trump drops major
| | | | |

Trump drops major statement on Iran: what China an…

Washington: U.S. President Donald Trump has said he does not believe that China or Russia are supplying weapons to Iran, citing assurances he received from the leaders of both countries.

Speaking to reporters, Trump said Chinese President Xi Jinping had assured him that Beijing would not provide weapons to Iran under any circumstances. According to Trump, the Chinese leader also stated that the policy applies to Chinese companies, preventing them from supplying arms to Tehran.

Trump said he trusts President Xi’s commitment in the context of U.S.-China relations and believes China is adhering to that position.

The U.S. president also said Russian President Vladimir Putin had informed him that Moscow would not sell weapons to Iran.

Trump’s remarks come amid continued international attention on Iran’s military capabilities and regional security. However, he did not provide additional details or evidence to support the statements, nor did he elaborate on whether the assurances were part of recent diplomatic discussions.

The comments reflect Washington’s ongoing focus on limiting the transfer of advanced military equipment to Iran as regional tensions and global security concerns continue to evolve.

Similar Posts

  • | |

    Punjab launches 1st overseas digital land registry

    LAHORE: In a landmark move aimed at simplifying property transactions for overseas Pakistanis, the Punjab Land Records Authority (PLRA), in collaboration with the Board of Revenue Punjab, has successfully completed the province’s first fully digital land registration through the Pakistan High Commission in London. The initiative marks a significant step toward modernizing land services, allowing Pakistanis living abroad to buy, sell, and transfer property in Punjab without the need to travel back to the country. By introducing a secure digital process, the system is designed to make property transactions faster, more transparent, and better protected against fraud. The first transaction under the new framework involved a Pakistani citizen based in London who transferred ownership of land located in Dina, Punjab, to a buyer in Pakistan. The seller’s statement was recorded remotely through a secure digital link, while the entire legal registration process was completed electronically in accordance with official procedures. Director General of the Punjab Land Records Authority, Ikram-ul-Haq, described the successful registration as a major milestone in strengthening the confidence of overseas Pakistanis and improving transparency in land dealings. He said the initiative reflects the government’s commitment to delivering international-standard public services through technology while promoting efficient and citizen-friendly governance. According to the PLRA, the service is currently available to Pakistanis residing in the United Kingdom. Authorities plan to expand the facility to Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates within the next 30 days through continued collaboration between the Punjab Land Records Authority and Pakistan’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Officials believe the digital registration system will make property ownership and transfers significantly more convenient for overseas Pakistanis while reinforcing trust in Pakistan’s land administration through secure and technology-driven services.

  • |

    Priyanka Chopra’s mother reacts to Kriti Sanon’s outfit controversy

    Indian actress Kriti Sanon’s Raksha Bandhan advertisement became the centre of an online debate over clothing, cultural traditions and expectations surrounding women’s appearance during festivals. The discussion gained further attention after Madhu Chopra, mother of Priyanka Chopra Jonas, shared her views on personal choice, dignity and dressing appropriately for different occasions. Speaking at the Women Building Cinema Together event in Mumbai, Madhu acknowledged that individuals should have the freedom to make their own choices. However, she stressed that personal freedom should also be balanced with awareness of the occasion and respect for other people’s values. “My body, my choice is right, but woh daayra zaruri hai,” Madhu said while discussing the issue. She explained that although people have the right to decide what they want to wear, there is also a need to consider the setting and maintain a certain level of dignity. According to her, clothing choices can be personal while still taking into account the cultural or social environment in which a person appears. Madhu also referred to the way her children dress for professional commitments. She said that her children, including Priyanka, wear different kinds of outfits depending on their work and personal preferences. However, she added that clothing should also be aesthetically suitable for the occasion. “My kids also wear such clothes, for work and because they like wearing but I also feel, they need to look good aesthetically as per the occasion,” she said. Her comments came amid criticism surrounding a Raksha Bandhan campaign by jewellery brand GIVA featuring Kriti Sanon. The advertisement showed Kriti in an Indo-Western outfit while celebrating the festival by tying a rakhi to her onscreen brother as well as her pet dog. The campaign quickly attracted criticism on social media, with some viewers questioning whether the actress’s outfit was appropriate for a festival associated with family traditions and cultural values. The debate soon expanded beyond the advertisement itself, with people discussing whether women should be expected to follow particular dress codes during traditional celebrations. Following the backlash, GIVA removed the advertisement from its social media platforms. The jewellery brand later clarified that it respected Indian culture, traditions and festivals and said that there had been no intention to hurt anyone’s sentiments through the campaign. Kriti subsequently addressed the controversy through her Instagram Stories. Rather than focusing on the clothes featured in the advertisement, the actress highlighted the emotional meaning behind Raksha Bandhan. She argued that the festival should primarily be understood through the relationships, affection and emotions shared between loved ones. “The essence of festivals is not in the clothes you wear; it is in the emotions and meaning you attach to the traditions,” Kriti wrote. The actress also spoke about her own relationship with her sister and the role her pets play in her life. She described Raksha Bandhan as a celebration of care, protection, love and prayers for the wellbeing of family members. Kriti further questioned the tendency to judge women primarily through their clothing during traditional occasions. She suggested that culture and traditions should not be reduced to the clothes a woman chooses to wear, particularly when the deeper meaning of a festival lies in relationships and emotions. The contrasting perspectives from Kriti and Madhu kept the conversation going online. While Kriti focused on personal choice and the emotional significance of festivals, Madhu emphasised the importance of balancing individual freedom with the nature of the occasion and respect for cultural values. The controversy ultimately became part of a wider discussion about how women are viewed during traditional celebrations and whether their clothing should determine how respectfully they are perceived. It also highlighted the continuing debate between personal expression and cultural expectations, particularly when celebrities and brands use traditional festivals in advertising campaigns.

  • Hun Sen Denies Reports of Foreign Troops in Cambodia

    BANGKOK – Cambodian leader Hun Sen has issued a firm denial of recent Thai media reports alleging that Russian soldiers or other foreign mercenaries are participating in hostilities on Cambodia’s side of the border conflict. In a statement posted on his official Facebook page, Hun Sen called the reports inaccurate and warned they risk damaging […]

  • | |

    Here’s why Disney+ cancelled Marvel’s Wonder Man

    Marvel Studios has reportedly cancelled Wonder Man after its first season, with the Disney+ series not expected to return for a second instalment as the company continues reshaping its television strategy. According to Variety, Marvel never planned to move forward with a second season in the traditional way. A source told the publication that a writers’ room for a follow-up season was never opened, and members of the creative team have since been released from the project. The comedy-drama starred Yahya Abdul-Mateen II as aspiring actor Simon Williams, alongside Ben Kingsley, who reprised his Marvel role as Trevor Slattery. The cast also included X Mayo, Demetrius Grosse, Zlatko Burić, Arian Moayed and Olivia Thirlby. The series was created by Destin Daniel Cretton and Andrew Guest. Cretton directed the opening two episodes, while Guest served as the show’s executive producer and showrunner. Despite its reported cancellation, Wonder Man received a strong response from critics. The show’s first season earned a 91% critics’ score on Rotten Tomatoes, making it one of Marvel Television’s best-reviewed recent projects. Yahya Abdul-Mateen II also received an Emmy Award nomination for Outstanding Lead Actor in a Comedy Series for his performance. The nomination marked another milestone in his career, making him the first live-action performer to receive Emmy recognition for both Marvel and DC projects after previously winning for HBO’s Watchmen. Television critic Alison Herman praised the performances of the two lead actors, writing, “Abdul-Mateen and Kingsley make their characters equally ridiculous and romantic, urged on by a motivation more intimate and individual than saving the world.” Marvel described the series through its official synopsis, stating, “Aspiring Hollywood actor Simon Williams (Abdul Mateen) is struggling to get his career off the ground. During a chance meeting with Trevor Slattery (Kingsley), an actor whose biggest roles may be well behind him, Simon learns legendary director Von Kovak (Burić) is remaking the superhero film ‘Wonder Man.’” The synopsis continues, “These two actors at opposite ends of their careers doggedly pursue life-changing roles in this film as audiences get a peek behind the curtain of the entertainment industry.” Although Disney has not released official streaming figures, Wonder Man briefly reached No. 8 on Nielsen’s Streaming Originals chart during its debut week before dropping out of the rankings the following week. The reported cancellation comes as Disney continues reducing its Marvel television output in favour of fewer, more focused productions. The studio has increasingly shifted away from producing a large number of interconnected streaming series, instead prioritising projects with stronger long-term potential. The latest development is particularly surprising because Wonder Man had reportedly been greenlit for a second season in March, only weeks after its debut. However, according to Variety, those plans ultimately did not progress into active development, with no writers’ room ever being assembled. While Marvel Studios has not officially commented on the report, the decision signals another step in Disney’s broader effort to streamline its Marvel Television slate despite the show’s positive reviews and award recognition.

  • | |

    Trump targets birthright citizenship again after c…

    WASHINGTON: US President Donald Trump has signed two executive orders seeking to restrict birthright citizenship, renewing his administration’s challenge to a constitutional provision just weeks after the Supreme Court rejected his earlier attempt. The new orders, signed on Thursday, take a narrower approach than Trump’s previous directive and focus on specific categories of children born in the United States. The administration argues that the measures fall outside the scope of the Supreme Court’s June 30 ruling. Birthright citizenship has been a central issue in Trump’s immigration agenda, with the White House particularly targeting what it describes as “birth tourism” — a practice in which pregnant foreign nationals travel to the US to give birth so their children can obtain American citizenship. At the signing ceremony in the Oval Office, White House aide Stephen Miller said the administration was formally moving to end the practice, declaring that “birth tourism” was banned under the new orders. The executive orders also seek to restrict citizenship rights for children born to certain foreign government employees and children of people classified as “alien enemies.” They could potentially have implications for people born in US territories if Congress approves proposed legislation seeking to end automatic citizenship there. Trump’s latest move comes only weeks after the Supreme Court ruled 6-3 against his earlier attempt to restrict birthright citizenship. His first executive order, issued in 2025, instructed federal agencies not to recognise citizenship for children born in the US when neither parent was an American citizen or lawful permanent resident. The 14th Amendment has traditionally been interpreted as guaranteeing citizenship to people born on US soil, with limited exceptions including children of foreign diplomats and members of an enemy occupying force. Trump criticised the Supreme Court ruling, calling it a “very unfortunate decision” and arguing that businesses and individuals were exploiting the citizenship system through birth tourism. However, legal experts and immigrant rights groups have questioned whether the new orders can withstand judicial scrutiny. The American Civil Liberties Union predicted that the administration’s latest effort would fail in court, while advocates accused Trump of attempting to bypass the Supreme Court. Deborah Fleischaker of UnidosUS said the high court had recently reaffirmed that birthright citizenship was a constitutional guarantee and argued that presidents could not alter it through executive action. The 14th Amendment’s Citizenship Clause states that all persons born or naturalised in the United States and subject to its jurisdiction are US citizens. The Supreme Court’s June ruling, Chief Justice John Roberts wrote, reaffirmed the principle that citizenship represents the right to participate fully in the country’s political community. The latest orders are therefore expected to trigger another legal battle, potentially putting Trump’s immigration policies and the constitutional interpretation of birthright citizenship back before the courts.

  • | |

    Former MPA accuses ex-wife of AI image deception

    Former Sindh Assembly member Ghulam Rasool Unar has accused his former wife of allegedly deceiving him through artificial intelligence-generated images. The case was heard by the Additional District and Sessions Court South in Karachi. During the hearing, the former MPA’s ex-wife opposed the petition filed by Unar. Her lawyer rejected several claims made in the petition. He said the former MPA’s claim that he had established contact with the woman through social media was not correct. The lawyer also told the court that the applicant had accepted certain conditions before the marriage. He said these conditions were acknowledged through an affidavit signed before the couple’s marriage. The dispute relates to allegations about photographs allegedly shared before the marriage. A few days earlier, Ghulam Rasool Unar had approached the court with his allegations. In his petition, he claimed that he had communicated with the woman through social media before their marriage. According to the former MPA, photographs were shared with him during their communication. He claimed that the woman appeared different in those photographs. Unar alleged that he saw his former wife in person for the first time after the marriage. He claimed that her appearance was completely different from the photographs he had received before the marriage. The former lawmaker alleged that the photographs had been manipulated or generated using artificial intelligence. He said the difference between the images and the woman’s actual appearance led him to distance himself from her. Unar further told the court that he stopped maintaining contact with the woman after seeing her in person. He also stated in his petition that he divorced her on August 9. The divorce followed the dispute over the alleged differences between the photographs and her actual appearance, according to his account. The former wife’s lawyer, however, disputed the allegations. The defence maintained that the claims made by the former MPA should not be accepted without proper legal examination. The court proceedings have brought attention to the growing legal questions surrounding AI-generated and digitally manipulated images. Such technology can create highly realistic photographs and has raised concerns about identity, consent and online deception. The case is still being heard. The allegations made by the former MPA have not been established by the court, while his former wife has challenged his claims through her legal counsel.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *