8220the ark8221 era
|

“The Ark” in an era of ecological reckoning

In summer 2026, the power plant “Batcave” opened a group exhibition The Ark curated by renowned painter Eric Fischl alongside Powerhouse Arts President Eric Shiner. Bringing together roughly 90 animal sculptures by a multigenerational line-up of international artists. The exhibition uses the ancient narrative of the Great Flood as a mirror for modern ecological and cultural turmoil.

The concept behind The Ark draws directly from the myth of the Deluge, an archetypal narrative found across diverse world traditions where catastrophic waters sweep away the old world to test human stewardship and resilience. Yet rather than adopting a purely apocalyptic or alarmist tone, the exhibition framing focuses on empathy, kinship, and survival. Co-curator Eric Fischl notes that animal sculpture offers a unique vehicle for exploring profound existential truths. Animal sculpture also captures raw instinct and sublime wonder through physical form. By placing non-human creatures at the center of the narrative, the exhibition encourages viewers to rethink their place within the broader web of life. 

From Historic Whaling Port to Post-Industrial Sanctuary

The journey of The Ark mirrors its thematic concern with changing environments. An earlier, smaller iteration of the show debuted at The Church in Sag Harbor, Long Island. A historic coastal town deeply tied to the 19th-century whaling industry. In that seaside context, the sculptures called to mind maritime history and marine life under threat.

When relocated and expanded for Powerhouse Arts in Brooklyn, the narrative shifted dramatically toward urban ecology and environmental remediation. Displaying ninety animal figures inside a rehabilitated power plant adjacent to heavily polluted urban waters creates a poignant visual tension. The physical site itself acts as a metaphor: an industrial relic turned creative sanctuary, witnessing the slow process of ecological recovery alongside the artistic preservation of animal life.

Masterpieces of Instinct and Form

The roster of participating artists spans decades and stylistic movements, uniting legendary figures of contemporary art with bold emerging voices.

Pioneering Figures: Works by artists such as Maurizio Cattelan, Kiki Smith, Bruce Nauman, Sarah Lucas, and Jim Dine showcase how animals have long served as psychological stand-ins for human vulnerability, angst, and desire.

Expanded Roster for Brooklyn: Newly added works by artists including Wangechi Mutu, Cannupa Hanska Luger, François-Xavier Lalanne, Nohemí Pérez, and Nari Ward introduce critical perspectives on Indigenous land sovereignty, post-colonial environments, and urban material reuse.

Craft and Material Labor: Because Powerhouse Arts functions primarily as a fabrication facility, the exhibition doubles as a tribute to artistic craftsmanship. Visitors encounter bronze beasts, woven totems, carved wood, and reassembled found materials, celebrating the tactile labor behind each creation.

 

By encouraging close physical encounters with these sculpted beasts, The Ark bridges the gap between artistic tradition and ecological activism. It asks visitors to consider what merits saving when tides rise. It is suggesting that compassion for vulnerable creatures may well be our most essential anchor in turbulent times.

Similar Posts

  • How breakfast supports children’s mental health

    Health experts say that starting the day with a healthy breakfast is important for children’s energy growth and mental development.  However many children go to school without eating anything in the morning. This habit can affect their health mood and studies. Skipping breakfast is common among school going children. Some children do not feel hungry in the morning while others leave home without eating because they are in a hurry. Experts warn that this routine can lead to tiredness low energy poor concentration and irritability. According to Health line it is not only important what children eat for breakfast but also where and how they eat it.  Research suggests that regularly skipping breakfast or having breakfast outside the home may be linked to a higher risk of emotional and behavioral problems among children and teenagers. A spanish national health survey collected information from parents and guardians of 3,772 children between the ages of 4 and 14.  The study looked at their breakfast habits as well as their mental well being self esteem mood and anxiety levels. The findings showed that eating breakfast outside the home could have negative effects similar to skipping breakfast completely.  Experts believe that a balanced home prepared breakfast can support children’s physical growth as well as their mental and emotional well being. A nutritious breakfast may also help improve children’s memory attention and ability to learn.  These benefits can make it easier for them to stay focused in class and perform better at school. Experts advise parents to plan breakfast in advance if mornings are busy.  Some foods can even be prepared the night before. Most importantly parents should try not to send children to school on an empty stomach as a healthy breakfast can help them stay active, focused and ready to learn throughout the day.

  • |

    How canvas and color rescued Winston Churchill

    When history pictures Sir Winston Churchill, it summons the same iconic image of the stoic wartime leader. This typical leader with a bulldog scowl possesses cigar clamped between his teeth and a V-for-victory sign raised to a resilient nation. Yet behind the fierce political maneuvers lay a deeply sensitive man fighting severe emotional exhaustion. There’s a major landmark exhibition in London, titled Winston Churchill: The Painter. It has kept Britain’s titan grounded: his lifelong, intense passion for oil painting. The 1915 Catalyst Churchill did not pick up a paintbrush as a youth or a rested pensioner. He was forty years old and engulfed in the darkest catastrophe of his career. Following the disastrous Gallipoli campaign in 1915 during the First World War, Churchill was stripped of his post at the Admiralty. He got abruptly casted into political exile. So, he felt his mind consumed by overwhelming anxiety and listlessness. He had described himself as a deep-sea creature suddenly hauled to the surface. He suffered from a terrifying drop in pressure. In desperation, he picked up a set of children’s paints belonging to his young family members. What began as a tentative experiment to stave off despair quickly blossomed into an obsession. As Churchill would later recall, The Muse of Painting came to my rescue. The canvas provided something his turbulent political career rarely allowed: a realm where he held absolute command over every stroke, texture, and hue. From Cautious Strokes to Bold Expressionism The exhibition traces Churchill’s artistic maturation across five decades and more than fifty rare works, many loaned from private collections where they have remained hidden from public view for generations. Initially guided by artistic mentors such as Sir John Lavery and Sir William Nicholson, Churchill’s early works were cautious and subdued, capturing war-torn landscapes on the Western Front during his subsequent military service in France. However, as his confidence grew, so too did his appetite for vibrant color and energetic compositions. Influenced by French Post-Impressionism, Churchill developed an eye for brilliant light and rich pigment. He famously declared his disdain for muted palettes, writing that he felt genuine pity for poor, timid browns in favor of unapologetic cobalt blues, emerald greens, and fiery terracottas. Whether rendering the lush water garden at Chartwell or capturing the sun-drenched architectural marvels of Marrakech, Churchill painted with the same he brought to the House of Commons. Morocco, in particular, held a magical appeal for him. He returned there six times, captivated by the dramatic contrast between the snow-capped Atlas Mountains and the luminous desert plains. Art as Solace and Soft Diplomacy For Churchill, painting was never a mere hobby to kill time; it was a psychological anchor and a companion through severe personal tragedies. When his three-year-old daughter Marigold tragically died of sepsis in 1921, or when political fortunes ebbed during his wilderness years in the 1930s, Churchill retreated to his studio at Chartwell. Surrounded by paint tubes housed in old cigar humidors, he labored for hours at his easel, finding peace in the disciplined focus required to translate nature onto canvas. Beyond personal healing, his artwork doubled as subtle political allegory and warm diplomacy. Paintings like The Beach at Walmer (1938) depicted a historical cannon watching over innocent swimmers. This artwork hinted at his growing anxiety over looming European conflict long before others acknowledged the threat. Later in life, he frequently gifted canvases to world leaders, bodyguards, and trusted confidants, using his art as a bridge of personal warmth.  A Portrait of the Man Ultimately, exploring Churchill’s canvases fundamentally reframes our understanding of one of history’s most formidable figures. The bold brushstrokes reveal an individual far more vulnerable, contemplative, and joyful than the uncompromising statesman of public memory. By stepping behind his easel, we discover that the stubborn courage that helped save the free world was nurtured, in no small part, by the quiet sanctuary of color and light.  

  • Plants reach Space as scientists study growth in orbit

    Green plants have now made their way to the International Space Station. NASA astronaut Jessica Meir who is commanding Expedition 75 aboard the International Space Station has shared pictures of the plants on social media platform X. Jessica Meir said that the Expedition 75 crew has welcomed some new members and they are none other than Russian plants. She explained that the plants include Red Russian kale and wasabi mustard. The crew members are taking care of the plants during their free time. The astronaut explained that the purpose of the experiment is to understand how plants grow in the open cabin environment of the International Space Station compared with their natural environment. The research also aims to examine how storing seeds in orbit affects their viability or ability to successfully grow. Jessica Meir added that having plants aboard the spacecraft feels like a form of “nature therapy.”

  • | |

    Documentary film on the struggle for Joint Elector…

    By Yassar Talib Aiman Zameer Lahore: The Centre for Social Justice (CSJ) held a screening of its documentary film, A Separation Refused, highlighting the Movement for the Restoration of the Joint Electorate in Pakistan, at a local hotel in Lahore. The 20-minute documentary film, by the award-winning the producer and director, CSJ and Dawood Akhtar Murad, traces the culmination of the world unique Separate Electorate system in Pakistan’s history and the movement for the restoration of the Joint Electorate in Pakistan especially during the 1990s to 2001. The film chronicles the efforts of civil society organizations, political leaders, faith communities, and human rights advocates who campaigned for equal citizenship and inclusive democratic participation for religious minorities. Using historical accounts and personal testimonies, the film illustrates how sustained advocacy contributed to democratic reforms and continues to inspire efforts towards equality, pluralism, social cohesion, and the protection of constitutional rights. Featuring over a dozen interviews, it brings together insights from Hina Jilani, Cardinal Joseph Coutts, Dr. Charles Amjad Ali, Dr. Yaqoob Bangash, and other prominent voices offering diverse perspectives youth, clergy and a parliamentarian. The even also premiered a song Hum Juda Nahein (We Are Not Separate) that expressed the The screenings were followed by an interactive panel discussion explored the progress made towards equal citizenship and the continuing challenges to the democratic participation of religious minorities in Pakistan. The panelists, Wajahat Masood a public intellectual and Peter Jacob, answered the questions while the academic Faaria Khan moderated the discussion. While addressing the participants, Wajahat Masood, said that democracy is based on the principle of equal citizenship and that the categorization of citizens into majorities and minorities reflects a constitutional anomaly. Referring to the Separate Electorate system, he noted that institutionalizing such divisions weakened democratic systems and undermined the principle of equal political participation. In response to a question on the rationale behind the documentary, Peter Jacob, Executive Director CSJ, said that the importance of the movement warranted a careful reading of the history. He noted that the film was developed to preserve authentic accounts of the struggle for the restoration of the Joint Electorate and to address competing interpretations of history and misunderstandings. He also emphasized the need for constitutional reforms to strengthen equal citizenship. He called for a review of Articles 41 and 91 of the Constitution, to remove precondition of religious affiliation for the offices of the President and Prime Minister. Moreover, implementation of Article 22(1) of the constitution of Pakistan that guarantees unbiased education. In the open discussion, participants emphasized that the message of documentary film highlighting constitutional rights, democratic inclusion, should be screened more widely through universities, arts councils, mainstream media, and other public platforms to encourage informed dialogue and greater public awareness. They further stressed that equal citizenship is not solely the concern of religious minorities but a shared national responsibility, and called for greater participation and support from the majority community in future advocacy and dialogue. At the end the participants reaffirmed a shared commitment to advancing constitutional rights, equal citizenship, participatory democracy, and peaceful coexistence through collective action.

  • Whitening creams may damage your skin

    Many people use skin whitening creams and bleaching products to make their skin look lighter and brighter. While these products may change skin tone for a short time experts say they can cause serious skin problems if used for a long period. In Pakistan and many other Asian countries skin lightening creams are widely used. Many people buy and use these products without first talking to a dermatologist. According to skin experts many whitening creams contain strong chemicals and steroids. These ingredients can make the skin appear lighter for a while but they may also damage the skin over time and lead to long lasting problems. One common side effect is acne. Experts say corticosteroids found in some creams can make the skin look smooth at first but continued use may trigger pimples. These pimples can later leave permanent dark marks or scars. This problem can affect both men and women. Some whitening creams also contain hydroquinone. Research suggests that using hydroquinone for a long time may cause a condition called exogenous ochronosis. This condition leads to blue or dark patches on the skin especially in people with sensitive skin. These marks can be difficult to hide even with makeup. Another possible risk is dermatitis a skin condition that causes irritation and inflammation. It may lead to redness itching, swelling, dry skin, rashes blisters and in severe cases painful sores. Dermatologists advise stopping the use of any whitening cream if you notice redness itching swelling unusual spots or other skin changes. They recommend seeking advice from a qualified skin specialist instead of relying on products that promise quick results. Protecting your skin and following professional medical advice is a safer and healthier choice.

  • Riyadh, Ankara, Islamabad — and the Empty Chair in New Delhi

    By Rai Saad Ali Three folders, two green and one crimson, changed hands beneath a portrait of Saudi King Salman at Al-Safa Palace in Mecca, the ink still fresh on the pages inside. Erdoğan, Crown Prince Muhammad bin Salman and Shehbaz Sharif held them up for the cameras at the Makkah Al-Mukarramah Summit for Joint Defence on August 7th, 2026. It was a carefully staged image, and the message was unmistakable: three of the Muslim world’s most consequential states, standing together in Islam’s holiest city, making clear that the region’s old security order is no longer one whose terms they are content merely to accept. The Mecca Joint Defence Agreement, signed that day by Türkiye, Saudi Arabia and Pakistan, commits each signatory to treat an armed attack against any one of them as an attack against all three. It builds on the bilateral Strategic Mutual Defence Agreement signed by Islamabad and Riyadh in 2025, but Türkiye’s accession changes the strategic arithmetic considerably. What was previously a two-country understanding, rooted in a decades-old relationship, is now a trilateral framework spanning the eastern Mediterranean, the Gulf and South Asia — and it was signed without so much as a courtesy call to New Delhi. That mutual-defence clause is exactly what has prompted comparisons to NATO’s Article 5, which treats an attack on one member as an attack on all. But the parallel does not hold up well under scrutiny. It would be misleading to oversell this agreement as a “Muslim NATO.” It is not one. The pact names no adversary, creates no joint military command, and does not specify what response would be required if a signatory were attacked. It establishes a framework for defence cooperation and coordination rather than a NATO-style alliance with clearly defined operational commitments, and Saudi officials have stressed that the agreement is defensive in character and not directed against any particular country. That distinction matters. NATO is more than seventy years old and has evolved into a mature institutional and military alliance over generations; the Mecca Agreement is still in its infancy. Over time, it could develop stronger institutions and deeper coordination that bring it closer in character to NATO. For now, that remains a possibility rather than an established trajectory. Yet dismissing the agreement as merely aspirational would be its own mistake. Frameworks matter, especially when they are signed in Mecca rather than in a foreign ministry conference room. The choice of venue was not incidental. It was a statement about whose summit this is, and who now gets to convene the Muslim world’s most powerful states at a moment when Washington’s security guarantees have begun to look less than absolute. That erosion of confidence in Washington is precisely what makes the partnership’s internal logic so coherent: each partner brings something the others lack, and that complementarity is the pact’s real substance. Turkey supplies NATO’s second-largest standing military and an increasingly self-sufficient defence-industrial base — the same industry that in 2023 sold Saudi Arabia drones in what Ankara called its largest defence export deal to date, and which has for years supplied Pakistan with warships and trainer aircraft. Pakistan brings the only nuclear deterrent in the Muslim world and a military establishment with decades of experience training and advising Gulf forces. Saudi Arabia brings the capital and the religious legitimacy that only the custodian of the two holy mosques can offer. What ties these three complementary roles together is a detail that deserves precision rather than a slogan. Pakistan’s air force flies the JF-17 Thunder, co-produced with China. Türkiye, a NATO member since 1952, has simultaneously built its own defence-industrial relationship with Beijing even as it remains formally inside the Western alliance system. That a NATO state, a nuclear-armed South Asian state with deep Chinese defence ties, and the Gulf’s foremost oil power can now sit inside the same mutual-defence framework shows how far the unipolar security order of the post-Cold War decades has already eroded. This is not a Pakistani ambition imposed on the region. It is a regional response to a security vacuum that Washington’s and Tel Aviv’s conduct in West Asia has itself created. The timing explains the substance. The pact was signed more than five months into the US-Israel war on Iran, a conflict that has sent missile and drone fire onto Gulf infrastructure and shipping, with Houthi strikes compounding the sense among Gulf capitals that American deterrence no longer covers them the way it once did. Riyadh, battered directly by this spillover, has drawn the obvious conclusion: a security guarantee is only as good as the willingness of the guarantor to honour it, and Washington’s recent conduct has not inspired confidence on that score. Ankara and Islamabad, for their part, were the two capitals best positioned to answer that call — one with hard power, the other with a record of reliability as a security partner to the Kingdom stretching back decades, long before this agreement made it formal. While Ankara and Islamabad were positioning themselves as reliable partners, New Delhi’s response has been telling in its caution. The Ministry of External Affairs said only that India is “closely following” developments and will “study the implications” — the language of a capital reacting to events it did not shape, rather than one setting the regional agenda. That contrast is the real story here, more than any single clause in the agreement’s text. That caution is not merely rhetorical. The substantive concern for India is not abstract: analysts have already flagged the live question of how a mutual-defence clause would be read if India were to conduct cross-border counter-terror operations against targets inside Pakistan, as it has in the past — even as others note such operations sit in a different legal category from state-on-state aggression. That ambiguity is itself a diplomatic cost to India: a Gulf partner it has spent two decades cultivating on energy, trade and counter-terrorism cooperation has now formally elevated Pakistan to treaty-partner status, indifferent to how

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *