Delhi high court orders removal of Kala Hiran teaser, says Salman Khan’s reputation must be protected

US influencer and hairstylist Sara Gilson was fatally shot in what authorities are investigating as an apparent murder-suicide, just weeks after she publicly accused her estranged husband, Jeremiah “Shawn” Duffey, of being a paedophile in a viral TikTok video. The tragic incident has drawn widespread attention, raising concerns about domestic violence and online safety. Gilson, 43, had built a strong following on TikTok by sharing lifestyle, beauty and family-related content. She also worked as a hairstylist in Oklahoma and frequently posted videos featuring her children and everyday life. Shortly before her death, one of her TikTok videos went viral after she claimed she had discovered disturbing information about her estranged husband. According to investigators, police responded to a 911 call from Gilson’s home in Owasso, Oklahoma, on July 23. A child inside the house contacted emergency services, and the dispatcher reportedly heard screaming and crying before a loud noise. Officers later found Gilson and Duffey with fatal gunshot wounds. Authorities believe Duffey shot Gilson before taking his own life. The investigation remains ongoing. The case has gained national attention because it followed a series of legal actions taken by Gilson. Court records show she had filed multiple protective orders against Duffey over the years, with the most recent one granted shortly before her death. The order required him to stay away from her and leave their shared home. Separate court documents also reveal that another protective order had been filed on behalf of a 15-year-old girl, accusing Duffey—who coached a youth basketball team—of inappropriate sexual conduct. Those allegations are separate from the homicide investigation and had not been resolved in court at the time of the incident. Gilson’s final TikTok posts received millions of views after she alleged that her estranged husband was a paedophile. The videos quickly spread across social media, with many users expressing concern for her safety and urging authorities to investigate the claims. Following her death, those posts resurfaced as people reflected on the tragedy. Friends and followers have remembered Gilson as a devoted mother and a positive presence online. A fundraising campaign has since been launched to support her children, while tributes continue to pour in across social media. Many users have described the incident as a heartbreaking reminder of the dangers faced by victims of domestic abuse. The case remains under investigation, and authorities have not announced any additional criminal proceedings because the suspected shooter is deceased. Meanwhile, advocates say the tragedy highlights the importance of taking threats, protective orders and allegations of domestic violence seriously, while ensuring victims have access to timely protection and support.

BTS member Jungkook has addressed fans directly after a series of privacy violations left him visibly frustrated, drawing a clear line between genuine fan support and behaviour that crosses into rudeness and disrespect. During a live session on Weverse, Jungkook spoke candidly about an incident that had clearly bothered him. He described going into a bakery to simply buy bread when a fan shoved a camera directly into his face without warning or permission. “Taking pictures together isn’t a problem, but I went in to get some bread and there was someone who shoved a camera in my face. That’s not good manners,” he said, adding plainly that this kind of behaviour was “kind of rude.” It was not an angry outburst. It was a measured and direct appeal from someone who has consistently tried to maintain a warm relationship with his fanbase while also asking to be treated like a human being rather than a subject for content creation. This is not the first time Jungkook has raised these concerns. He has previously spoken about fans showing up near his home, sending unsolicited deliveries and tracking his private movements and whereabouts. Each time, he has responded with patience and directness, asking people to reconsider whether what they were doing was genuinely supportive or simply intrusive. The latest comments come at a significant moment for BTS as a group. The band is currently preparing for its highly anticipated group comeback, with all members having completed or in the process of completing their mandatory military service in South Korea. Fans have been eagerly watching every update, which may partly explain the heightened intensity of interest in the members’ private lives during this period. But for Jungkook, that context does not change the basic principle he was articulating. The response from the BTS ARMY was largely supportive. Many fans took to social media to echo his message, encouraging other supporters to engage with the group’s work in ways that did not involve crossing personal boundaries. The conversations that followed touched on a broader tension that exists within large, dedicated fanbases, where the line between admiration and intrusion can blur, sometimes without the fan even realising it. Jungkook’s willingness to address the issue directly, on his own terms, in a live conversation with fans rather than through a formal statement, reflects a specific kind of relationship he has always tried to maintain. He speaks to his audience honestly and without pretence, which is precisely why the message landed the way it did. Respecting a public figure’s private moments is not a complicated ask. When someone is simply trying to buy bread, the most supportive thing a fan can do is let them.