court rules meta
| | |

US court rules Meta, others must face thousands of social media addiction suits

ByJustpaste.in

A US appeals court on Monday, August 10, allowed thousands of lawsuits to move forward against Meta Platforms, Alphabet’s Google, ByteDance’s TikTok and Snap Inc’s Snapchat over claims they designed their products to be addictive to young users.

The San Francisco-based 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals rejected an appeal by Meta and TikTok seeking to overturn a lower court ruling requiring them to face more than 3,000 lawsuits filed in federal court, saying the companies had appealed too early.

The companies had argued that Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996 — which generally shields online companies from claims over content posted by their users — also bars lawsuits claiming they failed to warn the public about the addictive nature of their platforms.

Must Read

Against oppressive algorithms, addictive design, parents can’t always keep up


Against oppressive algorithms, addictive design, parents can’t always keep up

Most appeals come after a case has concluded with a ruling or a verdict. The companies contended that they should not have to wait until the litigation ends to challenge the lower court’s rejection of their immunity defense. But the 9th Circuit said Section 230 provides a defense to liability, not immunity from lawsuits, so the appeal was premature.

Meta loses bid to delay multistate trial

The court also denied Meta’s bid to postpone a trial beginning on Wednesday in a lawsuit brought by 29 state attorneys general alleging that the company illegally collected and used children’s data, designed its social media platforms to keep young users hooked, and misled consumers about their safety. The company had argued that the trial couldn’t go forward while the appeal had been outstanding.

The news comes days after a New Mexico judge found Meta had created a public nuisance in the state and ordered it to pay $567 million into a teen mental health fund and implement youth-safety measures.

A spokesperson for Meta declined to comment.

Representatives for TikTok did not immediately respond to requests for comment on Monday’s ruling.

Lexi Hazam and Previn Warren, attorneys representing thousands of school districts and individuals suing Meta and other companies in the litigation over the claims in federal court, said in a statement the ruling would allow the states’ trial to move forward, as well as a trial over claims brought by school districts scheduled for February.

“A trial is how the public finds out what Meta knew about its products’ impact on children, when it knew it, and what it chose to do with that knowledge,” the attorneys said. “Meta has fought to keep that evidence from the public.”

Thousands of lawsuits

Filed by states, municipalities, school districts and individuals, the lawsuits allege that social media companies intentionally addicted young users, contributing to surging depression, anxiety and body-image issues and a broader mental health crisis among American youth in recent years.

Parents, school districts, states and other plaintiffs had argued that the trial court’s ruling was not final and therefore could not be appealed. But they also objected to the companies’ arguments about Section 230, saying it does not cover claims related to how they operate and design their products.

The cases, which have been centralized before US District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers in Oakland, California, seek damages, penalties and restitution from the companies. The companies appealed Rogers’ orders in 2023 and 2024 that largely allowed the litigation to move forward.

The companies are facing hundreds of additional lawsuits over similar claims in state court, with approximately 3,300 of them in a consolidated proceeding in California state court.

In the first lawsuit to go to trial in the California litigation, and a closely watched test of how juries might respond to similar claims, a Los Angeles jury in March found Meta and Google negligent for designing social media platforms that harm young people. The jury awarded $6 million to a young woman who says she became addicted to Instagram and YouTube as a child.

The New Mexico public nuisance ruling against Meta followed an earlier phase in the trial, in which a jury in March ordered it to pay $375 million after finding it had misled consumers about the safety of its platforms.

Both Meta and Google, which have denied the claims in those cases, said they would appeal. – Rappler.com

Similar Posts

  • |

    Bangladesh signals interest in joining Pakistan-Saudi Arabia-Türkiye defence framework

    ByJustpaste.in

      DHAKA: Bangladesh has indicated that it is open to joining the Makkah Joint Defence Agreement signed by Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and Türkiye, as Dhaka looks to broaden its strategic partnerships while maintaining a foreign policy centred on national interests. According to the state-run Bangladesh Sangbad Sangstha (BSS), Bangladesh Prime Minister’s Adviser for Foreign Affairs Humayun Kobir said the country maintained a positive outlook towards the possibility of becoming part of an economic or defence framework involving Saudi Arabia, Pakistan and Türkiye. Kobir said any decision regarding participation would be considered in light of Bangladesh’s national interests as well as changing global economic and trade dynamics. He stressed that Dhaka was pursuing a balanced foreign policy under its “Bangladesh First”approach, with national priorities remaining at the heart of its international engagement. He said Bangladesh was also working to strengthen its bilateral relationship with Pakistan through normal diplomatic channels. According to Kobir, the two countries were particularly focusing on expanding trade and improving people-to-people contacts and connectivity. The Bangladeshi adviser’s remarks come amid signs of improving diplomatic engagement between Dhaka and Islamabad. He also said Prime Minister Tarique Rahman’s proposed visit to Riyadh, following an invitation from Saudi Crown Prince and Prime Minister Mohammed bin Salman was expected to be finalised after the summer. The possibility of Bangladesh joining the defence framework comes shortly after Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and Türkiye signed the Makkah Joint Defence Agreement in Makkah on August 7. Under the agreement, an armed attack against any one of the three participating countries is to be treated as an attack against all three. The pact also provides a framework for greater defence cooperation, coordination and collective deterrence among the signatories. The agreement has attracted regional and international attention because of its potential to expand security cooperation among key Muslim-majority countries. Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan has described the arrangement as technically comparable to NATO’s Article 5 principle of collective defence, while emphasising that the agreement is not aimed at Iran or any other specific country. Ankara has also suggested that the framework could potentially be expanded to include additional regional states. Egypt has previously been mentioned as a possible participant in the broader security arrangement. Pakistan has similarly maintained that the agreement is defensive in character and is not directed against any particular country. Islamabad has also indicated that the framework remains open to states that are willing to support its principles and objectives. Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar has said the agreement does not seek to replace existing bilateral or multilateral defence and security arrangements. Instead, he said, it provides an additional platform for cooperation based on mutual respect, shared interests and peaceful resolution of disputes. Bangladesh’s latest position suggests that Dhaka is carefully assessing emerging regional partnerships while seeking to preserve strategic flexibility. Its potential participation could further broaden the Makkah agreement’s regional significance and strengthen cooperation among Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Türkiye and other interested countries. For Bangladesh, however, any decision to join would ultimately depend on how the proposed framework aligns with its national interests, foreign policy priorities and assessment of the evolving regional and global security environment.

  • |

    EU fines Google $1 billion over competition violations

    ByJustpaste.in

    The European Union has imposed a heavy fine on Google for allegedly using its dominance in the search engine sector to suppress other companies. According to a statement issued by the European Commission, Google illegally used its dominant position in the search engine market to reduce competition. The statement said that Google has been fined €890 million (around $1 billion) for this violation. The move is expected to increase trade tensions between the European Union and the United States as the Trump administration has warned of possible retaliatory measures and described EU trade policies as “unfair.” According to the European Commission, Google unfairly used its dominant search engine position to promote its own services including shopping, travel, gaming and other platforms reaching more users. The commission stated that Google placed its own services higher in search results while pushing competing services lower. The statement further explained that under the European Union’s Digital Markets Act, technology companies cannot show such biased behavior toward their own services and must follow transparent, fair and non-discriminatory policies. The European Commission also accused Google of unfairly preventing developers from informing users about alternative payment options on the Google Play Store as this could reduce Google’s service fees. This action was also considered a violation of the Digital Markets Act which aims to prevent large technology companies from establishing monopolies. According to the statement, Google must comply with the decision within 60 days otherwise additional penalties may be imposed. On the other hand, Google said in a statement that the decision would harm European consumers. This is not the first time the European Union has fined Google. In 2018, the EU imposed a $4.7 billion fine on Google over the alleged abuse of its dominance in the Android mobile operating system market and Google’s final appeal against the decision was rejected. In 2017, Google was fined $2.8 billion for abusing its dominance in the search sector while in 2024 its final appeal was also rejected.

  • | |

    ‘Patriotism has no single definition’: CJP lea…

    ByJustpaste.in

    NEW DELHI: Abhijeet Deepke, leader of India’s Cockroach Janata Party (CJP), has criticised the Indian government after being labelled a national security threat, saying patriotism should not be defined according to the government’s expectations. Speaking in an interview with an American television channel, Deepke said he considered himself a patriot but rejected the idea that citizens must demonstrate their patriotism in a particular way prescribed by the authorities. Deepke said he was deeply disappointed by the government’s decision to portray him as a threat to national security after he spoke out against the system and established the CJP. He had been living in the United States as an Indian student while holding an Indian passport. The CJP leader said he had decided to return to India from the United States, describing the move as an opportunity to demonstrate his commitment to the country and challenge the allegations made against him. His remarks come amid heightened political tensions surrounding youth-led protests and growing criticism of the government over its handling of dissent and political opposition.

  • | | |

    Ukraine claims strike on Russian weapons factory a…

    ByJustpaste.in

    Ukraine has claimed responsibility for a series of long-range strikes targeting key Russian military infrastructure, including a weapons components factory, a warship, and a cargo vessel allegedly linked to the transportation of Iranian military equipment. The announcement was made by Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, who said the operations were part of Kyiv’s continued efforts to weaken Russia’s military capabilities. In a statement posted on the social media platform X, Zelensky said Ukrainian forces carried out precision strikes overnight against facilities that support Russia’s ongoing military campaign. He described the attacks as a response to continued Russian assaults on Ukrainian cities and infrastructure. According to the Ukrainian president, one of the primary targets was a factory in Russia’s Kirov region that manufactures components used in weapons deployed against Ukraine. Zelensky noted that the facility is located approximately 1,200 kilometers (745 miles) from the Ukrainian border, highlighting the growing range of Ukraine’s strike capabilities. Ukraine also claimed to have targeted an oil refinery in Tyumen, a logistics facility in Yekaterinburg, and a fuel and supply depot in Rostov-on-Don. These locations are considered strategically important for supporting Russian military operations and logistics. In addition to the strikes inside Russia, Zelensky said Ukrainian forces achieved significant results in the Caspian Sea. He claimed that a Russian warship and vessels allegedly involved in transporting Iranian military-related cargo were also targeted during the operation. Ukraine has not released further details regarding the extent of the damage. Meanwhile, Iran’s Foreign Ministry confirmed that one of its commercial ships was hit in the Caspian Sea and strongly condemned the incident. Iranian officials said the attack caused an explosion aboard the vessel, killing one civilian and injuring another. Tehran described the strike as an act of aggression and accused Ukraine of attempting to broaden the Russia-Ukraine conflict. Iran also stated that it would safeguard its national interests and security while condemning any attacks on its civilian maritime assets. The incident has added another layer of tension to an already complex regional situation involving Russia, Ukraine, and Iran. The claims made by Ukraine and Iran have not been independently verified, and Russian authorities have not issued a detailed public response regarding the reported strikes. As the conflict continues, long-range attacks on military and logistical targets remain a significant feature of the ongoing war, reflecting the evolving nature of the battlefield and the growing strategic reach of both sides.

  • |

    Rahul Gandhi released after protest detention

    ByJustpaste.in

    Indian opposition leader Rahul Gandhi was released on Wednesday after being detained by police during a protest outside Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s residence in New Delhi. His release came as demonstrations over the country’s education system entered a third consecutive day. Gandhi joined protesters to express support for students demanding reforms in India’s examination system. During the protest, he accused the government of ignoring students’ concerns and criticized the police response to demonstrations held earlier this week. The protests are being led by the social media-driven Cockroach Janta Party (CJP), which has emerged as a major opposition movement calling for accountability and reforms in the country’s education sector. Protesters are demanding the resignation of Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan and greater transparency in national examinations. The movement has gained significant public attention after a series of examination-related controversies sparked widespread frustration among students and parents across the country. Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan said the government remains committed to addressing public concerns. In a statement, he acknowledged the need for accountability and reforms, adding that the government is working to improve the examination system and restore public confidence. Violence erupted during protests in New Delhi after clashes broke out between demonstrators and security forces. Police used tear gas and batons to disperse crowds after some protesters allegedly threw stones at officers. According to police, at least 60 civilians and 118 security personnel were injured during the unrest. Authorities said the situation was later brought under control, although security remained on high alert in several parts of the capital. Demonstrations also spread to other major cities, including Mumbai and Bengaluru, where hundreds of people gathered in solidarity with the student movement. On Wednesday, hundreds of protesters remained camped at Delhi’s Jantar Mantar protest site, vowing to continue their campaign until their demands are met. The CJP said it would maintain pressure on the government and continue nationwide demonstrations. The protests have become one of the most significant public challenges faced by Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s government since his re-election in 2024. Public anger has been fueled by repeated controversies surrounding India’s examination system. One of the biggest scandals involved the leak of a national medical entrance examination paper, forcing more than two million students to retake the test. Another dispute over the online evaluation of high school examinations further intensified criticism of the education system.

  • | |

    Araghchi says diplomacy possible if US changes course

    ByJustpaste.in

    Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi has said a return to diplomacy with the United States remains possible, but Washington must first accept that its pressure-based approach will not work. Araghchi made the remarks on Friday after holding what he described as constructive and creative discussions with Qatar’s Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Jassim Al Thani. The Iranian foreign minister said the United States should take steps to rebuild trust and engage Tehran through respectful dialogue. He also called on Washington to recognise Iran’s rights and honour commitments made under previous agreements. The comments come amid heightened tensions between Iran and the United States, particularly over sanctions, maritime restrictions and the future of the Strait of Hormuz. Iran and the US reached a 14-point memorandum of understanding in Islamabad in June through mediation by Pakistan and Qatar. The understanding included measures aimed at ending hostilities, reopening the Strait of Hormuz, removing a US naval blockade and beginning a 60-day negotiating process. Tehran has since accused Washington of failing to implement important parts of the agreement. Iranian officials have maintained that the Strait of Hormuz will not be fully reopened until the United States fulfils its commitments. The diplomatic dispute has also triggered a sharp exchange between Iranian and US officials. Iranian Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf criticised US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent after Bessent accused Tehran of spending large amounts of money abroad while Iranian citizens face economic difficulties. Ghalibaf rejected the criticism and argued that Washington should focus on its own domestic challenges rather than spending heavily on overseas military deployments and allies. The latest statements come as the United States maintains pressure on Iran and closely monitors maritime traffic in the Strait of Hormuz, one of the world’s most important energy routes. US Central Command said its forces had cleared sea mines from internationally recognised shipping lanes in the strait. Commander Admiral Brad Cooper said American military personnel from several branches had taken part in the operation. According to US officials, American forces have helped commercial vessels pass through the waterway while also stopping ships accused of attempting to bypass the maritime blockade. Iran, however, disputes Washington’s position and has warned that continued economic and maritime restrictions could provoke retaliation. Iranian Supreme National Security Council Secretary Mohsen Rezaei said Tehran would target US economic interests if the blockade continued. He also claimed that Iran had managed to maintain significant oil exports and establish alternative routes despite restrictions. Rezaei further warned against any military advance toward Beirut or southern Lebanon, calling the area a red line for Iran.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *