pakistan unveils new
|

Pakistan unveils new oil import framework to attract global suppliers

ByJustpaste.in

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan has decided to introduce a new policy framework aimed at facilitating international oil suppliers, improving the availability of petroleum products and strengthening the country’s energy security.

Under the proposed Import Policy 2026 through Customs-Bound Storage, foreign petroleum suppliers will be allowed to bring oil and petroleum products into Pakistan and place them in customs-controlled storage facilities without immediately becoming liable for domestic duties and taxes.

The new mechanism is designed to provide greater flexibility to international suppliers while creating an additional buffer of petroleum stocks within the country. Suppliers will be able to retain their products in designated customs-bound storage facilities and subsequently decide whether to sell the stocks in Pakistan or re-export them to other destinations.

According to the proposed framework, international suppliers will be able to supply petroleum products to local oil marketing companies (OMCs) and refineries when market conditions and domestic requirements warrant such sales. Alternatively, they may re-export the products without necessarily having to enter them into the domestic market.

The policy is expected to create a more flexible operating environment for global oil traders and suppliers, potentially encouraging them to establish a stronger presence in Pakistan’s petroleum supply chain.

The customs-bound storage mechanism would also allow petroleum products to be stored in the country while remaining under customs control. This could help suppliers manage their inventories more efficiently and respond more quickly to changes in domestic demand.

Officials and policymakers see the proposed framework as a step towards improving Pakistan’s petroleum supply security, particularly during periods of heightened international market volatility or disruptions in global energy supplies.

The availability of additional stocks within the country could also help reduce the risk of sudden supply shortages by providing a readily accessible reserve that can be released into the domestic market when required.

For local oil marketing companies and refineries, the framework could broaden their access to international suppliers and create additional options for sourcing petroleum products. Increased competition among suppliers may also contribute to greater efficiency in the petroleum import and distribution system.

The initiative is part of broader efforts to modernise Pakistan’s oil import arrangements and make the energy sector more responsive to changing international market conditions.

By allowing foreign suppliers to maintain petroleum inventories under customs control, the government aims to strike a balance between facilitating international trade and maintaining regulatory oversight of products entering the country.

The new policy framework is expected to establish clearer procedures governing the import, storage, domestic sale and re-export of petroleum products, while providing international suppliers with greater commercial flexibility.

Similar Posts

  • | |

    Petition urges President Zardari to approve judici…

    ByJustpaste.in

      A petition submitted to the Islamabad High Court (IHC) has challenged President Asif Ali Zardari’s delay in approving the appointment of judges to several high courts across Pakistan. The petitioner argues that the president’s failure to act on the recommendations has created a serious constitutional issue and worsened the shortage of judges, affecting the country’s justice system. The petition was filed by Advocate Luqman Zafar Chaudhry through his legal counsel, Zahid Asif Chaudhry. It requests the court to issue a writ of mandamus directing the president, through his secretary, to immediately approve the summary sent by the prime minister. The summary contains the recommendations of the Judicial Commission of Pakistan (JCP) for appointments to the Islamabad, Lahore, Sindh, and Balochistan High Courts, along with the confirmation of several additional judges. According to the petition, the Judicial Commission, chaired by the Chief Justice of Pakistan, completed the constitutional process by finalizing its recommendations on July 20 and 21. These recommendations were subsequently forwarded to the president under Article 48 of the Constitution through the prime minister. However, the president has neither approved the summary nor returned it for reconsideration, despite the constitutional process requiring timely action. The petitioner maintains that Article 48 allows the president to return the prime minister’s advice only once within 15 days for reconsideration. Beyond that, the Constitution does not permit indefinite delay or silence. Therefore, the petition argues that the president is constitutionally obligated to approve the recommendations once the prescribed period has passed. It further states that the delay disrupted the oath-taking ceremony for the recommended judges, which had been scheduled for July 27. As a result, the ceremony was postponed indefinitely, leaving several judicial positions vacant and increasing the burden on existing judges. The petition also argues that the president’s inaction effectively transforms a ceremonial constitutional responsibility into an unauthorized veto power, something the Constitution does not allow. It claims this undermines judicial independence protected under Articles 2A and 175(3) of the Constitution. Referring to previous Supreme Court judgments, the petitioner emphasizes that judicial appointments must be completed through a transparent, collaborative, and time-bound constitutional process without executive interference. The petition also compares the president’s role under Article 48 with Article 75, which governs presidential assent to legislation and similarly requires action within a specified timeframe. According to the petitioner, the continued delay has created an acute shortage of judges, slowing the disposal of cases and affecting citizens’ constitutional rights to a fair trial and access to justice under Articles 9, 10A, and 25. The petition also raises concerns that the delay may have been influenced by political considerations rather than constitutional requirements. Citing media reports and public statements, it requests the court to determine when the Presidency received the summary, seek an explanation for the delay, declare the continued inaction unlawful, and prevent any action inconsistent with the Judicial Commission’s recommendations until the case is decided. The controversy has emerged amid a wider constitutional debate regarding the president’s authority in judicial appointments. While earlier Supreme Court decisions have held that the president cannot reject recommendations made by the Judicial Commission, Article 175A(8) does not clearly specify how quickly the president must act. Legal experts believe the issue may ultimately require judicial interpretation to clarify the constitutional limits of the president’s role in the appointment process.

  • |

    Karan Johar revisits Kabhi Alvida Naa Kehna journey

    ByJustpaste.in

    Karan Johar has taken a nostalgic look back at Kabhi Alvida Naa Kehna as the much-discussed romantic drama completes two decades since its theatrical debut. Released on August 11, 2006, the film brought together Shah Rukh Khan, Rani Mukerji, Abhishek Bachchan, Preity Zinta and Amitabh Bachchan in a story that explored the uncertainties of marriage, emotional distance and complicated personal relationships. Set against the backdrop of New York, the film moved away from the conventional Bollywood portrayal of romance and family life. Its unconventional storyline quickly became a talking point, dividing viewers between those who appreciated its honesty and those who felt its themes challenged traditional values. Reflecting on the film’s journey, Johar recalled the wide range of reactions it generated after reaching cinemas. The filmmaker said he encountered everything from strong appreciation for the movie’s daring subject to severe criticism over the choices made by its characters. He also revisited a pre-release screening that gave him an early indication of just how strongly audiences might respond. During the screening, Johar noticed an audience member becoming visibly uncomfortable during a sequence involving Dev and Maya, the characters played by Shah Rukh Khan and Rani Mukerji. Another memory from that period involved a mother who approached Johar after watching the film. She questioned why he had chosen to build a story around divorce and troubled relationships rather than create another conventional family drama. With the benefit of hindsight, Johar has also been open about the movie’s imperfections. He acknowledged that its grand production, elaborate presentation and several songs contributed to an oversized cinematic experience, with some elements that he now believes could have been handled differently. However, Johar continues to stand by the central purpose of the film. He has maintained that the story was not intended to present infidelity as something admirable. Instead, it sought to examine the emotional consequences of decisions made within and outside marriage and the impact those choices can have on everyone involved. For Johar, the film’s enduring appeal lies in its willingness to avoid straightforward answers. Relationships, he suggested, cannot always be understood through simple definitions of right and wrong, particularly when emotions, expectations and personal struggles become intertwined. The filmmaker also acknowledged the contribution of the cast and crew who helped transform the ambitious idea into a large-scale production. Two decades later, Kabhi Alvida Naa Kehna remains a film that continues to invite debate. While its themes divided audiences when it first arrived, its exploration of imperfect relationships and difficult emotional decisions has allowed the movie to remain part of conversations around love, marriage and human choices.

  • | |

    New provinces debate gains momentum as coalition p…

    ByJustpaste.in

    A renewed debate over the creation of new provinces in Pakistan has gathered political momentum after two major coalition partners publicly endorsed Interior Minister Mohsin Naqvi’s proposal to restructure the country’s administrative system. However, the ruling Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) has yet to officially comment, fueling speculation over its stance on the sensitive issue. The discussion began after Naqvi argued that Pakistan’s existing administrative framework had become ineffective and called for a national consensus on establishing smaller provinces to improve governance and public service delivery. His remarks quickly drew support from coalition allies, including the Muttahida Qaumi Movement-Pakistan (MQM-P) and the Istehkam-e-Pakistan Party (IPP). Federal Health Minister Mustafa Kamal described the proposal as an urgent national necessity rather than a political choice, stressing that decentralizing administrative powers was essential for effective governance. The MQM-P has long advocated the creation of an additional province in Sindh, making the party one of the strongest supporters of the initiative. Privatization Minister Abdul Aleem Khan of the IPP also endorsed the proposal, suggesting that each of Pakistan’s four existing provinces could eventually be divided into three administrative regions. He argued that smaller provinces would bring government closer to the people and reduce the hardships faced by citizens traveling long distances to provincial capitals. Despite growing support from coalition partners, the proposal faces significant constitutional and political challenges. Any change to provincial boundaries requires a two-thirds majority in the affected provincial assembly, making consensus difficult to achieve. The Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP), which governs Sindh and is also part of the federal coalition, has expressed strong reservations, warning that such a move could create more problems than solutions. Opposition leaders have also criticized the proposal, arguing that the government lacks the political mandate for such a major constitutional change. They insist that strengthening democratic institutions and improving governance should take priority over redrawing provincial boundaries. Political analysts have offered differing views on the initiative. Some believe creating new provinces could deepen ethnic and regional divisions, while others see the debate as an attempt to shift public attention away from pressing national issues, including recent unrest in Azad Jammu and Kashmir and ongoing security challenges in Balochistan. Many experts argue that empowering local governments under the 18th Constitutional Amendment would be a more practical and effective way to improve governance without altering provincial boundaries. Mustafa Kamal also acknowledged that stronger local governments are essential regardless of whether new provinces are eventually created. With the PML-N maintaining silence and key coalition partners taking opposing positions, the proposal has opened a fresh political debate that is likely to remain at the center of Pakistan’s national discourse in the coming months.

  • | |

    Forensic report reveals new findings in Mir Raza c…

    ByJustpaste.in

    KARACHI: The forensic examination of a shirt belonging to Karachi youth Mir Raza has been completed. The report has been received by the police and is now being examined as part of the investigation. According to investigative sources, traces of hydrochloric acid were reportedly detected on the shirt during the chemical analysis. The sources also said that substances associated with a sedative were found in a blood sample taken from Mir Raza. The chemical examination was conducted to determine whether the shirt contained any material that could help investigators understand the circumstances surrounding the incident. The findings are expected to be considered along with other forensic evidence collected during the investigation. Investigators also reported the presence of gunshot residue (GSR) on the waist area of Mir Raza’s shirt. Sources said the concentration of GSR was higher around the waist section. They said this finding could provide investigators with important information about the direction and circumstances of the shooting. However, the forensic findings are expected to be assessed alongside other evidence before investigators reach any final conclusion. Police are also examining other aspects of the case to establish what happened. Meanwhile, further shortcomings in the investigation have reportedly emerged. Investigative officials said several important steps had not been completed despite days having passed since the incident. According to officials, geofencing of the crime scene has not yet been carried out. Geofencing could help investigators identify mobile devices that were present in or around the area at the relevant time. Officials also said that Mir Raza’s mobile phone data had not been obtained. The phone record could potentially help investigators establish his movements and identify contacts or activities around the time of the incident. Another issue raised by investigators concerns Mir Raza’s smartwatch. Officials said its forensic examination had also not been conducted. Such devices can sometimes contain information about movement, activity and other data that may assist an investigation. The latest findings have added new elements to the case. Investigators are now expected to examine the forensic report along with other available evidence. The police are also facing questions over why some investigative procedures were not carried out earlier. The family has previously called for a thorough investigation and answers about what happened to Mir Raza.

  • | |

    Acid traces found as Mir Raza probe widens

    ByJustpaste.in

    The Sindh government has decided to establish a judicial commission to investigate the death of 25-year-old businessman Mir Raza Ali in Karachi. Sindh Home Minister Zia-ul-Hassan Lanjar said the decision was taken during a meeting with Chief Minister Murad Ali Shah. He said the investigation would now be conducted with the involvement of judges from the Sindh High Court. Speaking about the case, Lanjar said the government wanted to ensure justice for Mir Raza’s family. He expressed sympathy with the family and said authorities were committed to uncovering the facts surrounding the young businessman’s death. The minister also confirmed that the police investigation team had already been changed. Deputy Inspector General Amir Farooqui is heading the new team. According to Lanjar, the family has also been given the option of suggesting police officers who could be included in the investigation team. He said authorities had so far found no evidence indicating the involvement of any high-profile personality. Lanjar said the formation of a judicial commission had become necessary because of questions surrounding the investigation and conflicting findings related to the case. The decision comes after a second post-mortem examination reportedly raised serious questions about the circumstances of Mir Raza’s death. Preliminary findings indicated that he had sustained a gunshot wound from behind, challenging earlier assumptions about the case. The minister also addressed concerns regarding the initial post-mortem examination. He said doctors responsible for the examination should have immediately informed their superiors if they believed there were shortcomings in the report. Meanwhile, a new development has emerged in the investigation. According to forensic sources, there was an alleged attempt to damage or burn Mir Raza’s body with acid. Sources said traces of acid were reportedly found on the shirt worn by the 25-year-old businessman. Investigators are expected to examine the finding as part of the wider forensic inquiry. Mir Raza’s body was discovered in bushes in Karachi’s Gulistan-i-Jauhar area after he went missing. His family has maintained that he was kidnapped, tortured and murdered. The latest developments have intensified questions surrounding the circumstances of his death. The proposed judicial commission is expected to examine the available forensic, medical and investigative evidence and determine what happened to the young businessman.

  • | | | | |

    Iran issues stark warning to US over ground troops

    ByJustpaste.in

    TEHRAN: Iran has issued a stark warning to the United States, saying any American ground troops attempting to enter Iranian territory would face fierce resistance. The warning was delivered by Iranian Army Ground Forces Commander Brigadier General Ali Jahanshahi, as tensions between Tehran and Washington remain high and the region continues to watch closely for signs of further military escalation. According to Iranian media reports, Jahanshahi said Iran’s armed forces were fully prepared to respond to any hostile action. He stressed that the country’s ground forces remained at a high state of readiness and were closely monitoring Iran’s borders. The Iranian commander made clear that Tehran would not take any threat to its territory lightly. Any attempt by an enemy to launch military action on Iranian soil, he said, would trigger an immediate and forceful response. The remarks underline Iran’s long-standing position that a direct ground intervention would represent a major escalation. Iranian officials have repeatedly warned that foreign troops entering the country would encounter strong resistance from the country’s armed forces. Jahanshahi also emphasized that Iran’s military units were prepared to respond to a range of potential scenarios. Security measures along the country’s borders, he said, remain active as authorities continue to assess possible threats. The latest warning comes against the backdrop of continued tensions between Iran and the United States, with military developments and diplomatic efforts both shaping the rapidly changing regional situation. For Tehran, the message appears aimed at drawing a clear red line around Iranian territory: while the country may face external pressure, any attempt to send foreign ground forces across its borders would be treated as a direct threat to national security. Analysts say such statements also reflect Iran’s effort to strengthen deterrence and signal military readiness at a time when uncertainty remains over the future course of US-Iran relations. With tensions already running high, any direct military confrontation could have consequences far beyond Iran and the United States, potentially triggering a wider regional crisis. For now, the sharp warning from Iran adds another layer of uncertainty to an already fragile security situation, while international attention remains focused on whether diplomacy can prevent another escalation.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *