iran war spreads
|

Iran war spreads to Red Sea and Caspian, Gulf quiet as US forgoes strikes

ByJustpaste.in

Signs of the Iran war’s spread emerged this weekend despite a pause in US strikes, as Yemen’s Iran-aligned Houthis attacked Saudi oil installations along the Red Sea coast and Iran accused Ukraine of targeting an Iranian vessel in the Caspian Sea.

The US military said on Saturday, July 25, that its naval blockade against Iran “remains in full effect” but did not explain why it halted a streak of 13 nights of escalating strikes. Asked about the pause, a senior official in President Donald Trump’s administration said Trump “has always been clear that his preference is diplomacy, but he has shown Iran what will happen if they fail to come to the table in a serious way.”

There were also no reports on Saturday of attacks from Iran on neighboring countries, like those that have been taking place daily in response to the US attacks.

Trump has decided, for now, to back away from earlier plans to ramp up attacks on Iran, the New York Times reported on Saturday night, citing two people briefed on the discussion. The president and his advisers, according to the Times, have concerns about expanding the conflict, depleting defense stockpiles, alienating Persian Gulf allies and affecting energy supplies and the global economy.

Despite the lull in the Gulf, fighting between Iran’s Houthi allies and Saudi Arabia on Saturday indicated the war, which has already disrupted energy supplies through the Strait of Hormuz, could affect a second major shipping route and reignite Yemen’s civil war.

Separately, Iran’s Foreign Ministry accused Ukraine of attacking an Iranian commercial vessel in the ​Caspian Sea, saying it resulted in an explosion that killed ‌a sailor and injured another.

Earlier on Saturday, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a social media post praised the results of “long‑range strikes” in the Caspian Sea, alluding to vessels shipping military cargo, but did not identify the nationality of the targets.

Iran’s Foreign Ministry summoned ​Ukraine’s chargé d’affaires in Tehran to convey its protest over what it described as a “hostile and criminal” attack, Iran’s state news agency IRNA reported.

The Iranian denunciation coincided with comments ​by Zelenskiy that Kyiv had noted Russia was passing ​on its satellite observations in the Middle East to Iran to enable it to direct ‌strikes ⁠in the region.

War threatens to spread to Yemen

Houthi military spokesperson Yahya Saree said the group struck sites belonging to Saudi state oil company Aramco in Jizan and Yanbu. Video shared on social media and verified by Reuters showed a large column of smoke rising from the direction of the Aramco refinery in Jizan.

Two Asia-based trading sources said they had been informed of potential damage to fuel and oil storage sites at Jizan. Aramco did not respond to requests for comment.

In Yanbu, two ballistic missiles aimed at oil installations were intercepted by a US-made Patriot battery operated in Saudi Arabia by the Greek military under an agreement with Riyadh, Greek security sources said.

Yanbu, Saudi Arabia’s main Red Sea oil port, has become a key route for Saudi oil skirting the Strait of Hormuz, which Iran has blockaded. Up to 400,000 barrels can be processed daily at the oil refinery in Jizan, a city on the Red Sea close to the Yemeni border.

Saudi-led coalition strikes Hodeidah

In Yemen, the air force of the Saudi-backed, internationally recognized government, which has opposed the Houthis for more than a decade, struck Houthi launch sites and arms depots in the Marib and al-Jawf provinces, Yemeni officials said.

Earlier, the Saudi-led military alliance said it bombed Houthi military positions on Friday in the Red Sea coastal city of Hodeidah, although the coalition said it did not target the port facilities.

The Yemeni officials said both sides in Yemen’s civil war were mobilizing forces along the front.

Saudi Arabia has led an Arab coalition battling the Houthis for more than a decade since the Iran-aligned fighters captured Yemen’s capital, Sanaa.

The civil war, during which hundreds of thousands of people died from fighting and famine, has been paused under a ceasefire since 2022. But that truce broke down this month, with the Houthis effectively joining the wider war their Iranian allies have waged since being attacked by the U.S. and Israel five months ago.

The Houthis have declared a naval blockade of Saudi Arabia over the past week, and Houthi leader Abdul Malik al-Houthi said all Saudi oil facilities could be targets. On Thursday, the Houthis struck two Saudi tankers in the Red Sea.

American forces recently resumed their own blockade on Iranian ports. US Central Command, whose coverage area includes the Middle East, said it disabled a ship whose crew attempted to run the blockade despite “repeated warnings” on Friday in the Gulf of Oman. – Rappler.com

Similar Posts

  • |

    Luigi Mangione pleads guilty in US insurance CEO killing

    ByJustpaste.in

    Luigi Mangione has pleaded guilty in federal court to charges linked to the fatal shooting of UnitedHealthcare executive Brian Thompson, bringing a major development in a closely watched case that sparked intense public debate over the US health insurance system. Mangione admitted in court that he shot Thompson in Manhattan on December 4, 2024. He pleaded guilty to two federal stalking charges involving Thompson and acknowledged that he had targeted the executive with the intention of killing him. “I shot Mr Thompson in Manhattan, and he died,” Mangione told the court. US District Judge Margaret Garnett warned Mangione that the federal charges could carry a maximum sentence of life imprisonment. She scheduled his sentencing for December 18. Federal prosecutors have indicated that they will seek a life sentence. The guilty plea eliminates the need for a federal trial over Thompson’s killing. It could also strengthen Mangione’s efforts to challenge or seek dismissal of separate murder charges filed against him in New York. Thompson, who headed UnitedHealth Group’s insurance division, was shot outside a Manhattan hotel while attending an investor conference. His death triggered widespread attention across the United States, while the circumstances surrounding the killing led to renewed public discussion about healthcare costs, insurance coverage and patients’ frustrations with the industry. Mangione, 28, told the court that he had experienced a serious back injury and had subsequently dealt with the health insurance system. He said he researched UnitedHealthcare’s investor conference before travelling to New York with the intention of killing Thompson. Prosecutors have alleged that Mangione used a 3-D printer to manufacture part of a firearm. He was later arrested in Pennsylvania following a nationwide manhunt. Thompson’s family welcomed the guilty plea, describing it as an important step toward justice. The family said it expected the court to impose a sentence that reflected the seriousness of the crime. The case has attracted enormous media and public attention since graphic footage of the shooting emerged and authorities launched a five-day search for the suspect. Mangione’s arrest also generated intense debate on social media, including criticism of the healthcare industry and reactions to the circumstances surrounding Thompson’s death. Mangione had previously denied the federal allegations and pleaded not guilty to murder, weapons and stalking charges in April 2025.

  • |

    Deadly explosion near Moscow restaurant leaves several dead

    ByJustpaste.in

      A homemade explosive device carried by a woman detonated near a high-end restaurant in central Moscow on Saturday evening, killing at least three people and injuring 21 others, according to Russian authorities. The incident has triggered speculation on social media about a possible connection to the ongoing war between Russia and Ukraine, although no official evidence has been presented linking the blast to the conflict. The explosion took place shortly before 8 p.m. near an Italian restaurant located inside one of Moscow’s famous Stalin-era skyscrapers at Kudrinskaya Square. Police said the blast occurred after a woman carrying an improvised explosive device attempted to enter the restaurant but was stopped by a security guard. Russia’s National Anti-Terrorism Committee (NAK) reported that the woman, the security guard, and a customer inside the Balzi Rossi restaurant were killed immediately following the explosion. Authorities said several other individuals were injured in the attack and emergency services were dispatched to the scene. The two additional victims who had been hospitalized died from their injuries, potentially raising the death toll to five. However, officials had not formally confirmed those additional deaths. The report also stated that six injured people remained in serious condition. Moscow Mayor Sergei Sobyanin expressed condolences to the families of those killed and injured, describing the incident as a serious terrorist attack. He promised that those responsible would face punishment. However, authorities did not immediately release the identities of the victims, name any suspects, or provide details about who may have been behind the explosion. Unconfirmed reports circulating on social media suggested that the attack may have been aimed at a senior Russian military figure. According to these claims, the alleged target survived the incident, although officials have not verified this information. The attack comes more than four years after Russia launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine. In recent months, Russian authorities have increased security measures around senior military officials following several assassinations and attempted attacks that Moscow has blamed on Kyiv. Ukraine has not claimed responsibility for the Moscow explosion and had not issued an immediate response. Some Russian military bloggers quickly accused Ukraine of involvement, but those claims were made without publicly available evidence. The Ukrainian government has not commented on the allegations. Russian newspaper Kommersant raised the possibility that the woman carrying the explosive device may not have been aware of its presence or purpose. The publication suggested that the bomb could have been remotely activated by another person rather than being intentionally detonated by the woman herself. The restaurant’s official website stated that the venue had been closed on Saturday due to a private event, although details about the gathering were not immediately available. The incident has drawn comparisons with a previous high-profile bombing in 2023 that killed Vladlen Tatarsky, a well-known Russian pro-war blogger. In that case, a bomb hidden inside a small statue exploded while Tatarsky was holding it during an event in St. Petersburg. A young woman, Darya Trepova, was later sentenced to 27 years in prison for delivering the explosive device. She claimed that she had been following instructions from a man based in Ukraine who had provided her with money. Ukrainian officials did not accept responsibility for the attack but also did not directly deny involvement at the time. The latest Moscow explosion is now under investigation as authorities work to determine the identity of those responsible and establish the motive behind the attack.

  • | | | | | |

    Trump orders one-day pause in Iran strikes as talks continue

    ByJustpaste.in

    US President Donald Trump has reportedly ordered a one-day halt to military strikes against Iran, temporarily interrupting a nearly two-week-long series of attacks, according to reports from US media outlets. The pause comes as uncertainty remains over whether the decision represents a temporary break in operations or the beginning of a broader ceasefire process. Reports suggest that the US military had been preparing for possible further strikes against Iran, but Trump has not yet approved any new major offensive. According to US media reports, military plans for continued operations were presented to the president, but Trump instructed officials not to proceed with attacks on that day. The decision marked a significant shift after a period of repeated strikes targeting Iranian positions. Trump later told reporters that the United States still had the option to continue military action and increase the intensity of attacks if necessary. However, he indicated that pursuing a diplomatic solution could be a more effective strategy. “The smart strategy is to make a deal,” Trump was reported as saying, adding that Iran appeared to be becoming more serious about discussions while the US remained prepared for possible military action. The reported pause came as an Omani delegation arrived in Iran for discussions aimed at addressing regional tensions and negotiating a possible agreement related to the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz. Officials suggested that a deal between Iran and Oman could potentially be reached during the weekend, after which the final decision would depend on Washington. Meanwhile, Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) claimed that Iranian forces had destroyed several US military aircraft and drones during attacks on American bases. The group claimed that 17 drones, an F-15 fighter jet, a P-8 aircraft, a C-17 transport aircraft, and eight refueling planes were destroyed. The claims from both sides have not been independently verified, and officials have continued to provide competing accounts of the military developments. The situation remains highly sensitive as regional tensions continue, with diplomatic efforts taking place alongside military preparations. The coming days are expected to determine whether the temporary pause leads to broader negotiations or whether hostilities resume.

  • |

    India says talks with China stressed need for border peace to boost ties

    ByJustpaste.in

    India and China have held a new round of border talks in New Delhi, emphasising that maintaining peace along their disputed frontier remains essential for broader bilateral relations. The 36th meeting of the Working Mechanism for Consultation and Coordination on India-China Border Affairs focused on boundary delimitation, border management, and trans-border cooperation. Indian officials also highlighted the necessity of early dialogue regarding shared rivers and the technical details of upstream projects. Both nations agreed to continue using diplomatic and military channels to resolve outstanding issues and prevent miscalculations along the Line of Actual Control.

  • | |

    Trump tells rally protester: ‘Your mom won’t b…

    ByJustpaste.in

    US President Donald Trump made a pointed remark about a protester who interrupted his campaign rally in South Carolina, telling the man that his mother would not be pleased with his actions. Trump was speaking at the Myrtle Beach Convention Center while campaigning for Darlene Graham, a candidate seeking a seat in the South Carolina Senate. Although Trump’s name was not on the ballot, he urged his supporters to turn out and vote in the election. According to US media reports, the disruption occurred at around 7:28 p.m. on Friday when a man stood up and interrupted the president’s remarks. Police officers and convention center staff subsequently moved the protester out of the venue. As the man was being escorted away, Trump briefly paused his speech and commented on the incident. He suggested that the protester would face criticism from his mother, adding that she supported Trump politically. The president then resumed his address as the protester was taken outside the convention center. US media reported that the demonstrator was wearing a black shirt carrying a provocative slogan condemning sexual abuse of children.

  • | |

    Capital one defends closure of Trump organization accounts

    ByJustpaste.in

    Capital One Financial has responded to a lawsuit filed over its decision to close bank accounts linked to the Trump Organization, arguing that the move was based on internal anti-money laundering reviews rather than political or ideological motivations. The bank, in a legal filing submitted on Friday, stated that it closed the accounts following a detailed assessment conducted by its anti-money laundering (AML) specialists. The company argued that the decision was made after months of analysis and was consistent with its internal policies as well as regulatory requirements. The filing represents the first time a major bank has publicly connected concerns related to money laundering risks with its decision to end a banking relationship involving the Trump family business. However, Capital One clarified that it has never accused the Trump Organization of committing illegal money laundering activities. Instead, the bank said that the account closures were the result of routine compliance procedures. Capital One argued that documents presented in the case, along with the plaintiffs’ own claims, demonstrate that the decision was related to AML concerns rather than any attempt to discriminate against the company because of political beliefs. The dispute began after Capital One informed the Trump Organization in March 2021 that it planned to close more than 300 accounts associated with businesses connected to former U.S. President Donald Trump. The Trump Organization and Eric Trump, Trump’s son, later filed a lawsuit in March 2025 in a Florida federal court, claiming that the bank had unfairly “debanked” them because of political pressure and what they described as the company’s “woke” policies. The lawsuit alleged that Capital One’s decision was influenced by the political environment following the January 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol. The plaintiffs argued that the bank wanted to distance itself from Trump and his supporters during a period of intense public and political scrutiny. A federal court in Miami has already dismissed two versions of the complaint but allowed the plaintiffs opportunities to revise and submit updated claims. Capital One argued in its latest filing that the amended complaint continues to contain the same weaknesses as earlier versions and fails to establish evidence of unlawful discrimination. The bank accused the Trump Organization of presenting selective information and relying on statements taken out of context. Capital One maintained that the allegations of political motivation were unsupported and ignored the broader circumstances behind the account closures. According to the bank’s filing, certain transaction patterns identified during its review matched types of activities that federal banking authorities commonly recognize as requiring additional examination. Capital One said its AML team followed established procedures before reaching the decision to terminate the accounts. The legal battle comes during a broader political debate in the United States over the issue of “debanking,” with some conservatives accusing financial institutions of unfairly targeting individuals and organizations because of their political views. During his second presidential term, Trump’s administration has criticized such practices and taken steps aimed at preventing what it describes as discriminatory banking decisions. The controversy has also involved other major financial institutions. Trump previously filed a lawsuit against JPMorgan Chase, making similar allegations regarding political discrimination. During his first term in office, Trump also took legal action against Capital One and Deutsche Bank in an effort to prevent the release of his financial records to Congress. The case continues to highlight the growing tension between banking compliance practices, political concerns, and the debate over whether financial institutions should have broader restrictions on ending relationships with controversial clients.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *