fake till you

Fake it till you break it: inside the deepfake era

ByJustpaste.in

Previously, I believed that if one could see something, it could be trusted because seeing is believing. A video was proof. A voice recording was evidence. That belief is gone, and I don’t think we have fully sat with the implications. There is an abnormal shift happening. AI-generated images, voice cloning, face-swapping apps, and similar tools were supposed to expand how people express themselves, but instead they have slowly chipped away at what matters most: the belief that people can express themselves through their images and their words.

I attended a workshop under the project titled “Digital Trust and Free Expression in the AI Era” at Department of Media and Development Communication, University of the Punjab, supported by the U.S. Mission to Pakistan in partnership with the Pakistan-U.S. Alumni Network (PUAN) last week. During the discussions on digital trust. I took part in the discussion and shared my thoughts that we are now in a time where we must take this out of the realm of fun tech novelty and place it in the realm of a structural issue in how societies operate. Everyone says deepfakes are a “misinformation” issue, but this is not an adequate way to describe it. Misinformation is something that’s a false statement that can, in theory, be fact-checked. Deepfakes strike at the heart of video and audio credibility which have always been treated as vivid reality. When people realize that any clip can be fabricated, they stop trusting all clips, even real ones. This is what concerns me most. Fake things are believed and real things become deniable. Consider the implications of journalism, courts, political accountability, etc. If a politician is recorded saying something damaging, they can simply claim that it’s a “deepfake” and, depending on how much trust citizen have lost, people may believe them.

We are creating a society in which it is possible to negotiate authenticity and in which negotiable authenticity is a gift for those who wish to avoid consequences. I also face a conflict here: I strongly believe in free speech, satire, parody, art and provocation even with synthetic media. The same technology behind de-aged actors, resurrected voices, dubbing, and experimental AI is extremely creative, yet it is all connected to malicious deepfakes. There is no way to ‘clean’ a tool of its worst use-case. A hammer can break windows or build houses. I do not think banning synthetic media is the answer, nor do I support pre-emptive censorship. That path harms legitimate satire, journalism and art under the pretense of ‘preserving truth’. History does not look kindly on institutions that decide what is a “fair” fake. Freedom of expression has never been of consequence or friction, and right now, deepfakes have almost no friction.

The reality is there is no cost, disclosure, and accountability in using this technology deceptively. The issue is the imbalance. I believe the solution is not reducing synthetic tools but improving provenance. We need a digital watermarking, which cannot be “easily removed”: cryptographic signatures embedded into cameras, microphones and generative tools at the point of creation, so that the “unverified” label appears by default, not as an afterthought. Not to prohibit any content but to allow people to know what they are seeing before deciding whether to trust it.

Platforms have been allowed to operate without responsibility for too long. Convincing fakes can reach millions before correction and corrections never travel as far. This asymmetry is not natural; it is a design choice. Platforms can mark, rate or tag synthetic content at the time of dissemination. Most simply haven’t had to! But, beyond platforms, we must change our own instincts as individuals.

The old saying was “pics or it didn’t happen.” The new rule should be: “Who gains from believing this and can I verify it myself? A society that believes everything or worse, believes nothing is in danger. The deepfake age is not the age of AI; it is the consequences of a world where the cost of faking reality is near zero and the cost of establishing truth remains high. Freedom of expression should protect the most challenging and profound exchange of ideas, not the production of fake consent, fake evidence, or fake people. We can have creative freedom and still expect honesty about sources. These are not competing prioritie

These are not different objectives/priorities. However, if we pretend it’s a content-moderation footnote, we must make sure we are not waking up in a world where “fake it till you make it” has become ‘fake it till you break it” and by that time, it won’t be just one video or one lie that will break. It will be our fundamental ability to reach a shared understanding of reality.

The views, thoughts, and opinions expressed in this blog are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the U.S. Mission to Pakistan or USEFP/PUAN.

The writer, Mahnoor Ashraf Wattoo, is a student of Media and Development Communication at University of the Punjab, Lahore 

Similar Posts

  • Omega-3 linked to better lungs

    ByJustpaste.in

    A new medical study suggests that omega-3 fatty acids may do more than protect the heart and brain. Researchers say these healthy fats could also help keep the lungs working well for a longer time by slowing the natural decline in lung function. Omega-3 fatty acids are found in foods such as oily fish, fish oil supplements walnuts, flaxseeds chia seeds vegetable oils and fortified foods. They are already known for their anti inflammatory effects and may help lower the risk of heart disease stroke and some types of cancer. Now scientists believe they may also play an important role in supporting lung health. The study was published in the American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. The research was led by Dr. Patricia A. Cassano from Cornell University in New York. She explained that while many studies have looked at how diet affects heart disease and cancer much less research has focused on how nutrition influences lung health. To explore this researchers carried out two separate studies. The first study followed 15,063 adults in the United States with an average age of 56. Most participants were healthy and had no diagnosed lung disease when the study began. They were monitored for between seven and 20 years. Researchers found that people with higher levels of omega-3 fatty acids in their blood experienced a slower decline in lung function over time. In the second study scientists analyzed genetic data from more than 500,000 people in Europe. They examined genetic markers linked to omega-3 levels in the blood and found the same pattern. Higher omega-3 levels were associated with better lung function and healthier lungs. Although the findings are encouraging experts say omega-3 supplements should not be seen as a cure or a replacement for medical treatment. A balanced diet regular exercise avoiding smoking and following medical advice remain the best ways to protect lung health.

  • Talking to yourself may boost brain power

    ByJustpaste.in

    Some habits may look strange to other people. Talking to yourself is one of them.  Many people think it shows poor concentration or a weak mind but research suggests that this habit can sometimes have positive effects. Self talk can support your brain Talking to yourself can help you organize your thoughts and understand your feelings.  It may also help improve memory focus, and confidence. A 2012 study found that people who talked to themselves could identify objects in pictures more quickly.  This suggests that saying things out loud may sometimes help the brain focus on what it is looking for. It may improve self control Research has also found a possible link between self talk and better self control.  Talking through a problem can help people think before acting and make better decisions. Self talk may also help people understand themselves better by giving them a chance to think about their feelings plans and problems. Positive self talk matters Not all self talk is helpful. Constantly criticizing yourself or using negative words can make you feel worse and may affect your confidence. Positive and balanced self talk can be more useful. For example reminding yourself to stay calm focus on a task or keep trying can help you manage difficult situations. So if you sometimes talk to yourself there is no need to feel embarrassed.  When kept positive and balanced this simple habit may help you focus organize your thoughts and understand yourself better.

  • |

    The aftermath of Free (Azad) Kashmir

    ByJustpaste.in

    For centuries, poets have romanticized Kashmir. The famous Persian couplet claimed: “Agar firdaus bar roo-e-zameen ast, hameen ast-o, hameen ast-o, hameen ast” If there is a paradise on earth, it is this, it is this, it is this. Our national rhetoric held this idea and declared Azad Jammu and Kashmir (AJK) as an Eden of resilient souls. We were taught to view the region through a single prism from our classrooms to our living rooms. Kashmir is a land of dignity waiting for liberation. We rightly raised our voices in moral outrage against Indian state violence.  We condemned the pellet guns in Srinagar. We  called out internet blackouts as crimes against basic humanity. Yet today, as the late Kashmiri poet Agha Shahid Ali lamented: “Kashmiri people are being rowed through Paradise in a river of Hell.” When the same heavy boots, digital blockades, and live gunfire echo through Rawalakot, Kotli, and Mirpur, our collective morality falls into a deafening silence. Finally, the elections have settled down with Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) securing its lead amid heavy security deployments. Still, the official state narrative speaks of democratic continuity and institutional order.  Beyond the victory speeches lies a darker reality. Elections held under the shadow of civil crackdowns are not a triumph of democracy. In fact, they are an exercise in management. The citizens of Azad Kashmir have not taken to the streets over abstract political games. Their demands were fundamental, human, and modest organized under grassroots movements like the Jammu Kashmir Joint Awami Action Committee (JAAC). They protested peacefully for affordable flour, fair electricity tariffs, local economic dignity, and genuine political representation. Instead of earnest dialogue, the state answered by banning civil rights, mobile internet access, and deploying paramilitary forces. The cost of this refusal to listen is written in blood. Over months of recurring unrest, clashes between security forces and civilian demonstrators have left dozens dead. The deaths consumed local traders, young protesters, and security personnel alongside over 100 people wounded across the region. Reports of continuous firing near Rawalakot confirm a tragic pattern. Whenever citizens ask for basic constitutional rights, they are met with gunshots.  It is painful to admit this hypocrisy, but honesty demands it. As ordinary citizens living in Punjab, we cannot spend our lives idealizing human rights movements across the border while remaining selectively blind to Kashmir. When Delhi cut the internet in the Kashmir Valley, we rightfully called it authoritarian. What name do we give to the blackouts imposed on Muzaffarabad and Poonch? When Indian police opened fire on demonstrators, we called it state violence. How do we rationalize our forces opening fire on citizens asking for fair economic treatment? We must acknowledge that living outside the valley does not grant us the privilege of silence. True solidarity cannot be a convenient geopolitical slogan. Azad (Free) Kashmir must’ve to be anything more than an empty prefix. Its people must possess the freedom to speak, to dissent, to connect, and to live without fear of a bullet. There mustn’t be such an electoral victory that carries legitimacy at the expense of Kashmiri lives. These political wins will remain hollow until the blockades are lifted and the state listens with humility rather than force.  

  • AI Video imagines birds as weapons

    ByJustpaste.in

    China has released an AI generated video showing birds being used as weapons in a fictional future war. The video uses artificial intelligence to create an imaginary scene in which advanced technology turns birds into tools for military purposes. The unusual concept has attracted attention on social media. A fictional look at future warfare The AI made video presents an imagined version of future warfare and shows how new technology could be used in unexpected ways. It does not show a real military operation. Instead it appears to be a creative representation of how artificial intelligence and advanced technology might influence future battles. https://x.com/saraanwar45/status/2086866754677190751?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E2086866754677190751%7Ctwgr%5Ed3bc601aa804c21c9cb186006047ab35f9b3b5b3%7Ctwcon%5Es1_c10&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Furdu.samaa.tv%2F2087358205 Social media reacts After the video appeared online social media users shared different opinions about the unusual idea. Some found the concept surprising while others viewed it as an interesting example of how AI can create fictional images of future warfare. The video has also sparked discussion about the possible role of artificial intelligence in future military technology and how AI could be used to imagine new forms of warfare.

  • Cheap deals are no longer enough

    ByJustpaste.in

    Major fast food chains in the United States, including McDonald’s are finding it harder to attract customers simply by offering cheaper meals and discounts.  Recent second quarter results show that price is still important but customers are now looking at other things too including food quality new menu choices and better service. Over the past two years, US fast food companies have used low-cost deals and promotions to attract customers affected by inflation.  However recent results suggest that discounts alone are no longer enough to keep customers coming back. The chains that performed better were those that combined affordable deals with new menu items better food quality and an easier customer experience. Taco bell sees strong growth Taco Bell owned by Yum Brands has focused on simple and clearly priced deals instead of offering large discounts across its entire menu. Its $5, $7, and $9 meal boxes became popular with customers. The company also added new menu items encouraging customers to buy more than just the discounted meal. Rachel Royster director of strategic planning and innovation at food-service consultancy Kinetic said value deals work best when customers can easily understand what they are getting and do not feel they are being attracted by a cheap offer only to face higher prices later. Taco bell reported a 7% increase in same store sales during the quarter. McDonald’s by comparison, recorded a 1.3% increase in global comparable sales. McDonald’s faces challenges McDonald’s also introduced low cost options including a menu with items priced below $3 and a $4 breakfast meal.  However the company’s performance was weaker than expected. McDonald’s CEO Chris Kempczinski said about two thirds of the decline in customer traffic came from people who were already loyal McDonald’s customers.  He said the problem was mainly with how the company’s strategy was carried out rather than the strategy itself. Low income customers remain  Under pressure Results from other fast food companies also show that discounts have not completely solved the financial pressure faced by lower income customers. Wendy’s introduced its Biggie Bag value deals starting at $5. Despite these offers its US same-store sales fell by 7%, and the company withdrew its yearly financial forecast. Wingstop also offered several promotions including $1 chicken wings but its US same store sales dropped by 7.5%. Wingstop CEO Michael Skipworth said sales were weaker in urban areas where many families are facing greater financial pressure.  In higher income areas however restaurant visits increased by as much as 9%. The company’s shares have also fallen sharply over the past six months. Analyst Matt Curtis of D.A. Davidson said the large number of promotions from different fast food chains has made it harder for customers to compare offers.  Customers are now taking more time to compare deals and choose what gives them the best value. Being the cheapest is not enough The second quarter results also show that a restaurant does not have to be the cheapest option in the market to succeed. Burger King owned by Restaurant Brands International was among the chains that performed better. Company officials credited its strong US sales to promotions such as “2 for $5” and “3 for $7,” along with improvements in operations and menu quality. Restaurant consultant John Gordon said Burger King is offering discounts but it is not relying on deep promotions all the time.  The company has also changed the way it presents its offers instead of constantly competing on the lowest possible price. Domino’s and Chipotle also perform well Domino’s Pizza benefited from value-focused offers and loyalty programs.  These efforts helped bring more customers to its restaurants and support sales. Chipotle Mexican Grill also reported strong results.  The company kept its price increases relatively limited, at around 1% to 2%. Chipotle CEO Scott Boatwright said value is not only about lower prices or discounts. It can also include convenience better service and new food choices. Customers want more than cheap food The latest results from the US fastfood market suggest that customers are becoming more careful with their spending. While affordable deals remain important people are also looking for good food better service convenient experiences and interesting menu options. For fast food companies the message is clear being cheap may attract customers but offering better overall value is what can keep them coming back.

  • Can you solve this weight puzzle?

    ByJustpaste.in

    This fun brain teaser is designed to test your observation skills and logical thinking. It also helps improve problem solving and creative thinking. In the picture three people are carrying a large tree log. At first glance it looks like all three are carrying the same amount of weight. But if you look more carefully you’ll realize that the weight is not shared equally. Take a close look at the image before answering. The question is trickier than it seems. Based on how weight is distributed the person standing in the middle is carrying the heaviest load. In fact the middle person is supporting more than 25% extra weight compared to the two people on either side.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *