nab clarifies rs500
| | | |

NAB clarifies Rs500 million jurisdiction threshold

ByJustpaste.in

ISLAMABAD: The National Accountability Bureau (NAB) has internally clarified that inflation-based adjustments to the value of liabilities cannot be used retrospectively to bring older, lower-value corruption cases under its jurisdiction.

The clarification follows the enforcement of the National Accountability (Amendment) Act 2026 on March 5. NAB has issued internal guidance for prosecutors and investigators to ensure a uniform legal position on the revised Rs500 million threshold.

Under the amended law, an offence falls within NAB’s jurisdiction when it involves corruption or misconduct involving at least Rs500 million. The law also links the financial threshold to annual inflation indicators issued by the Pakistan Bureau of Statistics, with the adjustment taking effect from July 1, 2026.

However, NAB’s internal interpretation distinguishes between the statutory jurisdictional threshold and the inflation-adjusted value of liabilities. The Rs500 million figure remains the basic test for determining jurisdiction. Inflation adjustment is applied only after the actual liability involved in a case has been finally determined.

The guidance identifies three situations based on when the alleged offence occurred.

For offences committed before July 2022, the original amount involved will be assessed according to the year in which the offence took place. No inflation adjustment will be applied retrospectively. If the final liability is Rs500 million or more, NAB will retain jurisdiction. If it is below Rs500 million, the case will fall outside NAB’s jurisdiction and may be transferred to the ordinary courts.

For offences committed after July 2022, the Rs500 million threshold will initially determine NAB’s jurisdiction. Once an inquiry or investigation establishes the final amount involved, the relevant inflation index for the year in which the case reaches its final stage will be applied if the original liability is at least Rs500 million.

The final reference will therefore contain both the original liability and its inflation-adjusted value. If the original liability is below Rs500 million, no inflation adjustment will be made and NAB’s jurisdiction will cease.

The third category concerns continuing offences that began before July 2022 but continued after that date. Such cases will be treated in the same manner as offences committed after July 2022.

The guidance further states that once the original liability has been finally established and the inflation-adjusted amount has been calculated, the resulting figure will be considered final. It will not be repeatedly revised on the basis of inflation increases in subsequent years.

According to the internal legal position, linking the financial threshold to inflation was intended to keep the threshold realistic and relevant over time and prevent inflation from reducing its practical value.

NAB has also clarified that the amendment was not intended to retrospectively expand the bureau’s jurisdiction or disadvantage accused persons.

The 2026 amendments made another significant change by expanding provisions concerning the transfer of cases falling outside NAB’s jurisdiction. The relevant provision now extends to pending appeals as well, whereas the earlier framework was primarily limited to inquiries, investigations and trials.

Similar Posts

  • | |

    Italy and Denmark rally 22 EU states behind push f…

    ByJustpaste.in

    Italy and Denmark have secured the backing of 22 European Union member states for a joint push toward stronger border security, following a chaotic migrant surge into the Spanish enclave of Ceuta that left at least 19 people dead. Thousands of migrants attempted to reach Ceuta, located on Africa’s northern coast, on Thursday, with many swimming around breakwaters using inflatable devices while others scaled the high border fence separating Morocco from the Spanish territory. Official estimates put the total number of migrants who crossed into Ceuta from Morocco at around 60,000. The scale of the crossing prompted alarm among European leaders, with Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni moving quickly to temporarily suspend Italy’s open border Schengen arrangement with Spain for one month, closing direct air and sea travel from Spain without passport checks. By Saturday, Italy had escalated its response further, joining Denmark in leading a coordinated diplomatic push. The two countries spearheaded a joint letter, signed by 22 EU member states, calling for urgent and coordinated European action on border security, deportations and human trafficking. Meloni wrote on social media that the scenes emerging from Ceuta underscored the urgency of a unified European response to illegal immigration. She said the letter, organized together with Denmark, calls for joint efforts to reinforce external borders, combat irregular immigration, target human traffickers, improve the effectiveness of deportations and remove any incentives that encourage further illegal crossings. She added that protecting the European Union’s external borders is not the concern of a single nation but a shared responsibility across the bloc. Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez pushed back against the growing pressure, accusing several EU countries of a selfish, polarizing and unlawful response to the crisis. In a letter sent to Brussels, Sanchez said some European states have chosen to target Spain and push for its temporary removal from the Schengen area, driven by what he described as prejudice, misinformation, ignorance or political motives. EU officials were scheduled to hold an emergency meeting Saturday afternoon to determine next steps in addressing the unfolding migration crisis in Ceuta. The dispute highlights a long running fault line within the European Union over migration policy, as border states facing the brunt of new arrivals often clash with governments pushing for stricter continent wide controls, a tension that has resurfaced repeatedly during major migration episodes over the past decade.

  • |

    ‘Remove Mamdani’: New York protests erupt

    ByJustpaste.in

    Hundreds of protesters gathered in New York City calling for Mayor Zohran Mamdani to resign or be removed from office. Demonstrators gathered near Gracie Mansion and voiced strong opposition to the mayor. Chants including “Remove Mamdani” and “Mamdani has to go” were heard during the protest. The demonstration came amid heightened tensions following a recent stabbing on Manhattan’s Upper West Side that is being investigated as a possible hate crime. One of the victims was a Jewish man, while another victim was Asian. Both survived the attacks. Critics of Mamdani have accused his administration of failing to do enough to protect Jewish New Yorkers. Protest organisers have also objected to his positions on Israel and broader foreign-policy issues. The protest reflects the growing political divisions surrounding Mamdani’s administration. His policies and views on international affairs have drawn strong support from some groups while facing intense criticism from others. Mamdani has previously defended the right to peaceful demonstrations, including protests directed against him. He has said that peaceful protest is a fundamental democratic right, while stressing that threats, violence and hate speech are unacceptable.

  • |

    Pakistan posts Rs3.6tr primary surplus as fiscal position improves in FY2025-26

    ByJustpaste.in

    ISLAMABAD: Pakistan closed the financial year 2025-26 with a primary budget surplus of around Rs3.6 trillion, marking the third consecutive year of a surplus and allowing the country to comfortably meet a key fiscal condition agreed with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The improvement came despite the government falling short of its tax collection targets, with stronger petroleum levy receipts, tighter expenditure controls and lower-than-expected debt servicing costs helping offset the revenue shortfall. According to the latest fiscal operations data released by the Ministry of Finance, the unadjusted primary surplus reached Rs3.63 trillion, equivalent to 2.6% of the country’s gross domestic product (GDP). The figure was approximately Rs464 billion higher than the IMF’s target of Rs3.16 trillion. The primary balance is considered an important indicator under Pakistan’s IMF programme because it measures the government’s fiscal position before interest payments on public debt. The latest figures indicate that the government maintained fiscal discipline despite continued pressure on revenues and expenditure. Overall fiscal deficit below target Pakistan’s overall budget deficit, after accounting for provincial cash surpluses, stood at approximately Rs3.3 trillion during FY2025-26. This was around Rs1.7 trillion lower than the amount initially projected in the federal budget. The federal government’s own deficit was recorded at Rs4.8 trillion, also significantly below the budgeted level. The better-than-expected outcome was primarily attributed to lower interest payments, stronger petroleum levy receipts and restrained development expenditure. Interest payments were around Rs1.3 trillion below the amount originally allocated in the budget. The government also collected approximately Rs101 billion more than its petroleum levy target, while federal development spending remained Rs82 billion below the initially approved allocation. The fiscal improvement also contributed to a moderation in the growth of public debt. Public debt increased by around 7% during the year, bringing some relief after several years of double-digit debt expansion. Provinces narrowly miss IMF cash surplus target The four provincial governments collectively generated a cash surplus of around Rs1.45 trillion during the fiscal year. Although the amount fell marginally short of the IMF’s combined requirement, the shortfall was only around Rs14 billion. Punjab contributed the largest share, recording a cash surplus of approximately Rs914 billion. Sindh posted a surplus of around Rs350 billion, followed by Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa with Rs165 billion and Balochistan with approximately Rs21 billion. Provincial governments, meanwhile, performed slightly better on revenue collection. Their combined tax receipts exceeded the IMF condition by around Rs18 billion, with collections crossing Rs1.2 trillion. FBR misses tax target Despite the overall improvement in the fiscal position, tax collection remained a major area of concern. The Federal Board of Revenue collected approximately Rs13 trillion during FY2025-26, falling nearly Rs1 trillion short of the IMF’s revised target. FBR tax receipts increased by about 11% compared with the previous year. However, this increase was broadly in line with nominal GDP growth, indicating that the tax-to-GDP ratio remained largely unchanged at around 10.3%. The figures suggest that additional revenue expected from new taxation and enforcement measures did not fully materialise. The government had anticipated around Rs700 billion in additional revenue from such measures. Non-tax revenue also remained below expectations by approximately Rs63 billion. Total non-tax receipts stood close to Rs5.1 trillion, including around Rs2.4 trillion in profits transferred by the central bank. Petroleum levy becomes key revenue source A major contributor to the stronger fiscal outcome was the petroleum levy. Collections under the petroleum levy climbed to around Rs1.567 trillion, representing an increase of approximately 28% over the previous year. The amount was also Rs101 billion above the target agreed with the IMF. The additional collection effectively represented roughly 25 days of petroleum price relief at a levy rate of Rs80 per litre on petrol and high-speed diesel. For the current financial year, the government has committed to collecting approximately Rs1.7 trillion through the petroleum levy. Meeting this objective is expected to require maintaining the levy at around Rs80 per litre, subject to the applicable petroleum pricing mechanism and market conditions. Development spending remains restrained The government’s fiscal consolidation strategy also affected development expenditure. Federal development spending was recorded at around Rs918 billion, approximately Rs82 billion below the originally approved budget allocation. However, the amount was still around Rs100 billion higher than the subsequently revised allocation. The figures reflect the government’s efforts to contain expenditure and prioritise fiscal targets amid pressure from debt servicing and revenue mobilisation. Debt servicing costs fall Lower-than-expected debt servicing provided another significant boost to the government’s fiscal position. The Ministry of Finance reported that debt servicing remained around Rs6.95 trillion during the year, compared with the budgeted amount of approximately Rs8.2 trillion. The government attributed the savings to tight fiscal management, improved cash handling and the early retirement of around Rs1.9 trillion in domestic debt. These measures helped reduce domestic debt servicing costs by nearly Rs1.97 trillion compared with the original estimates. Statistical discrepancy highlighted The fiscal operations report also identified a statistical discrepancy of around Rs853 billion across the federal and provincial accounts. According to the Ministry of Finance, the discrepancy was linked largely to changes in cash balances and differences in the recording and reporting of financial data. The negative discrepancy indicated that cash inflows were higher than recorded outflows. At the federal level, the discrepancy stood at approximately Rs448 billion. The ministry attributed the difference mainly to changes in commercial bank deposits as well as variations in reporting and accounting adjustments involving the State Bank of Pakistan, FBR and Economic Affairs Division. Provincial accounts showed a combined statistical discrepancy of approximately Rs405 billion. Punjab accounted for around Rs266 billion, Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa Rs95 billion, Balochistan Rs72 billion and Sindh around Rs28 billion. The ministry said movements in commercial bank deposits were among the principal factors behind the provincial differences. IMF review ahead The improved fiscal performance is expected to strengthen Pakistan’s position ahead of the next IMF assessment. An IMF mission is expected to visit Islamabad in the third week of September to review Pakistan’s economic performance during the previous fiscal year. The mission is also expected to

  • |

    Atif Aslam opens up about stardom, success and quitting music

    ByJustpaste.in

    Atif Aslam is one of Pakistan’s most celebrated singers, admired by millions of fans not only in the country but also around the world. With a social media following of more than 11 million, the singer has established himself as one of the most influential voices in the Pakistani music industry. Known for his soulful vocals, emotional delivery and remarkable ability to hit high notes, Atif has given audiences numerous memorable songs throughout his successful career. From Aadat and Kuch Is Tarha to Ba Khuda and Dil Diyan Gallan, his music has earned him a massive fan base across different countries and generations. His popularity has also taken him to some of the biggest stages internationally, where he regularly performs for packed audiences. Despite his immense fame and success, Atif Aslam believes that his journey to becoming a global star was not something he had completely planned. Reflecting on his remarkable career, the singer admitted that he was often unaware of how quickly his popularity grew. According to Atif, every successful song brought a new level of uncertainty. After releasing one hit, he would wonder what would come next, while another successful track could still leave him questioning whether audiences would continue to appreciate his work. However, as his career progressed and his albums gained recognition, he began to understand the responsibility that came with being a major artist. Atif also acknowledged the significant role Bollywood played in expanding his popularity. His songs for Indian films introduced his voice to an even wider audience and contributed to his international recognition. Interestingly, the singer does not believe that his success can simply be attributed to hard work. Instead, he expressed his belief that success is ultimately in Allah’s hands. He suggested that destiny plays a major role in determining where a person eventually reaches in life. While Atif Aslam has achieved extraordinary success, he has never seriously considered walking away from music. The singer revealed that he has never thought about quitting his profession, although, like every artist, he sometimes experiences periods of creative block. He explained that creative blocks are a natural and even necessary part of an artist’s journey. There are moments when an artist may feel completely empty and unable to write or create anything. Rather than viewing such phases negatively, Atif considers them part of the creative process. According to him, artists have to experience different phases throughout their careers. After periods of uncertainty and creative emptiness, inspiration eventually returns, allowing them to feel fulfilled once again. Atif described these moments as times when the metaphorical glass feels full. During such phases, he prefers to remain quiet, appreciate what he has achieved and thank Allah for everything. With no plans to leave music, Atif Aslam continues to entertain audiences through his powerful voice and live performances. His perspective on fame, success and creativity highlights the humility behind his extraordinary career and explains why he continues to remain one of the most admired singers in Pakistan.

  • PPRA probes Punjab health procurement

    ByJustpaste.in

    LAHORE: The Punjab Procurement Regulatory Authority (PPRA) has questioned the procurement practices of the Specialized Healthcare and Medical Education Department (SHC&MED) after allegations that tender specifications for cardiac consumables unfairly restricted competition and significantly increased procurement costs for the financial year 2026–27. The matter came before the PPRA after M/s 4S International filed a representation challenging the department’s decision to make United States Food and Drug Administration (US FDA) approval mandatory for several high-volume cardiac consumables. The company argued that the exclusion of European CE Mark-certified products, which had previously been accepted, created discriminatory conditions and led to an unjustified increase in prices. According to an order issued by PPRA Managing Director Sahibzadi Wasimah Umer, the complainant stated that balloon catheters (Item C3) bearing European CE certification had been procured during FY 2025–26 at a unit price of Rs6,985. Under the revised tender conditions requiring US FDA approval, the estimated unit price for the same item increased to Rs9,800. The company further alleged that the department selectively applied the US FDA requirement to certain high-volume items, including C3, C4, C7, C19 and C20, while continuing to accept European CE Mark-certified products for other comparable items such as C5, C6 and C8. The representation also claimed that objections to the revised tender conditions were formally raised during a pre-bid meeting held on June 30, 2026, but the official minutes did not reflect or address the concerns raised by prospective bidders. The complainant maintained that its CE Mark-certified products are registered with the Drug Regulatory Authority of Pakistan (DRAP) and are widely used in leading cardiology centres across Punjab with an established performance record. During a hearing before the PPRA on July 8, 2026, SHC&MED Contract Manager Shafique Hussain stated that the US FDA requirement had been introduced on the advice of medical experts to ensure higher quality standards. However, after the proceedings, the department’s representative requested that the matter be referred back for reconsideration by the department. In its ruling, the PPRA observed that public procurement laws require fairness, transparency and value for money, and noted that the distinction between accepted certifications warranted careful examination to determine whether it was based on clinical necessity, patient safety or other objective criteria, or whether it unnecessarily restricted competition without adequate justification. The authority directed the health department to constitute an independent technical committee comprising impartial experts and departmental officials to conduct an evidence-based review of whether restricting procurement exclusively to US FDA-approved products is clinically essential. The committee has also been asked to assess whether DRAP-registered products carrying European CE certification meet the required safety and performance standards and to provide M/s 4S International with an opportunity to present its case before a final decision is taken. The PPRA also ordered the immediate refund of the Rs50,000 security deposit submitted by M/s 4S International.

  • |

    Vijay demands complete abolition of NEET, backs student protests

    ByJustpaste.in

    Tamil Nadu Chief Minister and actor-turned-politician Vijay has voiced strong opposition to the National Eligibility cum Entrance Test (NEET), calling for the examination system to be abolished entirely while expressing support for students protesting in New Delhi. In a statement shared on social media on Wednesday, the 52-year-old leader reiterated that his party has consistently opposed NEET and believes the entrance exam has placed an unfair burden on students and their families across the country. Vijay stated that his party’s position on the issue remains firm and uncompromising. According to him, the current examination system has caused significant stress for aspiring medical students, many of whom face intense pressure while preparing for the highly competitive test. He argued that the impact extends beyond students themselves, affecting parents and families who invest considerable time, effort and resources into the preparation process. The actor-turned-politician also rejected what he described as political opportunism surrounding the issue. He said his party would not make unrealistic promises or use the NEET debate merely to gain electoral support, insisting that meaningful and lasting reforms are needed instead of temporary political statements. Vijay further argued that the long-term solution lies in returning education to the State List, allowing individual state governments to exercise greater control over educational policies and admission procedures. He maintained that such a move would enable states to develop systems that better reflect local educational needs and priorities. Acknowledging that constitutional or legal challenges could delay such a change, Vijay proposed an interim alternative. He suggested creating a Special Concurrent List that would provide state governments with expanded authority over education until broader constitutional reforms become possible. Under this proposed arrangement, states would receive greater powers to regulate all aspects of education, including medical education and admissions. Vijay said empowering state governments in this manner would help address concerns surrounding NEET while ensuring that educational policies are better aligned with regional requirements. His remarks come as discussions over the future of NEET continue to generate debate in several parts of India. Supporters of the examination argue that it establishes a uniform standard for admissions to medical colleges across the country. Critics, however, contend that it disadvantages students from different educational backgrounds and places excessive pressure on candidates preparing for a single nationwide examination. The issue has remained particularly sensitive in Tamil Nadu, where opposition to NEET has been a significant political and public concern for several years. Various political parties and student groups in the state have repeatedly called for exemptions or the complete withdrawal of the examination system, arguing that it affects equal access to medical education. By once again reaffirming his opposition to NEET and advocating greater autonomy for state governments in educational matters, Vijay has added his voice to the ongoing national debate over the future of medical admissions and the balance of powers between the Centre and the states.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *