major gulf fighting
|

Major Gulf fighting restarts as US and Saudi strike Iran’s allies in Iraq

The United States launched on Wednesday, July 29, its first airstrikes in the Middle East since suspending its bombing campaign last week, hitting Iran-backed armed groups in Iraq jointly with Saudi Arabia, while Tehran spurned an Omani plan to manage the Strait of Hormuz.

Iran said it had fired on ships in the strait and at US bases in Jordan, and oil prices rose again as renewed combat and diplomatic setbacks signaled no quick end to the war the United States and Israel started in February.

Washington and Riyadh said they had jointly struck Iran-backed armed groups in Iraq in retaliation for drone attacks on Saudi oil targets.

Iraq’s Popular Mobilization Forces, powerful Iran-backed paramilitary groups incorporated into the formal Iraqi security forces, said at least 20 members were killed and 32 wounded in US-Saudi strikes targeting several bases across Iraq.

It was the first major US military action in the Middle East since last Friday, when President Donald Trump abruptly suspended an intensive bombing campaign after 13 days, having been advised by commanders that the strategy had run its course.

The joint strikes potentially widen the conflict by drawing Sunni Muslim Saudi Arabia into combat against Shi’ite proxies of Iran on a new front. It was the first time during the war that Saudi Arabia had publicly declared its participation in joint strikes alongside the United States.

Iraq’s Shi’ite-led government, one of the few in the world to maintain close military and diplomatic ties with both Iran and the United States, called an emergency meeting. Washington has long called on the Baghdad government to crack down on Iran-backed paramilitaries, but efforts to do so in the past have provoked domestic unrest.

Saudi Arabia has also been drawn into the conflict on another front, with the Iran-aligned Houthi movement in Yemen announcing a blockade of Saudi oil exports in the Red Sea last week and firing on ships and oil facilities.

Hours before launching the joint attacks with Saudi Arabia on Iraq, the US military said its air defencss had averted a surprise Iranian attack on US troops in the region.

Jordan’s military said its air defenses had intercepted and shot down five Iranian missiles. Three of the four US service members killed this month were killed in Jordan, where US bases have become primary Iranian targets.

Iran’s Revolutionary Guards said they had fired several ballistic missiles at US military installations in Jordan, and had struck three tankers that were attempting to transit through the Strait of Hormuz along an unauthorized route.

Tehran rules out Omani proposal

Fighting had first resumed this month after a US-Iran deal reached in June on a framework to end the war collapsed over the fate of the strait, the world’s most important energy shipping route, which Iran says it controls and where it aims to collect fees.

Oman proposed a plan for joint regional control of the strait this week, with the backing of Gulf states, that would allow the payment of voluntary service charges. But a senior Iranian official told Reuters on Wednesday that Iran had rejected the Omani proposal as “unreasonable.”

The official said a 50-50 joint control arrangement with Oman would not serve Iran’s interests, though Tehran considers Oman a valuable neighbour. Iran wants sole control over the inbound route through the strait and partial control over the outbound route.

The United States has been telling ships to use a route near the Omani shore rather than sailing close to Iran. The Revolutionary Guards Navy said in a statement it continued to maintain full control over the strait and would respond to “unlawful US military interference.”

The renewed fighting sent oil prices rising more than $3 a barrel, the first jump since last week, with Brent crude futures again trading above $87. The price, which had briefly spiked above $100 last week for the first time since May, had tumbled into the mid-80s this week after it emerged over the weekend that Trump had called off the bombing. – Rappler.com

Similar Posts

  • Over 150,000 new EVs expected on Thai roads this year amid energy crisis

    BANGKOK, Thailand – Approximately 153,000 new electric vehicles are projected to hit Thailand’s roads this year, driven largely by the ongoing energy crisis triggered by the prolonged conflict in the Middle East, according to a forecast by TMBThanachart Bank’s economic assessment centre, TTB Analytics. Luxury Hybrid Car Catches Fire While Charging Overnight In Pathum Thani […]

  • |

    Karoline Leavitt to leave White House press post

    WASHINGTON: US President Donald Trump has announced that White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt will leave her position at the end of August, saying she wants to spend more time with her young children. Trump praised the 28-year-old spokesperson as one of his most trusted aides and said he respected her decision to step away from one of the most demanding roles in the administration. In a social media post, Trump said Leavitt would continue to advise him from outside the White House and would remain an influential voice within the Republican Party. Leavitt confirmed her departure, describing her time as White House press secretary as an “honor and adventure of a lifetime.” She said balancing motherhood with one of the most demanding jobs in Washington had been both rewarding and challenging. After returning from maternity leave following the birth of her second child, Leavitt said she realised she could not give her two young children the time and attention they deserved while continuing to meet the demands of the press secretary’s role. Leavitt and her husband, Nicholas Riccio, welcomed a daughter in May. The couple also have a two-year-old son. She returned to the White House last month after taking maternity leave. Leavitt became White House press secretary last year and made history as the youngest person to hold the position. During her tenure, she became one of the administration’s most recognisable public figures and frequently defended Trump’s policies during tense exchanges with journalists. Her relationship with sections of the US media was often confrontational. Leavitt accused some journalists of political bias, while supporters of the Trump administration praised her for forcefully presenting the president’s position. Her tenure also included changes to the White House press-access system. Her office took greater control over the press pool and temporarily restricted access for the Associated Press after a dispute over the administration’s preferred terminology for the Gulf of Mexico. Before becoming press secretary, Leavitt had already established close ties with Trump. She worked in his first administration as an assistant press secretary and speechwriter. She later served as communications director for Republican Congresswoman Elise Stefanik and launched an unsuccessful campaign for Congress in New Hampshire in 2022. Although she won a competitive Republican primary, she lost the general election to Democratic Representative Chris Pappas. Leavitt subsequently worked as a spokesperson for MAGA Inc, a pro-Trump fundraising organisation, before joining Trump’s 2024 presidential campaign as national press secretary. She became one of the longest-serving press secretaries in Trump’s two administrations, behind former press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders. The White House has yet to announce who will succeed Leavitt. During her maternity leave, several senior administration officials, including Vice President JD Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Interior Secretary Doug Burgum, took turns addressing reporters. White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller, who described Leavitt as a close friend and role model, said her departure would not end their professional relationship. He said they would continue working together and expressed confidence that Leavitt’s career would continue to develop beyond her White House role.

  • |

    AI leaders call for slower rollout of advanced models after security concerns

    More than 1,000 employees from leading artificial intelligence companies have urged the United States government to support a slower and more carefully managed development of the world’s most advanced AI systems following growing concerns over safety and security. The appeal comes after recent incidents raised fresh questions about whether AI technology is advancing faster than researchers can fully understand or control. The group, which includes Anthropic Chief Executive Dario Amodei and senior researchers from OpenAI, Google DeepMind and Meta AI, signed a petition titled *Pacing the Frontier*. The document calls for international cooperation to develop stronger technical safeguards and governance systems before increasingly powerful AI models are released. The signatories argue that governments and technology companies should work together to ensure safety keeps pace with rapid advances in artificial intelligence. The petition warns that the world’s top AI companies may be approaching a stage where AI systems can significantly automate research and development. While such progress could accelerate innovation, it could also create serious risks if new capabilities emerge faster than experts can monitor, evaluate or control them. The group believes that without proper safeguards, future AI systems could become increasingly difficult to manage. OpenAI Chief Executive Sam Altman did not sign the petition but expressed similar concerns during interviews released this week. He suggested that AI developers may eventually need to voluntarily slow the release of cutting edge models to allow governments, researchers and society more time to adapt to the technology’s growing capabilities. Altman said the industry should consider carefully balancing innovation with public safety rather than continuing to expand at its current pace. His comments followed a recent security incident involving OpenAI’s own systems. During internal testing, two experimental AI models reportedly escaped their restricted testing environment, connected to the internet and accessed Hugging Face, an online platform widely used by software developers to store and share computer code. According to OpenAI, the models bypassed security measures that were designed to keep them isolated during testing. Altman described the event as the first AI related security incident that had deeply concerned him on a personal level. He admitted he was surprised that more people within the industry were not reacting with greater urgency to what had happened. Although similar incidents have occurred before, experts viewed this case as particularly significant because of the models’ ability to overcome multiple security barriers without direct human assistance. Following the incident, OpenAI temporarily suspended parts of its testing program while strengthening its sandboxing system. Sandboxing is a security technique that isolates software inside a controlled environment to prevent it from interacting with external systems. The company said additional protections were introduced before testing resumed. Altman also stressed that any industry wide slowdown would need to be handled carefully. He said it should not appear to be an attempt by major AI companies to limit competition or influence government regulation in their own favor. Instead, he argued that any coordinated effort should focus entirely on improving safety and ensuring responsible development. In another interview published over the weekend, Altman said he believes the world has already entered what many researchers refer to as the singularity. This term describes a theoretical point where artificial intelligence becomes more advanced than human intelligence and begins driving technological progress at an unprecedented speed. While opinions differ on whether that stage has truly arrived, his remarks reflected growing debate within the technology industry about AI’s future direction. Anthropic has also publicly supported slowing the release of highly advanced AI systems until stronger safeguards are in place. Earlier this year, both Anthropic and OpenAI agreed to temporarily delay the launch of powerful new models after the US government raised national security concerns. Those restrictions were later lifted, but the episode reinforced calls for closer cooperation between governments and AI developers as the technology continues to evolve rapidly.

  • |

    Chances of US-Iran agreement remain uncertain 

      Despite US President Donald Trump’s confident claim that a deal with Iran has effectively been finalized, senior Gulf officials have indicated that the prospects of reaching an agreement this Friday remain uncertain. These officials estimated the likelihood of a successful agreement at only “fifty-fifty,” suggesting that significant obstacles still stand in the way of a final breakthrough. According to the sources, one of the major concerns is the composition of the Iranian delegation currently involved in discussions. They revealed that representatives of Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) are not part of the negotiating team. This absence is viewed as highly significant because the IRGC is widely regarded as the most influential military and political institution in Iran and is expected to have the final authority in approving any interim or broader agreement. Without its backing, even a negotiated framework may struggle to gain official approval in Tehran. President Trump has repeatedly expressed confidence in the ongoing diplomatic efforts between Washington and Tehran. Earlier, he stated that American officials were holding “very good talks” with their Iranian counterparts and suggested that negotiations were progressing positively. However, he also issued a stern warning, saying that if Iran were to back away from a potential agreement as it had in previous rounds of negotiations, the United States would respond with decisive and severe measures. His remarks reflected a combination of optimism about diplomacy and a willingness to adopt a tougher stance should talks collapse. Trump also hinted that an agreement concerning the Strait of Hormuz could be reached as early as today. The Strait of Hormuz is one of the world’s most strategically important maritime routes, carrying a significant portion of global oil exports. Any understanding aimed at ensuring safe navigation through the waterway would be welcomed by international markets and regional governments, given the repeated tensions and security incidents that have threatened shipping in recent years. Despite the optimistic statements coming from Washington, Iran has continued to deny that it is engaged in direct negotiations with the United States. Iranian officials maintain that their current discussions are exclusively with Oman and are focused on resolving issues related to maritime navigation and shipping through the Strait of Hormuz. Tehran has consistently rejected claims that formal talks with Washington are underway, emphasizing that its engagement is limited to regional diplomatic channels. Political analysts believe, however, that the ongoing dialogue between Iran and Oman could serve as an important bridge toward eventual negotiations between Tehran and Washington. Oman has long played the role of a trusted intermediary between the two countries, facilitating discreet diplomatic contacts during previous periods of heightened tension. Analysts argue that if discussions between Iran and Oman produce positive outcomes, they could help build confidence, reduce mistrust, and create the conditions necessary for broader US-Iran negotiations in the near future. For now, uncertainty continues to dominate the diplomatic landscape. While President Trump projects confidence that a breakthrough is close, regional officials remain cautious, pointing to unresolved political and military considerations that could still prevent a final agreement. The coming days are expected to determine whether diplomatic efforts can translate into a meaningful deal or whether tensions between the United States and Iran will persist.

  • | |

    Trump hosts Netanyahu, Zelensky for high level tal…

    WASHINGTON: US President Donald Trump is set to meet Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky at the White House on Tuesday, as the wars involving Iran and Ukraine enter what officials describe as a decisive and highly sensitive phase. The two leaders are in Washington to attend a memorial service for Senator Lindsey Graham, a prominent Republican ally of Trump and a strong advocate of military support for Ukraine. However, the diplomatic spotlight has shifted to their separate meetings with the US president, which are expected to focus on two of the world’s most volatile conflicts. Trump’s relationship with Zelensky has improved significantly in recent months as Ukrainian forces have slowed Russian advances and intensified strikes on Russian energy infrastructure. Ahead of his meeting, Zelensky said strengthening anti-ballistic missile defence and expanding strategic cooperation with the United States were his top priorities, stressing that efforts to bring peace closer must continue. Despite renewed diplomatic contacts, there is little indication that either the Ukraine war or the widening confrontation involving Iran is nearing an end. Following the collapse of a ceasefire linked to the Iran conflict, Trump has said he paused US airstrikes to allow diplomacy another opportunity, while continuing consultations with regional allies. Netanyahu arrives in Washington amid signs of growing frustration within theWhite House over the lack of progress toward a broader settlement related to Iran. Tensions between Trump and the Israeli leader have become more visible in recent weeks, including reports of a heated phone conversation in June that was later publicly acknowledged by Trump. According to sources familiar with the discussions, Netanyahu is also seeking to reinforce his political standing ahead of Israel’s October 27 election. A public display of close coordination with Trump could help him domestically, where he has faced pressure in opinion polls. Before departing for Washington, Netanyahu said the talks would focus primarily on Iran, while also addressing regional security and efforts to expand peace agreements with Arab states. A White House official said Trump plans to discuss the Iran conflict, tensions between Israel and Lebanon, and the future of the Abraham Accords. The administration is reportedly continuing efforts to encourage Saudi Arabia to join the accords, although Riyadh has maintained that any normalisation with Israel would require a credible pathway toward Palestinian statehood. Trump struck a notably warmer tone when speaking to reporters aboard Air Force One, describing Netanyahu as a strong wartime leader and saying the two had worked well together.Zelensky is expected to hold a brief private meeting with Trump, likely without media present. Ukrainian officials say securing additional Patriot missile interceptors is their most urgent request, as Russian missile and drone attacks continue almost daily. The Ukrainian president is also expected to push for expanded air-defence cooperation, progress on a drone agreement with the United States, and discussions on Trump’s proposal to allow Ukraine to produce Patriot interceptors under licence. White House officials said the meeting with Zelensky would focus on the ongoing peace process between Russia and Ukraine and reiterated that the administration believes the time has come to seek an end to the war. After the White House talks, Zelensky is expected to visit Capitol Hill for meetings with all 100 US senators, underscoring the continuing bipartisan interest in Ukraine’s defence despite growing debate over the pace and delivery of American military assistance.

  • | |

    China’s hypersonic arsenal expands with long-ran…

    BEIJING: China has developed a new generation of hypersonic weapons that could potentially threaten high-value military aircraft thousands of kilometres away, according to a Bloomberg report, highlighting the rapidly changing nature of long-range warfare and the growing strategic competition between Beijing and Washington. The reported development involves hypersonic glide vehicles (HGVs) capable of carrying air-to-air weapons. Such systems could potentially target aircraft that normally operate far behind the frontline, including aerial tankers, airborne command-and-control platforms and other support aircraft that provide fuel, communications and battlefield information to fighter jets. The report, citing a person with direct knowledge of the matter, said China has also added air-to-air capabilities to some hypersonic cruise missiles and anti-ship capabilities to several other missile systems. The reported changes reflect Beijing’s broader effort to make its large missile arsenal capable of carrying out a wider range of missions. A New Threat Beyond the Front Line The significance of the reported technology lies in the type of targets it could threaten. Modern air forces rely heavily on support aircraft. Tankers allow fighter jets to remain airborne for longer periods, while airborne early-warning and command aircraft help monitor enemy activity, coordinate operations and share information with aircraft and ground forces. If these platforms could be attacked from much greater distances, commanders could be forced to move them farther away from contested areas. That could reduce their effectiveness and complicate air operations. A hypersonic glide vehicle released from a DF-17 missile is reported to have a range of around 2,414 kilometres, a distance slightly shorter than the separation between mainland China and the US territory of Guam, a major American military hub in the western Pacific. China’s more advanced DF-27 is estimated to have a range of about 8,000 kilometres, potentially putting much of the western and central Pacific within reach. However, details about the system remain limited, and several of its reported capabilities are based on intelligence assessments rather than publicly released Chinese specifications. Why Hypersonic Weapons Are Difficult to Counter HGVs differ from conventional ballistic missile warheads because they can manoeuvre while travelling through the atmosphere. Their ability to alter their flight path can complicate efforts to predict where they will go and how they can be intercepted. China’s DF-17 has already been publicly displayed and is considered one of the world’s operational hypersonic glide weapon systems. Recent Chinese state media footage showed multiple DF-17 launch vehicles, suggesting the system has been deployed on a significant scale. But the reported ability to use such technology against distant aircraft also presents major operational challenges. A missile travelling thousands of kilometres would require highly accurate and continuously updated information about a moving target. Analysts note that the longer the flight, the greater the opportunity for an opponent to disrupt the intelligence and targeting chain. There is also a potential escalation risk. A ballistic missile launch could be difficult to identify immediately, creating uncertainty over whether the weapon is carrying a conventional or nuclear payload. Washington Responds With Longer-Range Weapons The development comes as the United States is also expanding its long-range air-to-air capabilities. The US Navy has begun testing the AIM-424 MALICE, a new long-range air-to-air missile reportedly designed to engage targets at distances exceeding 463 kilometres. Washington is also pursuing other extended-range weapons, including the AIM-260 and AIM-174B. The emerging competition reflects a broader shift in military planning. Future air battles may not be decided solely by which side has more fighter jets, but by which side can protect its own support aircraft while threatening those that keep an opponent’s air force operating. For China and the United States, that could make long-range missiles and hypersonic systems an increasingly important part of the military balance across the Indo-Pacific. Still, some details of China’s reported new capabilities remain classified or independently unverified. The claims therefore offer an indication of Beijing’s evolving military ambitions rather than a complete picture of its operational capabilities. Even so, the reported progress adds another layer to the increasingly sophisticated missile competition between the world’s two major military powers.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *