8216malamaal weekly 28217
|

‘Malamaal Weekly 2’ adds Fardeen Khan, Mahesh Manjrekar to cast

The star cast of “Malamaal Weekly 2” continues expanding, with Fardeen Khan and Mahesh Manjrekar now joining the ensemble. The sequel first entered development back in February 2026.

Bollywood Hungama has exclusively learned that both actors have officially signed on for the project. Their addition marks the latest in a steady string of casting announcements surrounding the film.

Amit Joshi, known for directing 2024’s “Teri Baaton Mein Aisa Uljha Jiya” was confirmed as director back in April. Since then, the cast has grown rapidly with each passing week.

Last week alone brought news of Raveena Tandon and Parineeti Chopra joining the project. That was quickly followed by confirmation on August 11 that Shilpa Shirodkar had signed on too, marking her Bollywood return after 26 years.

Just two days later, on August 13, Elvish Yadav and Rajpal Yadav were also locked in for roles. The rapid pace of signings reflects growing momentum behind the project.

According to a source, Fardeen Khan was considered an easy choice for the makers. The insider explained that Khan has been on a strong career comeback, working across multiple genres while remaining especially popular in comedic roles, which made him a natural fit for the makers.

The source added that Khan was genuinely pleased with the offer and signed on without hesitation. His comic sensibility reportedly aligned well with what the makers were looking for.

Mahesh Manjrekar’s casting was explained similarly, with the source describing him as a uniquely versatile performer who excels in comedy as well. The film reportedly includes a quirky character that the makers felt suited him perfectly.

According to the insider, Manjrekar was excited to be offered a role in the sequel of such a beloved original film. The producers reportedly feel confident he’ll deliver a performance audiences will enjoy.

The film is expected to begin shooting in November 2026. While the storyline itself will be entirely new, it is set to retain the spirit of the original, following ordinary small-town characters caught up in poverty, greed and the chaos triggered by a sudden shot at wealth.

Similar Posts

  • | |

    Sindh Colleges ban Ajrak, caps and gifts for visit…

    KARACHI: The Sindh College Education Department has directed government colleges across the province to stop presenting traditional gifts and souvenirs to the Secretary College Education during official visits. The directive, issued on August 6, instructs the Director General Colleges and regional directors in Karachi, Hyderabad, Mirpurkhas, Shaheed Benazirabad, Sukkur and Larkana, along with principals of government colleges, to ensure that no gifts are presented to the secretary during his visits. The department has specifically prohibited the presentation of Ajrak, Sindhi caps and bouquets. It has also made clear that commemorative shields, souvenirs and other ceremonial items should not be offered. Officials have been asked to strictly follow the instructions and ensure that the directive is implemented in both letter and spirit. The department has warned that any failure to comply with the orders will be taken seriously, signalling a move away from the customary practice of presenting traditional gifts to senior officials during official visits.

  • | |

    Met Gala 2027 theme sparks backlash after John Gal…

    The Met Gala 2027 is already generating heated debate months before the event, following the announcement that legendary fashion designer John Galliano will be the focus of next year’s Costume Institute exhibition. The Metropolitan Museum of Art and Vogue revealed that the 2027 exhibition will be titled “John Galliano: Horizon,” a decision that has drawn both praise for Galliano’s creative legacy and criticism over his controversial past. (vogue.com⁠) The annual Costume Institute exhibition serves as the inspiration for the Met Gala dress code, making the announcement one of the fashion industry’s biggest events. Organizers described John Galliano: Horizon as a celebration of the designer’s extraordinary impact on fashion, highlighting his groundbreaking work at fashion houses including Givenchy, Dior and Maison Margiela. The exhibition is expected to showcase his most influential collections and explore his decades-long contribution to haute couture. (metmuseum.org⁠) However, the announcement quickly sparked criticism online. Many social media users questioned the decision to honor Galliano because of his highly publicized antisemitic remarks made in 2011. At the time, the British designer was dismissed from Christian Dior after a video emerged showing him making offensive comments. He was later convicted by a French court for public insults based on religion and ethnicity. (bbc.com⁠) Supporters of the exhibition argue that Galliano has spent years rebuilding his career and taking responsibility for his actions. Following the scandal, he publicly apologized, sought treatment for addiction and gradually returned to the fashion industry. His creative revival at Maison Margiela has been widely praised, with many critics describing his recent couture collections as some of the finest work of his career. (vogue.com⁠) Critics, however, believe that celebrating Galliano with one of fashion’s highest-profile exhibitions sends the wrong message. Some argue that his past should not be separated from his artistic achievements, while others say the exhibition should provide broader context rather than simply celebrating his influence. The debate has quickly spread across social media, with fashion enthusiasts, journalists and cultural commentators expressing differing views. (theguardian.com⁠) Despite the controversy, the Metropolitan Museum of Art and Vogue have defended their decision by emphasizing Galliano’s lasting impact on fashion history. They say the exhibition aims to examine his artistic vision and transformative role in modern design rather than overlook the complexities of his career. (vogue.com⁠) As anticipation builds for the 2027 Met Gala, discussions surrounding John Galliano: Horizon are likely to continue. While some view the exhibition as a celebration of one of fashion’s most imaginative designers, others believe it raises important questions about accountability, redemption and the legacy of influential public figures. The conversation has ensured that next year’s Met Gala will be about more than glamorous red-carpet looks—it will also be a reflection of the ongoing debate over art, history and responsibility.

  • |

    Nimra Khan clarifies marriage status after viral Instagram reel

    Pakistani television actress Nimra Khan has addressed speculation about her marriage after an emotional Instagram post sparked rumours that she and her husband had separated. The actress, who enjoys a strong social media presence with more than 4.7 million followers on Instagram, clarified the situation after fans began questioning her relationship status following a recent reel that many interpreted as a sign of personal turmoil. Nimra, who announced her marriage in June 2026, had shared photos from her wedding and nikah ceremony in Paris with her followers. The images were widely celebrated by fans, making her recent social media activity all the more noticeable. The rumours began after Nimra posted a reflective Instagram reel featuring a heartfelt message about resilience and self-worth. In the video, she encouraged people to remain strong even when life becomes difficult, others stop understanding them, or they feel alone. She expressed that a person should never abandon themselves, regardless of the challenges they face. According to the actress, once someone learns to become their own source of strength, no obstacle or criticism can truly defeat them. She added that it is important for people to realise they are enough for themselves and should value their own inner strength. While the message resonated with many of her followers, others assumed it hinted at problems in her personal life. The speculation intensified when some social media users noticed that her wedding photographs were no longer prominently visible on her Instagram profile. One follower commented on the post, asking if everything was alright and suggesting that the actress had removed her wedding pictures, fuelling rumours that her marriage had ended. Responding directly to the comment, Nimra dismissed the divorce speculation and assured her followers that there was no reason for concern. She explained that everything was fine and clarified that she had not deleted her wedding photographs. Instead, she had simply moved them lower on her Instagram profile. According to the actress, the decision was made to protect her personal life from the effects of the “evil eye,” a belief commonly held in many cultures that excessive public attention or envy can bring misfortune. Nimra also thanked the fan for expressing concern and offering prayers, appreciating the support shown by her followers. Her clarification quickly put an end to the growing rumours, with many fans expressing relief and sending messages of love and good wishes. The incident once again highlighted how emotional or motivational social media posts are often interpreted as reflections of a celebrity’s private life, leading to widespread speculation. In Nimra’s case, a message intended to inspire self-confidence and emotional resilience was mistakenly linked to her marriage, prompting the actress to publicly clear the air. With her response, Nimra Khan has reassured fans that her marriage remains intact and that there is no truth to the divorce rumours circulating online. Her explanation also served as a reminder that not every inspirational post on social media reflects a personal crisis, and appearances on social platforms do not always tell the full story.

  • | |

    Christopher Nolan’s The Odyssey faces intense backlash

    Acclaimed filmmaker Christopher Nolan’s high-budget cinematic adaptation of Homer’s ancient Greek poem, The Odyssey, has found itself at the center of growing pre-release backlash and social media debate. Despite being one of the most anticipated blockbusters of the year, the star-studded epic has drawn heavy scrutiny ranging from casting choices to historical inaccuracies and filming locations. ​The film, which stars Matt Damon in the lead role of Odysseus alongside an ensemble cast including Anne Hathaway, Tom Holland, and Zendaya, first sparked heated debate online following casting announcements. Much of the criticism from conservative commentators and online users focused on Oscar-winner Lupita Nyong’o playing Helen of Troy and her half-sister Clytemnestra, with high-profile figures like Elon Musk accusing the production of altering character demographics to fulfill industry diversity criteria. Unsubstantiated rumors that trans actor Elliot Page was playing Achilles further fueled online uproar, though Page was actually cast as the soldier Sinon. ​Beyond casting, eagle-eyed viewers raised questions regarding creative choices seen in the promotional trailers. Critics pointed out perceived anachronisms, including the appearance of Viking longships—which existed centuries after the Mycenaean Greek era—along with modernized dialogue and non-traditional armor designs. Nolan defended these artistic decisions by explaining that his choice of modern-sounding dialogue aims to convey emotional resonance rather than strict historical mimicry, noting that ancient Greek oral traditions share similarities with modern vocal styles. ​The production has also drawn criticism from international human rights advocates. Human rights campaigners and Sahrawi activists raised concerns over the decision to shoot portions of the film in occupied Western Sahara, alleging that using the region as a film set inadvertently offers legitimacy to the ongoing Moroccan occupation. ​In response to the pre-release commentary, Nolan dismissed the online noise as “irrelevant”. Drawing on his experience directing The Dark Knight trilogy, the director emphasized that adapting a beloved classic always comes with strong public opinions before audiences have seen the final product. He noted that his primary goal was to honor Homer’s original text by offering a sincere, visually ambitious interpretation created specifically for the grandest theater formats. ​Despite the surrounding discourse, industry analysts expect The Odyssey to deliver massive box-office results, driven by Nolan’s reputation for technical filmmaking and high-concept storytelling. ​This video is relevant because it provides an in-depth news breakdown of the pre-release controversies, human rights boycott calls, and social media reactions surrounding the film.

  • |

    India’s Independence Day faces protests and boycotts

    NEW DELHI: India’s Independence Day celebrations were met with protests, shutdowns and boycott calls in several regions on Saturday, including Indian Illegally Occupied Jammu and Kashmir (IIOJK) and parts of the country’s northeast. Several political, community and regional groups called for strikes and non-participation in official celebrations, with some organisations observing the day as a “Black Day”. In IIOJK, boycott and shutdown calls were reported ahead of the celebrations. Security was significantly increased in Srinagar, with additional personnel deployed around key locations and routes leading to the main Independence Day venue. The protests and boycott calls were also reported in several northeastern states, including Assam, Nagaland, Manipur and Arunachal Pradesh. In Nagaland, Naga nationalist groups observed August 14 as their own Independence Day, recalling the Naga National Council’s declaration of independence in 1947. The groups continue to emphasise their separate political identity and longstanding demand for self-determination. Naga leader Thuingaleng Muivah reiterated that his group would not compromise on its demands concerning sovereignty, a separate flag and constitution. The Naga Students’ Federation also opposed the mandatory singing of Vande Mataram, citing concerns related to religious freedom and freedom of conscience. In Manipur, several organisations called a 12-hour general strike and shutdown. Black flags were reportedly displayed in parts of the state as groups urged people to stay away from official celebrations. Similar boycott calls were issued in Assam and neighbouring areas. Security forces were placed on alert around sensitive locations and border regions amid concerns over possible disruptions. The developments came as India held nationwide celebrations marking its Independence Day, with Prime Minister Narendra Modi leading the main ceremony in New Delhi. Meanwhile, India’s opposition also remained divided over the official celebrations. Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge and Leader of the Opposition Rahul Gandhi did not attend Modi’s ceremony. Their absence was linked to continuing political differences, including disagreements over seating arrangements and protocol.

  • |

    PERA’s proposed training academy puts 200 acres of fertile farmland, homes and wildlife breeding facilities at risk

    CHAKWAL: A proposed training academy of the Punjab Enforcement and Regulatory Authority (PERA) near Kallar Kahar has sparked concern among local residents, farmers and wildlife conservationists, as the site selected for the project comprises around 200 acres of fertile agricultural land, several homes, livestock farms and wildlife breeding facilities. The Punjab government has allocated Rs6.786 billion for the construction of the PERA training academy near Kallar Kahar, while Rs10 million has reportedly been released for the current financial year.     The proposed site, located along the Kallar Kahar-Talagang Road, was selected despite the availability of alternative locations, raising questions about the decision to choose an area that is not only inhabited but also serves as an important habitat for wildlife. The move has also left local PML-N MNA Sardar Ghulam Abbas and officials of the Punjab Wildlife Department apparently unable to prevent the proposed construction at the selected site. For 91-year-old Dost Muhammad, who has spent his life overcoming hardships, the latest development has become a source of deep anxiety. His family of around 40 members, along with their livestock, now faces the prospect of eviction from their ancestral land following a recent demarcation carried out for the proposed academy.   A few days ago, Dost Muhammad and his sons were constructing a cattle shed on their land. However, they have now abandoned the work after officials from the Punjab Revenue Department marked the boundaries of the proposed site. According to a letter available with Minute Mirror, PERA had requested the deputy commissioner of Chakwal on June 9 to initiate the process of acquiring land at a “suitable location in the pleasant hilly area of Kallar Kahar” for the construction of its training academy.   Following the request of the PERA director general, the district administration identified 1,568 kanals, or approximately 200 acres, along the Kallar Kahar-Talagang Road. Residents say the demarcation was carried out without adequately considering that the land is fertile agricultural property and is home to around 20 families. The area also serves as an important habitat for wildlife and contains two wildlife breeding farms and a private game reserve. Dost Muhammad is not the only resident facing uncertainty. At least 19 other families living in the area are also reportedly at risk of losing their homes. The demarcation has also raised concerns among wildlife conservationists, as two breeding farms for urial, chinkara and partridge have reportedly fallen within the proposed project area. “We are six brothers. We purchased 24 kanals of land in 2018 and constructed our houses after obtaining a loan of Rs3 million under a scheme launched by Chief Minister Maryam Nawaz Sharif. Now our houses are facing demolition,” said Raja Mohammad Farooq, who recently completed construction of his house. The issue is particularly serious for farmers in the hilly Kallar Kahar tehsil, where cultivable land is already limited. “I own only four acres of land, from which I produce wheat for my family and fodder for my livestock throughout the year. My entire four acres have been included in the demarcated area. If the proposed academy is built on my land, where will I get wheat for my family and fodder for my livestock?” asked 62-year-old Ghulam Shabbir, a resident of Ratta village. Imtiaz Ahmed, who operates a cement-block plant and also keeps a flock of sheep, is similarly worried about his livelihood. “I sold four rams this year, but now my farm and plant are at risk of demolition,” he said anxiously. Malik Mukhtar Haider, who has been running a community-based conservation (CBC) initiative and two wildlife breeding farms for several years, said he had devoted his life to protecting wildlife and the natural environment. “I have spent my entire life working for the protection of wildlife and the natural environment, but the proposed construction of the PERA training academy has put my decades-long efforts at risk,” he said. Officials of the Punjab Wildlife Department have also expressed surprise over the selection of the site, questioning how an area serving as a wildlife refuge could have been chosen for the construction of a training academy. “The demarcated area is not only an important habitat for various wildlife species, including the rare Punjab urial, but also contains two breeding farms and flora and fauna that have been nurtured through more than two decades of sustained efforts,” Assistant Chief Wildlife Ranger Abid Hussain told Dawn. He questioned the rationale behind selecting the area and said the development appeared to undermine the conservation efforts being carried out by Malik Mukhtar Haider through his CBC initiative and breeding farms. “If government institutions themselves are bent on destroying wildlife habitats, then who will protect them?” he asked. Meanwhile, the district administration and local parliamentarians appear to have been unable to halt the proposed construction at the selected site. When contacted, Deputy Commissioner Chakwal Sara Hayat said the district administration had proposed three possible locations, but PERA had selected the present site. “We have to comply with the directions issued by the higher authorities,” she said. The proposed project has thus triggered a debate over the selection of public land for government infrastructure, with residents questioning why fertile agricultural land, inhabited settlements and an established wildlife habitat were chosen despite the reported availability of alternative sites.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *