yuchengco tells sec8217s
| | | |

Yuchengco tells SEC’s Lim: Fresh PSE blood is shareholders’ call

Vivian Yuchengco refuses to let the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) decide when her nearly three-decade run on the Philippine Stock Exchange (PSE) board should end.

Days after Yuchengco and fellow veteran broker-director Eddie Gobing asked the Court of Appeals to junk the SEC’s new term limits, Yuchengco fired off at SEC Chairman Francis Lim.

Her message, stripped of the pleasantries normally exchanged in corporate boardrooms: The SEC may regulate the stock market, but it does not own it.

“Shareholder rights are NOT a privilege granted by the SEC,” Yuchengco said in a statement obtained by Rappler, emphasis hers. “The SEC does not own the shares. The SEC does not elect the directors. The shareholders do.”

inside track logo

Having already served well beyond the new 10-year cumulative cap, Yuchengco could eventually be barred from seeking another term once the transition period for incumbents runs out.

For the long-time broker-director, that’s precisely the problem with Lim’s argument that shareholders remain free to elect directors, provided their nominees meet regulatory qualifications. She called that reasoning “plainly misleading” and accused the SEC of using corporate governance as a “pretext” to dislodge directors it would rather not see around.

“Chairman Lim calls the Circular ‘reform.’ But reform does not mean using regulatory power to remove directors whom shareholders have repeatedly chosen to keep on the Board. That is not reform. It is the regulator overriding the judgment of the shareholders,” she said in the statement.

Must Read

[Vantage Point] PSE veterans take SEC term-limit fight to Court of Appeals


[Vantage Point] PSE veterans take SEC term-limit fight to Court of Appeals

The woman who can’t be moved

Yuchengco is no casual occupant of the PSE board. The petition she filed with Gobing says she has accumulated 29 years as a PSE director, including a stint as chairperson from 2002 to 2003. She was also the first woman elected president of the old Makati Stock Exchange in 1989 before it merged with the Manila Stock Exchange to form the PSE. She later helped work on the PSE’s demutualization.

She chairs the Philippine Association of Securities Brokers and Dealers and owns and manages The First Resources Management and Securities Corporation, an active PSE trading participant. She also sits as a non-independent director of Philippine Dealing System Holdings.

And, yes, it is that Yuchengco name. She belongs to the broader business family whose interests include RCBC, House of Investments, Malayan Insurance, and education businesses under iPeople, although her PSE representation is through her own brokerage.

Her lawyers are also keen to point out that shareholders have hardly been trying to get rid of her. The petition notes, with a bit of legal chest-thumping, her and Gobing’s repeated reelections in “landslide victories no less.” Yuchengco received the highest number of votes among all elected PSE directors in both 2025 and 2026, according to the filing.

Must Read

The high stakes showdown between the SEC and Vivian Yuchengco over PSE board term limits


The high stakes showdown between the SEC and Vivian Yuchengco over PSE board term limits

Lim: The old guard has had its time

To be fair, there’s precedent for both sides. Term limits exist in the stock exchanges of other major markets. Hong Kong’s HKEX has tenure limits for non-executive directors, while Singapore’s SGX also limits the terms of independent directors of listed companies. But hard caps on broker representatives in particular are not universal. Nasdaq, one of the world’s largest stock exchanges by market capitalization, has no term limits for broker-directors, relying instead on annual elections.

Nevertheless, Lim has hardly concealed what he is trying to do.

When Rappler spoke with the SEC chair in July, weeks before Yuchengco finally took him to court, Lim described the term limits as part of a deliberate effort to remake the Exchange’s board.

“I talked to Vivian on why we need that change,” Lim said. “We have to reconstitute the PSE board. We have to, because reform starts from the board. Reform starts from the board.”

“If the same old people do things in the board the way they’ve been doing before, and our stock market is ganito pa rin (still like this), there must be something wrong.”

Broker-directors previously had no equivalent tenure ceiling even as independent and non-broker directors faced term limits. Lim’s answer was a maximum cumulative tenure of 10 years, with a cooling-off requirement after five years.

“Fair is fair. I just wanted to level the playing field, so to speak, at the board level. And secondly, governance. Hindi naman tama siguro ‘yung forever ka diyan, di ba? (It’s probably not right that you’re there forever, right?)” Lim said, talking to journalists and stockbrockers at the Monday Circle forum.

He had personally spoken to Yuchengco while crafting the reform — and already knew litigation was on the horizon.

“She was the one threatening to sue me,” recalled Lim, the veteran corporate lawyer who once headed the PSE himself and spent years teaching securities regulation. “I don’t mind being sued.”

Now that Yuchengco has made good on the threat and taken the fight to court, the dispute comes down to who gets to decide when longtime directors should make way for Lim’s “new blood.” Yuchengco’s position is that shareholders should make that call.

“If shareholders want new directors, they can elect new directors,” she said in her statement. “If they continue to elect experienced directors, that choice belongs to them.” – Rappler.com

Must Read

SEC chief Francis Lim to Villars: No family is too powerful to sue


SEC chief Francis Lim to Villars: No family is too powerful to sue

Similar Posts

  • | | |

    Pakistani envoy highlights investment opportunitie…

    Pakistan’s Ambassador to the United States, Rizwan Saeed Sheikh, has held a series of meetings with American business leaders. The discussions focused on expanding economic and investment ties between Pakistan and the United States. The ambassador encouraged US investors to explore opportunities in Pakistan. He particularly highlighted the country’s mining and surgical instruments sectors. Sheikh said American investment could play an important role in developing Pakistan’s mineral resources. He stressed the need to add greater value to these resources through modern technology and investment. The ambassador also highlighted opportunities in Pakistan’s mineral sector. He said stronger cooperation with American companies could help improve processing and value addition. During the meetings, Sheikh welcomed an ongoing $200 million joint venture related to the export of Pakistani pink salt. He described such projects as an important step towards expanding trade and investment links between the two countries. He also called for increased US investment in Pakistan’s surgical instruments industry. The sector has significant potential for growth, particularly through modern production methods, advanced technology and international market access. As part of his engagements, Sheikh visited a facility in Naperville involved in the finishing, packaging and distribution of Pakistani surgical instruments. During the visit, he discussed the need to further develop the sector. He said Pakistani businesses could benefit from modern technology, better training and improved technical skills. The ambassador stressed that investment in skills and technology was important for increasing the quality and competitiveness of Pakistani surgical products. Sheikh also met officials of the Pakistan-American Chicago Land Chamber of Commerce. The meeting focused on strengthening commercial links between Pakistani and American businesses. He encouraged closer interaction between business communities in both countries. He said stronger business-to-business connections could help identify new investment opportunities and expand bilateral trade. The ambassador’s engagements form part of efforts to promote Pakistan as an attractive destination for foreign investment. The focus on minerals, surgical instruments and other export-oriented sectors is aimed at creating stronger commercial partnerships with US businesses.

  • |

    Germany’s delayed lignite review fuels debate over coal exit

    BERLIN: Germany’s decision to postpone an interim assessment of its planned lignite phase-out in North Rhine-Westphalia has raised speculation that some coal-fired power plants could remain available for longer than originally scheduled to protect the country’s electricity supply. The German government had been expected to publish an interim report by August 15 examining the consequences of the planned early shutdown of lignite-fired generation in the country’s largest state. However, the economy ministry has delayed the assessment while it awaits the outcome of tenders for new gas-fired power plants being conducted this year. The development has attracted attention because the report is expected to play an important role in determining whether Germany can maintain electricity security while moving ahead with its ambitious coal-exit strategy. Agreement with RWE Under an agreement reached in 2022 between the German government and energy company RWE, lignite-fired electricity generation in North Rhine-Westphalia is scheduled to end by March 2030. The timetable brought forward the shutdown of several lignite plants by eight years compared with Germany’s broader national coal phase-out target. Lignite, commonly known as brown coal, is among the most carbon-intensive fossil fuels and has long been a major target of Germany’s efforts to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions. The government nevertheless retained the possibility of reassessing the situation by 2026. If the review finds that electricity supplies could be threatened, some RWE facilities could potentially remain available until 2033. Delay raises market expectations The postponement of the interim report has prompted speculation in energy markets that Berlin may eventually use the security provisions included in the agreement. Market expectations have centred on around 3.6 gigawatts (GW) of RWE’s lignite-fired capacity potentially being placed into a so-called security standby arrangement. Under such a mechanism, plants could remain available to operate if the electricity system faces supply shortages, potentially extending their role through the end of 2033. The government, however, has not announced any decision to extend the operating life of the plants. RWE Chief Executive Markus Krebber said on Thursday that the company had not been informed of any change to the agreed 2030 shutdown date. He also indicated that the government had not approached RWE about extending the plants’ operations. Gas power becomes increasingly important The delay comes as Germany seeks to strengthen its electricity system with additional gas-fired generation. Germany has approximately 266 GW of installed electricity-generation capacity, but a substantial portion comes from solar and wind power. While renewable energy has expanded rapidly, both technologies are weather-dependent and cannot independently guarantee continuous electricity production around the clock. That has intensified concerns about how the country will maintain reliable power supplies as coal-fired generation is gradually removed from the system. Gas-fired plants are increasingly being considered as a flexible source of electricity that can support the grid when renewable generation is insufficient. The government’s current tenders for new gas capacity are therefore closely linked to the broader debate over how quickly Germany can retire coal-fired plants without creating supply risks. Security of supply remains a key concern Germany’s energy transition has faced a difficult balancing act between climate objectives and electricity reliability. The country wants to expand renewable generation while reducing its reliance on fossil fuels, but the retirement of conventional power plants removes generation capacity that can be dispatched when required. The issue became particularly sensitive following the country’s decision to phase out nuclear power, leaving policymakers with fewer sources of low-carbon, dispatchable electricity. Supporters of a rapid coal exit argue that expanding renewable generation, electricity storage, grid infrastructure and flexible gas capacity can compensate for the closure of coal plants. Critics maintain that Germany could face periods of tight supply unless sufficient backup generation is available. AfD presses for reversal The issue has also become politically contentious. The far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD), currently the country’s largest opposition party and leading nationwide opinion polls, has strongly opposed Germany’s coal and nuclear phase-out policies. The party has called for a reversal of the energy-exit strategy, arguing that the closure of conventional power stations could increase the risk of electricity shortages and potentially lead to blackouts. The government, meanwhile, faces the challenge of ensuring that its climate commitments do not undermine electricity security.

  • Thailand Bets Heavily on Natural Gas For Its Economic Growth

    BANGKOK – As Southeast Asia rapidly emerges as a major global energy hub, Thailand’s state-backed conglomerate PTT Plc is aggressively expanding its liquefied natural gas (LNG) trading operations. Facing an expensive global shift toward green energy, Thai leaders are heavily utilizing natural gas to secure domestic economic growth and power stability. The nation aims to […]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *