cambodia flies over

Cambodia Flies Over 250 Drones Across Thai Border, Violating Ceasefire

BANGKOK – Cambodia has violated the ceasefire agreement reached just two days ago by flying more than 250 drones over multiple Thai border areas, the Royal Thai Army announced on Monday. Army spokesman Major General Winthai Suvaree stated that the incursions occurred on Sunday night and represent a serious provocation.

Thailand–Cambodia Ceasefire Takes Effect, to Be Monitored for 72 Hours

According to the 2nd Army, the drones were sighted over several border zones, including Chong Bok, Chong An Ma, Sattasome, Sam Ta, Don Tuan, Chong Krang, Ta Muen Thom, and Sai Taku. These areas span four northeastern Thai provinces bordering Cambodia: Buri Ram, Si Sa Ket, Surin, and Ubon Ratchathani.

Major General Winthai condemned the action as a breach of both tension-reduction measures and the joint statement issued after the General Border Committee (GBC) meeting on December 27. “This act is considered a provocation and violation of tension-relieving measures and does not comply with the Joint Statement,” he said. “Cambodia continues with its provocation and hostility against Thailand, which jeopardises security and the safety of military personnel and people along the border.”

The spokesman warned that continued violations could affect Thailand’s planned release of 18 captured Cambodian soldiers. “If violations of the agreement and of national sovereignty continue, the army must do its duty, which is to protect the national interest and security,” he added.

Eleventh Thai Soldier Loses Leg in Sisaket Landmine Blast

Major General Winthai noted that Thailand has adhered to peaceful efforts to reduce tensions. He also recalled that a similar large-scale drone deployment by Cambodia followed the first round of border clashes earlier this year, ultimately leading to renewed attacks earlier this month.

-Thailand News (TN)

Similar Posts

  • | | |

    Daily petrol prices trigger Senate debate over tra…

    Islamabad: Pakistan’s new daily petroleum pricing system came under serious discussion in the Senate as lawmakers questioned whether the mechanism is providing relief to consumers or creating new challenges for the public and fuel dealers. The Senate Standing Committee on Petroleum reviewed the daily petrol price determination system and demanded clarity over why the government replaced the previous fortnightly price revision system with daily changes. The committee questioned the reasons behind the new policy and asked whether frequent price adjustments were helping ordinary citizens or increasing uncertainty in the fuel market. Federal Minister for Petroleum informed the committee that the government had removed political influence from the petroleum pricing process by giving the responsibility of setting prices to the Oil and Gas Regulatory Authority (OGRA), an independent regulator. He said the new system was introduced to make petroleum price decisions more transparent and based on market conditions. OGRA Chairman informed the committee that petrol prices are calculated through a seven day average of international Platts benchmark prices. He explained that instead of directly passing sudden changes in international oil markets to consumers, the seven day average spreads the impact over time. According to OGRA, the system helps reduce sudden price shocks, especially during international tensions and market uncertainty. Officials said the daily pricing mechanism also aims to discourage people from creating artificial shortages or making unfair profits through speculation. However, senators raised concerns about the effect of frequent price changes on citizens and businesses. The committee expressed concern over the high tax burden on petroleum products and questioned how increasing fuel costs affect the daily lives of ordinary people. Representatives of the Petroleum Dealers Association informed the committee that frequent price revisions were creating operational difficulties for fuel dealers. They said continuous price changes make business planning more difficult and require better coordination between authorities and dealers. The committee directed OGRA to consult all stakeholders, including petroleum dealers, and prepare practical recommendations to address their concerns. Members also stressed the need for greater use of technology in the petroleum supply chain to prevent fuel smuggling, adulteration and illegal storage. The committee said a stronger digital monitoring system could improve transparency and ensure consumers receive better quality fuel. Senator Umer Farooq chaired the meeting of the Senate Standing Committee on Petroleum, where members reviewed the new pricing system and related petroleum sector issues. The committee emphasized that petroleum pricing directly affects every citizen because fuel costs influence transportation, business expenses and prices of daily goods. Members said the government and regulators must ensure that any pricing system protects consumers while maintaining stability in the petroleum market. The committee directed OGRA to continue reviewing the mechanism and ensure that the interests of consumers remain the top priority.

  • | |

    KP orders blacklist of corrupt, underperforming of…

    PESHAWAR: The Khyber Pakhtunkhwa government has directed all provincial departments to prepare verified lists of corrupt, disreputable, underperforming and suspicious officers by August 7 as part of a major governance reform aimed at improving transparency, accountability and public service delivery. According to official directives, officers included on the verified negative lists will not be posted to sensitive positions or offices involving direct interaction with the public. The government has also instructed departments to ensure that all appointments and transfers are made strictly on the basis of merit, performance and suitability. The directives further emphasize transparency in public procurement and financial management, the establishment of an effective public grievance redressal system, the digitization of government services and ensuring that officers deliver timely and efficient services to citizens. Sources said the instructions were issued following a high-level meeting chaired by Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Chief Secretary Shahab Ali Shah. The meeting was attended by administrative secretaries, director generals and heads of various government departments. According to the sources, if the decisions are fully implemented, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa could become the first province in Pakistan to officially maintain a verified negative list of government officers with poor performance records, corruption allegations or damaged reputations. An official document quoted the chief secretary as saying that providing quality public services and ensuring the welfare of citizens should remain the top priority of every government department

  • Thai ‘Michael Jackson’ Tik Shiro Jailed 2 Years Over Fatal Drink-Driving

    BANGKOK, Thailand — A prominent Thai singer known as the country’s “Michael Jackson” has been sentenced to two years in prison by a Bangkok criminal court for a fatal drink-driving crash that claimed the lives of two siblings in late 2024. Youth detained for drink driving killing a traffic police officer Manasawin Nantasen, widely recognized […]

  • New Year Road Safety Campaign Records 207 Fatalities in Five Days

    BANGKOK, Thailand – The first five days of the New Year holiday period saw 207 lives lost and 1,141 people injured in a total of 1,185 traffic accidents nationwide, according to figures released by authorities on Sunday. Park Rangers Search for Elephant Injured in Khao Yai Road Collision Public Health Minister Pattana Promphat reported that […]

  • | | |

    Pakistanis get relief as US visa policy overturned

    A US federal judge has struck down a State Department policy that suspended immigrant visa processing for applicants from Pakistan and 74 other countries. US District Judge Jeannette Vargas issued the ruling in Manhattan, finding that the policy exceeded the legal authority of Secretary of State Marco Rubio. The State Department had introduced the suspension in January, preventing consular officials from issuing immigrant visas to applicants based solely on their nationality. Judge Vargas described the policy as unlawful and said it conflicted with federal immigration law. She ruled that the law does not give the Secretary of State the authority to impose a blanket suspension on immigrant visa issuance based on an applicant’s nationality. The policy affected applicants from a wide range of countries, including Pakistan and Bangladesh in South Asia. Several countries in Latin America, the Balkans, Africa, the Middle East and the Caribbean were also included. US authorities had defended the measure by arguing that applicants from the listed countries were considered more likely to become dependent on government-funded assistance after entering the United States. The ruling came in a case brought by immigrant rights organisations, visa applicants and US citizens sponsoring family members from the affected countries. The plaintiffs challenged the State Department’s decision, arguing that the blanket suspension unlawfully restricted access to the immigrant visa process. The decision represents a legal setback for the Trump administration, which has pursued tougher immigration policies since returning to office. The administration has said its immigration measures are intended to strengthen national security and reduce pressure on public resources. Immigrant rights groups, however, have criticised several aspects of the crackdown. They have raised concerns about due process, discrimination and the treatment of ethnic minorities. The State Department had not immediately issued a response to the judge’s decision.

  • | |

    Ariana Grande takes legal action after alleged the…

    Ariana Grande is taking a firm stand against the unauthorized leaks of her unreleased music and private creative materials. The Grammy-winning singer has filed a lawsuit against unidentified individuals, accusing them of orchestrating a years-long hacking campaign that targeted people within her professional circle and resulted in the release of confidential content never meant for the public.  According to court documents filed in Los Angeles County Superior Court on July 27, Grande’s lawsuit names John Doe 1 and John Does 2 through 100 as defendants. The singer alleges that the individuals illegally accessed digital accounts belonging to photographers, producers and other close collaborators through phishing schemes and other hacking methods. The complaint claims the hackers stole unreleased songs, photographs, videos and audio recordings documenting Grande’s creative process.  Grande’s legal team argues that the stolen files were never intended for public release and that some of the material was sold on the dark web for significant amounts of money. The lawsuit further claims that 45 unreleased songs were leaked in 2023 alone and that hundreds of similar leaks have affected the singer since the beginning of her music career in 2011. According to the complaint, the repeated breaches have caused “substantial and irreparable harm” to both her career and her personal privacy.  The singer is not only seeking damages but is also asking the court to help identify the anonymous individuals behind the alleged cyberattacks. By obtaining subpoenas, her legal team hopes to trace the hackers’ digital footprints and hold them accountable for what the lawsuit describes as an unlawful invasion of privacy and intellectual property theft.  A source close to Grande told People that the legal action goes beyond her personal case. The source said the lawsuit is intended to protect artists’ rights and discourage future attacks on musicians and other creators. “Artists deserve the right to control how and when their art is shared with the world,” the source said, emphasizing that unauthorized leaks undermine the creative process.  Grande has previously spoken out against music leaks. In a 2024 interview, she warned those responsible for leaking her unreleased song “Fantasize” that there would be consequences, famously saying, “I’ll see you in jail, literally.” Her latest lawsuit demonstrates that she is now following through on that warning.  As the legal battle unfolds, Grande’s case highlights the growing challenges artists face in protecting their work in the digital age. The outcome could have wider implications for how the entertainment industry combats cybercrime, safeguards unreleased content and defends creators’ rights in an increasingly connected world. 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *