers, and suppliers across the board,” the EVAT executive emphasized. “We are hoping to submit and discuss these proposals with the government as soon as possible to ensure that Thailand’s automotive transition benefits our domestic industry.”

The associations plan to meet with officials from the Ministries of Finance and Industry to present their case and explore potential policy adjustments. Key discussion points are expected to include the structure and timing of import duties, mechanisms for verifying local content compliance, and strategies for supporting small and medium-sized enterprises during the industry’s electric transition.

Thailand has long positioned itself as the “Detroit of Asia,” serving as a major production hub for conventional vehicles and increasingly for electric models. The country’s strategic location, established supply chains, and government incentives have attracted significant investment from global automakers seeking to serve both domestic and export markets. However, the rapid rise of Chinese EV manufacturers—backed by substantial state support and advanced battery technology—has introduced new competitive dynamics that challenge traditional industry structures.

Government officials have not yet issued a formal response to the associations’ proposal, though sources familiar with policy discussions indicate that the Ministry of Finance is reviewing various options for balancing consumer access to affordable electric vehicles with the need to protect domestic industrial capacity.

“For policymakers, the challenge is finding the right equilibrium,” said a former trade official who spoke on condition of anonymity. “Too much protection could raise prices for consumers and slow EV adoption; too little could erode the industrial base that has supported Thailand’s economy for generations.”

Consumer advocacy groups have expressed mixed views on the proposed import duties. While some acknowledge the importance of protecting local jobs, others worry that higher tariffs on Chinese EVs could limit affordability and slow the transition to cleaner transportation.

“Electric vehicles offer significant environmental and economic benefits, but only if people can actually afford them,” said a representative from a Thai consumer rights organization. “Any policy discussion should consider both industrial protection and accessibility for everyday buyers.”

As the debate unfolds, Thailand’s approach to managing the electric vehicle transition is being watched closely by neighboring countries facing similar questions about industrial policy, foreign investment, and technological sovereignty. The outcome could influence regional strategies for balancing open markets with domestic development goals.

For now, industry associations remain focused on advancing their proposals through official channels. “We are committed to constructive dialogue with the government,” the EVAT executive stated. “Our goal is not to block competition but to ensure that Thailand’s automotive transformation creates lasting value for our workers, our companies, and our economy.”

Chinese EVs Dominate Bangkok Motor Show

Further updates regarding government responses, policy deliberations, and industry negotiations are expected as discussions between automotive associations and ministry officials proceed.

-Thailand News (TN)

Similar Posts

  • | | | |

    Petrol down Rs3.39, diesel Rs4.07

    The federal government has announced another reduction in petroleum prices, lowering the rates of both petrol and high-speed diesel (HSD) effective August 5 under the recently introduced daily fuel pricing mechanism. According to a notification issued by the Ministry of Petroleum, the price of petrol has been reduced by Rs3.39 per litre, bringing the new rate to Rs328.56 per litre. The price of high-speed diesel has also been cut by Rs4.07 per litre, with the revised rate set at Rs385.86 per litre. The latest reduction follows a similar decrease announced a day earlier, reflecting continued adjustments under the government’s daily fuel price review system. The new pricing mechanism, introduced on July 17, determines fuel prices using a seven-day average of international oil market rates. The policy aims to align domestic petroleum prices more closely with global market trends and allow quicker adjustments in response to fluctuations in crude oil prices. Pakistan remains heavily dependent on imported crude oil and refined petroleum products, making local fuel prices highly sensitive to movements in international energy markets. Changes in global oil prices directly affect the country’s import bill, foreign exchange reserves and inflation. Energy analysts say international petroleum prices continue to be influenced by geopolitical developments, including tensions in the Middle East, decisions by OPEC+ countries, sanctions on major oil producers and disruptions in key global shipping routes. These factors can significantly impact crude oil prices and transportation costs, ultimately affecting domestic fuel prices in Pakistan.

  • | | |

    Three Pakistanis killed in Houthi attack on vessel

    Three Pakistani sailors were among four crew members killed after a commercial vessel came under attack in the Bab al-Mandeb Strait on Tuesday, according to Yemen’s Ministry of Transportation. The Yemeni-flagged vessel, identified as Tihamah, was carrying food supplies when it was reportedly struck by three ballistic missiles while sailing through the strategically important waterway. The attack set the vessel on fire and caused significant damage, the ministry said. Four other crew members were wounded, while a member of the rescue team also sustained injuries. The ministry said another missile was fired at the vessel while rescue teams were trying to reach the crew. It accused the attackers of attempting to disrupt the rescue operation and increase the number of casualties. The ministry condemned the incident and described the attack as a serious threat to maritime security and international trade. It also warned that attacks on commercial vessels carrying essential goods could affect food and consumer supplies in Yemen. There was no immediate statement from the Houthis regarding the reported attack. According to maritime security sources, the crew lost control of the vessel after the attack. Yemeni coastguard personnel moved towards the ship, but the responding forces reportedly came under fire. The incident occurred near Perim Island, a strategically important location close to the Bab al-Mandeb Strait. A British maritime security organisation said the vessel was reportedly at anchor northeast of the island when it was struck. The ship was reportedly carrying food supplies and had departed from the government-controlled Yemeni port of Al-Mokha on Saturday. Maritime data indicates that shipping activity through the Bab al-Mandeb and Red Sea has fallen sharply amid continuing security concerns. Traffic through the strategic waterway has declined by more than half compared with levels recorded before an earlier wave of Houthi attacks on commercial shipping. The latest restrictions have further reduced shipping activity in the region. Industry data showed that an average of about 32 vessels passed through the strait each day last week, compared with around 50 before the latest blockade was announced. The Bab al-Mandeb connects the Red Sea with the Gulf of Aden and serves as a major international shipping route. Any prolonged disruption could affect the movement of food, fuel and other essential goods between Asia, the Middle East and Europe. The incident also adds to concerns over the safety of Pakistani nationals amid the widening regional conflict.

  • | |

    Trump targets birthright citizenship again after c…

    WASHINGTON: US President Donald Trump has signed two executive orders seeking to restrict birthright citizenship, renewing his administration’s challenge to a constitutional provision just weeks after the Supreme Court rejected his earlier attempt. The new orders, signed on Thursday, take a narrower approach than Trump’s previous directive and focus on specific categories of children born in the United States. The administration argues that the measures fall outside the scope of the Supreme Court’s June 30 ruling. Birthright citizenship has been a central issue in Trump’s immigration agenda, with the White House particularly targeting what it describes as “birth tourism” — a practice in which pregnant foreign nationals travel to the US to give birth so their children can obtain American citizenship. At the signing ceremony in the Oval Office, White House aide Stephen Miller said the administration was formally moving to end the practice, declaring that “birth tourism” was banned under the new orders. The executive orders also seek to restrict citizenship rights for children born to certain foreign government employees and children of people classified as “alien enemies.” They could potentially have implications for people born in US territories if Congress approves proposed legislation seeking to end automatic citizenship there. Trump’s latest move comes only weeks after the Supreme Court ruled 6-3 against his earlier attempt to restrict birthright citizenship. His first executive order, issued in 2025, instructed federal agencies not to recognise citizenship for children born in the US when neither parent was an American citizen or lawful permanent resident. The 14th Amendment has traditionally been interpreted as guaranteeing citizenship to people born on US soil, with limited exceptions including children of foreign diplomats and members of an enemy occupying force. Trump criticised the Supreme Court ruling, calling it a “very unfortunate decision” and arguing that businesses and individuals were exploiting the citizenship system through birth tourism. However, legal experts and immigrant rights groups have questioned whether the new orders can withstand judicial scrutiny. The American Civil Liberties Union predicted that the administration’s latest effort would fail in court, while advocates accused Trump of attempting to bypass the Supreme Court. Deborah Fleischaker of UnidosUS said the high court had recently reaffirmed that birthright citizenship was a constitutional guarantee and argued that presidents could not alter it through executive action. The 14th Amendment’s Citizenship Clause states that all persons born or naturalised in the United States and subject to its jurisdiction are US citizens. The Supreme Court’s June ruling, Chief Justice John Roberts wrote, reaffirmed the principle that citizenship represents the right to participate fully in the country’s political community. The latest orders are therefore expected to trigger another legal battle, potentially putting Trump’s immigration policies and the constitutional interpretation of birthright citizenship back before the courts.

  • Thailand to Rethink Gun Laws After School Shooting Leaves 9 Dead

    BANGKOK – A horrific school shooting in Thailand has left the entire nation in shock and deep mourning. Nine people are tragically dead, and 15 others are seriously injured following a brutal attack. The violence occurred at a well-known high school located just outside the bustling capital of Bangkok. This devastating tragedy has immediately forced […]

  • | |

    Punjab PMS officers oppose plan to create 101 AAC …

    LAHORE: The Provincial Management Service (PMS) Officers Association has strongly opposed the Punjab government’s proposal to create 101 new Additional Assistant Commissioner (AAC) posts, describing the move as unnecessary and harmful to the existing administrative structure. The association argued that the AAC posts had been abolished years ago and their revival was not justified, particularly after the establishment of the Punjab Enforcement and Regulatory Authority (PERA), which was created to strengthen enforcement and regulatory functions across the province. During an executive committee meeting chaired by Association President Qamar Zaman Qaisrani, members unanimously decided to raise their concerns with senior government officials. A delegation of the association is expected to meet the Punjab services secretary and the additional chief secretary to seek a review of the proposed decision. The association warned that if its concerns remain unaddressed, PMS officers across Punjab will begin a province-wide protest campaign. As part of the first phase, officers plan to wear black armbands while performing official duties to register their protest against the government’s decision. PMS officers believe the creation of the new posts would place a significant financial burden on the provincial treasury. According to the association’s estimates, establishing one Additional Assistant Commissioner post, including official facilities, office infrastructure, staff, transport and operational expenses, would cost approximately Rs46.8 million. They claim that creating all 101 posts would require nearly Rs4.73 billion initially, in addition to recurring expenditures on salaries, allowances and other administrative costs. The association further expressed concerns over what it described as long-standing issues within the provincial bureaucracy. These include delays in promotion boards, alleged discrimination in transfers and postings, and the appointment of junior officers to positions traditionally reserved for senior officials. Former administrative secretary Yawar Mehdi also commented on the proposal, saying that efforts to improve public service delivery were welcome if they genuinely strengthened governance. However, he stressed that introducing additional administrative positions should not weaken the existing civil service structure or negatively affect the career progression of Provincial Management Service officers.

  • Tragedy Claims Young Police Officer: Chiang Rai Family Recovers Body After Deadly Pub Fire

    BANGKOK — A grieving family arrived at the Institute of Forensic Medicine on Monday evening. They came to claim the body of a young female police officer. She tragically lost her life in a massive fire at a local entertainment venue. The victim was identified as Police Corporal Pemika Onsrī. She was only 24 years […]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *