cannot replace expertise

AI Cannot Replace Expertise

By Arooba Younas

The surge in the use of Artificial Intelligence by businesses, corporations, and organisations has been illustrated by the latest McKinsey Global Survey on the state of AI. Accordingly, 88 per cent of organisations reported the regular use of AI in at least one business function, a 10 per cent increase from the results of the survey conducted in the preceding year. Indicative of business leaders’ desire to boost productivity and reduce operational costs, companies adopted AI to achieve greater efficiency. The reverberations of AI integration are felt in the splintering of the organisational pyramid, driven by the expansion of what a single individual can accomplish. However, flattening hierarchies is not tantamount to flattening skill hierarchies or democratisation of expertise.

Research has shown that Generative AI (GenAI) has the greatest impact on the level of expertise required to perform jobs, resulting in an accelerated learning curve for entry-level workers. Whilst shortening the learning curve and the time it takes novices to gain competence at new tasks, the limits of GenAI in upskilling workers have been revealed in an experiment conducted by researchers from Harvard Business School’s Data Design Institute and Stanford University, involving 78 employees from IG Group, a UK-based fintech company. Dividing the employees into three groups of occupational insiders (professional writers), adjacent outsiders (marketing specialists), and distant outsiders (technologists), the experiment attempted to gauge whether marketing specialists and technologists could match the performance of professional writers in conceptualising and drafting articles for IG Group’s website while receiving GenAI assistance. The results revealed that AI levelled the playing field at the conceptualisation stage. However, when the nature of the task shifted to executing the ideas by putting them in writing, a prominent expertise gap emerged. Both with and without GenAI’s help, the writers produced the best work, with marketers coming close and technologists lagging behind regardless of AI use.

The divergence in performance, despite AI support, is a portrayal of the “GenAI Wall”, depicting the point at which GenAI does not sufficiently reduce the expertise gap between occupational insiders and outsiders. This is indicative of GenAI’s limit in how far it can carry workers outside their domain expertise. Without foundational knowledge, it becomes difficult for outsiders to distinguish between effective and flawed suggestions generated by GenAI. As a result, they may rely on its outputs without applying the necessary refinement, critical judgement and contextual understanding.

Nonetheless, the experiment has implications for business organisations, particularly for leaders who overestimate the abilities of AI. It can only hasten the competency of individuals who are adjacent to a domain, and not conjure expertise out of thin air. In this regard, work structure, which is already undergoing change, can be rethought along the lines of expertise. A more fluid work environment can be created, where, in lieu of strict job roles, boundaries can blur by converging adjacent specialists. However, the experiment is not an advocacy for hiring fewer novices. Studies have shown a reduction in entry-level role postings, falling by 32 per cent in 2025 compared to 2019-2022. This suggests a myopic conclusion drawn from GenAI’s putative capabilities, for it is beginners who, when assimilated into the company’s culture and learn through practice, become experts. By thwarting the pipeline of learners by letting AI take over early-career work, which actually led to the making of experts, today’s efficiency may be sacrificed for impoverished talent tomorrow. The latter has been represented by the AI boomerang effect – recent AI-related layoffs, which are now being quietly reversed – as reports indicated employers regretting layoff decisions. This is because of AI hallucinations as well as its inadequacy to replace the required context or institutional knowledge, which human employees possessed.

Although the IG Group experiment was conducted in a Western context, its implications can be generalised across the world, particularly as the allure of AI has diffused across continents. However, the embracing of AI in the Global South, whether in businesses or other sectors, has to be accompanied by digital literacy, localised governance, and a research ecosystem. This is significant lest the adoption of AI brings with it downsides in the form of overdependence and a putative magic bullet solution to solving complex issues ranging from bad governance to climate-related disasters. Additionally, GenAI’s exposure to the labour market has caused faster materialisation of disruptions rather than productivity gains due to a higher risk of job losses, as AI-driven automation can close clerical and administrative positions, which have historically served as pathways to decent work.

Conclusively, GenAI has brought the promise of enabling individuals to bridge their capability gaps. However, AI cannot replace expertise or be an all-encompassing fix because it relies on pattern recognition rather than understanding real-world context. Thus, the future of work is where humans can learn to effectively partner with AI, grounded in human judgement, and not replacing it.

 

Arooba Younas is a Research Assistant at the Centre for Aerospace and Security Studies (CASS), Lahore. She can be reached at info@casslhr.com.

 

Similar Posts

  • | |

    The pure joy of private writing

    Recent archival developments in the literary world have reignited a timeless debate about the nature of creation. When the personal archives, diaries, and private notebooks of legendary literary figures are cataloged and opened to the public, readers gain an intimate glimpse into a process entirely free from external expectation. Raw Honesty In an era dominated by social media algorithms, content metrics, and immediate digital validation, the contemporary act of writing has become increasingly public. Writers are frequently urged to build personal brands, cultivate audiences before completing a single chapter, and measure the value of their thoughts by engagement metrics. Yet, a look across literary history suggests that forcing self-expression through the filter of public consumption often strips writing of its essential power: raw honesty. The Freedom of the Unseen Page When Franz Kafka famously instructed his close friend Max Brod to burn all his unpublished manuscripts and private journals upon his death, he was asserting a radical boundary. Though Brod ultimately defied those wishes giving the world masterpieces like The Trial and The Castle, Kafka’s mandate highlighted a fundamental truth about his relationship with the written word. For Kafka, writing was not a trade, a performance, or a search for acclaim. Rather, it was a urgent, internal necessity. He wrote to process his existential anxiety and negotiate his place in a confusing world. Revolutionary Contribution to Modern Poetry Similarly, Emily Dickinson spent her life in relative reclusion in Amherst, Massachusetts, quietly composing over 1,700 poems. She bound them carefully with thread and tucked them away in a wooden chest, largely indifferent to the literary establishment of her era. Freed from the pressure of publisher deadlines, critical reviews, or popular trends, Dickinson invented an entirely original poetic structure. Unconventional in its punctuation, bold in its metaphors, and uncompromising in its vision. she didn’t customise her voice to suit 19th-century publishing standards. That’s her revolutionary contribution to modern poetry is still there. Why Private Writing Rescues Creativity Writing for an audience activates self-censorship. When you write exclusively for yourself, the fear of judgment vanishes. This phenomenon allows uncomfortable truths and unrefined ideas to flow onto the page. Modern culture fixates on output. For instance, the finished book, the polished essay, the published post. Writing privately restores focus to the immediate sensation of thinking on paper. It is transforming the craft from a task into a sanctuary. A writer’s authentic voice is rarely found by attempting to match market trends. It emerges in the quiet margins of private journals, where syntax and thought patterns develop naturally without external influence. Reclaiming the Personal Journal in a Public World Reclaiming the joy of private writing does not require abandoning public work altogether. Instead, it requires establishing a sacred space where performance is forbidden. Writing for an audience of one remains one of the most effective ways to sharpen thought and restore mental clarity.   The enduring fascination with published literary archives proves an intriguing paradox. The writing that captivates us most deeply is often the very writing that was never meant for our eyes. We unlock the true alchemy of the written word by letting go of the need for an audience. A private conversation between the self and the page.

  • “A Glimpse After Twenty-One Days”

    By Amar Qawi If, someday, the entire sky were covered in darkness—without a moon, without stars, without even the faintest sparkle—would a lover whose heart glows like moonlight still be able to live beneath such a sky? That day, I sat on the rooftop of my house searching for the moon. But fate had something else in store. Instead of appearing in the heavens, the moon descended into the street below to grant me a glimpse after twenty-one long days. I did not dwell much on that radiance because something similar had happened to me earlier, on the fifteenth of July. Therefore, I took it as nothing more than an unfulfilled dream rather than believing that the moon belonged to me. In truth, even considering someone as one’s possession is itself a form of poverty. Since childhood, society has taught us that air, fire, and water are the necessities of life. Yet I feel sorry for those teachers who remain unaware of a deeper truth: human beings do not survive by air, fire, and water alone. Love, inspiration, and moonlight are equally essential for the soul to remain alive. A person may survive in this highly technical age amidst bombs and weapons, but without the sight of the beloved, the soul can never truly live. Just as air, fire, and water are essential to human existence, so too is the vision of the beloved. The truth is, I was not sitting on the rooftop in search of the moon in the sky. I was waiting for that moon from whom my moonbird-like heart had been separated for what felt like centuries. And yet, even when I found that moon, it was only within my dreams. Twenty-one days after the fifteenth of July, as I walked through that familiar street, she passed by me just as a shadow silently slips along a wall in the darkness. She is my shadow, and I am her reflection. She is my reflection, and I am her moonbird. She is the full moon to me. Whenever she shines like the full moon, my heart, like a restless chakor bird, longs to fly toward her and kiss her beauty. But alas, those delicate butterfly-like wings eventually grow weary from endless flights inspired by love. When I saw her in that street after twenty-one days, the fallen Taj Mahal of my imagination began to rebuild itself. The shy poet hidden within me blossomed with the spirit of Sheikh Ayaz’s immortal lines: “O moon! Who has stolen your sleep? Surely the chakor birds have enchanted you.” Just as Sheikh Ayaz expressed, something similar happened to me. When I first met her, I had no intention of falling in love. Yet I vividly remember that when we parted, dryness had settled upon our lips while tears embraced our eyes. It was as though the Urdu poet had written about our separation: “When we parted, my poem remained within her eyes— A poem that had never yet been recited to anyone.” When she passed beside me after twenty-one days, my eyes swore by the little golden nose ornament she wore and silently recalled the beautiful verse of Shah Abdul Latif: “Who says, my beloved, that you should walk gently? Place your feet upon my eyelashes without hesitation. Leave behind all fear of causing pain, For your passage itself is my greatest joy.” When even her tongue could not gather the courage to speak to me, my own eyes, too, denied themselves the permission of truly beholding her after those twenty-one days. Love is not dependent upon union; it longs for the meeting of souls. Therefore, for a lover like me, a glimpse after twenty-one days carries no real meaning if the beloved merely passes by like a silent shadow in the darkness. In the end, I wish to encourage the young people of our society who lose their dreams and their future while chasing someone who does not value their love. As an Urdu poet beautifully said: “If you have changed, then so be it. If not you, then someone else. And if not someone else, then another.” Thus, that glimpse after twenty-one days holds no value for me if it is wrapped in deception, falsehood, and unfaithfulness. To me, that meeting means nothing if pride and arrogance overshadow love. She merely appeared in the street and passed by like a shadow. Yet even today, I continue to wait for her, because my heart still loves that moon-like beloved with the devotion of a chakor bird. Even after twenty-one days, she remains steadfast in her pride. Still, the beloved’s pride is a matter of honor for the lover, for the beloved herself is both the lover’s pride and the most precious treasure he possesses. He can be reached at alikareemshaikh123@gmail.com

  • Water during meals may increase food intake

    A new study suggests that drinking water again and again while eating may not help with weight loss. Instead it could actually make people eat more food. Many people believe that taking sips of water during a meal helps them feel full faster leading them to eat less. However the new research challenges that common belief. Researchers at Cornell University found that for every extra 100 milliliters of water people drank during a meal they ate about 40 grams more food on average. This equals roughly 50 extra calories. The study also found that people who frequently switched between eating and drinking water consumed more food overall than those who did not. Earlier studies have also shown that people with obesity are more likely to drink water for longer periods during meals drink it more quickly and take frequent sips throughout the meal. Researchers say these findings suggest that the relationship between drinking water during meals and the amount of food people eat may be different from what was previously believed. However they stress that more research is needed before any firm conclusions can be made.

  • When global recognition becomes a local burden

    In the Carpathian Mountains of central Slovakia lies Vlkolínec, a preserved settlement. This village is renowned for its pastel-painted timber cottages and traditional 19th-century folk architecture. It was inscribed as a UNESCO World Heritage site in 1993. Vlkolínec was celebrated not merely as a set of historical buildings, but as a living community. A rare surviving traditional rural life in Central Europe. However, three decades after receiving this prestigious designation, the small mountain is struggling with an existential dilemma. What was meant to be a cultural preservation has transformed into a challenge for the few villagers who still call Vlkolínec home. Now, frustration among permanent residents has reached a boiling point. There are calls to have the village removed from the UNESCO list altogether. When UNESCO designated Vlkolínec as a World Heritage site, one of the criteria was that it remained an inhabited settlement. At the time of inscription, the village was home to around 200 residents. Today, that permanent population has declined to just 14 to 17 people spread across four core families. In contrast to this dwindling resident count, Vlkolínec receives approximately 100,000 tourists every year. For the remaining inhabitants, the ratio of over 7,000 visitors per resident has basically altered the daily life. Locals report feeling as though they live inside a tourist zoo. The boundaries between public spaces and private homes are routinely ignored. Despite signs requesting privacy, visitors frequently wander into private yards, peer through kitchen windows, and treat active properties as open-access museum displays. The loss of privacy is compounded by anti-social tourist behavior. This conduct has been leaving locals feeling alienated in their own hometown. Overtourism is only one side of the coin. Residents also voice deep frustration over the rigid conservation framework that accompanies World Heritage status. Under national protection laws and strict UNESCO guidelines, historic homes face tight restrictions on modern modifications and physical alterations. Elderly villagers point out that these preservation rules have made customary rural activities increasingly difficult. Small-scale farming, livestock keeping, and land cultivation have gradually vanished. Surrounding agricultural terraces have become overgrown. Traditional meadow mowing has largely ceased as older generations pass away and younger generations move away. Furthermore, many of the village’s timber cottages have been bought up by outside buyers to serve as weekend holiday retreats. This phenomenon has increased the loss of a permanent, cohesive community. Some residents argue that revoking UNESCO status would reduce tourist pressure and ease regulatory burdens. However, municipal officials and heritage experts contend that delisting is neither practical nor the right solution. Local administrators in the nearby town of Ružomberok emphasize that UNESCO status brings significant heritage recognition and funding opportunities. Rather than abandoning the title, officials advocate for smarter tourism management. From a procedural standpoint, voluntary delisting at the request of a local community is virtually unprecedented in UNESCO’s history. The organization typically removes properties only when they lose their outstanding universal value due to severe destruction or irreversible development. The debate unfolding in Vlkolínec highlights a broader issue facing protected historic sites around the globe. How to balance global recognition and economic benefits with the rights and wellbeing of local inhabitants! Small historic communities across Europe and beyond battle with overcrowding and demographic decline. Vlkolínec serves as a reminder that preserving physical architecture alone is not enough. Without protecting the living social fabric of a community, world heritage sites risk turning into empty shells of their former selves.  

  • Bridal brands prepare for the Taylor Swift effect

    Taylor Swift’s wedding dress remains a mystery but bridal fashion companies around the world are already preparing for a possible new trend inspired by the pop star’s style. Fashion experts believe that the design fabric, color shape and overall look of Swift’s wedding outfit could influence what brides choose to wear in the coming years. Swift’s wedding dress remains a mystery According to Reuters, Taylor Swift wore a Christian Dior dress at her private wedding ceremony held at Madison Square Garden in New York on July 3. However full details and clear images of the dress have not yet been widely revealed. Millions of fans are eagerly waiting to see the dior outfit she wore on her special day. Bridal brands are already preparing David’s Bridal, one of the major bridalwear companies has already prepared around two dozen designs that could fit the style Swift may have chosen.  The company operates around 200 stores across the US. CEO Kelly Cook said the company is waiting for more photos and details of Swift’s actual dress.  Once more information becomes available the team will be able to move quickly with designs inspired by its key features. The company has already noticed a major increase in online searches for dresses similar to Swift’s possible style.  Prices for its wedding dresses range from a few hundred dollars to more than $3,000. Three possible swift inspired styles David’s Bridal design chief in Hong Kong, Viola Chan said the team has prepared three general styles inspired by Swift. These include dramatic decorated gowns simple and elegant dresses and shorter wedding gowns. She also believes that Swift’s makeup hairstyle dress color and flower arrangements could influence future bridal trends. Other brands are watching closely Spanish bridal brand Pronovias has also indicated that it is watching Swift’s dress for inspiration.  However the company plans to focus on broader fashion trends rather than directly copying her outfit. Sharon Sever, creative director at designer Galia Lahav, said that if Swift chooses an unusual color fabric or veil it could become a new trend in bridal fashion. New York design director Lisa Ponteroni also pointed out that celebrity photos can have a strong influence on the fashion industry. The Justin Alexander Group is also following the trend and may include some of Swift’s possible dress features in future designs. Brands avoid direct copies Not every bridal company wants to copy Swift’s outfit directly.  Luv Bridal founder and CEO Lane Litt said her company’s new designs would only take small amounts of inspiration from Swift’s style. The company may simply tell customers when it has dresses with features similar to those seen in Swift’s wedding look. Legal issues also matter There is also a legal side to celebrity inspired fashion. Legal experts say that copying the general cut or shape of a dress is not necessarily illegal.  However a company could face legal trouble if it falsely uses Taylor Swift’s or Dior’s name to mislead customers. For this reason most brands are focusing on the fashion ideas rather than using Swift’s name to market their products. Could Swift Start a new bridal trend? Taylor Swift’s wedding dress has become important not only to her fans but also to the bridal fashion industry. If more photos reveal a unique color fabric shape, or design those details could inspire thousands of brides. Swift’s private wedding outfit may therefore become a major source of bridal fashion trends for years to come.

  • |

    Why marginalia is devised for conversation

    For centuries, books were treated as sacred, untouchable artifacts. Readers were taught to open a spine with reverence, turn pages by the edges, and never, under any circumstance, mark the paper. But in the modern reading culture, a quiet revolution has taken root: marginalia is no longer viewed as defacement. Today, it is recognized as a vital form of active intellectual engagement. Marking up a book transforms reading from a passive act of consumption into an active. Reading is a two-way dialogue between the reader and the writer. When you read with a pencil, pen, or sticky tab in hand, your relationship with the text fundamentally shifts. You cease to be a distant spectator observing someone else’s thoughts. In other words, you become a collaborator. Underlining a sentence, drawing an exclamation point next to a surprising plot twist, or a counterargument in the margin forces your brain to process language at a deeper level. It requires you to articulate why a passage resonated or failed. Furthermore, annotated books serve as personal time capsules. When you reopen a novel you marked up five or ten years ago, it offers an unfiltered reflection into who you were at that exact moment in your life. You might find yourself cringing at an old marginal note. Then you agree passionately with a circled phrase, or realizing that a passage you completely ignored years ago now carries personal meaning. The book becomes a physical record not just of the author’s story, but of your own cognitive and emotional evolution. Edgar Allan Poe once wrote: ‘In getting my books, I have been always solicitous of an ample margin … for the facility it affords me of pencilling suggested thoughts, agreements and differences of opinion …’ Practically speaking, marginalia also sharpens critical thinking. Students, scholars, and casual readers alike find that tracking themes through custom color-coded tabs or brief summary notes at the end of chapters drastically improves retention and comprehension. It prevents the common phenomenon of eye-scanning where your eyes move across sentences while your mind wanders elsewhere. Annotation demands presence. Ultimately, scribbling in the margins strips away the artificial pedestal we often place books upon. It reminds us that literature is not meant to sit pristine and untouched on a display shelf. Literature is meant to be wrestled with, questioned, celebrated, and lived in. The next time you open a book that challenges or moves you, don’t hold back. Pick up a pen, claim the empty white space on the page, and join a conversation that has been taking place across centuries.  

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *