pakistan secures 6295
|

Pakistan secures US $629.5 million in agreements following landmark Pakistan-China Pharmaceutical B2B Conference

ByJustpaste.in

Syed Mustafa Kamal, Federal Minister for National Health Services, Regulations and Coordination has announced a major breakthrough for Pakistan’s pharmaceutical sector following the successful Pakistan-China Pharmaceutical Business-to-Business (B2B) Conference held in Islamabad on 17–18 July.

Addressing a press conference, the Minister said the conference marks a significant milestone in the government’s efforts to transform Pakistan’s pharmaceutical industry into a globally competitive sector, attract foreign investment, strengthen local manufacturing, and reduce dependence on imported pharmaceutical products.

“The purpose of sharing this success is to present a positive image of Pakistan to our people and the world. While challenges exist, it is equally important to highlight our achievements that restore confidence in Pakistan’s economy and its investment potential,” the Minister said.

The two-day conference brought together 240 Chinese delegates representing 140 leading Chinese pharmaceutical companies and 430 Pakistani delegates from 210 local companies, making it one of the largest Pakistan-China engagements ever held exclusively for the pharmaceutical sector.

To maximize business outcomes, the Ministry of National Health Services facilitated six weeks of virtual business matchmaking before the conference, ensuring participating companies entered the event with well-developed business discussions rather than first-time introductions.

As a result, the conference generated 340 bilateral business meetings, culminating in:

22 commercial agreements worth US$629.5 million
84 Memoranda of Understanding (MoUs) with an estimated value of approximately US$800 million, many of which are expected to mature into formal investment agreements.

The signed agreements span six strategic sub-sectors critical to the future of Pakistan’s healthcare industry:

Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients (APIs) – 2 agreements
Local Vaccine Production – 8 agreements
Clinical Trials – 2 agreements
Generic Formulations & Injectables – 2 agreements
Medical Devices Manufacturing – 8 agreements

The Minister emphasized that the government’s objective extends beyond signing MoUs, focusing instead on legally binding commercial agreements that lead to tangible investments, technology transfer, industrial growth, and employment generation.

Highlighting the government’s broader pharmaceutical reforms, the Minister noted that Pakistan has, for the first time, developed and approved a National Local Vaccine Production Policy, creating the policy framework necessary for domestic vaccine manufacturing. Currently, Pakistan administers 13 vaccines under its national immunization programme, all of which are imported. The new policy aims to establish local production capacity, improve health security, and reduce import dependence.

The Minister also identified several strategic priorities being pursued jointly with Chinese partners, including:

Development of Pakistan’s clinical trials ecosystem;
Promotion of Traditional Chinese Medicine and herbal medicines;
Local manufacturing and export of medical devices;
Establishment of vocational and technical training programmes for the pharmaceutical and biotechnology workforce; and
Indigenous production of Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients (APIs), as Pakistan currently imports approximately 95% of the raw materials used to manufacture medicines despite producing nearly 85% of its pharmaceutical products locally.

The Minister observed that healthcare is a permanent and growing global industry, and with Pakistan’s population exceeding 250 million, strengthening domestic pharmaceutical manufacturing has become both an economic and strategic necessity.

He further highlighted the government’s regulatory reforms, particularly within the Drug Regulatory Authority of Pakistan (DRAP), where approximately 85% of regulatory processes have now been digitized. The reforms have substantially reduced processing times, enhanced transparency, minimized human intervention, and improved ease of doing business.

As an example, the Minister noted that the registration of medical devices, which previously required years to complete, can now be processed entirely online, with approvals being issued within 20 days, significantly improving investor confidence.

The Minister acknowledged the collective efforts of the Embassy of Pakistan in Beijing, led by Ambassador Khalil Hashmi, the Ministry of National Health Services, DRAP, the Trade Development Authority of Pakistan (TDAP), the Board of Investment (BOI), the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, Islamabad Police, law enforcement agencies, and all public officials whose coordinated efforts ensured the successful organization of the conference.

He also appreciated the active participation of the Pakistani pharmaceutical industry and Chinese business partners, whose collaboration translated business dialogue into concrete investment commitments.

Concluding the press conference, the Minister described the conference as the beginning of a long-term strategic partnership between Pakistan and China in the healthcare and pharmaceutical sectors. He reaffirmed the government’s commitment to ensuring that the signed agreements are implemented expeditiously and translated into operational projects that strengthen Pakistan’s pharmaceutical manufacturing capacity, create employment opportunities, increase exports, and contribute to national economic growth.

Similar Posts

  • | |

    Whoopi Goldberg defends Elliot Page’s casting in The Odyssey

    ByJustpaste.in

    Whoopi Goldberg has stepped forward to defend the casting of Elliot Page in Christopher Nolan’s The Odyssey, delivering a pointed and characteristically direct response to the wave of criticism that has been directed at the actor since the film’s release. Speaking on Tuesday’s episode of The View, Goldberg addressed the backlash head-on after a clip was played of conservative commentator Ben Shapiro describing Page’s role as an “absolute puzzler” and taking aim at the actor’s appearance and voice. Goldberg’s response was blunt and unapologetic. “A lot of conservatives who see this are going to feel the same way. That’s okay,” she said. “But I don’t understand. Why go see the movie? If you don’t want to see it, don’t go see it. Why do you care who’s cast in it?” She continued: “I don’t understand this idea that if we hate it, everybody must hate it because we hate it for this reason. You don’t like Elliot Page? Don’t go see the damn movie. Don’t do it. We will be okay if you don’t go see it.” Page, who is trans, plays Sinon in the film, a cousin of Matt Damon’s Odysseus. The casting drew significant online criticism, some of it amplified after Elon Musk weighed in on social media, initially claiming incorrectly that Page would be playing the warrior Achilles. Despite the inaccuracy being pointed out, the backlash continued and widened. Page is not the only cast member to have faced criticism over their casting. Lupita Nyong’o, who plays both Helen of Troy and her sister Clytemnestra in the film, has also been subjected to racially charged criticism over her dual role, highlighting a pattern of commentary around the film’s diverse ensemble that goes well beyond questions of artistic interpretation. Fellow View panelist Alyssa Farah Griffin also pushed back on the criticism during the segment, arguing that the film’s themes of family, faith and the consequences of war are broad and universal enough to resonate across different audiences, including those who had voiced objections before seeing the film. What the controversy has not managed to do is dent the film’s commercial performance. The Odyssey opened in theatres on July 17 and crossed $300 million worldwide within days, making it one of the biggest releases of Christopher Nolan’s career and one of the year’s most significant box office events so far. For Goldberg, the message was simple: the film exists, it is performing, and those who object to its casting choices have every right to stay away. What they do not have, in her view, is the right to demand that everyone else feels the same.

  • |

    Sidharth Malhotra supports Kiara amid Toxic criticism

    ByJustpaste.in

    Sidharth Malhotra has shown his support for Kiara Advani amid the criticism surrounding her upcoming film Toxic, which also stars South Indian superstar Yash in a leading role. The actress has recently found herself at the centre of online controversy following the release of the film’s final trailer. Several viewers criticised her for the bold and intimate scenes featured with Yash, with some social media users expressing their disappointment over her on-screen chemistry with the actor. Amid the growing criticism, Sidharth appeared to stand firmly by his wife and praised her hard work ahead of the film’s release. The actor took to Instagram to reshare the final trailer of Toxic, accompanying it with a heartfelt message for Kiara and the entire team. Highlighting the dedication and effort that went into making the highly anticipated project, Sidharth wrote that the hard work, passion and determination of the cast and crew would be visible on the big screen. He also expressed his excitement about Kiara’s performance, suggesting that the film could become one of her best projects. Sidharth further praised director Geetu Mohandas, Yash and the rest of the team for creating what he described as something magical. He concluded his message by extending his best wishes to the Toxic team and looking forward to the film’s release on August 26. His supportive message comes at a time when Kiara has been receiving considerable attention on social media because of her role in the action-packed film. The trailer has generated strong buzz among audiences, particularly because of the actress’s chemistry and intimate moments with Yash. While some viewers have criticised the scenes, the film’s team has continued to promote the project ahead of its theatrical release. Yash has also addressed the criticism surrounding Kiara and her role in Toxic. During the film’s recent trailer launch, the actor spoke highly of his co-star and praised her commitment as a performer. According to Yash, audiences have only witnessed a small glimpse of what Kiara has brought to the project. He described her as a dedicated actor and suggested that viewers should wait to experience her complete performance when the film arrives in cinemas. The actor also appeared to send a broader message to performers dealing with public criticism. He encouraged actors to remain committed to their beliefs and artistic choices instead of allowing outside opinions to influence their work. For now, the controversy has only added to the anticipation surrounding Toxic. With its star-studded cast, action-packed storyline and high-profile collaborations, the film is among the most awaited upcoming releases. As audiences prepare to watch Kiara and Yash on the big screen, Sidharth’s public show of support has made it clear that he is standing behind his wife and eagerly waiting to see her performance.

  • Appeal filed in Supreme Court over minority reserved seats

    ByJustpaste.in

    An appeal has been filed in the Supreme Court’s Lahore Registry challenging the Lahore High Court’s decision dismissing a constitutional petition seeking an increase in the number of reserved seats for minorities in the National and Provincial Assemblies in line with the country’s population growth. The constitutional appeal has been filed by advocate Naseeb Masih, who has made the Federal Government, the President of Pakistan, and the Secretary for Law and Parliamentary Affairs respondents in the case. The appellant contended that the Lahore High Court failed to correctly appreciate the legal and constitutional issues raised in the petition. It was argued that the number of reserved seats for minorities should have been increased following successive population censuses, but this constitutional requirement had been ignored. According to the appeal, the minority population has grown at a rate comparable to the Muslim population, yet the number of reserved seats allocated to minorities has remained unchanged. It was further submitted that representation for women has also not been increased proportionately to the growth in population. The petitioner maintained that the Constitution currently provides 10 reserved seats for minorities in the National Assembly, while the Punjab Assembly has eight reserved minority seats, Sindh nine, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa four, and Balochistan four. The appeal states that these allocations were originally based on the 1981 Population Census, following a Presidential Order issued in 1985, under which 10 minority seats were reserved in the National Assembly when the House consisted of 207 general seats. It further points out that under the Legal Framework Order (LFO) 2002, the number of general seats in the National Assembly was increased to 272, and 60 seats were reserved for women. However, despite these constitutional changes, the number of reserved seats for minorities was not increased. Similarly, the appeal notes that the number of general seats in the Punjab Assembly was enhanced from 240 to 297, while the number of reserved seats for women was increased to 60. However, the number of minority seats remained fixed at eight, despite the increase in the province’s population. The petitioner has requested the Supreme Court to set aside the Lahore High Court’s judgment and direct the relevant authorities to increase the number of reserved seats for minorities in the National and Provincial Assemblies in proportion to the country’s population, ensuring equitable constitutional representation for minority communities.

  • | |

    Stray dog attack on child at Punjab university cam…

    ByJustpaste.in

      Lahore: A deeply unfortunate, alarming, and unacceptable incident occurred today at Punjab University when the young daughter of a university professor was attacked by stray dogs roaming freely on the university campus. The brutal attack left the child with approximately fifteen deep bite wounds on different parts of her body, requiring immediate medical attention. The tragic incident has caused immense shock, grief, and concern among the victim’s family as well as the entire university community. The Academic Staff Association (ASA) and the Joint Action Committee stated that they have repeatedly raised concerns over the growing stray dog population on the campus through both written communications and verbal representations over the past several months. According to the associations, they had consistently warned the university administration that the increasing number of stray dogs posed a serious threat to the lives and safety of students, faculty members, university employees, and their families. Despite numerous complaints and repeated demands for action, the administration allegedly failed to address the issue with the seriousness it deserved, displaying what the associations described as criminal negligence, indifference, and a lack of responsibility. They maintained that today’s tragic incident is a direct consequence of this continued inaction. The Academic Staff Association and the Joint Action Committee expressed profound disappointment over what they described as the misplaced priorities of the current university administration. Instead of focusing on resolving the institution’s fundamental issues, ensuring campus security, and protecting the welfare of the university community, the administration has allegedly remained preoccupied with retaliatory actions, harassment of faculty and employees, and unnecessary administrative conflicts. The associations argued that when an administration neglects its basic legal and administrative responsibilities, such unfortunate incidents become inevitable, and responsibility for the consequences rests with the concerned authorities. Strongly condemning the incident, the Academic Staff Association (ASA) and the Joint Action Committee have put forward the following demands: An immediate, transparent, and impartial inquiry should be conducted to determine responsibility for the incident and hold those accountable. The injured child and her family should be provided with every possible medical, administrative, and financial assistance. A comprehensive, effective, and permanent operation should be launched on an emergency basis to make the entire Punjab University campus safe from stray dogs. A clear, practical, and sustainable campus safety policy should be developed and implemented to ensure the protection of students, faculty members, employees, and their families. The Academic Staff Association and the Joint Action Committee further warned that if the university administration fails to take immediate and effective measures to permanently resolve the stray dog issue, and if any similar incident occurs in the future, they will reserve the right to pursue all available legal remedies against those responsible. These measures may include the registration of a First Information Report (FIR) and other legal proceedings against the relevant authorities for negligence. The associations urged the university administration to set aside personal preferences, retaliatory attitudes, and unnecessary disputes, and instead devote its full attention to addressing the university’s core challenges. They stressed that ensuring campus security and safeguarding the lives and property of students, faculty members, employees, and their families must remain the administration’s highest priority. The statement concluded by emphasizing that the protection of human life is the foremost responsibility of any institution, and any further negligence in fulfilling this duty would be entirely unacceptable.

  • | |

    Supreme Court upholds death sentence in woman’s …

    ByJustpaste.in

    The Supreme Court has issued a landmark ruling concerning women’s rights, declaring that a woman’s right to seek khula (judicial divorce) is a constitutional right and that violence against a woman exercising this right amounts to an attack on the Constitution. A three-member bench of the Supreme Court dismissed the jail petition filed by convict Waseem Abbas and upheld his death sentence. Justice Muhammad Hashim Khan Kakar authored the four-page detailed judgment. According to the judgment, women are fully protected under Articles 9, 14 and 25 of the Constitution, which guarantee their security, dignity and equal rights. The court said that anyone who uses violence against a woman seeking khula would face the full force of the law. It observed that killing a woman for exercising her legal right is an act of brutality and open defiance of the law. The Supreme Court further ruled that a convict involved in a cold-blooded and planned murder does not deserve any concession. The judgment also clarified that the testimony of relatives cannot automatically be rejected in cases involving crimes committed within the privacy of a home. The court said forensic evidence recovered from the crime scene provided conclusive evidence against the accused. The forensic examination established a match between the recovered bullet casings and the pistol linked to the crime. The Supreme Court found no legal or factual flaw in the decisions of the lower courts and upheld the death sentence awarded to Waseem Abbas. According to the case record, Waseem Abbas shot and killed his former wife, Shehnaz Bibi, on October 11, 2020. She had obtained a legal khula decree from a family court before the incident. The convict allegedly entered the woman’s home and killed her around 48 hours after she obtained the decree. A trial court subsequently sentenced Abbas to death and awarded him 10 years in prison. The Lahore High Court later upheld the death sentence.

  • | |

    Louis Partridge sparks speculation after deleting …

    ByJustpaste.in

    Louis Partridge has fueled fresh speculation about his relationship with ex-girlfriend Olivia Rodrigo after fans noticed that he had deleted a heartfelt Instagram post previously dedicated to the singer. The move comes months after reports claimed the couple ended their relationship in late 2025 and shortly after Rodrigo was seen publicly with her rumored new boyfriend, prompting renewed attention from fans online. (pinkvilla.com⁠) Partridge and Rodrigo first sparked romance rumors in 2023 before making several public appearances together. Throughout their relationship, the pair generally kept their romance private, although they occasionally shared affectionate moments on social media and during public events. Reports later suggested the two quietly went their separate ways in December 2025, though neither publicly discussed the reason behind the breakup. (pinkvilla.com⁠) The latest speculation began when fans realized that Partridge had removed an Instagram post celebrating Rodrigo’s birthday. The post, which had featured a sweet message and photos of the couple, was no longer visible on his profile. The timing quickly caught the attention of social media users because it came after Rodrigo was photographed with a new rumored partner, leading some fans to wonder whether the deletion was intentional. (pinkvilla.com⁠) Despite the online chatter, there is no confirmation that the deleted post was meant as a message toward Rodrigo. Neither Partridge nor the singer has commented publicly on the removal, and there is no verified evidence suggesting the actor was attempting to criticize or “shade” his former girlfriend. Many celebrities choose to archive or delete posts from previous relationships after a breakup, making the move relatively common. (pinkvilla.com⁠) Rodrigo, meanwhile, has continued to focus on her music and public appearances. Recent reports linking her to a new boyfriend have attracted significant attention, although the Grammy-winning artist has not publicly addressed the status of her personal life. She has often preferred to keep her relationships private despite intense media interest. (pinkvilla.com⁠) As for Partridge, the actor has remained focused on his growing film career while largely avoiding discussions about his private life. Although the deleted Instagram post has sparked widespread speculation, the true reason behind its removal remains unknown. For now, fans continue to debate the timing of Partridge’s decision, but without a statement from either star, any claims that the deletion was directed at Olivia Rodrigo remain unconfirmed. The incident highlights how even small social media changes can quickly become the subject of major public speculation when high-profile celebrities are involved.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *