indias chief justice
|

India’s chief justice clarifies ‘Cockroach’ remark, days comments were misquoted

 

India’s Chief Justice Surya Kant has clarified his controversial remarks involving the term “cockroach,” saying that his comments made during a Supreme Court hearing were misquoted and subsequently presented out of context.

In a recent interview, Chief Justice Surya Kant addressed the controversy surrounding his remarks and alleged that the statement had been deliberately misrepresented. He said that his comments were presented in a misleading manner, creating confusion and misunderstanding, particularly among young people.

The Chief Justice said that what he had actually stated during the court proceedings was different from the version that was circulated publicly. According to him, his remarks were taken out of context and presented in a way that misled the public and India’s youth.

Surya Kant also expressed concern over the growing practice of sharing short video clips of court proceedings on social media without providing the necessary background or context. He said that isolated clips can create an inaccurate impression of what was actually said during judicial proceedings.

The Chief Justice appealed to the media as well as citizens to recognize that constitutional rights come with corresponding responsibilities and duties. He stressed that while people have the right to express their views and access information, they must also understand their responsibility toward society.

“When we talk about rights, we must also have the ability to perform our duties,” Surya Kant said, emphasizing the importance of maintaining social harmony. He added that society must make continuous efforts to promote harmony and responsible public discourse.

The controversy dates back to May, when the Chief Justice reportedly compared holders of fake degrees and people allegedly misusing the Right to Information (RTI) system or social media to “cockroaches.” The remarks triggered a strong public reaction and generated widespread discussion on social media.

Following the controversy, a satirical public political movement called the “Cockroach Janta Party” was reportedly established. The group used the Chief Justice’s controversial remarks as a basis for its political satire and public activities.

The movement has also attracted attention through its recent protest over the alleged NET-UG paper leak issue in Delhi. Demonstrators reportedly gathered at Jantar Mantar one of the capital’s prominent locations for political protests and public demonstrations.

The protest over the examination paper leak reportedly ended with calls for the resignation of Indian Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan, highlighting the growing political and public anger surrounding the issue.

The latest comments by Chief Justice Surya Kant appear aimed at clarifying his position and explaining the context in which the original “cockroach” remarks were made. His criticism of social media clips also reflects broader concerns within the judiciary about court proceedings being circulated online without the complete context.

The controversy has sparked a wider debate in India over judicial language, freedom of expression, responsible use of social media and the responsibilities that accompany constitutional rights.

By clarifying his remarks, the Chief Justice has urged the public and media to consider the complete context of judicial observations rather than relying solely on short clips or selectively quoted statements circulating on social media. He also emphasized the need for citizens to balance their rights with their responsibilities and work toward maintaining social harmony.

Similar Posts

  • | | |

    Fake spiritual guru arrested in Pune over alleged …

    A 23-year-old man posing as a motivational speaker, social media influencer and spiritual guide has been arrested in Pune, India, over allegations of obtaining private images of a 22-year-old woman and later using them to harass and threaten her. According to Indian media reports, police launched an investigation after the woman filed a complaint against the accused, identified as Divya Jitendra Parmar. Police subsequently arrested the suspect and seized a mobile phone and laptop believed to have been used in the alleged offence. Investigators said the accused had built an online persona portraying himself as a trusted motivational speaker and spiritual figure. He allegedly contacted the woman through social media and gradually gained her confidence. According to the complaint, the accused later told the woman that she needed to follow a particular method to remove what he described as negative energy from her body. Under this pretext, he allegedly persuaded her to share private images and follow certain physical exercises. Police allege that the accused subsequently used the images to harass the woman and threatened to circulate them if she refused to establish a sexual relationship with him. The woman then approached police and lodged a complaint. During the investigation, authorities reportedly seized the suspect’s mobile phone and laptop, along with photographs, videos, messages and other digital evidence. Police are examining the material to establish the full circumstances of the case. Investigators are also looking into whether the accused may have targeted other women using a similar method. This aspect of the investigation could determine whether the alleged incident was isolated or part of a wider pattern of online manipulation. The case has also highlighted the risks associated with individuals who use social media to build false identities and gain the trust of vulnerable people. Authorities have increasingly emphasized the importance of verifying online identities and reporting threats involving private images. Police have registered a case against the accused under relevant provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) and the Information Technology Act. The investigation remains ongoing, and the allegations will be subject to the legal process. The case serves as another warning about the misuse of private digital content and the dangers of trusting unverified online personalities who claim to offer spiritual, motivational or personal guidance.

  • |

    China missile test deepens pacific’s struggle fo…

    SUVA: A Chinese ballistic-missile test in the Pacific has exposed a growing dilemma for the region’s small island nations: how can they preserve their vision of an “Ocean of Peace” while increasingly finding themselves caught between the military ambitions of major powers? China’s July missile launch, its first known ballistic-missile test into the Pacific since September 2024, has intensified concerns about the region’s rapid militarisation. The test came just hours after Fiji signed a major defence agreement with Australia, its first-ever military alliance. The timing highlighted the competing security interests shaping the Pacific, where the United States and China are increasingly contesting influence. Yet despite widespread concern among Pacific leaders, the region failed to agree on a joint statement condemning the Chinese missile test during a meeting of foreign ministers in Suva last week. Papua New Guinea Foreign Minister Justin Tkatchenko described the launch as “totally inappropriate”, saying that while China remained a close friend and partner of Papua New Guinea, the missile test was not helpful. Beijing had informed Papua New Guinea about the launch beforehand, Tkatchenko said, but did not provide details about where the missile would land. China defended the exercise at the time. Foreign Ministry spokesperson Mao Ning said the test had been conducted safely and urged other countries not to “over-interpret” the event. Pacific caught between major powers The missile launch was the latest in a series of military developments that have transformed the Pacific into an increasingly contested strategic space. Chinese naval deployments and live-fire exercises, including drills in the Tasman Sea, have become more visible. At the same time, US allies have expanded military exercises around Guam and Hawaii, while Washington maintains major military facilities and forces across Hawaii, Guam and the Marshall Islands. For Pacific island governments, the growing military activity creates an uncomfortable contradiction. Many have repeatedly insisted that their region should not become another battleground for global power competition. In September 2025, Pacific leaders endorsed the Ocean of Peace Declaration, pledging to protect the region and strengthen international peace and security. The initiative was intended to put Pacific countries themselves at the centre of discussions about their security rather than allowing outside powers to define the region’s strategic priorities. David Peebles of the Australian National University’s Pacific Security College said Pacific nations had historically resisted security agendas imposed by larger countries. But the growing number of defence agreements is now testing that principle. Defence deals bring benefits — and fears For some Pacific governments, security partnerships offer practical advantages. They can provide surveillance against illegal fishing, disaster-response capabilities, policing assistance, military equipment and training. Australia’s new defence agreement with Fiji, known as the Ocean of Peace Alliance, reflects that approach. But critics fear that a growing network of bilateral security arrangements could gradually draw Pacific nations deeper into the strategic competition between China and the United States. Tuvalu’s permanent foreign secretary, Pasuna Tuaga, speaking in a personal capacity, expressed concern over increasing militarisation, including security arrangements such as the AUKUS partnership between Australia, Britain and the United States. The concern is not simply about military exercises or missiles. Pacific governments also worry that agreements could eventually influence how their territory, waters and critical infrastructure are used. Solomon Islands Foreign Minister Rick Houenipwela, who chaired the Suva talks, stressed that the region’s security agenda must remain “conceived by the Pacific, shaped by the Pacific”. Yet achieving that unity is becoming increasingly difficult. China divides Pacific consensus The failure to produce a common statement on China’s missile test revealed just how sharply interests differ among Pacific nations. Officials familiar with the discussions said Kiribati and Nauru did not support the wording of a proposed statement. Both countries have strengthened relations with Beijing after switching diplomatic recognition away from Taiwan. New Zealand Foreign Minister Winston Peters attributed the failure to reach consensus to foreign influence, although he did not identify any country. The disagreement reflects a broader challenge. Some Pacific governments, particularly those closer to longstanding US military facilities, favour stronger security ties with Washington and its allies. Others remain cautious about becoming involved in military competition between major powers and maintain close economic or diplomatic relations with Beijing. Fiji faces a difficult balancing act Fiji is now at the centre of this debate. The country signed its defence agreement with Australia and participated for the first time in the US-led RIMPAC military exercises last month. At the same time, Fiji has publicly supported the vision of a peaceful Pacific free from major-power confrontation. Foreign Minister Sakiasi Ditoka acknowledged the tension, saying Pacific nations wanted to be free from “all these war-making paraphernalia” while recognising that some security capabilities were necessary to protect them. For Pacific leaders, the challenge is increasingly about finding the right balance. The region does not want to choose sides in a rivalry between Washington and Beijing. But as military exercises expand, defence agreements multiply and missiles are tested in Pacific waters, remaining completely outside that rivalry is becoming harder. The issue is expected to return to the spotlight when Pacific leaders gather in Palau in three weeks for the Pacific Islands Forum summit. The missile test may have lasted only moments, but its political impact could linger far longer — forcing Pacific nations to confront whether their dream of an “Ocean of Peace” can survive amid an increasingly militarised region.

  • | | |

    China’s Saindak copper mine in Pakistan faces su…

    China’s long-running copper mining project in Pakistan is facing growing operational challenges as repeated militant attacks in Balochistan disrupt supply routes connected to the mine. The Saindak copper and gold mine, located in Balochistan’s Chagai district, is considered one of China’s oldest mining investments in Pakistan and remains its only major copper interest in the country. Analysts say ongoing security issues have created difficulties for transporting materials and maintaining regular operations. The attacks along key routes have raised concerns about what some analysts describe as an “economic blockade,” potentially affecting the movement of supplies required for mining activities and the shipment of copper produced at the site. Copper is a strategically important commodity for China, which is the world’s largest consumer of the metal due to its extensive manufacturing, energy, and technology industries. Any disruption to supply sources can create concerns for industries dependent on stable copper availability. The Saindak project has long been viewed as an important symbol of Pakistan-China economic cooperation. The mine has contributed to Pakistan’s mineral sector while providing China with access to copper resources. However, security challenges in Balochistan have repeatedly affected development projects and infrastructure networks. The province has witnessed several militant attacks targeting government installations, security forces, and economic projects. Officials and security agencies have increased efforts to protect strategic assets and transportation routes, but continued instability remains a major challenge for investors operating in the region. Experts say maintaining security around mining operations is essential not only for the continuity of the Saindak project but also for attracting future foreign investment in Pakistan’s mineral resources. As global demand for critical minerals continues to rise, the stability of resource-rich regions like Balochistan will remain a key factor in determining the future of mining cooperation between Pakistan and international partners.

  • |

    US fuel opens a capitalist crack in Cuba

    HAVANA: Gasoline selling for as much as $38 a gallon, diesel advertised on social media and fuel stored inside cramped apartments are offering an unusual glimpse of private enterprise in communist Cuba, where the energy sector has long remained firmly under state control. A US policy allowing American companies to export fuel to private Cuban businesses has triggered an unexpected transformation. As Cuba struggles with shortages, blackouts and a weakened public transport system, imported fuel is creating a growing private market — while also exposing a sharp divide between those who can afford it and millions who cannot. The change follows the collapse of Cuba’s traditional fuel supplies from Venezuela and Mexico after the United States removed Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro in January. With sanctions discouraging tankers from sailing toward the island, fuel shortages have increasingly affected transport, hospitals, schools and other essential services. Under an exception to Washington’s oil restrictions, however, private Cuban restaurants, retailers, taxi operators and other businesses have been allowed to import fuel. The impact has been striking. Between February and May, around 900,000 barrels of US fuel entered Cuba — enough to meet only about nine days of the country’s energy requirements. Yet those relatively small shipments have helped create a new network of legal wholesalers, private buyers and illegal resellers. Gasoline becomes a luxury For ordinary Cubans, the new fuel market has often brought frustration rather than relief. On a July afternoon in Havana, 53-year-old Amarilis Sanchez waited for hours at a bus stop after attending her daughter’s birthday celebration. Public buses, which normally cost only two pesos, were unreliable. Nearby, taxi drivers offered rides in vintage cars, but one driver quoted Sanchez 1,000 pesos for the journey — roughly 500 times the price of a bus ride. Unable to afford it, Sanchez considered spending the night at her daughter’s home and trying again for a bus the following day. Her experience illustrates how Cuba’s fuel crisis is creating two very different realities: one for people with access to private vehicles and imported fuel, and another for those dependent on the country’s struggling public transport network. Black-market gasoline prices reportedly reached $10 per litre, or about $38 per gallon, during the spring before falling as imports increased. Social media fuels a new market The emerging trade is increasingly visible online. WhatsApp groups and Facebook pages advertise gasoline and diesel, while some sellers store fuel in apartments and small shops despite the dangers posed by fire, explosions and toxic fumes. At one Havana convenience store, a shopkeeper reportedly kept around a dozen 20-litre fuel containers in a backroom, selling gasoline for approximately $5 per litre. Private companies are also moving into the newly emerging legal wholesale market. By late July, almost 200 Cuban businesses had received permission to distribute fuel wholesale to other private companies. One company, A Granel, advertises diesel through social media and charges $2.50 per litre for a 940-litre tank. The promotion reportedly features a model walking through a warehouse of diesel containers while Daddy Yankee’s famous song Gasolina plays in the background — an unusually flashy image for a country where the energy industry has historically been dominated by the state. Are Cuban gas stations next? The transformation could go further. Cuban lawmakers approved a broad package of economic reforms in June aimed at opening the energy sector to private and foreign investment. Prime Minister Manuel Marrero Cruz later announced that Cuba had approved its first foreign investment project focused on importing and selling fuel, although he did not name the company. The reforms have raised the possibility that private operators could eventually take control of some of Cuba’s familiar state-run Cupet petrol stations. For now, however, retail fuel sales remain largely under state control. Some state-owned stations are storing imported fuel but can distribute it only to vehicles belonging to authorised private businesses. Cuban authorities have defended the reforms while rejecting the idea that they represent a move toward large-scale privatisation. President Miguel Diaz-Canel has accused Washington of imposing a “genocidal siege” on Cuba and said economic changes were not being introduced to satisfy the United States. A lifeline with a heavy price The new fuel market has helped prevent some businesses from shutting down completely. During recent power outages, restaurants and shops with generators powered by imported fuel remained illuminated while much of Havana was plunged into darkness. But experts warn that the emerging system could deepen inequality. With the average government salary reportedly around $10 a month, imported gasoline remains unaffordable for most of Cuba’s roughly nine million residents. Cuban sociologist Mayra Espina said the limited fuel supplies had helped prevent “complete paralysis” but warned that the benefits were overwhelmingly concentrated among those able to pay. The result is an extraordinary contradiction: a small opening toward private enterprise is helping Cuba keep parts of its economy running, while simultaneously making access to basic mobility and energy increasingly dependent on wealth. For a country that has spent decades keeping fuel firmly within the state system, Cuba’s new gasoline economy may therefore prove to be more than a temporary response to shortage. It could become an early test of how far Havana is prepared to let capitalism into one of its most tightly controlled sectors.

  • |

    Devastating Russian ballistic missile strikes claim lives across Ukraine following presidential warning

    Russian forces executed a coordinated overnight barrage of ballistic missiles targeting several Ukrainian urban centres, resulting in multiple civilian casualties and extensive structural damage shortly after President Volodymyr Zelenskyy issued a national safety alert. A direct hit from an Iskander-M ballistic missile destroyed a family home on the outskirts of Kryvyi Rih, killing six people, including two young girls aged five and twelve, and leaving at least eight others wounded. In the capital city of Kyiv, emergency services confirmed one death alongside widespread fires across several municipal districts, whilst residential buildings in the western city of Lviv also sustained damage during the bombardment. The severe escalation prompted neighbouring Poland to scramble fighter jets and activate ground-based air defence systems to secure its own national airspace. In response to the wave of destruction, President Zelenskyy renewed his urgent appeal to international allies for additional air defence missiles to replenish depleted stockpiles and protect civilian infrastructure. Meanwhile, in Russia’s western Penza region, a Ukrainian retaliatory drone strike set fire to a large commercial warehouse, injuring one individual and forcing the emergency evacuation of approximately two hundred workers.

  • | | | |

    Qatar restores maritime traffic after two-week suspension

    Qatar has fully resumed maritime navigation for all types of vessels after a two-week suspension imposed amid heightened security tensions in the Gulf and around the Strait of Hormuz. Qatar’s Transport Ministry announced that maritime activities would resume from Sunday. It urged shipping companies, vessel operators and other concerned parties to follow safety regulations and official instructions to ensure safe voyages. The ministry did not provide further details about the reasons behind the decision. Qatar had suspended maritime navigation on July 12 as regional tensions intensified. It had earlier halted maritime traffic on June 29 before partially restoring operations on July 5. The conflict also prompted several shipping companies to advise vessels to remain outside the Strait of Hormuz because of security concerns. Meanwhile, Iran said it had made progress in talks with Oman on arrangements for safe shipping through the Strait of Hormuz. Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baqaei said officials from the two countries held discussions in Tehran on Friday and Saturday. The talks focused on common principles and practical mechanisms for ensuring the safe movement of ships through the strategic waterway. Baqaei described the discussions as productive and said progress had been achieved. He added that technical and political consultations between the two countries would continue. Iran also said there had been no change in the existing maritime traffic situation in the Strait of Hormuz. The waterway remains a key route for international energy and commercial shipments, making any prolonged disruption a major concern for global trade. At the same time, Iranian military officials claimed that Tehran had targeted US military facilities in Jordan, Kuwait and Bahrain during retaliatory operations. Brigadier General Mohammad Reza Akraminia said Iran had taken action after accusing Washington of violating previous commitments related to the Strait of Hormuz. Iranian army spokesman General Abolfazl Shekarchi also claimed that the United States had failed to achieve its objectives against Iran. He described the situation as difficult for Washington and said the US was looking for a new strategy. Iranian officials further claimed that US military infrastructure in Iraq’s Erbil suffered extensive damage during the conflict. Tehran has warned that its military operations could resume if hostilities escalate again. The United States, meanwhile, says its naval blockade against Iran remains in effect. US Central Command said American forces had redirected several commercial vessels accused of attempting to breach the blockade. It also reported disabling two vessels and boarding others to verify compliance. One oil tanker was inspected in the Arabian Sea before continuing its journey, while another vessel was reportedly disabled in the Gulf of Oman after allegedly ignoring repeated warnings. The US actions have added to concerns over the safety of commercial shipping in the region. Kuwait has rejected reports that it participated in military operations against Iran. Kuwait’s ambassador to the United States said her country had not taken part in attacks against Tehran and had not allowed its territory, airspace or territorial waters to be used for offensive operations. Kuwait has also condemned attacks against shipping in the Red Sea. Its Foreign Ministry described such attacks as a threat to maritime security, international trade and freedom of navigation. Kuwait expressed solidarity with Saudi Arabia and backed measures taken by Riyadh to protect its security and interests. The latest Red Sea tensions followed the Houthis’ announcement of a naval blockade targeting Saudi Arabia. Saudi Arabia subsequently launched strikes against Houthi-held areas, while the Houthis later claimed attacks on Saudi oil facilities. Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps has meanwhile warned countries supporting US military operations against Tehran. An IRGC spokesperson said countries cooperating with Washington could become targets and specifically referred to Britain and Gulf states. US President Donald Trump has also reportedly paused plans for further strikes against Iran after nearly two weeks of military action. Reports suggested concerns over the availability of US air defence supplies in the region were among the factors behind the decision. The reported pause could provide additional space for diplomatic efforts, although it remains unclear whether it represents a temporary break or a broader halt to US strikes. US forces are reportedly maintaining contingency plans should major military operations resume.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *