frances top court
|

France’s top court blocks social media ban for under-15s

 

 

France’s Constitutional Council, the country’s highest constitutional authority, has rejected a proposed law that would have banned children under the age of 15 from accessing social media. The decision represents a setback for President Emmanuel Macron, who had strongly supported measures aimed at protecting young people from the potential harms of social media.

The proposed legislation would have prevented children below 15 from creating social media accounts from September 1. It also required social media companies to close accounts belonging to existing under-15 users within four months. Platforms would have been required to introduce an age-verification system approved by France’s privacy regulator to determine whether users met the minimum age requirement.

However, the Constitutional Council ruled that important parts of the legislation did not provide sufficient legal safeguards. In particular, the council objected to the requirement that users prove their age without clearly defining the conditions and limits surrounding the collection and use of such information.

According to the council, the legislation placed disproportionate restrictions on freedom of expression and communication. It also failed to adequately protect individuals’ right to privacy. The ruling effectively prevents the law from coming into force in its original form.

French lawmakers had approved the legislation in July, making France one of the first European countries to pursue such a comprehensive restriction on social media use by young teenagers. The move followed Australia’s decision to introduce a world-first social media ban for children under 16 in December. The Australian restrictions cover major platforms such as Facebook, Snapchat, TikTok and YouTube. Australian lawmakers are now considering stronger penalties for companies that fail to comply, although early data has indicated that the ban has had mixed results.

Several other countries have also taken steps to restrict young people’s access to social media. China, the United Arab Emirates and Türkiye have introduced measures or discussed plans aimed at limiting children’s access to online platforms.

At the European Union level, authorities have also indicated that stronger protections may be needed to shield children from harmful features and content on social media platforms.

Major technology companies have generallyFrance’s Constitutional Council, the country’s highest constitutional authority, has rejected a proposed law that would have banned children opposed blanket restrictions, arguing that they already provide tools and age-based safeguards to protect younger users. At the same time, companies have indicated that they would follow government regulations where required. Google, Meta, Snap and TikTok had not immediately issued comments on the French court’s decision.

Following the ruling, Macron instructed Prime Minister Sebastien Lecornu to revise the proposed legislation and address the Constitutional Council’s concerns. The Elysee Palace said the French president remains committed to introducing the reform.

The government wants a revised version of the legislation to take effect before spring 2027, when France is scheduled to hold its next presidential election. Macron is constitutionally barred from seeking a third consecutive term, making the issue a significant part of his government’s remaining agenda.

Similar Posts

  • |

    Foreign nationals among victims of Nizhnekamsk attack, Russia says

    At least 13 people were killed in a terrorist attack targeting civilian facilities in Nizhnekamsk, Russia’s Tatarstan region, on August 10, according to the Russian Foreign Ministry. Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova said most of those killed were foreign nationals. Preliminary information indicated that eight victims were citizens of Uzbekistan, while another victim was from Tajikistan. Around 20 foreign nationals were also reported to have been injured in the attack. Zakharova accused Ukrainian forces of deliberately targeting civilian locations where foreign workers and residents from countries friendly to Russia were present. She claimed the attack was intended to create tensions between Russia and those nations. The Russian official described the incident as a terrorist attack and said such strikes have resulted in the deaths of both Russian citizens and nationals of other countries. The Russian Foreign Ministry expressed condolences to the families and relatives of those killed. It also wished a rapid recovery to those injured. Moscow further urged the international community to condemn what it described as attacks against civilian targets. The accusations were made by the Russian Foreign Ministry as part of its response to the Nizhnekamsk incident. The claims concerning responsibility and the circumstances surrounding the attack could not be independently verified from the statement alone. The incident has raised concerns over the safety of foreign nationals working and living in areas affected by the Russia-Ukraine conflict. Further details about the victims, the extent of the damage and the circumstances of the attack are expected as investigations continue.

  • | | | |

    Houthi attack on Yemen’s Mokha leaves six dead

    MOKHA: A Houthi attack on Yemen’s Red Sea port city of Mokha has killed six people, including two security personnel, according to a military official from Yemen’s internationally recognised government. The attack, which took place on Friday, targeted commercial vessels unloading cargo at the port, raising fresh concerns over the security of maritime activity along one of the world’s most strategically important shipping routes. The military official said the Iran-aligned Houthi group fired five missiles at the vessels. The strikes reportedly hit the port area and caused fires to break out aboard two ships. The attack comes as tensions continue to rise across Yemen, with Houthi forces increasingly targeting areas controlled by the internationally recognised government. The latest violence has also added to concerns over the safety of commercial shipping operating near the Red Sea and Bab el-Mandeb Strait. Mokha, historically known as Mocha, is located on Yemen’s western coast near the Bab el-Mandeb, a narrow maritime passage linking the Red Sea with the Gulf of Aden. Its location gives the port significant importance for regional trade and shipping. The latest incident follows a series of Houthi attacks in and around Yemen’s government-held territories and against commercial vessels. The United Nations has warned that Yemen is at increasing risk of a return to wider conflict, with military activity intensifying despite the fragile calm that followed the 2022 truce. The renewed attacks have also raised fears of further disruption to international shipping. Maritime authorities continue to warn commercial operators about missile, drone and other threats in the southern Red Sea, Bab el-Mandeb and Gulf of Aden. Details about the identities of those killed and the extent of damage to the vessels were not immediately available. The attack is likely to further deepen concerns about Yemen’s fragile security situation and the growing risks facing civilian and commercial activity along its Red Sea coastline.

  • |

    Houthis deny reports of Red Sea transit fees

    Yemen’s Houthi movement has rejected reports claiming it plans to charge commercial vessels for passing through the Red Sea, insisting that navigation through the strategic waterway remains free. In a statement issued by the Houthi-run Humanitarian Operations Coordination Center (HOCC), the group said its safe transit service for ships using the Bab al-Mandeb Strait is voluntary and does not involve any fees. It emphasized that no authorized Houthi body is collecting payments from shipping companies. The HOCC also warned shipping operators against making payments or sharing sensitive information with unauthorized individuals or organizations claiming to represent the group. It said any such demands are fraudulent and should not be recognized as official. The clarification came after recent reports suggested that the Houthis were considering introducing transit charges for vessels passing through the Bab al-Mandeb Strait. The reports claimed the proposal had been discussed during meetings with Iranian officials and that plans were being explored to establish a system for regulating such payments. The Bab al-Mandeb Strait is one of the world’s most important maritime routes, linking the Red Sea with the Gulf of Aden. Thousands of commercial vessels carrying oil, fuel and other goods use the passage every year, making it a vital corridor for global trade between Asia, Europe and the Middle East. Security concerns in the Red Sea have remained high since attacks on commercial shipping began in late 2023. The conflict significantly disrupted international shipping, forcing many companies to divert vessels to longer and more expensive routes around southern Africa. Although attacks temporarily declined following a ceasefire last year, commercial traffic through the region has yet to return to previous levels. Shipping companies continue to monitor the security situation closely before routing vessels through the area. The latest reports have also prompted regional efforts to strengthen maritime security. Saudi Arabia recently announced a multinational maritime coalition aimed at protecting freedom of navigation in the Bab al-Mandeb Strait, the Red Sea and the Gulf of Aden.

  • | |

    Iran vows to withstand sweeping new US sanctions

    TEHRAN: Iran has said it is fully prepared to deal with the latest expansion of US economic sanctions, as Washington launches what it describes as a major campaign to cut Tehran off from international financial and trade networks. Iranian Economy Minister Ali Madanizadeh said the government had anticipated the new measures and prepared a long-term strategy to limit their impact. He said Tehran had its own economic tools and expected to continue commercial relations with countries willing to trade with Iran. The remarks came after US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent announced a broad package of sanctions targeting Iran’s financial connections and revenue sources. Washington said the measures were designed to put further pressure on Tehran and force it to choose between greater international isolation and a return to normal economic relations. Bessent described the campaign as an unprecedented financial offensive against Iran. He said the United States would target networks and channels allegedly used by Tehran to generate revenue and bypass existing sanctions. The new measures cover several sectors, including digital assets, technology, gold, aviation and shipping. The US Treasury also announced sanctions against dozens of entities, individuals and vessels allegedly connected to Iran’s economic activities. Washington warned governments, banks and businesses that continue dealing with Iran that they could also face consequences. Bessent said the administration would move quickly against entities that continued to support Tehran’s financial networks. Iran, however, rejected the pressure campaign and said it expected to maintain economic relations with key trading partners. China has also criticised the latest US measures, describing unilateral sanctions as illegitimate. Beijing said economic pressure would not resolve disputes and stressed that it would protect its own economic interests. China is particularly important to Iran because it remains a major buyer of Iranian oil. Analysts say the effectiveness of the latest sanctions will depend heavily on whether countries such as China enforce Washington’s restrictions. Experts have also questioned how much additional pressure the new measures can place on Iran’s energy sector. Some analysts argue that existing restrictions and disruptions to oil exports have already significantly affected Tehran’s energy revenues. The confrontation is also affecting global energy markets. Oil prices have risen sharply since the conflict began, raising concerns about inflation and fuel costs in several countries. Iran has warned that it could take further action against regional oil exports if the conflict continues. Tehran has also issued warnings to vessels seeking to pass through the Strait of Hormuz, a strategically important waterway through which a significant share of global oil and gas shipments normally travels. The latest sanctions come after months of escalating pressure between Washington and Tehran. The United States has repeatedly sought to use economic measures to force Iran to change its policies, while Tehran has continued to reject what it calls unilateral American pressure. The economic consequences are also being felt in the United States. Higher oil prices have pushed gasoline costs above $4 per gallon in parts of the country, adding to concerns over household expenses ahead of the November midterm elections. For Iran, the latest US campaign presents another major economic challenge. However, Tehran’s response indicates that it intends to rely on existing trade relationships, particularly with countries that oppose unilateral US sanctions, to keep its economy functioning.

  • |

    Cross-party US legislators introduce resolution demanding prompt elections in Caracas

    A bipartisan group of US senators has introduced a resolution urging the swift organisation of free, transparent elections in Venezuela. The measure comes seven months after the American intervention that removed former President Nicolas Maduro and placed Vice President Delcy Rodriguez in charge as acting president. Spearheaded by Republican Senator Ted Cruz and Democratic Senator Jeanne Shaheen, the proposal demands the immediate release of political detainees and measures to protect political figures from violence or state retribution. The resolution highlights growing Congressional dissatisfaction with the current diplomatic stance of the White House, which lawmakers argue has failed to move the interim administration in Caracas toward establishing democratic processes. The action arrives as formal talks between the interim government and select opposition factions prepare to open without the inclusion of prominent opposition leader and Nobel Peace Prize laureate Maria Corina Machado. Machado, currently living in exile following post-election repression, has signaled intentions to return home to assist with national recovery following severe earthquakes, despite reluctance from Washington officials who argue her return could destabilise the fragile political environment. Senatorial leadership emphasised that restoring elected governance remains vital to regional security, cross-border cooperation, and international democratic norms.

  • |

    Use of Pellet guns in Delhi protests revive Kashmi…

    Cockroach Janta Party protests in Delhi has sparked a nationwide debate while reopening old wounds in occupied Kashmir, where the weapon has been used extensively against peaceful protesters for years. The incidents in the capital have drawn attention to the long-standing suffering of Kashmiris, who have borne the brunt of pellet gun injuries, with many left blinded or permanently disabled. The Delhi protests, led by students demanding education reforms, ended successfully with the resignation of Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan. However, the use of pellet guns against demonstrators has overshadowed the victory, raising concerns about the government’s approach to handling dissent. Critics have questioned why such force was used against peaceful protesters in the capital, drawing parallels to the devastation caused in occupied Jammu and Kashmir. Rahul Gandhi, a prominent opposition leader, expressed deep sorrow over the use of pellet guns, highlighting the tragic toll they have taken in Kashmir. Human rights organizations have repeatedly condemned pellet guns as a “cruel weapon” that causes disproportionate harm, and the international community has raised concerns about their use in the region. The Delhi incident has reignited calls for a ban on pellet guns, with activists urging the Indian government to adopt less lethal methods of crowd control. The controversy has also drawn attention to the broader issue of human rights violations in occupied Kashmir, where the use of such weapons has been a persistent concern. Hospital records from the region highlight the devastating impact of pellet gun injuries, with countless young Kashmiris left with permanent disabilities. The use of pellet guns in Delhi has not only sparked outrage but has also brought the Kashmir issue back to the forefront of national and international discourse. Human rights groups have called for a thorough investigation into the incidents and for the government to ensure that such weapons are no longer used against citizens exercising their fundamental rights. As the debate continues, the victims of pellet gun injuries in both Delhi and Kashmir await justice and accountability. The incident serves as a reminder of the urgent need for reforms in crowd control measures and the importance of protecting the rights of all citizens. The international community continues to monitor the situation closely, urging India to uphold its human rights obligations. The time for change is now. The government must act decisively to ensure that the rights of all citizens are protected and that such incidents are never repeated. The victims of pellet gun injuries, both in Delhi and Kashmir, deserve justice, and the government must take concrete steps to ensure that their voices are heard and their grievances addressed. The fight for justice continues, and the nation must stand united in its commitment to upholding the rights and dignity of all citizens. The use of pellet guns in Delhi has once again exposed the harsh realities of India’s approach to law and order, and the need for meaningful reform has never been more urgent.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *