pagcor imposes p1m
| |

Pagcor imposes P1-M fine on gambling firm linked to Ivana Alawi iPhone giveaway

MANILA, Philippines –The Philippine Amusement and Gaming Corporation (Pagcor) imposed a P1 million fine against a gambling firm for sponsoring influencer Ivana Alawi’s giveaway of 100 iPhones back In July without seeking permission to undertake the promotion.

During the House of Representatives’ committee on appropriations budget hearing for 2027, Kamanggagawa party-list Representative Elijah Fernando showed surprise and alarm at influencers and gambling firms linking up to promote each other. Fernando also called out Alawi without naming the specific gambling firm she was linked to.

In Alawi’s case, she has a brand ambassadorship with Casino Plus as previously disclosed by the online gaming platform.

Alawi bought some P4.28 million in iPhone 17 Pro Max units — 100 in all — and the promotion to give them away tasked prospective winners with following her “CP Fam” and commenting on a given post to be considered for the giveaway.

Must Read

[Tech Thoughts] Ivana Alawi, a promised iPhone, and the siren call of online gambling


[Tech Thoughts] Ivana Alawi, a promised iPhone, and the siren call of online gambling

Pagcor chairman and CEO Alejandro Tengco said, “We fined the online gaming company P1 million and, together with that, gave them a stern warning na hindi na dapat maulit ito (that it shouldn’t happen again).”

He added, “Kung maulit ito (If it occurs again), a heavier fine and the possibility that another violation can lead to the suspension and ultimately, the cancellation of their license,” a warning that those endorsements should have the blessing of the Ad Standards Council and Pagcor.

Tengco also noted that about “50% of the current operators of online gaming are illegal, meaning that we do not have any jurisdiction over them.”

When asked about enforcement against illegal gambling operators, Tengco said Pagcor coordinates with the Department of Information and Communications Technology, the National Telecommunications Commission, and the Cybercrime Investigation and Coordinating Center in filing cases against the endorsers of illegal gambling sites in a bid to take down the sites themselves.

Further, Tengco also said a number of influencers and content creators withdrew their sponsorships and endorsements when this was made known, finding legal operators to tie up with instead.

– Rappler.com

Similar Posts

  • |

    AI errors hit report behind Australia’s under-16 ban

    A government-commissioned report that helped support Australia’s plan to restrict social media access for children under 16 has come under scrutiny after several inaccurate and apparently fabricated academic references were identified. The report, produced as part of a $3.48 million government-funded trial examining age-assurance technologies, was prepared by the Age Check Certification Scheme (ACCS). The organisation has acknowledged that ChatGPT was used to rewrite parts of the document after initially denying that artificial intelligence had been involved. An analysis of the report found six problematic citations in a chapter examining emerging technologies. Some of the digital object identifiers, or DOIs, reportedly directed readers to research papers that did not exist. Other references contained combinations of authors, journals and publication dates that could not be verified in academic records. In another case, a DOI reportedly led to a genuine research paper, but the paper did not support the claim attributed to it in the report. The controversy intensified after ACCS was questioned about the use of artificial intelligence. A spokesperson initially said no AI had been used in producing the report. The organisation later acknowledged that ChatGPT metadata was present in four links across two sections of the document. ACCS maintained that the metadata effectively disclosed the use of the tool and said the references had been manually checked. However, efforts to correct the disputed citations reportedly resulted in further inconsistencies. One example involved a research paper that an ACCS source said had been accessed in March 2025. According to the paper’s lead author, however, the research was not published until June 2025, raising additional questions about the accuracy of the report’s references. The report has attracted attention because it was used in the policy process surrounding Australia’s planned restrictions on social media for under-16s. Communications Minister Anika Wells had previously praised the report for identifying potential approaches to age verification. The minister’s department told a Senate inquiry that it had discussed the citation problems with ACCS. However, the department was reportedly informed about faulty links rather than allegations that some references had been fabricated. Australian National University academic Christian Downie warned that unreliable references can have serious consequences regardless of whether they were generated by AI or resulted from human error. He said inaccurate citations could contribute to poor policymaking and weaken public confidence in government-commissioned research. Independent Senator Fatima Payman also compared the controversy with a separate case involving Deloitte, which refunded part of a $440,000 government contract after problems were identified with AI-generated references.

  • |

    Samsung software update triggers battery and heating complaints 

    Samsung’s latest software update has sparked concern among some Galaxy S25 Ultra and Galaxy S24 Ultra users, with numerous reports suggesting that the update has negatively affected battery performance, charging speed, and overall device temperature. Many users have taken to online technology forums and social media platforms to share their experiences, claiming that their smartphones are no longer performing as efficiently as they did before installing the update. According to user reports, one of the most common issues is rapid battery drain. Several Galaxy owners have said their devices now lose power at a much faster rate, even during light or moderate usage. Some users claim that a phone charged to 100% can drop to a significantly lower battery level within only a few hours, despite being used for basic tasks such as messaging, browsing the internet, or checking emails. This unexpected battery consumption has become a major source of frustration for many customers who previously enjoyed reliable battery life. Another frequently reported problem is overheating. Users say their smartphones become unusually warm shortly after the software update, even when the devices are idle. Some owners have mentioned that their phones heat up while simply resting on a table or couch without any demanding applications running. Others have observed increased temperatures during everyday activities such as streaming videos, browsing social media, or using navigation apps. The excessive heat has raised concerns about the long-term impact on battery health and overall device performance. In addition to battery and heating issues, several users have reported slower charging speeds after updating their devices. According to these reports, phones now require more time to reach a full charge than they did before the software installation. Although charging still functions normally, the extended charging time has become another inconvenience for users who depend on fast charging during their daily routines. Technology enthusiasts and community members believe the issue may be linked to background system processes that fail to complete properly after the update. These processes may become trapped in continuous operating loops, forcing the phone’s processor to remain active even when the device is not being used. As a result, the processor consumes more power than usual, leading to faster battery depletion and higher internal temperatures. While Samsung has not yet released an official statement acknowledging the reported issues, users can try several temporary measures to reduce their impact. Reviewing the Battery Usage section in the Settings menu can help identify applications consuming an unusually high amount of power. Closing these apps, clearing their cache, or limiting background activity may improve battery performance. Users may also benefit from temporarily disabling automatic cloud backups if they suspect syncing services are contributing to the problem. Restarting the smartphone can also terminate unnecessary background processes that may have become stuck after the update, potentially improving battery life and reducing overheating. This is not the first time Samsung users have experienced battery-related issues following a major software release. Similar problems have been reported after previous updates, and in many cases, the company later resolved them by releasing follow-up software patches. Until Samsung provides an official fix, Galaxy S25 Ultra and Galaxy S24 Ultra owners experiencing these problems may need to rely on these temporary troubleshooting methods. Users are also encouraged to keep their devices updated, as future software releases are expected to address the reported battery drain, overheating, and charging performance concerns.

  • | |

    Press freedom across South Asia

    Press freedom across South Asia faces significant structural constraints. Media environments throughout the region share a common historical legacy often relying on inherited colonial-era penal codes alongside modern cybersecurity legislation. However, the legal frameworks and regulatory instruments used to govern the press vary across neighboring countries. Comparative Analysis by Country  Pakistan Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority (PEMRA), Prevention of Electronic Crimes Act (PECA), and administrative policy frameworks like the Foreign Media Facilitation Guidelines. Media regulation in Pakistan relies heavily on administrative controls, licensing restrictions, and broad content advisories prohibiting coverage of sensitive political or national security subjects. While constitutional protections exist under Article 19, exceptions based on glory of Islam, national defense, and public order give authorities broad latitude to issue blackout orders, manage foreign correspondents’ mobility through No Objection Certificates (NOCs), and impose structural pressure on broadcast networks.  India Information Technology Rules (2021), Digital Personal Data Protection (DPDP) Act, and the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act (UAPA). While India possesses a large and diverse private media market, journalists increasingly face legal scrutiny under broad national security and anti-terror legislation. Amendments to digital media laws allow central authorities to demand the takedown of online content deemed harmful to state interests. Furthermore, criminal defamation suits and restrictions on access to conflict areas (such as Jammu & Kashmir) remain common mechanisms of regulatory pressure. Bangladesh Cyber Security Act (CSA)—which replaced the controversial Digital Security Act (DSA) and state information ministry directives. For years, non-bailable clauses in cybersecurity statutes were widely criticized by media watchdogs for chilling investigative reporting on corruption or state officials. Following recent political transitions, draft media reform policies have been introduced, though press operations remain tightly monitored during periods of political volatility and public unrest.  Sri Lanka Online Safety Act, Prevention of Terrorism Act (PTA), and Official Secrets Act. Sri Lanka’s regulatory framework expanded significantly with the passage of the Online Safety Act, which created a government-appointed commission with sweeping powers to classify online content as false statements and order its removal. Critical reporting regarding state response to economic crises or wartime history continues to face legal and physical friction in sensitive provinces. Nepal: Press Council Act and National Mass Communications Policy. Nepal consistently ranks highest in South Asia on global press freedom indices, supported by a constitution that explicitly guarantees press rights without prior restraint. However, challenges persist regarding local government transparency, criminal defamation provisions, and proposed social media regulation bills that civil society groups fear could introduce licensing hurdles for digital outlets.  Afghanistan Direct directives issued by the Ministry for the Propagation of Virtue and the Prevention of Vice and the Ministry of Information and Culture. Following the political shift in 2021, independent journalism in Afghanistan has faced near-total suppression. Women journalists are largely banned from broadcasting, international news services face widespread blocking, and all local reporting is subject to strict pre-publication censorship. Common Trends Across the Region Across South Asia, governments are increasingly shifting control from traditional print/broadcast regulators toward cybersecurity, online safety, and data protection laws to monitor digital newsrooms and independent creators. Constitutional guarantees of free speech throughout South Asia uniformly contain broad public order and national defense exceptions, which states routinely cite to enforce reporting restrictions during regional crises. Beyond direct legal action, states across the region frequently utilize non-judicial levers such as withholding state advertising funds, slow-walking accreditation, or requiring special travel permits to shape editorial stances.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *