artificial intelligence human

Artificial Intelligence vs Human Creativity

ByJustpaste.in

By Muhammad Talha Karim

A workshop under the project titled “Digital Trust and Free Expression in the AI Era” at the Department of Media and Development Communication, University of the Punjab, supported by the U.S. Mission to Pakistan in partnership with the Pakistan-U.S. Alumni Network (PUAN) made me ask myself that: “can a machine create, or does it only create what humans have already imagined?”

Creativity has always been a phenomenal ability for human beings, which makes it unique from all other creatures. It helps us solve problems, create art, design new things, think differently, compose music, and write stories. The rapid development of AI has made machines so capable that they can generate music, create art, write essays, and even solve human-related problems. But a very serious question arises here: “Can AI truly be more creative than humans?

AI has shown that it can perfectly help humans create new ideas. It simply analyzes the large amount of information, follow the pattern that is previously provided and by combining all the sources, generates content within few seconds. For example, can write an essay, assist you in providing you with the needed material, and make the stories for you. It can also make the process quicker by giving different alternatives.

But, if we talk about human creativity, no AI-powered tool can match the detailing, background content and emotional support of a human creativity.

AI-powered tools merely scan the information, combine it, rearrange the patterns and give you the required material. It does not use any kind of emotional power, background knowledge to do it. While on the very opposite side, human creativity holds this very significant and unique ability to use emotions, feeling and history with the art. Humans use attach emotions like love, loneliness, sadness, happiness, betrayal and attachment and many more and they are feeling with the art to create it perfectly.

For example, if an artist creates a painting, it is not merely the amalgamation of colors, strokes and lines but it experiences the emotion that made the artist create the art. Human beings can physically and mentally feel that specific emotion and a sense of attachment with the art and artist.

Creativity has always been deeply linked with emotions and feelings. Certainly, AI powered tools can create content more quickly, but it lacks a major factor “attachment”. It simply rephrases and rearrange the words that are already given and/or uploaded on it. but cannot explain it by using emotions.

For instance, if a user commands any AI powered tool to write a story, it will be done in just few seconds, but it will lack the emotional attachment. On the other hand, a story written by a human being will be rich in emotions and feelings. Maybe the writer turned his own experience into the story. As the writer himself experienced that feeling, he can put that in words in such a

way that it hits directly in the heart of the reader or any other person. They can feel more attachment to it. They can see themselves in that story, which connects people more strongly.

 

The second major factor is intention and purpose. Human beings have their purpose and intentions for doing a certain job. It can either be an emotion or a thought. Human beings can challenge the society, write to change the entire perspective of a group of people, and many other reasons while AI does not possess any of this. It writes only because it is being commanded. It does not experience childhood, young age, love, hate, separation, loneliness – nothing at all which makes it merely a content provider while Human beings are the content experiencers.

They personally go through those feelings and phases, and they can better explain this!

 

Despite all these differences, both AI and Human creativity can go together. Humans can provide emotions, feelings, ideas and content while AI can provide speed, more information, new ideas and solutions to different problems. Instead of making AI and humans competitors they can become partners and offer better outcomes. For example, a graphic designer can ask AI to give him various initial concepts and then use his own concepts and creativity to make the best one.  AI may be able to imitate creativity, but human creativity comes from a life that no machine has ever lived.

AI has changed the way humans think about creativity. No matter how Fastly AI can generate the content to create pictures, write stories and compose music, it still cannot connect it with emotions. But human beings connect emotions, feelings, thoughts, ideas more creatively. As a human being, it’s the need for us to keep getting the content, art, music and information which emotionally connects us with each other.

The views, thoughts, and opinions expressed in this blog are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the U.S. Mission to Pakistan or  USEFP/PUAN.

Similar Posts

  • Vaping may be as harmful as smoking

    ByJustpaste.in

    Smoking is well known to cause lung cancer heart disease and breathing problems.  However many people believe that vaping is a safer alternative. New scientific research suggests this belief may be misleading. Studies show that using e-cigarettes can also harm the body and may cause damage similar to that seen in cigarette smokers. Experts say switching from cigarettes to vaping should not be considered completely safe. Although e-cigarettes do not contain traditional tobacco they still expose the body to harmful substances. Research published in 2026 by the University of New South Wales along with findings from scientists at the University of Southern California found that vaping can damage the DNA in cells of the mouth and lungs. DNA is the body’s genetic blueprint. It controls how cells grow and function. When DNA is damaged the risk of serious diseases including cancer can increase. Researchers also found that sweet and fruit flavored vape products may contribute to DNA damage. People who use pod based vaping devices showed even higher levels of cell damage in the study. According to the scientists vaping may increase the risk of cancers of the mouth and lungs.  The research also found that DNA damage in people who vape was almost as severe as the damage seen in cigarette smokers. Although vaping and smoking work differently both can seriously affect health. Health experts advise people not to think of vaping as a harmless option. Every vaping session may damage important cells in the body. They recommend avoiding vaping altogether and raising awareness about its possible health risks.

  • |

    The comfort of familiar stories

    ByJustpaste.in

    In a world that constantly demands novelty, the act of re-reading can feel like a radical act of slowing down. The digital feeds update every second and endless streams of new books hit shelves each month. In this case, opening a novel whose plot twists you already know by heart, whose characters are familiar companions, and whose ending holds no surprises might seem inefficient to an outsider. Yet, psychologists and literary scholars recognize that re-reading is not a passive repetition. It is a claimed psychological profound and an essential dimension of human storytelling. At its core, returning to a beloved text satisfies a deep need for emotional regulation. Life is unpredictable, chaotic, and frequently overwhelming. When we navigate complex personal challenges or heightened anxiety, processing entirely new information requires significant cognitive effort. Re-reading, by contrast, lowers the mental load. It offers what psychologists call predictable comfort. Knowing exactly how a narrative conflict resolves provides a soothing sense of control and stability. In the pages of a familiar book, the universe behaves according to rules we already understand. The phenomenon offers a safe harbor when the real world feels chaotic. However, the appeal of re-reading goes far beyond simple comfort. It also acts as a mirror reflecting our own internal growth. Heraclitus famously remarked that you cannot step into the same river twice, for it is not the same river, and you are not the same person. The same principle applies to literature. The physical words printed on the page do not change over time, but we do. When you re-read a book after five, ten, or twenty years, you bring a completely different set of life experiences, heartbreaks, victories, and insights to the text. A passage that meant little to you as a teenager might suddenly strike depth in adulthood. A character you once viewed as an antagonist might reveal subtle vulnerabilities that evoke your empathy today. In this way, re-reading becomes an intimate dialogue between your past and present selves. It is a clear timeline of your emotional and intellectual evolution. Additionally, re-reading changes our focus from what happens next to how the story is constructed. Our brains are liberated to appreciate the finer nuances of literary craft. We begin to notice subtle foreshadowing, thematic motifs, delicate sentence rhythms, and character moments that flew past us during our breathless initial read. Ultimately, re-reading reminds us that literature is not a checklist of titles to be consumed and discarded. The greatest books are living spaces. The places we can inhabit again and again, finding new rooms every time we cross the threshold.  

  • |

    How fiction brain-trains compassion

    ByJustpaste.in

    Empathy is the capacity to understand and share the feelings of another. It’s not merely an inherent personality trait; it is a cognitive muscle that requires exercise. While there are many ways to practice compassion in daily life, neuroscientists and psychological researchers have uncovered a uniquely powerful tool for training this mental capacity: reading deep, character-driven fiction. For decades, society viewed reading literature as a purely intellectual or escapist hobby. However, recent scientific studies using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) have revealed that when we read a story, our brains process the experience in ways remarkably similar to real-world social interaction. When an author describes a character running through a dark forest, struggling with heartbreak, or feeling a sharp pang of injustice, the sensory and emotional centers in the reader’s brain light up as if the reader were experiencing those events directly. This neural simulation allows us to step entirely out of our own shoes and temporarily inhabit the subjective reality of someone else. Psychologists often refer to this ability as theory of mind. It’s the cognitive skill that enables human beings to attribute mental states (beliefs, intents, desires, emotions, and knowledge) to themselves and others. Life only permits us to live a single, localized existence defined by our specific background, culture, and circumstance. Literary fiction breaks through those physical and social barriers. Through the pages of a novel, a reader living in a quiet suburban town can intimately experience the internal struggles of an immigrant navigating a new city, an incarcerated individual fighting for dignity, or a historic figure facing a agonizing moral dilemma. Crucially, fiction tells us what people do. Also, it exposes why they do it. It grants us unprecedented access to the secret thoughts, doubts, and vulnerabilities that real people rarely reveal in public. By witnessing a character’s internal contradictions, readers learn that human behavior is rarely black-and-white. We develop a tolerance for ambiguity and a healthier skepticism toward snap judgments. When we close the book, that expanded perspective lingers in our conscious mind, subtly altering how we interact with co-workers, strangers, and loved ones. Furthermore, reading fiction builds emotional stamina. It asks us to sit quietly with uncomfortable emotions like grief, fear, longing, and regret without fleeing into digital distractions. In doing so, it expands our capacity to hold space for others when they undergo difficult seasons in real life. Literary fiction, therefore, is far more than entertainment. It is a quiet, radical act of bridge-building. Every time we turn a page and immerse ourselves in a stranger’s story, we perform a vital neurological exercise that softens our defenses, broadens our horizons, and reminds us of our shared humanity.  

  • Algorithmic moderation and the shadow-ban dilemma

    ByJustpaste.in

    By Raheel Waqar I attended a workshop under the project titled “Digital Trust and Free Expression in the AI Era” at the Department of Media and Development Communication, University of the Punjab, supported by the U.S. Mission to Pakistan in partnership with the Pakistan-U.S. Alumni Network (PUAN) last week. During the discussions on digital trust, I remembered that a few months ago, I received a call from a friend who is a small business owner and runs a modest page selling handcrafted candles. She told me that her posts had suddenly stopped getting reaching people. No warning. No explanation. Her engagement dropped overnight, and when she contacted the platform, she received a flat, nonanswer. She wasn’t banned. She wasn’t warned. She was just… quieter. That is essentially the shadow-ban dilemma, and I believe it is one of the least discussed problems of trust in the age of AI. There is a reason for algorithmic moderation exists. The volume of content shared on a platform daily is far too large to be managed by humans alone. AI systems can now detect hate speech, misinformation, spam, and harassment faster than an entire team of human moderators. Theoretically, this creates a safer and more livable Internet. But where I differ from current structure is that moderation operates as black box, and the worst offender is shadow banning, silently restricting a user without informing them. If a platform explicitly rejects you, you can appeal, argue, or move on. Shadow-banning removes even the most basic dignity. You face punishment without knowing the charges; you are not shown the evidence and are rarely given any avenues for reclamation. I genuinely believe that trust is the digital currency. We bring our voices, our business, and our relationships to these platforms, expecting something close to a level playing field, even if imperfect. Shadow-banning violates that implied contract. It assumes the rules are clear while relying opaque algorithms, and doubt becomes corrosive. Users begin to question each drop in engagement. Was it the algorithm? Was it just a bad week? Did I say something wrong? This uncertainty leads to confusion and self-censorship, which is not healthy foundation for a digital public square. Moreover, the phenomenon of shadow-banning disproportionately effects those without influence, legal support, or the media visibility. A major creator, with millions of followers, may get a quick, individualized explanation when something goes wrong. My friend, the candle-seller, heard nothing. This imbalance is significant if free expression online is to be practiced, not not merely discussed — by everyone. I don’t believe that the solution is to eliminate moderation entirely. The combination of harassment, spam, and bad-faith users who overwhelm others makes a total freeforall unusable within minutes. As anyone who has used an unmoderated platform knows how quickly it becomes impossible to navigate when spam and abuse take over. When people are constantly shouted down, free expression is not free. However, there is a difference between moderation and invisible moderation. Platforms can reduce the reach of harmful content without disrespecting or degrading the users by withholding explanations. The technology to notify users already exists. What is missing is the will. In my own re-design of this system, three principles would guide it: A user should be notified, not in a lucky screenshot of a “test” a month later, but in a clear, timely notice to explain the general reason that their content or reach is being limited. It is not theatre; it is meaningful appeal. Many platforms claim to offer appeals, but these are often routed to another algorithm or a human who skims for a few seconds. Real appeal is a true second look with actual power to correct an error. Not all infractions are equal and deserve the same silence and indefinite containment. It is not the same as coordinated harassment campaigns; it is not borderline, or an honest mistake, or satire. There is nothing impossible for this. It is a matter of priorities. Transparency costs platforms something; it exposes them to scrutiny and disagreement. I am not opposed to algorithmic moderation. Used responsibly, it can make the internet more habitable space for all, particularly for those who are disproportionately targeted by harassment and abuse. However, moderation that is not transparent is not safety; it is control disguised as safety. In a world where artificial intelligence systems increasingly decide who is heard and who is quietly muted, we must hold these systems accountable for their explanations. Platforms that merely claim that they know how to handle moderation, do not build trust. Trust is constructed by showing their work. Shadow-banning is not just a technical issue; it is a question of what kind of digital public square we want to inhabit and whether we will insist on honest, accountable moderation. The views, thoughts, and opinions expressed in this blog are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the U.S. Mission to Pakistan or USEFP/PUAN. Raheel Waqar is a student of Media and Development Communication at University of the Punjab, Lahore and can be reached at raheelwaqar540@gmail.com.

  • Bad breath causes and prevention

    ByJustpaste.in

    Almost everyone experiences bad breath at some point in life. In medical terms this condition is called halitosis. While it is often temporary some people may have bad breath for a long time. In certain cases it can also be a sign of an underlying health problem. Experts estimate that about half of all adults experience bad breath at least once in their lifetime. •Common causes of bad breath •Poor oral hygiene One of the main causes of bad breath is not cleaning your teeth gums and tongue properly.  Tiny food particles can stay in the mouth and break down over time. This allows bacteria to grow and produce an unpleasant smell. •Not cleaning the tongue The tongue naturally collects bacteria. If it is not cleaned regularly these bacteria mix with leftover food and can cause bad breath. Cleaning your tongue every day is just as important as brushing your teeth. •Strong smelling foods Foods such as garlic onions and certain spices can make your breath smell bad. After digestion some of the natural oils from these foods enter the bloodstream and reach the lungs where they affect the smell of your breath. •Smoking Smoking is another common reason for bad breath. It leaves a strong smell in the mouth reduces saliva and increases the growth of harmful bacteria. •Dry mouth and not drinking enough water Saliva helps wash away food particles and bacteria. When your mouth is dry bacteria stay longer and produce bad odors. A dry mouth can happen if you sleep with your mouth open take certain medicines have problems with the salivary glands, or simply do not drink enough water. •Gum and tooth problems Plaque can build up around the teeth and gums if you do not brush and floss properly. Over time this can lead to gum disease infections, and bad breath. •Nose throat or sinus infections Bad breath may also be caused by sinus infections throat infections tonsil stones or other conditions affecting the nose and throat. •Certain medical conditions Sometimes bad breath is linked to health problems such as diabetes kidney disease liver disease or acid reflux. If bad breath continues even after improving oral hygiene it is a good idea to consult a doctor or dentist. •Simple tips to keep your breath fresh •Brush your teeth twice a day. •Clean your tongue every day. •Floss regularly to remove trapped food. •Drink plenty of water to keep your mouth moist. •Avoid smoking. •Limit foods with strong odors before social events. Visit your dentist regularly for check ups and cleanings. In many cases bad breath can be prevented with good oral hygiene and healthy daily habits. However if the problem does not go away it may be a sign of an underlying medical condition that should be checked by a healthcare professional.

  • |

    Silence is the gateway to self-knowledge

    ByJustpaste.in

    In a world governed by the constant impulse to broadcast every thought, quiet reflection has become a rare commodity. Modern culture often treats silence as an uncomfortable void. It is termed as a gap in conversation that must be immediately filled with idle chatter, opinions, or background noise. However, a insightful cultural piece by The Marginalian revisit Kahlil Gibran’s classic masterpiece, The Prophet. It reminds us that embracing silence is not an act of withdrawal, but a necessary passage toward understanding who we truly are. When Kahlil Gibran wrote The Prophet in 1923, he addressed human struggles that remain relevant today. In his discourse on speech, Gibran suggests that incessant talking often springs from a subtle internal distress. We speak most compulsively when we lose touch with the quiet rhythm of our own thoughts. When we can no longer sit comfortably with our internal world, language transforms from genuine connection into a mere distraction. Thus, rendering itself as verbal pastime designed to drown out silence. Gibran offers a vivid metaphor for this dynamic. He writes that thought is a bird of space that can spread its wings inside a cage of words. Yet, it remains incapable of real flight. By reducing complex feelings into rigid verbal formulas, we often constrain the depth of our experiences. Excessive talk can obscure deeper understanding rather than clarify it. It might replace genuine contemplation with superficial noise. Why do so many people flee from quiet moments? According to Gibran, chatter frequently serves as a shield against the intimidating clarity of solitude. In the stillness of being alone, external distractions vanish. This silence forces us to stand face-to-face with our unvarnished selves: our fears, insecurities, unresolved longings, and raw truths. When Gibran’s prophet-protagonist is asked to address the matter of talking, he responds: You talk when you cease to be at peace with your thoughts; And when you can no longer dwell in the solitude of your heart you live in your lips, and sound is a diversion and a pastime. And in much of your talking, thinking is half murdered. For thought is a bird of space, that in a cage of words may indeed unfold its wings but cannot fly.In a world governed by the constant impulse to broadcast every thought, quiet reflection has become a rare commodity. For many, this exposure feels uncomfortable, triggering an urgent desire to keep a conversation going. It takes genuine courage to endure the silence long enough to hear what our inner world is actually trying to tell us. Gibran’s perspective on self-knowledge carries a warning against over-categorizing human identity. He cautions against treating the human soul as a static math problem or a territory that can be fully mapped and measured. Rather than declaring, “I have found the absolute truth,” Gibran suggests a humbler, more open attitude: “I have found a truth” He describes the human spirit not as a straight line or a single rigid structure, but as a boundless sea unfolding like a lotus with countless petals. When we attempt to define our entire identity through fixed labels or rigid verbal definitions, we risk placing artificial boundaries around a psyche that is naturally vast and evolving. Real self-knowledge isn’t about arriving at a final conclusion about who we are… it is about maintaining a curiosity toward our own inner evolution. Reclaiming Quiet in a Hyper-Connected Age In an epoch characterized by constant connectivity, Gibran’s reflections serve as an urgent invitation to recalibrate our relationship with quietness. Silence is not the absence of sound. Rather, it is a space where creative intuition, emotional healing, and genuine self-awareness take root.  

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *