human civilisation has

Human civilisation has always been scared of forgetting

ByJustpaste.in

By Syed Tahir Rashdi

A time ago before the first computer, the first library or even the first book people thought memory was the most important thing for knowledge. Whole societies relied on it. People remembered laws and stories by heart. Passed them down to their children. To remember something was not just to recall facts it was to keep your identity, culture and history alive.

A time ago in ancient Greece people started to worry about memory.

In a book called “Phaedrus” Socrates tells a story about a god named Theuth. Theuth invented writing. Thought it would make people wiser and help them remember more.. The king of Egypt, Thamus did not agree. He said that writing would actually make peoples memories weaker. People would start to rely on written words of trying to remember things themselves. They would think they know something just because they can read it. They would not really understand it.

Course that is not what happened. Writing did not hurt society it changed it. Books became a way to store knowledge and share ideas with people all over the world.

Socrates was worried about something that is still important today.

The question now is not whether we remember things because of books.

It is whether we remember anything all.

Today we have information stored somewhere than ever before. Our phones remember our conversations. Computers store our photos forever. We can find answers to questions in seconds. Machines can summarise books. Help us find information fast.

Never before has much information existed outside of our own minds.

This is a change in how people relate to knowledge.

A man named Marshall McLuhan said that every new technology is like an extension of our abilities. The wheel is like an extension of our feet. The telescope is like an extension of our eyes. By that logic our phones are like an extension of our memories.

They help us remember things.

The problem is obvious.

As we get better at storing information outside of our minds we get worse at remembering things ourselves. We do not remember phone numbers because our phones do. We do not remember birthdays because our computers do. We do not remember how to get places because our phones tell us. We are not trying to remember things much as we used to.

We are just looking them up.

That small change might be one of the most important things that has happened to our minds in the past century.

It is easy to see why we like to store information outside of our minds. Who would want to go to using paper maps or big books to find answers? Digital technology has made it easy for everyone to get information. We can find things out in seconds that used to take days.

The question is not whether this is useful.

It is whether it is changing our minds in some way.

Some psychologists did a study in 2011. Found out something interesting. They found out that when people know they can find information easily they do not try to remember it much. They just remember where to find it.

This is a deal.

Our minds are changing from storing information to finding it.

We are getting better at finding the path. Not the destination.

This is not a habit it is how we think. Remembering things is not about storing facts it is about using them to make decisions to imagine things and to be creative. When we remember things we can connect them in ways and have new ideas.

When we store information outside of our minds that changes.

A man named Nicholas Carr said that digital technology is not just changing how we get information it is changing how we think. The internet is great at giving us answers. It is not so good at helping us really understand things. If we get used to getting answers we might not be as good at thinking deeply about things.

This does not mean that technology is making us less smart.

It means that our intelligence is changing.

The problem is not that we do not know things.

It is that we are too dependent on technology to remember them for us.

A student might think that they can just look up answers and not really learn anything. A professional might rely much on reminders that they do not even try to remember things. Machines are getting better at remembering things for us. That might mean we do not have to try as hard.

Slowly remembering things is becoming more like looking them up.

Knowledge is becoming about getting access to information.

Thinking is becoming more about getting things done.

Technology has definitely helped us store information than ever before.

The question is whether it is also making us less likely to try to remember things ourselves.

Memory is not just about storing information.

It is about how we experience life.

A computer can store every document ever written. A machine can look up every photo ever taken.. They cannot turn experience into wisdom. Our memories are not just storage they are how we interpret things. We forget some things we remember others. We use them to understand ourselves.

A writer named Jorge Luis Borges wrote a story about a man who could remember everything.. This gift was actually a curse. The man could not forget anything so he could not think about things in a way. He was trapped by his memory. Borges was saying that forgetting is not a thing it is actually necessary for thought.

This is not about how we think as individuals.

It is about how we learn and how we understand ourselves as a society.

Education used to be about more than learning facts. It was about learning how to think. If we just store information outside of our minds education might just become about looking things up.

The same thing applies to our society.

Every society relies on shared memories. We keep records, histories and monuments because they help us remember who we are. If we forget our past we do not just lose information we lose perspective.

The digital age has stored information than any other time in history.

It has also made it easy to forget things. Yesterdays news is replaced by todays notifications. History is not just competing with people who want to deny it.

It is competing with distractions.

This is the problem with technology and memory.

We have made machines that can remember perfectly. We might be creating a culture that remembers less deeply.

This is not an argument against technology. Every new technology has changed how we remember things. Digital memory has made it easier for us to learn and access information.

The problem is not with the technology.

It is with how we think about it.

We need to decide whether we will use technology to help our minds or replace them.

Because the biggest danger of technology is not that machines will remember everything.

It is that we will forget that memory is not about storing the past.

It is, about helping us imagine the future.

(The writer is a Shahdadpur-based contributing columnist, book reviewer, and climate change activist. He holds a BS degree in Pakistan Studies from University of Sindh and can be reached at syedtahir926@gmail.com.)

 

Similar Posts

  • |

    Kashmir’s nightingale Habba Khatoon

    ByJustpaste.in

    Habba Khatoon stands as Kashmir’s Nightingale and Zoon: the Moon of Kashmir. Living in the 16th century, she transformed personal grief, marital heartbreak, and political exile into the foundational canon of Kashmiri romantic poetry. She was born to a peasant family in Chandhara village (Pampore), famous for its saffron fields. Unlike most rural girls of her era, her father sent her to a local maktab where she learned Persian and Arabic, nurturing her early literary talent. She got married to a peasant named Aziz Rathar. Unappreciative of her poetic disposition and intelligence, her husband and mother-in-law ill-treated her. She began singing her inner pain while working in the saffron fields and fetching water. Legend holds that while hunting near Pampore, Prince (later Sultan) Yousuf Shah Chak heard her singing under a plane tree. He arranged her divorce and married her as he was mesmerized by her voice and beauty. This marriage elevated her to Queen of Kashmir as Habba Khatoon. Emperor Akbar summoned Sultan Yousuf Shah to Delhi under the pretense of talks, arrested him, and exiled him to Bihar. Kashmir fell to Mughal rule, breaking Habba Khatoon’s world. She shed her courtly garments, donned the robes of an ascetic, and wandered the valley singing lamentations for her lost king. In short, she refused royal comfort. She spent her final years near Gurez and Athwajan, where her tomb rests today. Before Habba Khatoon, Kashmiri verse was dominated by devotional mysticism: Vaakhs and Shrukhs. She revolutionized Koshur literature by introducing the Lol. Lol is a short, melic lyric of intense personal feeling, love, longing, and domestic intimacy. It’s particularly designed to be sung rather than recited. One of her most iconic pieces, sung to this day across the valley: Mey haa karchey kitt kitaye, Mey kar tayiaar lole-vun… Chey kyaah gazi chaani roopeye, Volo haa maalyene dhoopeye! I have prepared myself in every way, I have composed my heart into a song of longing… What does it cost your beauty to look upon me? Come, my love, let us gather wild mountain herbs together! In the following verses, she uses Kashmir’s fleeting spring as an allegory for human beauty and time: Gulaan goy rang, pholan goy bahar, Mey valai poshan hyund hahaar… Yuthus chhumyene chaani dhaar, Volo maayi chaane pyarey! The flowers have faded, spring has taken its leave, My youth is wilting like a blossom in the heat… My eyes remain fixed on the path where you disappeared Come back, my beloved, for the sake of love!   After emperor Akbar exiled her husband to Bihar, she wrote this verse that captures geopolitical heartbreak reduced to raw human loss: Cchey saazey vaaye, bo saazey vaaye, Kati chhak chey, bo kati chhas… Diluk zaar vanay kith-kith bo, Jeel-e-Jhelum geyi aaba-haar! You play your tune far away, while I play mine in solitude, Where are you trapped, and where am I left to wander? How shall I tell you the agony of my heart? Even the waters of the Jhelum weep and overflow their banks for us. Her poetry is more than a story of personal transformation. It is the emotional arc of Kashmir itself. By introducing the Lol, she pulled Kashmiri verse down from abstract, detached mysticism into the intimate, beating heart of human experience. She gave language to the quiet endurance of ordinary women, the agony of sudden separation, and the unyielding beauty of a homeland caught in the tides of history.  

  • AI Video imagines birds as weapons

    ByJustpaste.in

    China has released an AI generated video showing birds being used as weapons in a fictional future war. The video uses artificial intelligence to create an imaginary scene in which advanced technology turns birds into tools for military purposes. The unusual concept has attracted attention on social media. A fictional look at future warfare The AI made video presents an imagined version of future warfare and shows how new technology could be used in unexpected ways. It does not show a real military operation. Instead it appears to be a creative representation of how artificial intelligence and advanced technology might influence future battles. https://x.com/saraanwar45/status/2086866754677190751?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E2086866754677190751%7Ctwgr%5Ed3bc601aa804c21c9cb186006047ab35f9b3b5b3%7Ctwcon%5Es1_c10&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Furdu.samaa.tv%2F2087358205 Social media reacts After the video appeared online social media users shared different opinions about the unusual idea. Some found the concept surprising while others viewed it as an interesting example of how AI can create fictional images of future warfare. The video has also sparked discussion about the possible role of artificial intelligence in future military technology and how AI could be used to imagine new forms of warfare.

  • Azad Kashmir Elections: A Pilot Project or a Model for Pakistan’s Next General Elections?

    ByJustpaste.in

    By Engr. Saqlain Abid Political Commentator and NFPA-Certified Electrical Engineer   Elections are the vital organ of a living democracy. If they are conducted according to the people’s choice, without interference, on equal grounds, and with the consensus of all democratic participants, then the state not only remains in good health but also flourishes with the hope and commitment promised before the elections.   For the first time in the history of Pakistan, the Azad Jammu and Kashmir (AJK) elections are not being held on a single polling day. Instead, the electoral process has been divided into three different phases—27 July, 8 August, and 20 August 2026. This unusual arrangement raises several important questions. Why is the state preparing this electoral model? What are the conditions on the ground that necessitated such a strategy? More importantly, how could this experiment influence Pakistan’s national elections next year?   The political environment surrounding these elections has already become highly contested. The major political force JAAC has been banned by the government, and several of its leaders have been detained. The party has consequently boycotted the elections. PTI, another major opposition force, has also chosen to boycott the electoral process. According to its leadership, the party has been forced to contest only through independent candidates rather than under its official party platform. PTI argues that the government has failed to provide the safety, guarantees, and political environment necessary for free and fair elections. Under such circumstances, the party believes participation would merely legitimize a process it does not trust.   On the other hand, the ruling coalition, led by PML-N and PPP, has entered the campaign with promises of development projects, including new motorways and business initiatives aimed at attracting voters. While development remains an important component of any election campaign, questions regarding electoral credibility continue to overshadow these promises.   In principle, elections should be transparent, efficient, and completed within the shortest possible time. If technological solutions such as secure online systems become feasible in the future, they may further reduce the chances of manipulation. However, extending the polling process over three different days also creates a debate. While supporters argue that it makes election management easier, critics believe that a prolonged process increases opportunities for allegations of interference and weakens public confidence.   The government should have taken all political parties on board before announcing such an unprecedented electoral model. A genuinely inclusive process requires the participation of every major democratic stakeholder. JAAC, which commands significant public support in parts of Azad Kashmir, should have been engaged through political dialogue rather than exclusion. The credibility of elections depends not only on voting day but also on the perception that every political voice has been given an equal opportunity to participate.   Pakistan has previously criticized India for conducting elections in Jammu and Kashmir while sections of the local political leadership remained outside the process. At the time, Islamabad argued that elections held without broad political participation reflected only a procedural exercise rather than the genuine will of the people. The obvious question now is what circumstances have led Pakistan toward a model that some critics argue resembles the same approach.   Some political analysts believe that the AJK elections may serve as a pilot project to test a phased electoral model before its possible application across Pakistan during future general elections. Whether this perception is accurate or not, the debate itself demonstrates the level of public skepticism surrounding the process.   Another factor attracting attention is the role of the Chief Election Commissioner, whose tenure continues to face criticism following the February 2024 general elections. Allegations raised by former Rawalpindi Commissioner Liaquat Ali Chattha regarding manipulation of election results remain part of Pakistan’s political discourse, despite subsequent developments in the case. These controversies have inevitably shaped public perceptions regarding electoral transparency.   If voter turnout remains significantly low because of political boycotts and public distrust, the legitimacy of the exercise may come under further scrutiny. It is therefore the moral responsibility of the government and the Election Commission to create an environment where every democratic force feels secure enough to participate and where no stakeholder can reasonably question the fairness of the process.   The electoral process ultimately determines the political shelf life of a state. When governments emerge through elections widely accepted by the public, trust between the people and the state grows stronger. When that trust weakens, political polarization deepens, frustration increases, and hostile external actors find greater opportunities to exploit internal divisions. With Balochistan already facing serious security challenges and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa confronting persistent instability, any controversy surrounding the AJK electoral process may further strengthen perceptions that democratic space is shrinking rather than expanding.   Ultimately, the success of these elections will not be measured solely by administrative efficiency but by whether the people of Azad Kashmir believe that their voices were freely heard and genuinely counted. A credible electoral process strengthens democracy; a disputed one risks weakening the very foundations upon which democratic legitimacy depends.

  • | |

    Documentary film on the struggle for Joint Elector…

    ByJustpaste.in

    By Yassar Talib Aiman Zameer Lahore: The Centre for Social Justice (CSJ) held a screening of its documentary film, A Separation Refused, highlighting the Movement for the Restoration of the Joint Electorate in Pakistan, at a local hotel in Lahore. The 20-minute documentary film, by the award-winning the producer and director, CSJ and Dawood Akhtar Murad, traces the culmination of the world unique Separate Electorate system in Pakistan’s history and the movement for the restoration of the Joint Electorate in Pakistan especially during the 1990s to 2001. The film chronicles the efforts of civil society organizations, political leaders, faith communities, and human rights advocates who campaigned for equal citizenship and inclusive democratic participation for religious minorities. Using historical accounts and personal testimonies, the film illustrates how sustained advocacy contributed to democratic reforms and continues to inspire efforts towards equality, pluralism, social cohesion, and the protection of constitutional rights. Featuring over a dozen interviews, it brings together insights from Hina Jilani, Cardinal Joseph Coutts, Dr. Charles Amjad Ali, Dr. Yaqoob Bangash, and other prominent voices offering diverse perspectives youth, clergy and a parliamentarian. The even also premiered a song Hum Juda Nahein (We Are Not Separate) that expressed the The screenings were followed by an interactive panel discussion explored the progress made towards equal citizenship and the continuing challenges to the democratic participation of religious minorities in Pakistan. The panelists, Wajahat Masood a public intellectual and Peter Jacob, answered the questions while the academic Faaria Khan moderated the discussion. While addressing the participants, Wajahat Masood, said that democracy is based on the principle of equal citizenship and that the categorization of citizens into majorities and minorities reflects a constitutional anomaly. Referring to the Separate Electorate system, he noted that institutionalizing such divisions weakened democratic systems and undermined the principle of equal political participation. In response to a question on the rationale behind the documentary, Peter Jacob, Executive Director CSJ, said that the importance of the movement warranted a careful reading of the history. He noted that the film was developed to preserve authentic accounts of the struggle for the restoration of the Joint Electorate and to address competing interpretations of history and misunderstandings. He also emphasized the need for constitutional reforms to strengthen equal citizenship. He called for a review of Articles 41 and 91 of the Constitution, to remove precondition of religious affiliation for the offices of the President and Prime Minister. Moreover, implementation of Article 22(1) of the constitution of Pakistan that guarantees unbiased education. In the open discussion, participants emphasized that the message of documentary film highlighting constitutional rights, democratic inclusion, should be screened more widely through universities, arts councils, mainstream media, and other public platforms to encourage informed dialogue and greater public awareness. They further stressed that equal citizenship is not solely the concern of religious minorities but a shared national responsibility, and called for greater participation and support from the majority community in future advocacy and dialogue. At the end the participants reaffirmed a shared commitment to advancing constitutional rights, equal citizenship, participatory democracy, and peaceful coexistence through collective action.

  • Why walking slows with age

    ByJustpaste.in

    Getting older is a natural part of life and it cannot be stopped. But have you ever noticed that people often walk more slowly and feel tired more quickly as they age? A new study may explain why this happens. Researchers from Flinders University and the University of Canberra in Australia studied how walking changes with age.  They found that as people get older the body starts to focus more on safety and balance than on walking speed. The study included 107 healthy people between 26 and 86 years old. Researchers examined how their bodies moved while walking. They found that movement around the ankles and other muscles changes with age. The ankle muscles play an important role in keeping the body balanced and helping people move forward. As people age the body appears to use more muscle effort to stay stable and upright. Older adults may move the muscles around their ankles in a way that makes the ankle joints stiffer.  This can improve balance and reduce the risk of losing stability. However there is a downside. Using the muscles this way requires more effort which can make older people feel tired sooner and walk more  slowly. Researchers believe that the nervous system also becomes more focused on preventing falls and maintaining stability with age. The good news is that regular physical activity can help maintain movement and muscle strength. Exercises that improve balance and strengthen the muscles may help older adults stay active and move more confidently.

  • When dry skin may lead to infection

    ByJustpaste.in

    Dry peeling skin around the nails is a common problem. It can be uncomfortable and may make simple daily tasks difficult.  This dryness can happen for several reasons including frequent hand washing harsh products and skin irritation. Why does skin  around the nails become dry? Frequent hand washing Washing your hands again and again can remove the skin’s natural oils.  If you do not use moisturizer afterward the skin around your nails may become dry and cracked. •Allergies and Irritation •Nail polish soaps detergents and other products may contain chemicals that irritate the skin.  This irritation can cause dryness peeling or redness. Nail Biting Biting your nails can damage the skin around them.  Small cuts may develop and increase the risk of irritation or infection. Lack of nutrients A poor diet may sometimes affect the health of your skin and nails.  A balanced diet with enough vitamins and minerals is important for healthy skin. Infection dry or damaged skin around the nails can sometimes become irritated or infected especially if it is picked or bitten. How can you  care for dry skin around the nails? •Use moisturizer Apply a good hand cream or moisturizer regularly especially after washing your hands.  This helps keep the skin soft and prevents cracking. •Aloe Vera Apply fresh aloe vera gel to the dry skin around your nails. It can help soothe and moisturize irritated skin. •Honey Apply a small amount of honey to your hands for 10–15 minutes then wash it off with lukewarm water. Honey can help keep the skin moisturized. •Cucumber Place fresh cucumber slices on your hands for about 15–20 minutes.  Then wash your hands with lukewarm water. •Olive oil Gently massage a little olive oil around your nails to help soften dry skin. After a few minutes wash your hands and apply moisturizer. Tip Avoid biting or pulling the peeling skin around your nails. If you notice severe pain  swelling pus or redness that does not improve  consult a doctor or dermatologist.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *